
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The EPCAT II trial examined whether aspirin and rivaroxaban were clinically equivalent in the extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee replacement. They proved “comparably effective and safe,” according to our guest, Dr. David Anderson, the study’s first author. An editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine, where the study appeared in February, calls the results practice-changing. One thing was sure from the outset — aspirin is cheaper than rivaroxaban by orders of magnitude.
A note to listeners: Dr. Anderson and I conducted the interview over several sessions, so the first-half audio sounds a bit rougher than the second. Your speakers don’t suddenly get better — my equipment does!
Links:
NEJM report
NEJM editorial
Journal Watch General Medicine summary
By NEJM Group4.5
5656 ratings
The EPCAT II trial examined whether aspirin and rivaroxaban were clinically equivalent in the extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee replacement. They proved “comparably effective and safe,” according to our guest, Dr. David Anderson, the study’s first author. An editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine, where the study appeared in February, calls the results practice-changing. One thing was sure from the outset — aspirin is cheaper than rivaroxaban by orders of magnitude.
A note to listeners: Dr. Anderson and I conducted the interview over several sessions, so the first-half audio sounds a bit rougher than the second. Your speakers don’t suddenly get better — my equipment does!
Links:
NEJM report
NEJM editorial
Journal Watch General Medicine summary

7,595 Listeners

317 Listeners

2,060 Listeners

125 Listeners

497 Listeners

298 Listeners

884 Listeners

259 Listeners

3,340 Listeners

111,888 Listeners

90 Listeners

5 Listeners

92 Listeners

512 Listeners

2,549 Listeners

366 Listeners

15,815 Listeners

61 Listeners

31 Listeners

64 Listeners