Real Seekers

OK this is another debate between myself on the Christian side and a Muslim named Daniel. We had a very cordial, respectful and substantive debate on the topic of "Is Muhammed a True Prophet or Not?". I took up the negative side answering No, Muhammed is NOT a true prophet and Daniel took up the affirmative. Interestingly, Daniel is a Quran-only Muslims and hence appealing to the Hadith traditions is totally irrelevant for him and as such the only sources he considers to be inspired and authoritative are the Torah, Prophets, Gospels (and the Johannine epistles too apparently) and the Quran. We restricted ourselves to debating Muhammed's prophethood on the basis of 4-6 criteria that Daniel claims represent the Biblical test for prophethood.Enjoy :)

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/24/debate-is-muhammad-a-true-prophet-dale-glover-the-christian-vs-daniel-the-muslim/

This was not an episode I had planned on doing and indeed it was not one I had any desire to do, but I have to expose the newly discovered truth about Hugh Farey as a purposeful liar! I recently did a great show with Modern Atheism in which we discussed the Shroud, many skeptics on there seemed to be in good faith and I appreciated their inputs very much. However, there were also a few rotten eggs and true to form, Hugh Farey showed up to egg them on so to speak by posting his usual insulting, condescending and/or belittling posts about me in front of his fellow skeptical underlings who just blindly and mindlessly believe anything and everything he says. This is just business as usual in dealing with Hugh Farey online, but shockingly, something new happened this time... Hugh Farey seems to have exposed himself as a direct, willful and purposeful liar who will say anything to defend the cause of Shroud skepticism, even at the expense of God's truth!For years, I denied this was the case, I refused to listen to those who tried to warn me and hence, in the light of his recent denial of the one piece of evidence I used to believe proved he was honest regardless of any impact on the Shroud skeptical agenda; it appears I was wrong and so I apologize to those who warned me, I was wrong to defend Hugh as a good faith and honest to a fault opponent. It appears to me now that he does have the nefarious intentions and motivations that you ascribed to him all this time.I will never make that mistake again and as such, I needed to reveal the truth as I now see it to my audience and also warn them to have their guard up against anything and everything they might hear from Hugh Farey the "Ultimately Lying Shroud skeptic"- do not, I repeat do not, believe anything he says unless and until it has been independently verified first!!!RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/19/debating-the-historical-and-shroud-evidence-for-jesus-resurrection-w-juan-of-modern-atheism/

This was the 2nd of 5 debates I got lined up in the past two weeks. In this episode I go up against Juan from the Modern Atheism channel and had a great talk discussing the historical evidence for the Resurrection and addressing his issues with miracles, contradictions in the Gospels and of course we get to the Shroud of Turin in the end.A very civil and respectful conversation- love it :)RSM Blog (with my slides) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/19/debating-the-historical-and-shroud-evidence-for-jesus-resurrection-w-juan-of-modern-atheism/

Alright Real Seekers fans, this is the ultimate showdown, Muslim vs. Christian on the topic of "Is Muhammed Mentioned in the Bible". In this debate, it is only the Muslim who makes the claim and thus bears the burden of proof to affirm the proposition. I merely provide various undercutting and rebutting defeaters to the Muslims claim which he must, in turn, prove all of them to be improbable to be true for at least one of his presented Biblical "prooftexts" in order to successfully establish his claim.Admittedly, this debate did not go as I had planned esp. with the cross examine section (I've always been bad at the interrogation style approach of this aspect of debates) and as such I keep it real by admitting that I think I lost the debate in the end. That said, losing a debate, is not necessarily akin to being a wrong on the debate issue itself and I hope any and all Real Seekers would use this debate as a springboard for further research on their own end instead of assuming the Muslim must be right cause he stumped his debate interlocuter a few times!That said, I thoroughly enjoyed the debate, despite the outcome, and I plan on sitting down to reflect and do a Solo show to objectively evaluate the various claims made in the debate to see if, in fact, the Muslim has connected the logical dots necessary to prove Muhammed is in the Bible or not; I pray that will be edifying for all involved. Beyond that, I hope to engage The Orthodox Muslim again in many future debates over time, including on this specific issue again (if he would be agreeable) and so until then, I'll just say, "I'll get you next time Orthodox Muslim... next time!" lol :PRSM Blog (with my Opening Slides and free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/13/is-the-prophet-muhammad-in-the-bible-debate-with-the-orthodox-muslim-vs-dale-glover/

Attention all Shroud fans, we have some breaking news!!! According to Shroud skeptics a new document written between 1370-1382 A.D. by the medieval skeptic and scholar Bishop Nicole Oresme has allegedly confirmed the claims of the D'Arcis Memorandum about the Shroud being a hoax!Is this true? Has this newest text just recently discovered changed the game by disproving the Shroud for all time or have Shroud skeptics simply doubled down on their dumb D'Arcis delusions? To find out, make sure to tune in to hear the scholarly arguments presented by Pro-Shroud historian Jack Markwardt debating skeptic Hugh Farey on precisely this question.RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources including the Peer-reviewed Paper by Nicolas Sarzeaud = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/05/shroud-wars-panel-review-part-20-debating-the-earliest-medieval-oresme-document-just-discovered/

Allan Ruhl joins me, as per a recommendation of Harry Stark, to speak on a couple of the biggest Jewish myths about Christians and Christianity; i) the historical myth that Christians have persecuted Jews for 2000 years and ii) the theological objection that Christians are idolators via the doctrine of the Trinity.Allan Ruhl's YouTube Channel =    / @kaiseruhl  

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/03/addressing-jewish-myths-about-christianity-w-historian-allan-ruhl/

Larry Stalley provides his third and final 2025 Conference presentation on the divine testimony of the Shroud from the New Testament. In this lecture he discusses the various typological references to the Shroud images in Hebrews 9.RSM Blog (with slides and free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpres...Larry's Book "Divine Testimony for the Resurrection: Hidden References to the Holy Shroud in the Bible" = https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Larry-Sta...

Phil Bair has recently created a brand new prayer ap called Supplica to help Christians organize and manage their prayers to God. In this show, we discuss the importance of prayer and how Supplica can help to vastly improve your prayer life for just $10/month.Supplica Prayer Ap link = https://philbair.org/supplica/login.phpRSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/08/31/new-supplica-prayer-ap-cultivating-communication-with-god-w-phil-bair/

Alright Real Seekers fans, this show is for you as I return to answering 4 fan requests from fans. The first has to do with the battle of Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38-39 vs. Rev 20. The second deals with the Great Isaiah Scroll and it's textual preservation. The third is a brief response to Cicero Moraes recent Shroud skeptical paper on the "3D" and vertical mapping process of direct contact vs. a shallow bas-relief (whereby Cicero himself admits his paper does NOTHING to refute the Pro-Shroud argument). Finally, I address two Eucharistic miracles; one in 2008 from Sokolka Poland and the other, the newest Eucharistic miracle image of Jesus' face which occurred in India in 2013 and was just accepted by the Vatican this year.RSM Blog (with my slides and sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/08/31/8868/

Pro-Shroud historian Jack Markwardt returns to provide an extensive presentation on the historical evidence for the Shroud from 1001-1207 A.D.

Jack provides a critical comparison between Ian Wilson's Image of Edessa hypothesis vs. his own Image of God Incarnate theory during this period and the evidence for and against each.

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2023/02/17/shroud-wars-panel-review-part-4-the-shrouds-history-from-49-a-d-1350-a-d/