
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Last week’s New England Journal of Medicine paper on the placebo effect in evaluating asthma treatments was fascinating in itself. The editorial that accompanied it, however, was a delight. It asks clinicians to think less about laboratory measures of cure, and more about the patient’s satisfaction with treatment — whether the treatment was “real” or not.
This week’s guest, Dr. Daniel Moerman, wrote that editorial. His training in anthropology adds a refreshing viewpoint to his observations on clinical medicine. Let us know what you think by leaving a comment.
Relevant links:
By NEJM Group4.5
5656 ratings
Last week’s New England Journal of Medicine paper on the placebo effect in evaluating asthma treatments was fascinating in itself. The editorial that accompanied it, however, was a delight. It asks clinicians to think less about laboratory measures of cure, and more about the patient’s satisfaction with treatment — whether the treatment was “real” or not.
This week’s guest, Dr. Daniel Moerman, wrote that editorial. His training in anthropology adds a refreshing viewpoint to his observations on clinical medicine. Let us know what you think by leaving a comment.
Relevant links:

7,663 Listeners

316 Listeners

2,061 Listeners

126 Listeners

497 Listeners

299 Listeners

883 Listeners

260 Listeners

3,346 Listeners

112,105 Listeners

91 Listeners

5 Listeners

94 Listeners

514 Listeners

2,547 Listeners

369 Listeners

15,942 Listeners

60 Listeners

31 Listeners

67 Listeners