
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When the first Nuremberg trial of Nazi war criminals came to an end, the ground-breaking international tribunal handed down 12 death sentences. Seventy-five years on, is the world any better at delivering justice for the worst of crimes? In the years that followed, there were hopes that an evolving mechanism of international justice would deter and punish further heinous acts of mass murder and genocide. Does it remain an impossible ideal? Stephen Sackur speaks to international lawyer and author Philippe Sands.
(Photo: Philippe Sands in the Hardtalk studio)
By BBC World Service4.4
327327 ratings
When the first Nuremberg trial of Nazi war criminals came to an end, the ground-breaking international tribunal handed down 12 death sentences. Seventy-five years on, is the world any better at delivering justice for the worst of crimes? In the years that followed, there were hopes that an evolving mechanism of international justice would deter and punish further heinous acts of mass murder and genocide. Does it remain an impossible ideal? Stephen Sackur speaks to international lawyer and author Philippe Sands.
(Photo: Philippe Sands in the Hardtalk studio)

7,588 Listeners

4,161 Listeners

376 Listeners

524 Listeners

1,049 Listeners

294 Listeners

5,470 Listeners

1,801 Listeners

1,758 Listeners

1,043 Listeners

2,091 Listeners

974 Listeners

197 Listeners

745 Listeners

50 Listeners

3,180 Listeners

723 Listeners

143 Listeners

1,015 Listeners

269 Listeners

24 Listeners

149 Listeners