Rigour & Flow with Aiwan and Tamanda

95% of doctors who died during COVID-19 were Black and racially minoritised. And at the height of the pandemic, while making up only 14% of the population, Black and minoritised communities accounted for 63% of all healthcare worker deaths.

Why was the risk so unevenly distributed? It’s time to stop sitting with the numbers and shift the stakes.

In this Feedwarmer edition, Tamanda and Aiwan revisit a 2021 conversation to dismantle the deep-seated racial disparities in UK healthcare. Featuring Rianna Raymond-Williams (Ree Speaks) and Michael Hamilton (The Ubele Initiative), we explore how youth-led organising like the "We Need Answers" campaign forced accountability onto the national agenda.

From public health activism to the deeper architecture of systems change, we ask: Who is protected? Who is exposed? And what must happen now?

🎙️ In this episode:

• The 95% Reality: What COVID-19 revealed about racial inequality in the UK
• The Frontline Cover Up: Why black and racially minorised doctors were sent to the frontline over their white colleagues and what this reveals about a lack of institutional safety
• We Need Answers: The power of youth-led organising and how it put accountability onto the agenda
• Unhealthy Structural Racism: What could happen when data confirms what communities already know?
• Moving up the “Funding Food Chain”: Why black organisations must shift from "firefighting" on small, unpredictable grants to controlling large-scale institutional capital

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts


🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/L5WdH5NZiIA

🔁 Share with someone thinking about systems, power and change    

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow    

Subscribe for more critical deep-dives into power, class and the Black experience. And be ready for the launch of Season 5 next week!

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Rigour & Flow is evolving. After a full year of weekly episodes, we are moving to a Seasonal rhythm starting with Season 5 this May.

In this intimate update, we reflect on our first year through the lens of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Dream Count and our own personal Easter Monday reflections. We’re sharing the "why" behind our move to seasons, what the data from Year 1 told us, and a preview of the incredible conversations we’ve already recorded for the new season. Stay tuned for a feedwarmer coming soon!

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts

🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/KCuL_ALYTsA

🔁 Share with someone trying to build something that lasts

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow   

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Everyone has a podcast. But very few people sustain one.

In this final episode of Season 4, we mark one year of Rigour & Flow - a milestone that feels both significant and, at times, improbable. Because behind the weekly releases, the conversations and the growth, there have also been moments of doubt, exhaustion, and the very real question of whether we could keep going.

We reflect on what it actually takes to build and sustain an independent podcast. Not just creatively, but emotionally, relationally and practically. This takes us back to the beginning: the original names we nearly chose, the friend who thankfully stopped us being ‘Ditsy Wise’, the poll that pointed us one way, the reality check that forced us another, and the emergence of ‘Rigour & Flow’ as the title that could hold the tension between depth and levity, critique and ease, research and culture.

We talk about how the show has changed us. Aiwan speaks about getting to understand, from the inside, what clients go through when they try to make podcasting sustainable. Tamanda reflects on how hosting has expanded her sense of identity, raising new questions about research, knowledge, public thought, and the blurred line between scholar and public intellectual.

Finally, we look back at the first year of the show itself: 52 episodes, platform features, awards, global listeners, growing audience connection, the first signs of monetisation, and the reality that sustainability has to become the next serious conversation if the show is to keep evolving.

🎙️ In this episode:

• One year is no small thing: Why sustaining a weekly podcast matters more than simply launching one
• The podcasting apocalypse horsewomen: Burnout, time and despair as real threats to creative consistency
• The names before the name: From Ditsy Wise to In Tandem to Rigour & Flow
• From producer to podcaster: What Aiwan learned by living what clients face
• Research in real time: Tamanda on audience, interpretation and the question of public intellectual work
• The archive before the show: How relationship video diaries became the seedbed of the podcast
• What the show has changed in us: Podcasting, identity and becoming ourselves in public
• Marking the journey: Apple features, awards, global listeners and building from zero
• Sustainability and the future: What has to change if independent podcasting is going to endure

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts


🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/7kq4dvcwNMw

🔁 Share with someone trying to build something that lasts

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow   

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Podcasting is shaping politics. But who controls the mic and who gets left out? In this episode, we turn the mic on the podcasting industry itself.

