
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Brett and Nazim return with a discussion on the oral argument in Whole Women's Health v. Jackson and United States v. Texas, which both address the (procedural) Constitutionality of Texas' abortion ban supported by private enforcement. This discussion includes (1) what are they talking about, (2) how did this get here, and (3) is this going to be over soon. Law starts at (05:02); and for reference, there are minor sound static in the third act because Brett was pounding on his desk when he talked, but it goes away fairly quickly.
4.4
229229 ratings
Brett and Nazim return with a discussion on the oral argument in Whole Women's Health v. Jackson and United States v. Texas, which both address the (procedural) Constitutionality of Texas' abortion ban supported by private enforcement. This discussion includes (1) what are they talking about, (2) how did this get here, and (3) is this going to be over soon. Law starts at (05:02); and for reference, there are minor sound static in the third act because Brett was pounding on his desk when he talked, but it goes away fairly quickly.
5,012 Listeners
9,117 Listeners
1,092 Listeners
32,043 Listeners
3,460 Listeners
1,943 Listeners
678 Listeners
55,862 Listeners
6,747 Listeners
5,533 Listeners
6,444 Listeners
3,755 Listeners
15,333 Listeners
361 Listeners
664 Listeners