The first post in this series looked at the structure of Claude's Constitution.

The second post in this series looked at its ethical framework.

This final post deals with conflicts and open problems, starting with the first question one asks about any constitution. How and when will it be amended?

There are also several specific questions. How do you address claims of authority, jailbreaks and prompt injections? What about special cases like suicide risk? How do you take Anthropic's interests into account in an integrated and virtuous way? What about our jobs?

Not everyone loved the Constitution. There are twin central objections, that it either:

The most important question is whether it will work, and only sometimes do you get to respond, ‘compared to what alternative?’

Amending The Constitution

The power of the United States Constitution lies in our respect for it, our willingness to put it [...]

---

Outline:

(01:30) Amending The Constitution

(03:45) Details Matter

(05:09) WASTED?

(07:40) Narrow Versus Broad

(09:00) Suicide Risk As A Special Case

(10:36) Careful, Icarus

(11:19) Beware Unreliable Sources and Prompt Injections

(12:15) Think Step By Step

(12:50) This Must Be Some Strange Use Of The Word Safe I Wasn't Previously Aware Of

(16:26) They Took Our Jobs

(20:08) One Man Cannot Serve Two Masters

(24:29) Claude's Nature

(30:14) Look What You Made Me Do

(32:32) Open Problems

(36:40) Three Reactions and Twin Objections

(36:57) Those Saying This Is Unnecessary

(38:05) Those Saying This Is Insufficient

(39:56) Those Saying This Is Unsustainable

(43:12) We Continue

---

First published:

Source:

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.