Revealed Apologetics

In this episode, Eli responds to the notion that logic is not absolute because there are different systems of logic.

In this episode, Eli discusses his issues with Molinism, a view that he once held.

In this episode, Eli shares his journey to embracing partial preterism and walks through the key Bible passages that reshaped his view.

In this episode, Eli is joined by Dr. James R. White to respond to 9 arguments against Sola Scriptura put out by Cameron Bertuzzi of Capturing Christianity.

In this episode, Eli further explores the issue of neutrality in apologetics and why we should reject such an approach. He draws from an article written by Joshua Pillows, a fellow presuppositionalist which can be found in its entirety here: https://www.apologeticscentral.org/blog/antithesis-a-biblical-refutation-of-neutral-apologetics

Eli responds to a critic of the Transcendental Argument for God.

In this episode, Eli explores the role of the Holy Spirit in Apologetics.

In this episode Eli provides some practical guidance on how to approach a conversation with a Mormon, what passages of the Bible are relevant to this engagement and how to be clear on the message.

In this video, Eli dives into a crucial question for every Christian and apologist: What was Jesus’ view of Scripture? If we’re going to defend the Christian faith, we must first understand how Jesus regarded the Word of God—as inspired, authoritative, and without error. Anything less undermines our witness and our worldview.

In this episode, Eli offers an accessible introduction to Cornelius Van Til’s concept of analogical reasoning, a cornerstone of his apologetic method. Van Til insists that human knowledge is not univocal (exactly the same as God's) nor equivocal (completely different from God's), but analogical—that is, our knowledge corresponds to God’s truth in a creaturely way. Eli contrasts this with the epistemology of Gordon Clark, who emphasized a more univocal understanding of truth between God and man, grounded in propositional revelation and logical consistency.