And that was the majority of people wealthy through faith they stole from others where they were part of the state they were kings they had taxes tides whatever you called it they took their money from other people without really providing anything in return there was no choice in the matter right so fast forward to today the majority of the rich surely still some ultra-rich folks who've made their money through staff because maybe they were here maybe they inherited it or they were like um a communist, the socialist country just stole the goods from their people.

Made money for somebody and that person pay to heed them for their time or created a product or service and sold it to people and they were getting money in return for giving examples so let's talk about we can talk about tech people.

They got rich because they created something that we want to listen to we listen to it, we pay them, and then we listen to it it's the same for celebrities and seen for its musicians it's Joe Rogan, all of these people, so everybody that's everybody wealthy out there 99.9 percent of the wealth today was created through trade as in the created something these individuals created something. That other people wanted to buy, which is why they're wealthy, right, so let me ask you something, why should I be penalized for that if I only went out there and created something. The other people were willing to pay me for why I should be penalized.

It wasn't about stealing from others, so that's the difference in Marxist time socialist time the calmest time they saw this imbalance because they figure the rich stole from the poor and that's why they were rich today it's different the majority of the rich created something the poor wanted, and that is why there is a disparity in America in another country like this the poor can become rich just like that only have to do is create something that people want.

And taking money away from somebody because they were got wealthy through trade is completely wrong because they work for that god damn money they deserve all of that god damn money it's the people who got money through theft which don't deserve it who gets money through staff the majority people get me through theft nowadays the government the state government programs that are all paid for by faith those are the ones who should be paying higher taxes not the productive generators of trade.

Politics is all about control, so anybody who wants to get into politics only really wants to control other people. Now correct me if I'm wrong. I'd love to hear a correction if I'm wrong. Still, that is the number one reason people get into politics as some people may have a pet because, I mean, look at parks and rec. I'm going to fill it. I want to create a garden. Still, you can't do any of that stuff yourself. You have to try and coerce other people or convince other people or persuade other people to do things so that you can get these things done, so it's all about control, it's all about coercion, it's all about getting other people to do something for you, so that is what politics is that is what government is the government is controlled. Give an example, okay, so.

In the neighborhood, I used to live in the trash to be picked up every morning around 7:00 AM every morning around 7:00 AM 70 M. 7:00 AM if you didn't have your trash out by 7:00 AM not every morning but every Monday or Wednesday whatever day it was they always pick up your debris at 7:00 AM still. And then, one day, they started picking up trash intent. I should pick up at ten, and then it was picked up at 10:00 to pretend picked up attended picked up again, and it was picked up at ten until we all got used to the fact that trash is being picked up at 10:00 and then all of a sudden one day without warning. We hear the garbage trucks out at 630 in the morning at 630 mornings Dr. Lorimer. People are freaking out there running out there in their bathrobes, pulling up their trash, and many times in the pick it up. Some governments do. Probably said, you know I'm going to screw around with them.

I'm going to mess them up today because I'm not feeling perfect. Maybe I didn't get a raise, maybe a little pit stop, so I'm going to call the company that picks up the trash, and I'm going to move the time from 10:00 AM to 7:00 AM and not tell anybody because I'm in a hole and I could do whatever the hell I want. And then all the sudden that starts happening in they keep doing that for a while and put it back to 10:00 in the keep messing with you the people who are in government everybody who's in government everybody who's in politics all they care about is control all they care about is controlling other people so when you look at politics when you look at politicians when you look at governments when you look at the state. Suppose you are trying to figure out why they are doing this. You know so many of the cedars of why are these people doing this if you go to the court to the crux to the foundation of all these things the main reason is control. They are trying to control others until they get that control over others, then they will not be happy, which is why we need to eliminate the state. We need to be done as much private stuff as possible because of personal things work. The government is control over other people. The nongovernment you're doing it not with coercion. You're doing it with the agreement. It's like the difference between theft and trade. With private firms, you need to agree to things with the government. They can do stuff by mandate, and if you don't get him done, they can throw you in jail or fine you.