We start with Aiwan’s journey into podcasting, from the early iTunes and RSS era to producing shows professionally and use that to ask what makes podcasting so different from film, television and music.

What emerges is a picture of a medium that still feels young, unstable and oddly opaque: open source, easy to access, but thin on shared standards, reliable metrics and real accountability.

From there, we get into the politics of measurement, or the lack of it. We unpack the confusion around downloads, plays, streams and influence, and why podcasting can still feel full of smoke, mirrors and unverifiable claims. We also look at Spotify’s move to make play counts visible and what that revealed about hype, visibility and the pressures facing indie creators.

We then move to one of the episode’s sharpest concerns: podcasting as a site of power. From the Steven Bartlett health misinformation controversy to the underrepresentation of women - and especially Black women - across major podcast ecosystems, we ask: who gets to dominate the mic, whose voices get amplified, and who still gets left out?

Finally, we turn more directly to big ‘P’ of politics. We reflect on the so-called “podcast election”, the rise of right-leaning media ecosystems, and the way entertainment formats now carry ideology far beyond formal news spaces. Beneath all of this sits the major challenge: if podcasting is helping shape the future, who is building that future through sound, story and representation?

And what responsibility comes with having listeners, however many they may be?

🎙️ In this episode:

• Origin stories and RSS feeds: How podcasting began, and how Aiwan found her way into the medium
• The Wild West problem: Why podcasting still feels under-regulated, opaque and structurally immature
• Metrics or mythological claims?: Downloads, plays, streams and the absence of shared industry standards
• Smoke and mirrors: Why podcasting can be easy to hype and hard to verify
• Misinformation on mic: What the Steven Bartlett controversy reveals about health claims, platform power and mis and disinformation
• Who dominates the mic?: Gender, race, class and the myth of podcasting as a democratised medium
• The podcast election: How entertainment formats increasingly shape political discourse
• Right-wing media ecosystems: Why the best-funded voices often dominate culture through repetition and reach
• Responsibility and risk: What Rigour and Flow means when you are speaking into public life in real-time

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts


🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: ​​https://youtu.be/f3owORRx3BY

🔁 Share with someone thinking about media, politics and who gets to shape public conversation

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow   

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

From sex work in Georgian England to modern debates on marriage, consent and criminalisation, this episode of Rigour & Flow focuses on women’s perspectives on power, survival and who gets to define respectability.

We start by discussing the historical drama Harlots, a series set in 18th-century London that centres the lives of women working in the sex trade. Written by women, the show offers a refreshing lens on the world’s “oldest profession.” Instead of caricatures or moral judgement, we see the economic realities, survival strategies and brutal power dynamics shaping women’s lives.

Our behind-the-scenes conversation evolves to consider what happens when women control the narrative. When the story is told from a woman’s experience, the hypocrisy of power becomes harder to ignore. In this case, the series depicts men not as romantic heroes but as unrefined figures of entitlement and violence.

From there, we move beyond the show. Exploring the politics of sex work today, the consequences of criminalising sex work, and some unconsidered parallels between sex work and marriage as historical economic transactions. religion, law and survival as we draw attention to the structures and hierarchies societies build around sex and sex work.

Finally, the episode then turns personal. As Aiwan and Tamanda reflect on their own perspectives on sex work, the sociology behind it and why an 18th-century dominatrix in Harlots - who flips the power dynamic entirely - represents a radically different form of agency for women.

Underneath the humour and cultural critique runs the question: What exactly is sex work and what does it tell us about women’s lives today?

🎙️ In this episode:

• Women holding the pen: Why Harlots tells a truer story of women’s lives
• No heroes here: What women-centred storytelling exposes about male power and hypocrisy
• Survival for sale: Sex work, status and the brutal economics of being a woman in Georgian England
• When payment becomes permission: Consent, coercion and the fiction of contractual sex
• Holy performance: Religion, shame and Florence’s use of faith as shield and strategy
• Marriage as transaction: Why the line between wifehood and sex work is not as neat as we pretend
• Murky power: Secrets, brothels and the influence women hold inside patriarchal systems
• Whips, wit and reversal: Nancy Birch and the seductive idea of women turning power back on men

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts


🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: ​​https://youtu.be/ivPBaWFO4sE

🔁 Share with someone interested in culture, feminism and social power

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It’s International Women’s Month. So what better time to ask: what would society look like if women were truly prioritised? In this week’s episode of Rigour & Flow, we explore the idea of matriarchy - not as a fantasy of female domination, but as a thought experiment about power, care and social priorities.

