
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!
By Greg Hancock & Patrick Curran5
221221 ratings
In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!

32,250 Listeners

26,233 Listeners

863 Listeners

26,384 Listeners

3,647 Listeners

12,133 Listeners

113,307 Listeners

56,974 Listeners

2,398 Listeners

939 Listeners

7,245 Listeners

5,606 Listeners

953 Listeners

16,508 Listeners

369 Listeners