
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!
By Greg Hancock & Patrick Curran5
218218 ratings
In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!

43,815 Listeners

43,563 Listeners

26,233 Listeners

3,981 Listeners

10,726 Listeners

60 Listeners

2,093 Listeners

604 Listeners

480 Listeners

826 Listeners

303 Listeners

449 Listeners

15,930 Listeners

268 Listeners

586 Listeners