We begin with the plot of a recent series we watched: ‘The Power’. Teenage girls develop the ability to emit electric shocks. “Everything is getting zapped.” Overnight, hierarchies destabilise. Power shifts. Fear shifts.

But is that a matriarchy? Or simply patriarchy reversed?

Very quickly, we realise the term itself needs unpacking. Matriarchal. Matrilineal. Matrifocal. Gynarchy. Some anthropologists argue that matriarchies have never existed in any strict sense. While others point to examples across the globe.

The conversation moves between theory and lived experience. Women-only spaces. Academic retreats. AiAi Studios as a women-led business.

We ask what might change if women were truly prioritised. If sanitary care were not taxed. If maternal mortality were treated as urgent. If research into fibroids and endometriosis were as widely understood as space exploration.

At one point, we name it exactly as we see it: we have been bamboozled by patriarchy. If power has always looked like domination, can we even imagine a world organised differently? In response, we examine communities often labelled matriarchal, such as the Umoja village in Kenya. We then consider female politicians in the UK, and ask whether representation alone transforms structures.

Underneath the debate lurks a blunt question. Is the fear of matriarchy really fear of women ruling, or fear of men no longer being centred? This episode interrogates how power is defined, who is prioritised, and whether we are capable of imagining structural change without defaulting to ineffective reversal.

🎙️ In this episode:

• Patriarchy flipped or structural shift: Why female domination is not the same as systemic transformation
• Matriarchy, matrilineal, matrifocal: Untangling definitions often collapsed into one word
• Centred vs accommodated: What changes when women are prioritised rather than simply included
• The knowledge gap exposed: Fibroids and maternal mortality versus the Hubble telescope and dark matter
• Women-only spaces under the microscope: Church fellowships, academic retreats and the experience of being centred
• Representation without restructuring: Why female Prime Ministers do not automatically dismantle patriarchy
• Umoja and other women-led communities: Survival, refuge and the limits of the “matriarchy” label
• The imagination gap: Whether discomfort with matriarchy is really discomfort with decentring men

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts


🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/yi1qn3gBJQI

🔁 Share with someone thinking about power, gender and the systems we live inside

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow   

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Last week, we told the story of friendship rupture. But what happens when the mirror turns around?

In Part 2 of our adult friendship series, we step into uncomfortable territory: the moments where we may have been the difficult one. The one who ghosted. The one who didn’t communicate. The one who hurt someone we loved. This episode moves beyond betrayal and jealousy to something quieter and harder - accountability.

We begin with conditioning. Aiwan reflects on growing up in a high-control Pentecostal Nigerian church community, where friendship came with warnings: Do not be unequally yoked. Friends were for saving. Held lightly. Guarded. No birthday parties. No Christmas gifts. No sleepovers.

We get into the charged territory of ghosting. Referencing therapist Nedra Glover Tawwab, we ask:
Are people allowed to leave relationships without explanation?
Is ghosting immaturity or sometimes necessary discernment? Tamanda confesses her core toxic trait:
“When I’m done, I’m done.”

We then revisit the “broken bone” analogy from last week’s episode. Once trust fractures, even if repaired, will it ever land the same way again?

Finally, we answer the question many of us avoid: Was I the problem? As we know now, adult friendships are not low stakes. They are spaces of learning, ego confrontation, grief and growth. And we acknowledge that the deepest maturity is not just knowing when to leave but knowing when to look at yourself.

