For this episode of Distraction Therapy, we’ve tuned our focus toward the creative energy that arises from philosophical resistance. At the heart of this mix is an echo of one of the most bitter intellectual feuds in European philosophy: Arthur Schopenhauer’s contempt for Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. More than an academic rivalry, their opposition symbolises two divergent ways of understanding the world—ways that continue to reverberate through contemporary art, music, and the spaces in which we gather.

Schopenhauer saw Hegel as the embodiment of bloated system-building: abstract, pompous, and complicit with the institutions that rewarded complexity over clarity, and conformity over truth. He dismissed Hegel’s speculative metaphysics as empty jargon—philosophy in service of power rather than insight. In contrast, Schopenhauer rooted his thought in lived experience: suffering, desire, and the relentless drive of the Will. His writing sought the universal not through historical teleology, but through the immediacy of music, the stillness of aesthetic contemplation, and the clarity of pessimism.

There’s a lesson in this for today’s artists and listeners. Much of the cultural noise around us still favours the Hegelian impulse—to systematise, to rationalise, to fit the messy beauty of life into a framework that flatters institutional authority or commercial success. In the creative industries, this often manifests as metrics-driven programming, algorithmic predictability, and a hunger for visibility that overrides experimentation.

But Schopenhauer’s defiance reminds us that art is not for the system. It is for the rupture. It is for the brief suspension of striving. And music, as he believed, bypasses the representational world altogether. It speaks directly to the essence of existence—the Will itself—without translation, without mediation.

This week’s mix is an homage to that spirit. The selections drift between melancholy and resistance, between surrender and resolve. They are not designed to elevate or to ascend some progressive ladder of cultural achievement. They are meant to bring us into the present, to reflect the rawness of feeling, and to resist the pretence that everything can or should be reconciled into a single coherent narrative.

In this way, metamodern aesthetics become a kind of reconciliation through tension. They embrace both the yearning for depth and the recognition of failure. They oscillate. Not unlike Schopenhauer’s own position—resigned yet sharp, solitary yet universal—they invite us to engage with art not as a solution, but as a companion through contradiction.

When you listen to this episode, consider it a protest against the flattening logic of the system. Not a bombast of slogans or a cry for novelty, but a quiet turning away from false certainties. It’s a reminder that sometimes the most subversive gesture is simply to feel—without explanation, without justification, and without apology.

Source

As we step into this latest episode of the Distraction Therapy music mix podcast, we’re inviting listeners to participate in something more than just a curated set of sounds—it’s an experiment in aesthetic transcendence. Following the lead of Arthur Schopenhauer, we explore how moments of disinterested contemplation, often through art and music, can offer a fleeting but vital reprieve from the ceaseless grind of desire and striving that defines so much of contemporary life.

Schopenhauer’s idea of aesthetic transcendence begins with a radical claim: that art allows us to momentarily escape the blind and restless force he called the Will. This Will is the inner engine of all existence, a drive without reason, endlessly pushing forward with no satisfaction in sight. But through art—especially through music—we can suspend this drive. We become, as he says, “pure, will-less subjects of knowing.” Not consumers, not agents, not individuals driven by needs, but open presences capable of perceiving the world without distortion.

In metamodern terms, we might say that Schopenhauer offers an early framework for oscillating between irony and sincerity, between longing and detachment. Where the postmodern gaze is caught in loops of self-conscious meaninglessness, and the modern impulse is too confident in its mastery, Schopenhauer reminds us that to suffer is human—but to perceive beauty without desire is momentarily divine.

Contemporary artists, musicians and event-makers, knowingly or not, continue this lineage. From immersive sound installations to intimate live sets, from site-specific rituals to underground clubs, the search is on for spaces where time can slow, the self can dissolve, and a shared aesthetic moment can emerge. These are the events where phones are forgotten, where the body is suspended in sound, where no outcome is required beyond the being-there.

What Schopenhauer recognised—what so many artists now intuitively sense—is that aesthetic experience offers not just pleasure, but a kind of therapy. In a culture saturated with commercial messages, fractured attention, and relentless demands to ‘be productive,’ art invites a rare alternative: an escape from the need to want. In that escape, even if temporary, lies a paradoxical form of liberation.

This is not escapism. It is re-orientation. A turning away from the noise of the everyday toward something timeless, archetypal, and shared. Metamodern art doesn’t offer solutions to the world’s crises. But it does offer gestures—glimpses—of alignment between the inner and outer worlds. It brings back the possibility that we might, for a moment, exist not as fragmented individuals, but as part of something larger, ineffable, and meaningful.

