
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!
By Greg Hancock & Patrick Curran5
221221 ratings
In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!

32,100 Listeners

26,197 Listeners

876 Listeners

26,250 Listeners

3,654 Listeners

12,237 Listeners

111,948 Listeners

56,508 Listeners

2,374 Listeners

934 Listeners

7,230 Listeners

5,485 Listeners

948 Listeners

15,950 Listeners

348 Listeners