I've noticed that over the last little while, the people are just losing their minds over the news. They only lose their minds. All are cutting people off, people who are divorcing, voting for the wrong candidate. It is just insane this political wave part of the election turns into a stunning—bit of insanity. In reality, is that it's all being done using. The site's fate, everything you read, everything you see, everything in the news, everything in social media, all of that should not be taken with a grain of salt. I don't understand why anyone believes. That what they see online on the internet in their feeds on Facebook and Google in all on Twitter and Twitter on any of these do I need any of the services or any of these TV stations or any of these new sources. I don't understand why people are looking at these and watch them going, yes, this is the truth, I believe that, and then taking it and sharing it. Because I'll bet you anything that none of this is real, I talked about this before B. as being entertainment see this is the thing that we don't understand a lot of people don't understand they think the part you're seeing is the truth 88 the true folks it isn't the truth and if you share the truth without looking at it in profoundly thinking about. Understanding wait for a second, this can't be true. Do some checking to confirm that it's true or not before you share and do anything with it because it's all untrue. You think. Trump lies in your Bible because everybody lives everybody lies, everybody exaggerates, and everybody shares fake news, fake information, fake data. The crux of the internet. There is very little on there this real. So. That's why CDU when you get a particular. Crafts or engaging war is raging. Bit of information coming across your feed that has been designed and engineered and created to reach you may or may not have any truth in it at all, and if you get outraged if you share it, 2000 people, if you make comments on it if you. Decide to cut people out of your life because of this one piece of information to somebody disagrees with you on this one piece of information, then you have lost your mind. All this stuff is not real it's fake. Plus, let me ask you one thing when do we lose the ability to agree to disagree? Why can't we say I have opinion X. you have an opinion why and we don't want to kill each other to get the other person to believe. Why can't we agree to disagree? Why do we have to cut people out of our lives because they don't believe in the way we do. We have to step beyond this. We have to step above it; we have to say to ourselves, is this real. And even if this is real. Do I need to force everybody to agree with me?

As you can see I'm a huge Star Trek fans to huge Star Trek fan after watching it back in the late sixties or whatever seventies whenever was being shown on TV in in room and syndication a huge Star Trek the original series fan enemy answers fan TNG bubble but I'm a fan of all of the series and it's funny because it sometimes people are like oh my god this is horrible and that's horrible this is horrible and that's a really really horrible but the discovery or they hate lord actually had all these all these of the modern offshoots of Star Trek but I still think to myself you know what it's still Star Trek no matter what it is I will consume it I'm one of those true believers who thinks Star Trek is amazing ensure every generation has a different interpretation of it but the original series still has tons and tons of elements I've said it before I'm seein it is the number one cultural artifact which I believe has changed the course of human history more than anything else the original series Star Trek the original series send more people into stem than anybody else we wouldn't have flip phones would have smartphones would have a lot of the technology that we have today if it wasn't for people you know sitting at home watching Star Trek dreaming of this hopeful future hopeful future.

Still, underneath it all, there was this kernel of hope the portrayed if future that was better than our future, and if it didn't portray a future that was better than our future, say it did there was a war or whatever you still had the good guys fighting for a better future there was still that hope for better things right hope for better things, and that's that was there in every series of Star Trek up until discovery.

It's also super-dense with Star Trek lore you can tell like if you're a starter to believe or like me, you can tell that whoever has constructed this thing whoever's put this thing together is deep deep deep into the lower because they have their so many Easter eggs in that thing that refer to things like if you have you know like encyclopedia memory of the Star Trek universe like I do that seems to be the only thing I have a cycle Pedic memory of is the Star Trek universe.

Now that they've propelled themselves into a future beyond all of the other Star Trek canon, they can truly present a future which is beyond all that, which is what our futures of today can present because if you watch it, you will see things that I can completely believe where it will happen in the future of the Star Trek universe which is set in the year 123188 or something like that there are things that you will see on the show not to spoil that tell me that yes we're finally into our future.

Hello, this is your truth now I ask you. To. Take a little bit of trial takes a little bit of a test to watch anything at all on TV or social media or advertising or whatever as you. They are watching all of this media coming flowing at you. Let me ask you something. Maybe please, where is the white male. That's right is the where's Waldo plea where's the white male because in many many many of these new media news shows new movies and he was coming along I'm starting to see an absence of white males. White males are an endangered species. White males, if they are there at all, tend to be the bad guy is killing the first season of discovery where the white male captain, the hetero white male captain, turned out to be the bad guy. I just watched the first episode of discovery season 3, which is good I'll talk about the next show. I liked it. But once again, I thought to myself, okay, where are the white males? There are no white males on this show now in the future in the Ryans, and Dorian's and stuff like that. I'm sure that maybe white males underneath all that makeup, but I didn't see one white male. White males are endangered species. I guess they figure that, okay, you know white males and have the spotlight for way too long, so now it's time for everybody else in the spotlight, and white males can take a backseat. I mean, yeah, that's right, I forgot there are game males gateway males on sponsored or to cover discovery, but there are no more white males. Still, I digress, so yeah, next time, isn't you look around there just for fun? I don't know what you are, I don't know whether, and I don't care what you are but just for fun, see if you can spot the white male, it's like where's Waldo where's the white male is there when there is a win here there's one he's a lousy guy yeah that's right I forgot. My people, you know, there are lots of white males out there who are not the devil. They haven't killed anybody. They're not violent. They're just ordinary people like everybody else trying to get through the world. There's plenty of white males out there who are familiar. They're not running the show; they're not multi-millionaires. They're not, you know, they're just trying to take down everybody else they're not there for that. They want to live their lives, do their jobs, go home have a family bond bubble a lot. You know we people brown people black people Asian people we're all pretty much the same underneath it all we all want the same thing we all want to be happy we all want to live a life without pain and suffering we all want the same things but then when you see your culture disappearing you think yourself hang on a second. That's weird. Why can't we all get along? Why can't we all link arms? Why can't we all listen to it, and the case said in care about people because of their character and not because of their skin why do we have to eliminate? White males from all media. Is it necessary why can't we have an equal distribution of everybody?