So, as you listen to this episode, don’t rush. Let the tracks take you out of the usual flow of striving. Whether you’re alone with headphones or drifting through a space with others, consider this an invitation: to stop, to notice, and to feel—not in order to fix, but simply to be.

Because in those moments, brief and delicate as they are, something changes. And that change, perhaps, is enough.

Source

In a world gripped by constant flux, where cultural references fracture and recombine with dizzying speed, the persistent question remains: how do we find meaning in the midst of fragmentation? To consider this challenge, we might look not forward, but backward—to the metaphysical pessimism of Arthur Schopenhauer, whose philosophy uncannily speaks to the emotional tonality of our metamodern moment.

At the heart of Schopenhauer’s system is the “Will to Life”: a blind, ceaseless force that drives all beings to strive, compete, desire, and ultimately suffer. Life, according to this view, is not a march toward enlightenment or progress, but an endless cycle of yearning that can never truly be satisfied. The Will is not rational; it knows no goal or purpose—it simply is. This renders human existence, as Schopenhauer famously argued, intrinsically marked by suffering. Each moment of satisfaction gives way to a new craving. Peace is a brief intermission, not a destination.

Yet for Schopenhauer, this bleak vision also opens a path to transcendence. If life is suffering, then art, contemplation, and aesthetic experience offer fleeting, luminous reprieves. These moments, though temporary, allow us to step outside the grasp of the Will and perceive existence without the distortion of desire. In such states, we become “will-less subjects of knowing,” immersed in what is timeless, harmonious, and whole.

This perspective resonates deeply with the metamodern psyche. If postmodernism revelled in the deconstruction of grand narratives, irony, and perpetual deferral of meaning, then metamodernism acknowledges the debris left behind—but also seeks to rebuild. We oscillate between irony and sincerity, knowing and unknowing, scepticism and hope. The cultural producer in this context is no longer simply a critic or a commentator, but a healer of sorts—a cartographer of chaos, mapping provisional meanings where only ruins seemed to remain.

Contemporary content creation—whether in podcasting, music mixing, visual design, or storytelling—often bears the weight of this dual function. On one hand, it must acknowledge the disintegration of coherence: the collapse of shared references, the exhaustion of genres, the hyper-fragmentation of media ecologies. On the other hand, it dares to reassemble the pieces. Not with naïve optimism, but with the courage to offer therapeutic resonance: to help others feel seen, held, and potentially whole, even in the presence of contradiction.

In this sense, the metamodern artist or content producer doesn’t merely distract or entertain. They offer a form of attention that confronts the Will—our deep, unconscious drives—and seeks a balance between immersion and reflection. This isn’t transcendence in the Schopenhauerian sense of total escape, but a rhythmic dance with reality: sometimes resisting it, sometimes remaking it, always aware of its complexity.

We live in a time when popular culture swings violently between irony and earnestness, detachment and intimacy, despair and yearning. But what makes this metamodern oscillation meaningful is not its instability, but its capacity for alignment. To create culture now is to participate in a kind of spiritual architecture: crafting forms that acknowledge suffering without being consumed by it, offering beauty without denying brokenness.

In the end, Schopenhauer’s Will may never be defeated—but it can be witnessed, softened, and reframed. And perhaps that’s the task of the metamodern producer: not to overcome the Will, but to score its rhythms, translate its griefs, and find ways to move with it—toward connection, sense-making, and a shared language of renewal.

Source

In this edition of the Distraction Therapy Music Mix Podcast, we explore Arthur Schopenhauer’s reflections on the nature of individuation and how his ideas continue to echo in the lives of artists, dreamers, and creators who seek truth beyond the demands of modern life. Drawing a thread from Schopenhauer’s metaphysics to Carl Jung’s psychology and finally to the metamodern sensibility of contemporary art, we ask: what does it mean to be an individual in an age of overwhelming noise, flux, and uncertainty?

For Schopenhauer, the individual self is not a stable, sovereign entity, but a vessel carried by the ceaseless tide of the Will—a blind, insatiable force that drives all life through perpetual striving and suffering. The more we chase desires, the more we become entangled in their endless cycle. But there is a release: art. Through the aesthetic experience—especially in music—Schopenhauer believed we can momentarily escape the tyranny of the Will. In this transcendental state of contemplation, we no longer exist as desiring subjects but as pure observers of timeless truth.

This idea of stepping beyond the self deeply influenced Carl Jung, who reframed it through the lens of individuation: a process of becoming whole by integrating the unconscious with the conscious self. Unlike Schopenhauer’s more renunciatory path, Jung’s model embraces the complex dance of inner opposites—shadow and persona, ego and Self. Individuation is not an escape but a reconciliation; not disinterested detachment, but meaningful integration.