🎙️ In this episode:

• Inherited friendship scripts: How religious control, family trauma and “unequally yoked” theology shape adult relationships
• Adolescent betrayal under the lens: When low self-esteem, displacement and the hunger for validation override loyalty
• Toxic or traumatised: Distinguishing character flaw from unprocessed survival strategy
• Grace in the aftermath: The gift of friends who allow you to grow beyond your worst moment
• Boundaries or avoidance: When “I’m done” is clarity and when it is emotional evasion
• The slow friendship fade: Ghosting, disengagement and the message of silence
• Fracture and load-bearing trust: Why repaired relationships rarely carry weight the same way again
• Narrative humility: Asking how the friend you lost would tell the story of you
• Intentionality as practice: Wanting to be a better friend in a life already stretched thin

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts

🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/Oi2ID23STvg

🔁 Share with someone navigating friendship tension, repair or release.

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow   

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Where do you stand on choosing to fix a failing friendship, or deciding to let it go?

Adult friendships are supposed to be the easy relationships.
No shared mortgage. No in-laws. No vows. Why then can they break you in ways that feel like such a fundamental failure?    

In this episode of Rigour & Flow, we open a conversation that surprised us both. Using a provocation from Lovette Jallow on friendship breakups and “outgrowing” people, we ask whether growth always calls for departure, or whether sometimes we lack the skills to repair what ruptured.

We start with joy. Childhood friendships. Estate windows facing each other. Writing and recording songs onto cassette decks. The best friends who became family when there was no family. The friend groups that shaped us. The boarding school betrayals that undid us.

The adult friendships that finally felt chosen, reciprocal and real.

Then we recount the ruptures. What happens when envy enters a friendship? When a friend falls in love with you?
When your growth feels like their loss?

Aiwan shares about the devastating breakdown of a 20-year friendship. She takes us through the triggers that tore it apart: Jealousy. Resentment. One-sided romantic feelings, disclosed despite an existing relationship. Attempts at repair. Boundaries set. And then the slow and painful realisation that some friendships could not hold the fullness of who she was becoming on her journey.

What do you do with such difficult dynamics? We examine how fixing a friendship in this bind may be attempted, but sometimes trust no longer feels intact.

And we get deep into the discussion of the trickiest dilemmas: Can you have friendships when someone feels romantic attraction? And is “outgrowing” someone simply growth, or merely avoidance in disguise?     

🎙️ In this episode:

• Chosen “family” & early belonging: Estate windows, cassette tapes, and the friendships that felt like home when home was unstable
• Friendship as “low stakes” myth: Why we treat romance and family as therapy-worthy, but sideline friendship ruptures
• Moments of envy: What happens when someone cannot celebrate your wins and finally says, “I was jealous of you.”
• When attraction destabilises friendship: Queerness, blurred lines and the shock of a foundation shifting
• Growth vs abandonment: Realising that your becoming feels like their loss
• Setting boundaries in conversation: Accountability, difficult questions and the refusal to stay in ambiguity
• Boundaries as safety: Aiwan’s “broken bone theory” and the (im)possibility of repair after rupture    
• Outgrowing or avoiding?: Exploring the difference between emotional maturity and ego protection

This is Part 1 of our exploration into adult friendships and friend breakups. In Part 2, we will be doing more self-introspection and asking if or when we’ve ever been the toxic friend! 👀 Stay tuned.

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts

🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/ceGb5I53gZk

🔁 Share with someone who has ever felt the grief of losing a friend

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow    

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Many of us learned very young that sexual violence is “unsayable”. That naming it has consequences. In turn, sexual violence remains endemic, sustained by the silent treatment it is given, and by a society that tolerates such an insatiable appetite for violence without accountability.

In this episode, we step into terrains of this damaging silence and ask who it protects, who it punishes, and what it costs to speak out.

We begin with memory. Tamanda reflects on the moment she first encountered the word “rape” as a child, and the shock of being told never to say the word again. We trace how “unsayability” becomes culture - how silence is taught, reinforced and often rewarded by wider society. We examine the instinctive disbelief that greets disclosures of abuse, and the psychological defences that surface when believing someone would require us to confront our own histories.

Then we take the fight for justice to institutions. Universities. Creative industries. And justice systems. We explore what happens when belief demands action, and action threatens power. Why do institutions so often choose disbelief? Why does position protect perpetrators? How do cultures of silence become entrenched through complicity?