Some people say KALABOUKIS you're always complaining about California you are saying California this California that California is bad California's awful you got that you got the socialism you got to poop you got the Ryan C. to get the fires you got isn't California horrible why do you want to continue living there.

Are you an authentic person? Are you thankful to everybody around you? Do you reveal your true self to everybody who's around you? Oh god, no, nobody does that. Everybody has a facade. Everybody has a percent nobody knows well maybe some people might share their innermost. Being with other people with their intimates but most of the time, 90 percent of the time, we're all presenting a facade to the rest of the world I'm presenting of sub right now stress what I'm trying to be open on something about my conversations. However, I still have a facade I even don't I always can't talk about some of the issues that I feel deeply because I know that they're not going to be socially acceptable; I still need to live in this world right. So that's the thing that the reality is that we are none of us are 100 percent authentic we all display different facades to different individuals various social media other this different than in this one of the beautiful things about social media this allows you to create an entirely different persona for this media that meaning I could be like this for this I can be like that for that so the reality is is that nobody is authentic nobody's authentic all we're seeing is that let tiny little slice that we're allowing other people to know about us now a lot of times people don't think about that too hard they figure okay I'm going to reveal this summer revealed item shows some tell that. Still, we can't do that anymore because the internet is forever, like all this stuff stays around forever, I mean maybe profoundly buried and hidden. Still, it's around forever, so we have to be more judicious about how we present ourselves in social media and to the rest of the world. We need to be. More thoughtful about how we present ourselves we need to be more in tune with the kinds of facades of personas that we present on the internet because if you think about it especially nowadays because of it and everybody being remote this that you see here is me to you this is me it's not me meeting you in person and giving you a handshake and padding on the back or whatever this is me this square that I'm in is how you know me now and how most people know me now because of the lack of being able to personally communicate with people so this is as far as you're concerned my authentic self but have you manage yourself like this do you manage yourself persona by persona based on each type of social media that you're part of no these are different versions of you you need to be more thoughtful. About how you present yourself the words some people are really great at it but maybe you should think about it a bit more before you present things the world remembers everything that you put out there it's out there forever.

 have a weight problem all my life. Well, I was a teenager before that. I was a pretty skinny kid. I was a pretty skinny tall kid until I became I went through puberty. Then I got fat, and I've been struggling and struggling with weight loss all of my life, and recently since the start of coated, strangely enough, I've been able to lose about 30-35 almost 40 pounds in about 15 pounds away from my goal weight. And I have tried every stinking diet under the sun I have tried keto, I have tried paleo I have tried Atkins I have tried this that the other thing I have tried almost every single solitary diet and exercise that has ever been out there I remember the oil diet that's right folks I used to drink a shot glass of oil in the morning there was just such a missile me crazy nice I tried. There was that the master cleanse diet where had lemon and cayenne pepper. Oh my god, I tried this in the cabbage soup diet I tried even that all these diets I tried hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of diets over all this time. I still haven't been able to keep the weight off right until May when I found Newman. I'm not promoting noon because it's an app and what it did is it taught me about blocking my food and restricting my calories. I've always wanted to try it like a severe calorie restriction to see if it would work because I'm also interested in life extension. I know that calorie restriction folks are also into like stanchion. It turns out that you know when they do studies with mice and other animals where they restrict the kill calories restrict the clerical or entry, then they end up living longer. So I've always wanted to experiment with it, but I've never really had the impetus. I finally said you know what this is done? I'm going to pay the money; I'm going to get a new home in a minute. Track my calories now. We assume they tell you how many calories you're allowed per day. It depends on how much you've exercised because of the tracks your steps a Traxxas attract that track all of the stuff. He gave me, you know, 1200 to 1400 calorie window, which is the course and much less than I've been eating, so I tried that for a while and then I realize that it wasn't losing anyway, so you know what I said I said well I'm at this already wants to try to reduce it, even more, when I try to hit maybe about 1000 calories a day that was the magic number for me at 1000 calories a day between 900 and 1100 calories a day I lost weight