In the world of metamodern art, we see this synthesis evolving further. The artist today is not a detached seer above the fray, nor a mere reflex of cultural production. Instead, they oscillate between inner experience and outward expression, between the personal and the universal. Like Schopenhauer’s genius who grasps eternal Ideas, the metamodern artist channels deeper, often ineffable intuitions—but rather than aiming to rise above the world, they seek to shape it anew through layered, self-aware, emotionally resonant expression.

This is art not as escape, but as engagement. Not as irony, but sincerity doubled by awareness. The DJ who blends field recordings with fragments of Romantic symphonies is not merely curating sound—they are crafting a moment of disidentification, inviting the listener to step outside their own striving self, to perceive, even briefly, what it means to be free from the Will.

We are reminded that in a world where identity often feels like a performance, individuation might mean turning down the volume of the world just long enough to hear the quieter, deeper tones of being. Whether through music, image, movement, or word, the metamodern artist helps us tune into those frequencies.

And for a fleeting moment, like Schopenhauer’s pure subject of knowing, we are no longer striving—we are listening.

Source

In this episode of Distraction Therapy, we consider a question that refuses to go away: What is the purpose of the artist? Not the profession. Not the job description. But the role—philosophically, psychologically, and spiritually.

Arthur Schopenhauer’s answer, drawn from The World as Will and Representation, is as uncompromising as it is clarifying. For Schopenhauer, the world is driven by the Will—a blind, ceaseless, and irrational force that animates all desire, all striving, and ultimately all suffering. The artist, then, is not simply someone who “makes things.” The true artist is someone who sees beyond. They are capable of transcending this Will, even if only momentarily, and offering us a vision of what lies beneath the surface of appearances: the universal, the eternal, the essential.

Schopenhauer distinguishes between two modes of experience: one dominated by the Will, the other by Representation. Most of life is spent under the sway of the Will. We want, we chase, we act. But in rare moments—particularly in the aesthetic experience—we move into the realm of Representation. Here, the artist becomes a channel for pure, intuitive knowledge. Not knowledge as data or information, but as lived insight, as the quiet beholding of what is timeless and true. The artist does not just depict the world; they reveal it.

Art, in this sense, is not instrumental. It is not for persuasion or utility. It is not concerned with moral lessons or political directives. It is contemplative. It is about seeing clearly, without desire, ego, or agenda. The artist, at their best, becomes a “will-less subject of knowing,” offering the rest of us a moment of transcendence in a world otherwise marked by striving and noise.

This is, of course, a world apart from the contemporary art market.

Today, the artist is often positioned as a producer in a cultural economy. Whether housed in creative industries frameworks or funded through institutional programmes, the artist is required to navigate a dense web of processes, applications, deadlines, outcomes, and networks. Artistic labour is measured against strategic objectives. Its value is often determined by its alignment with political or social goals—or its ability to generate return on investment.

Representation becomes performance. Intuition is filtered through grant-writing vocabulary. The Will reasserts itself, not as ecstatic suffering, but as professional branding.

This is not to romanticise the past. Art has always existed within economies—patronage systems, church commissions, courtly rituals. Schopenhauer’s own era was marked by the rise of the bourgeois public sphere and the commodification of taste. But what Schopenhauer gives us is a powerful reminder that the artist is not first and foremost a service provider or a curator of experience. The artist is, at root, a witness: someone who sees beyond the veil of striving and offers a glimpse of something more enduring than transaction.

The question, then, is whether such witnessing is still possible. Can we still distinguish between expression and exhibition? Can the artist find sanctuary from the Will in a time when every act of creation is expected to be a career step, a political gesture, or an economic offer?

In this episode, we explore this tension—not to resolve it, but to sit with it. To listen to voices, sounds, and insights that refuse easy categorisation. To honour the strange clarity that can emerge when we stop performing and start perceiving.

Schopenhauer didn’t offer a map for how to live. He offered a mirror to the forces we so often ignore. Perhaps the artist’s task is still the same: to hold that mirror up—not to change the world, but to momentarily reveal it.

Source

In this episode of The Distraction Therapy, we return to an idea that’s both ancient and urgently needed—art as a space for transcendence. Drawing on Arthur Schopenhauer’s radical notion that music is not just entertainment but a portal to something beyond the grinding machinery of life, we ask: what would it mean to take music seriously again—not as a tool, a service, or a box to tick—but as a doorway to a different mode of being?

