
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


“Neither a borrower nor a lender be,” advised Shakespeare’s Polonius. These words seem hopelessly out of touch in cost of living crisis with soaring inflation and astronomical levels of personal debt. The charity StepChange has warned that money borrowed by UK households to pay for Christmas could take years to repay. Meanwhile, a study by the Resolution Foundation suggests the British public are the worst in the developed world at saving. How did we get here?
For some, our eye-popping indebtedness begins with a failure of personal responsibility, an absence of prudence, and an inability to discern between our ‘wants’ and needs’. For others, the real problem is systemic, where borrowers are victims of a consumerist society that both pressurises and stigmatises the poorest. Pragmatists argue that debt itself is morally neutral and merely part of the furniture of modern life. Free market libertarians see debt as a democratising force, giving people greater personal agency. Whereas many religious and philosophical traditions have long believed that there is something intrinsically immoral about charging interest on lending.
Is debt inevitable? Or a moral failing? If so, whose?
Producer: Dan Tierney.
By BBC Radio 44.6
5151 ratings
“Neither a borrower nor a lender be,” advised Shakespeare’s Polonius. These words seem hopelessly out of touch in cost of living crisis with soaring inflation and astronomical levels of personal debt. The charity StepChange has warned that money borrowed by UK households to pay for Christmas could take years to repay. Meanwhile, a study by the Resolution Foundation suggests the British public are the worst in the developed world at saving. How did we get here?
For some, our eye-popping indebtedness begins with a failure of personal responsibility, an absence of prudence, and an inability to discern between our ‘wants’ and needs’. For others, the real problem is systemic, where borrowers are victims of a consumerist society that both pressurises and stigmatises the poorest. Pragmatists argue that debt itself is morally neutral and merely part of the furniture of modern life. Free market libertarians see debt as a democratising force, giving people greater personal agency. Whereas many religious and philosophical traditions have long believed that there is something intrinsically immoral about charging interest on lending.
Is debt inevitable? Or a moral failing? If so, whose?
Producer: Dan Tierney.

7,718 Listeners

891 Listeners

1,066 Listeners

212 Listeners

5,474 Listeners

1,809 Listeners

1,785 Listeners

1,043 Listeners

2,119 Listeners

2,078 Listeners

29 Listeners

36 Listeners

347 Listeners

161 Listeners

43 Listeners

74 Listeners

96 Listeners

632 Listeners

3,225 Listeners

737 Listeners

1,042 Listeners

3,033 Listeners

993 Listeners

756 Listeners

51 Listeners