So if you ask me, I think the liberal white allies of these people of color are worse than the people of color themselves or give you a case in point, but there are so many of these examples out there. I'm going to start with the local area to me here, so there is an area in San Jose that's right now called Japantown. And V. that that area used to be the Chinatown in San Jose and then eventually Japanese distances to go took over so that area's been primarily Asian for probably about 100 years but when an American first owned that area I think is a German American I believe his name is Hickenlooper or something like that and. This area is just redeveloped and will be condos in there, and it's going to be a park. And the contention is with the naming of the park to the park is in Japantown. The buildings are in Japantown business areas in Japantown, so the Japantown association of businesses got together in the Chinatown association of businesses the 2 Asian groups that were have been in that area for 100 years got together and said, you know what we want to name this park because the park needs to be called we want to name this park. After the guy who gave us the land to build Chinatown and eventually depend on how we want to name this Hickenlooper park, I think it's something like that. But the guy who's running the parks department, an old white guy said owner. We have too many things that are named after old white guys, so I suggest we call it something Asian like Sakura Park, which is Japanese cherry blossoms the Japanese and the Chinese were offended they said why would we want to name our park after that when we feel that the guy who gave us the land he gave us the ground needs to be honored. We don't care if he's a white guy. We want to celebrate the guy who helped us out and gave us the land. The white parts guy is the owner. No, I'm on your side here. I don't know why you're making this decision. I don't know what you're thinking. That is a good idea to name it after a white guy. Let's call its socket apart now. It's the point I don't know what it's going to be 8. Still, you see what I'm saying here you've got the ethnic groups who have made a decision based on their own. The conclusion preferences that they want to name a park after a white person; it is the old white guy saying to this ethnic group Hey, you shouldn't do that because I think there are too many places named after. White people, I mean what we say here. Do you believe that the ethnic group should be offended that this white guy tells them what they should name their park in both the Japanese and the Chinese groups is saying why we should call it sucked up? There's no connection. There's no history we want to honor the man who gave us the land, so why can't we name it? This is the ethnic group. These are the Asians that have the lander on the ground have been on the land for hundreds of years or 100 years. They want to name it Hickenlooper park. But the old white guy who's in power now I guess he figures that he's just doing it for their excellent because maybe in the future they might not want to be named after a white guy but are you seeing this everywhere? This is the same thing where ever you are the red skins the NBA B. O. M. you can look at pictures of BLM right now is there 99 percent white liberals guilty white liberals its allies folks it's the white allies of these people of color who are causing most of the problems the people themselves don't care if you ask native Americans do you have a problem with the word Washington Redskins they'll probably say no it honors us do you have a problem with the Atlanta Braves no that celebrates us right with that that brings us into the conversation. What these people what these white allies want to do is they want to. In a colonial way, it eliminates.

RAW TRANSCRIPT:

I'm usually not very offended. I'm not very at. I don't get offended by a lot because I'm like, you know people can try to insult me. I don't get offended, but the other day I got a little offended, just a little offended, so I went into a restaurant here recently, a recently opened restaurant. And I had to use the restroom, which was this month's bags before pre cove it. Hence, everything was normal. Everybody could get their water and sit in their seats, whatever touring for food. I had to use the restroom, so I go to where the restrooms are in a C. 2 restaurants, and what do I see? I see a women's restroom. I see an all-gender restroom, and I don't see a men's room, and I'm like, okay, I guess I have to be. I guess I'm locked into the all-gender restroom, right? I guess this is during a time when California is mandating all-gender restrooms. So. Now barely that was struck down, so you know what, I don't understand any of this. I don't see why we have to have this or that or whatever, but you know, if it makes people uncomfortable to be in restrooms where the people may have different genitalia, then why don't we just defined the restrooms by genitalia right since then the men's room and a ladies room or men's room in a women's room let's have a penis room and a vagina room I mean I don't know what you got under there so let's put a P. on the room with the people who have a P. Ellis put it V. on the room with the people who have a V. or you know just stylized penis OR vagina and then you know then there's no more you know on clarity. Hence, if you're at a trans man and have a penis, then go into the penis room if you are a trans female. You have a vagina go to the vagina for right, then it's all clear we don't need to have all-gender this gender that we have a room into the dining room and if you have neither then. I don't know, are you both? I don't know, but you know that's a tiny piece of the population, so all of us, I mean, almost 100 percent of us have a P. or a V, right? So if you get a P, go in there. If you get a V. going there, I don't know which got under there. That's the only thing people care about, so why not just relabel the bathrooms or the washrooms just like that.