
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Brett and Nazim return with a discussion on the oral argument in Whole Women's Health v. Jackson and United States v. Texas, which both address the (procedural) Constitutionality of Texas' abortion ban supported by private enforcement. This discussion includes (1) what are they talking about, (2) how did this get here, and (3) is this going to be over soon. Law starts at (05:02); and for reference, there are minor sound static in the third act because Brett was pounding on his desk when he talked, but it goes away fairly quickly.
4.4
230230 ratings
Brett and Nazim return with a discussion on the oral argument in Whole Women's Health v. Jackson and United States v. Texas, which both address the (procedural) Constitutionality of Texas' abortion ban supported by private enforcement. This discussion includes (1) what are they talking about, (2) how did this get here, and (3) is this going to be over soon. Law starts at (05:02); and for reference, there are minor sound static in the third act because Brett was pounding on his desk when he talked, but it goes away fairly quickly.
5,043 Listeners
1,117 Listeners
8,478 Listeners
371 Listeners
32,102 Listeners
1,026 Listeners
246 Listeners
3,480 Listeners
3,563 Listeners
2,538 Listeners
1,486 Listeners
5,677 Listeners
722 Listeners
372 Listeners
665 Listeners