Schopenhauer saw existence as dominated by what he called the Will: a blind, insatiable force behind all striving, all desire, all suffering. For him, art—especially music—offers a rare and fleeting reprieve from this torment. When we truly engage with music, we do not consume it. We do not demand anything of it. We do not ask it to justify itself in terms of metrics or outcomes. We simply enter it. We become, momentarily, “will-less subjects of knowing.” That is, we stop wanting, and we start perceiving.

This feels alien now. In the social arts sector, much of our creative effort is shaped by process management and transactional expectations. Funding forms, KPIs, logic models, and outcome frameworks dominate the conversation. Even where we speak of “engagement” and “inclusion,” we often mean participation that serves a measurable goal. Artistic experience is not seen as valuable for its own sake but only in relation to the metrics it supports—behaviour change, community cohesion, employability, mental health. These are all important, yes. But when art is subsumed into this model, its ability to disrupt, to transport, to transcend is quietly dismantled.

Art becomes a service. Music becomes background. The artist becomes a facilitator. And the audience becomes a dataset.

Schopenhauer would have found this industrialisation of aesthetic life grimly ironic. The very thing he believed could lift us out of suffering is now caught in the same cycle of instrumental reasoning that he believed caused that suffering in the first place. The Will reasserts itself—only now with a spreadsheet.

But there is still a way out, even if temporary. And that’s what this episode aims to offer. Not a solution. Not an argument. Just an experience. A moment of sonic contemplation that doesn’t need to be explained, justified, or monetised. Music that simply is.

So as you listen—wherever you are, whatever you’re doing—try to step outside the stream of expectation. Let the music hold you, not as a tool of recovery or development, but as an experience of being without need. Not a distraction from the world, but a reconnection to something deeper than utility or function. A space where you are no longer an agent of output, but a subject of wonder.

In that moment, Schopenhauer believed, we cease to suffer. Not because the world changes, but because we do.

Source

When Nietzsche introduces the figure of the tightrope walker early in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, it’s more than a theatrical flourish. It’s a moment loaded with symbolism, a moment that places the reader not just on the threshold of a new philosophy, but on the rope itself—between what was and what might be.

Zarathustra, descending from his mountain to bring humanity a new vision, is interrupted by this performer crossing a rope strung between two towers. It’s a literal and metaphorical crossing: from man to Übermensch, from meaning inherited to meaning created. The crowd watches, entertained or indifferent. But Zarathustra sees something more—an emblem of human struggle, a symbol of the perilous journey between the beast and the overhuman.

This image resonates with us at Radio Lear, where we’re interested in how meaning is made—and unmade—in contemporary society. We live in a time when stable structures of belief and identity are in flux. Political certainty, cultural cohesion, even personal identity are all up for renegotiation. Like the rope-walker, we find ourselves suspended between towers—between old certainties that no longer hold and new forms of meaning that have yet to settle.

Nietzsche’s tightrope walker doesn’t survive the crossing. He is interrupted by a jester, mocked and thrown off balance. There’s tragedy in that, but also insight. The fall is not failure. The fall is the reality of risk when attempting transformation. And Zarathustra’s gesture—cradling the fallen performer, recognising his courage—is a profound act of care in the face of the unknown.

For those of us trying to navigate today’s saturated media landscape, institutional collapse, and cultural fragmentation, the image of the rope-walker remains disturbingly apt. We are each asked, in different ways, to step out over the void and attempt to carry meaning forward—not inherited, not dictated, but forged in the act of crossing.

At Radio Lear, we work with sound not just to entertain but to hold space for this precarious journey. To listen closely is itself a balancing act: between noise and signal, between self and other, between what is and what could be.

The rope is thin. The fall is real. But the crossing—if we choose to attempt it—is necessary. And perhaps, even beautiful.

Source

On the evening of 18th June 2025, the Real Ale Classroom in Leicester played host to an event that proved you don’t need large rigs or towering speaker stacks to make an impact. The Tiny Gear Concert, organised as part of a continuing series of local experimental sound gatherings, brought together a group of adventurous performers who showed that constraint can be the mother of invention—and that intimacy can be more powerful than scale.

Tucked into the warm, wood-panelled surroundings of the Classroom’s backroom, the evening unfolded as a series of micro-sets—each crafted using minimal hardware: compact samplers, pocket synthesisers, DIY instruments, contact mics, loopers, and carefully curated field recordings. The focus was on immediacy, creativity, and a sense of play, inviting both performers and audience to lean in and listen more closely.

What stood out wasn’t just the gear (though its sheer portability was a point of fascination), but the textures and moods it produced. There was a tactile quality to the sounds—grainy loops, hums, clicks, fractured rhythms, and layered ambience that blurred the line between music and environment. One performer manipulated recordings of birdsong and beer glasses clinking to create a layered composition that seemed to situate the audience somewhere between a forest and a pub garden. Another brought out a modular drone rig no larger than a lunchbox, weaving slow-shifting tones that shimmered with harmonic overtones.

