Real Seekers

Harry Stark's take on charges against the Talmud.RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/01/09/harry-stark-shows-2025/

I was invited to be a guest on Tony Costa's Toronto Apologetics channel to present my argument for God from Beauty via making the case for Theistic Dispositional Realism.RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/08/22/god-beauty-the-case-for-theistic-dispositional-realism-w-dr-tony-costa/

Fresh from the 2025 Shroud Conference, Biblical scholar Larry Stalley returns to the show to present his case for the Shroud images being cryptically mentioned in 1 John 5:4-13.RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/04/15/divine-testimony-for-the-resurrection-hidden-references-to-the-holy-shroud-in-the-bible-w-larry-stalley/

Bring it on Hugh! Hugh Farey has recently taken it upon himself to threaten to bring out his "big guns" in response to my latest Shroud review refuting the Godless Engineer by writing up a Blog post on the infamous D'Arcis Memorandum. At one point I probed Hugh for actual evidence that the only two folio manuscripts of the D'Arcis Memo in existence are both actually original autographs instead of later manuscript copies (given that our earliest explicit mention of the folios themselves only comes in ca. 1877). Should the two folios extant today not be the originals, but are later manuscripts dating after the 14th century, then its plausible to suggest that perhaps there can be any number of unknown transcription/scribal errors and/or interpolations in the two extant folio manuscripts vs. what the original autograph itself actually said.Despite various potential ways to establish such a claim evidentially, Hugh had nothing more than insults and mindless dismissal to offer in response on my YouTube comments and so I hereby challenge him to write a Blog proving his claims regarding the folios specifically and to present sound reason and evidence for his claim that the two extant folios of the Memo are, in fact, the originals as written by D'Arcis himself (or his scribe) back in 1389-1390 A.D.Of course, even if Hugh is successful in meeting this challenge, the D'Arcis Memo still suffers from all the other criticisms and objections already raised by Pro-Shroud historians and experts who assume that D'Arcis did write the Memo as we see it today in the folios.Over to you Hugh!RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/08/12/shroud-wars-the-darcis-memo-the-bibliographical-test-challenge-for-hugh-farey/

New RSM Intro Done by Fan Orthodox Joker- see original =    @RealSeekers Revised channel introduction

Alright, this one is a two for one type deal, in the first half of the episode, I was asked to do a debate/discussion with Mike from the Evil Christianity Podcast on the topics of the WAXS dating vs. the 1988 C-14 dating of the Shroud. In the end, Mike, as a very humble and respectful skeptic, admitted that I really provided an intriguing Pro-Shroud case that he wants to look into further :)The second half is a fan request from "Ghawk" who asked me to respond to a Shroud skeptic named Godless Engineer, a typical ignorant and arrogant fundy lay online Shroud skeptic. I didn't have much time to deal with his Satan-induced supernatural skeptical stupidity, so I only reviewed the first 22 mins of his 40 min video. RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/08/08/shroud-wars-debating-waxs-vs-c-14-w-skeptic-evil-christianity-refuting-the-godless-engineer/

We mostly discuss determinism in this post-debate 3-hour after show.

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/08/04/debating-moral-epistemology-on-ss-w-atheist-david-johnson/

I was invited onto the Skeptics and Seekers Podcast to debate two rival Moral Epistemologies; one being that of Christian Theism and the other that of Atheist David Johnson called "Enlightened Selfishness".RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/08/04/debating-moral-epistemology-on-ss-w-atheist-david-johnson/

Harry Stark has been quite busy lately, this time he tackled the Indigenous peoples vs. Christianity.RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/01/09/harry-stark-shows-2025/

Having evaluated Paulogia's "Minimal Witnesses" hypothesis on its own terms in Part 1 and seeing that it utterly fails with a "D-" grade in terms of explaining the 10 indisputable "established history" of Christianity (including Gary Habermas' Minimal Facts).In Part 2, I address some of the specific responses Paulogia gave to some of the "Counter-Facts" I gave in my original Open Mic show on Paulogia from over a year ago. I provide a proper rebuttal to all of Paulogia's responses.RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/07/24/the-paulogia-project-parts-1-2/

In this first part of the fan requested Paulogia Project, I recovered the detailed video I did before (about 70-80% finished) and finished it in order to fully assess Paulogia's "Minimal Witnesses" hypothesis on its own terms. I find that, at best, it gets a grade of "D-" as it can only provide a possible natural account/explanation for 5 of the 10 "established historical facts" of Christianity (includes Gary Habermas' 6 "Minimal Facts")- a mere 50%!RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/07/24/the-paulogia-project-parts-1-2/