
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!
By Greg Hancock & Patrick Curran5
218218 ratings
In Part 1 of a two-part series, Patrick and Greg draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to discuss aspects of the grant review process, including the scoring criteria, conflicts of interest, what it's like "in the room," and what happens after grants are reviewed. They also talk about turkey legs, sausage making, acronym-based drinking games, hairy eyeballs, roller coasters, and Pink Floyd: The Wall.
Stay in contact with Quantitude!

44,007 Listeners

43,696 Listeners

26,250 Listeners

4,008 Listeners

10,712 Listeners

49 Listeners

2,077 Listeners

606 Listeners

478 Listeners

822 Listeners

302 Listeners

444 Listeners

16,055 Listeners

267 Listeners

588 Listeners