Tamanda reflects on navigating sexual misconduct within academic spaces, including the bind of having to cite known perpetrators to move through the system’s assessment hoops. Aiwan examines how the entertainment industry reproduces similar dynamics through scarcity, blurred boundaries and informal power - creating what she calls a “Bermuda triangle” of silence.

We move on to whisper networks. The informal, often women-led circuits of protection that emerge when formal systems repeatedly fail. Discussing their necessity, their limits, and what they reveal about institutional trust.

Throughout, we hold to one principle: safety before testimony. Even in cases where justice is achieved, the process itself can be devastating. With that in mind, we ask: What do survivors truly owe the world? And do unsafe systems deserve our disclosure at all?

In closing, we return to the personal and the practical. To therapy. To allies. To gauging risk. To the hope that even making sense of one’s own experience is a step toward protection.

This is not an episode about individual villains or public scandal. It is about structures. Rather than offering prescriptions or calls to disclosure, we sit with a more difficult truth: that silence is sometimes imposed, sometimes chosen, and sometimes the only viable survival strategy available.

⚠️ Content note: This episode contains discussion of sexual violence, abuse of power and institutional harm. Please take care while listening.

🎙️ In this episode:

• Unsayable from the start: How childhood silence around sexual violence shapes adult speech and shame
• Disbelief as defence: Why the first response to disclosure is often “But do you believe her?”
• Silence by design: How institutions teach, reinforce and reward quiet complicity
• Belief and consequence: Why institutions choose disbelief when belief would demand action
• The Bermuda Triangle of survival: Small industries, reputational risks and the cost of speaking up
• Whisper networks explained: How informal systems of warning emerge when formal systems fail
• Academic entanglement: Citing scholars accused of harm and the structural bind of professional survival
• Men and masculinity: Why patriarchy makes male disclosure uniquely difficult
• Safety before testimony: Why getting to safe matters more than satisfying institutional narratives
• Finding allies and resources: From therapy to the 1752 Group and survivor-led protection networks

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts

🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/D3cqvxgI0-o

🔁 Share with someone navigating institutional silencing and safety

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow   

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Whistleblowing is often framed as an act of courage. But in practice, it is more often met with punishment, isolation and quiet retaliation.

In this episode of Rigour & Flow, we examine what actually happens when people tell the truth inside institutions that claim to value transparency, ethics and accountability.

Drawing on lived experience, research and patterns across multiple sectors - including academia, media, charities and the creative industries - we explore why whistleblowers so often become the problem, while harm is minimised, managed or protected.

We explore the gap between official reporting processes and informal power: how complaints are received, reframed, delayed or quietly buried; why “doing the right thing” frequently backfires and how institutions close ranks when truth threatens reputation, funding or authority.

Similarly, we explore what happens when allegations of wrongdoing enter the public sphere, how reactions play out on social media, and what we’ve encountered ourselves since launching the show.

This is a discussion about retaliation that doesn’t always look dramatic, but is deeply effective. It’s about progressive spaces that punish, often reproducing the same silencing they claim to oppose. And it’s about the emotional, professional and psychological costs of refusing to stay quiet.

Rather than offering a simple morality tale, we sit with the uncomfortable reality: that silence is often rewarded, truth is seen as a liability, and whistleblowers are rarely protected in the ways policy suggests.

This episode is for anyone who has ever been told to report concerns and then learned directly the cost of doing so.

🎙️ In this episode:

• The system punishes courage: why speaking up often triggers retaliation rather than protection
• The whistleblowing myth: how “doing the right thing” is celebrated rhetorically but punished in practice
• The whistleblowing paradox: why institutions tell you to report harm, until you actually do
• Why systems close ranks: reputation management, risk containment and the quiet defence of power
• Progressive spaces aren’t exempt: how charities, media, academia and creative industries reproduce the same silencing dynamics
• Retaliation without spectacle: exclusion, stalled careers, informal blacklisting and being reframed as “difficult”
• Silence as currency: how compliance, restraint and loyalty are rewarded over truth
• What accountability would actually require and why institutions resist it

🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts

🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/FWzSfpNpimI

🔁 Share with someone thinking about power and accountability

☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow    

Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.

Connect with us on:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• AiAi Studios
• Roots & Rigour

This is an AiAi Studios Production

©AiAi Studios 2025

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.