The event also served as an informal platform for conversation and community. Between sets, performers shared techniques and tools, often showing how they’d modified their kit or discovered accidental workflows. There was no hierarchy—just an open exchange of enthusiasm, curiosity, and a shared love for sonic experimentation.

In a world saturated with high-tech spectacle and algorithmically flattened content, the Tiny Gear Concert felt refreshingly human and grounded. It was a reminder of what can be achieved with limited means, clear intention, and a willingness to explore. For those who attended, it was more than a gig; it was a quiet, resonant moment of collective attention—a listening space cultivated with care and imagination.

As the evening ended, and the audience drifted back into the early summer night, the sounds lingered. Not in the ears, necessarily, but in the atmosphere: subtle, strange, and full of promise.

Whether you’re a seasoned audio tinkerer or just curious about what happens when sonic art goes pocket-sized, this concert series is one to watch. Or rather, to listen to—carefully.

Source

In this second part of our Summer Solstice episode, we linger in the aftermath of the turning point. The sun no longer stands still, but the memory of its pause remains—etched into the fields, the sound of the wind through grass, and the rhythms that thread through our music mix. Here, in the aftermath of light’s zenith, we turn not only to sound but to symbol.

Across Western Europe, the solstice has long stood as a potent convergence of cosmology and culture. From the stone circles aligned to the sun’s rising, to fire festivals that marked the vitality of crops and community, this day was never just a date on a calendar. It was an event—mythological, astronomical, agricultural, and spiritual. Its rituals were shaped by solar worship, the fertility of the earth, the need for protection, and later, woven into the observances of the Christian calendar. It became a moment when time curved back into itself, and people gathered to reassert their place within the great, repeating circle of life and light.

In our own time, that circle has been obscured. We live under the glare of digital clocks and data streams, in a world that prizes efficiency over ceremony, transaction over transformation. But something in us still aches for the turning of the year, for the stories that gave meaning to our passage through it.

This is where metamodern sensibility offers a way forward—not through nostalgia, but through re-integration. We are not trying to recreate a golden past or escape into fantasy, but to acknowledge that symbolic and mythic ways of being are not archaic—they are essential. The passage of the seasons and celestial rhythms offer a cosmology that speaks to more than just physics. They speak to the soul of a culture. They locate us in something larger than ourselves.

What would it mean to renew ritual in modern life? Not as performance, but as participation. Not as belief, but as presence. To mark the solstice not only with music or celebration, but with reflection and recalibration. To listen for the echoes of ancient wisdom—not to replicate it, but to respond to it.

This mix is an attempt to do just that. To hold space for myth in a world that has become thin. To follow the arc of the sun as it moves through sound. And to offer a gentle call to remember that we are not apart from nature’s turning—we are part of it.

As the light begins its slow retreat, how might we carry its memory? How might we renew our rituals—not to bind ourselves, but to connect more deeply with what is real, cyclical, and alive?

Stay with us. The turning continues.

Source

At the height of the year, when the sun stands still in the sky, something shifts. The Summer Solstice arrives not as a loud celebration but as a quiet turning—an axis of light and time. This latest episode of Distraction Therapy draws from that stillness, curating a sonic landscape that honours the tension of abundance and decline, radiance and retreat. We sit with the fullness of things, even as their fading begins.

In many traditions, the solstice is more than a celestial event—it is a threshold. It marks the longest day, when the sun reaches its zenith and seems to pause before beginning its descent. In that moment of suspension, we are invited to linger. To notice. To realign. It is a time of symbolic ripeness: of fertility, power, and clarity. Yet it is also the start of the slow contraction, a reminder that light always carries its opposite within it.

Folklore remembers this night as a portal, a time when the veil between worlds grows thin. In the fading light, the ordinary becomes charged. Plants gathered under solstice skies are said to hold special potency. Dreams speak more clearly. Boundaries blur. It’s a night for ritual—not to command, but to listen. Not to escape, but to attend.

The mix in this episode follows that arc. We begin with radiance—tracks pulsing with energy, rhythm, and joy. But slowly, the mood turns reflective, shaded with textures that pull us inward. This is a mix for those standing at the edge: of summer, of change, of knowing. It’s for those who feel that the stillness of the sun is not just a pause, but an invitation.

What are we letting go of? What are we welcoming in? And how do we hold both—light and shadow, clarity and uncertainty—as we step across this solstice threshold?

Tune in and travel with us.

Source