
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Are humanoid robots distracting us from the real unlock in robotics ... hands?
In this TechFirst episode, host John Koetsier digs into the hardest (and most valuable) problem in robotics: dexterous manipulation.
Guest Mike Obolonsky, Partner at Cortical Ventures, argues that about $50 trillion of global economic activity flows through “hands work,” yet manipulation startups have raised only a fraction of what locomotion and autonomy companies have.
We break down why hands are so hard (actuators, tactile sensing, proprioception, control, data) and what gets unlocked when we finally crack them.
What we'll talk through ...
• Why “navigation ≠ manipulation” and why most real-world jobs need hands
• The funding mismatch: billions to autonomy & humanoids vs. comparatively little to hands
• The tech stack for dexterity: actuators, tactile sensors (pressure, vibration, shear), feedback, and AI
• Grasping vs. manipulation: picking, placing, using tools (e.g., dishwashers to scalpels)
• Reliability in the wild: interventions/hour, wet/greasy plates, occlusions, bimanual dexterity
• Practical paths: task-specific grippers, modular end-effectors, and “good enough” today vs. general purpose tomorrow
• The moonshot: what 70–90% human-level hands could do for productivity on Earth ... and off-planet
Chapters
00:00 Intro—are we underinvesting in robotic hands?
01:10 Why hands matter more than legs (economics of manipulation)
04:30 Funding realities: autonomy & humanoids vs. hands
08:40 Locomotion progress vs. manipulation bottlenecks
12:10 Teleop now, autonomy later—how data gets gathered
14:20 What’s missing: actuators, tactile sensing, proprioception
17:10 Perception limits in the real world (wet dishes, occlusions)
22:00 General-purpose dexterity vs. task-specific ROI
26:00 Startup landscape & reliability (interventions/hour)
29:00 Modular end-effectors and upgrade paths
30:10 The moonshot: productivity explosion when hands are solved
Who should watch
Robotics founders, VCs, AI researchers, operators in warehousing & manufacturing, and anyone tracking humanoids beyond the hype.
If you enjoyed this
Subscribe for more deep-tech conversations, drop a comment with your take on the “hands vs. legs” debate, and share with someone building robots.
Keywords
robotic hands, dexterous manipulation, humanoid robots, tactile sensing, actuators, proprioception, warehouse automation, AI robotics, Cortical Ventures, TechFirst, John Koetsier, Mike Obolonsky
#Robotics #AI #Humanoids #RobotHands #Manipulation #Automation #TechFirst
4.7
1414 ratings
Are humanoid robots distracting us from the real unlock in robotics ... hands?
In this TechFirst episode, host John Koetsier digs into the hardest (and most valuable) problem in robotics: dexterous manipulation.
Guest Mike Obolonsky, Partner at Cortical Ventures, argues that about $50 trillion of global economic activity flows through “hands work,” yet manipulation startups have raised only a fraction of what locomotion and autonomy companies have.
We break down why hands are so hard (actuators, tactile sensing, proprioception, control, data) and what gets unlocked when we finally crack them.
What we'll talk through ...
• Why “navigation ≠ manipulation” and why most real-world jobs need hands
• The funding mismatch: billions to autonomy & humanoids vs. comparatively little to hands
• The tech stack for dexterity: actuators, tactile sensors (pressure, vibration, shear), feedback, and AI
• Grasping vs. manipulation: picking, placing, using tools (e.g., dishwashers to scalpels)
• Reliability in the wild: interventions/hour, wet/greasy plates, occlusions, bimanual dexterity
• Practical paths: task-specific grippers, modular end-effectors, and “good enough” today vs. general purpose tomorrow
• The moonshot: what 70–90% human-level hands could do for productivity on Earth ... and off-planet
Chapters
00:00 Intro—are we underinvesting in robotic hands?
01:10 Why hands matter more than legs (economics of manipulation)
04:30 Funding realities: autonomy & humanoids vs. hands
08:40 Locomotion progress vs. manipulation bottlenecks
12:10 Teleop now, autonomy later—how data gets gathered
14:20 What’s missing: actuators, tactile sensing, proprioception
17:10 Perception limits in the real world (wet dishes, occlusions)
22:00 General-purpose dexterity vs. task-specific ROI
26:00 Startup landscape & reliability (interventions/hour)
29:00 Modular end-effectors and upgrade paths
30:10 The moonshot: productivity explosion when hands are solved
Who should watch
Robotics founders, VCs, AI researchers, operators in warehousing & manufacturing, and anyone tracking humanoids beyond the hype.
If you enjoyed this
Subscribe for more deep-tech conversations, drop a comment with your take on the “hands vs. legs” debate, and share with someone building robots.
Keywords
robotic hands, dexterous manipulation, humanoid robots, tactile sensing, actuators, proprioception, warehouse automation, AI robotics, Cortical Ventures, TechFirst, John Koetsier, Mike Obolonsky
#Robotics #AI #Humanoids #RobotHands #Manipulation #Automation #TechFirst
4,337 Listeners
30,773 Listeners
32,191 Listeners
525 Listeners
1,859 Listeners
25,893 Listeners
24,666 Listeners
112,500 Listeners
3,980 Listeners
6,448 Listeners
9,634 Listeners
456 Listeners
16,002 Listeners
2,252 Listeners
495 Listeners