
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Last week’s New England Journal of Medicine paper on the placebo effect in evaluating asthma treatments was fascinating in itself. The editorial that accompanied it, however, was a delight. It asks clinicians to think less about laboratory measures of cure, and more about the patient’s satisfaction with treatment — whether the treatment was “real” or not.
This week’s guest, Dr. Daniel Moerman, wrote that editorial. His training in anthropology adds a refreshing viewpoint to his observations on clinical medicine. Let us know what you think by leaving a comment.
Relevant links:
By NEJM Group4.5
5656 ratings
Last week’s New England Journal of Medicine paper on the placebo effect in evaluating asthma treatments was fascinating in itself. The editorial that accompanied it, however, was a delight. It asks clinicians to think less about laboratory measures of cure, and more about the patient’s satisfaction with treatment — whether the treatment was “real” or not.
This week’s guest, Dr. Daniel Moerman, wrote that editorial. His training in anthropology adds a refreshing viewpoint to his observations on clinical medicine. Let us know what you think by leaving a comment.
Relevant links:

7,874 Listeners

320 Listeners

2,050 Listeners

124 Listeners

501 Listeners

298 Listeners

904 Listeners

266 Listeners

3,387 Listeners

113,494 Listeners

89 Listeners

5 Listeners

90 Listeners

520 Listeners

2,582 Listeners

367 Listeners

16,556 Listeners

58 Listeners

31 Listeners

66 Listeners