
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


I am discussing the list of "constraints" that Popper applies to critical and rational thinking:
The appeal to "cooperate" or "to do this together" is often coercive: it's a way to ensure everyone aligns to what you want. Real cooperation is different. Real cooperation = distributing autonomy + seeking consent around a new idea = not forcing everyone on 1 line
It is impossible to get everyone on 1 line before starting something, and it is impossible to do that at every step of the way.
So you need not want that
Everyone has different ideas about how to realise something, the act of forcing that to 1 given idea you have is not effective.
It works better the other way around : seek for the idea that gathers more people around it, by evolving it into an ever better explanation. By letting the idea evolution free instead of fixed on beforehand
Episode 75 - A misconception about communication : when you have communicated, you’re not “done” … you merely just started.
Some reflections after my talk at the Oxford Karl Popper Society.
The original talk is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB67Hp0n4QQ&t=4764s
Een idee van Karl Popper over politieke systemen ... toegepast op management systemen
This piece is based on Popper's 1945 book “The open society and its enemies” … where he laid out his ideas about politics and democracy.
Fixing a solution too quickly, and then being too sure, too soon
Discussing the link between Flow (a concept coming out of psychology, and developed by Michaly Cszikcentmihaly) and Critical rationalism (a theory of epistemology, developed by Karl Popper)
In this episode I discuss the following slide in Linkedin:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6742406509872861185/
Empiricism
Critical rationalism
From the publisher's feed