
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, hosts Savannah Eccles Johnston and Matthew Brogdon examine the presidential veto — what it is, what it isn’t, and why it remains one of the most potent constitutional powers in modern governance.
They dissect the mechanics of Article I, Section 7, and explain the differences between the qualified veto (which Congress can override) and the pocket veto (which Congress cannot). Along the way, they revisit presidential losers like Andrew Johnson, discover why Reagan and Clinton both wanted a line-item veto and explore why even the threat of a veto is often more powerful than the veto itself.
Plus, a special focus on the institutional tug-of-war that defines the separation of powers and how the veto isn’t just a tool for lawmaking, but a key part of constitutional interpretation.
In This Episode
Notable Quotes
[00:02:06] “The president can veto a bill, subject to two-thirds override, but the word ‘veto’ doesn’t even appear in the Constitution.” — Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:04:29] “The pocket veto isn’t in your face. It’s like, ‘Oops, I forgot to act and now all your legislative effort is dead.’” — Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:11:24] “This almost feels like an absolute veto because you could never muster the political will to override it.” — Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:24:30] “Congress can’t get its house in order, so they ask the president to run it for them.”
— Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:29:14] “Sometimes a veto message gets overridden, but the constitutional argument inside it eventually wins.” — Matthew Brogdon
[00:31:00] “The constitutional system is structured so that each branch has to interpret the Constitution for itself.” — Matthew Brogdon
Resources and Links
This Constitution
Savannah Eccles Johnston
Matthew Brogdon
By Savannah Eccles Johnston & Matthew Brogdon5
1818 ratings
In this episode, hosts Savannah Eccles Johnston and Matthew Brogdon examine the presidential veto — what it is, what it isn’t, and why it remains one of the most potent constitutional powers in modern governance.
They dissect the mechanics of Article I, Section 7, and explain the differences between the qualified veto (which Congress can override) and the pocket veto (which Congress cannot). Along the way, they revisit presidential losers like Andrew Johnson, discover why Reagan and Clinton both wanted a line-item veto and explore why even the threat of a veto is often more powerful than the veto itself.
Plus, a special focus on the institutional tug-of-war that defines the separation of powers and how the veto isn’t just a tool for lawmaking, but a key part of constitutional interpretation.
In This Episode
Notable Quotes
[00:02:06] “The president can veto a bill, subject to two-thirds override, but the word ‘veto’ doesn’t even appear in the Constitution.” — Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:04:29] “The pocket veto isn’t in your face. It’s like, ‘Oops, I forgot to act and now all your legislative effort is dead.’” — Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:11:24] “This almost feels like an absolute veto because you could never muster the political will to override it.” — Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:24:30] “Congress can’t get its house in order, so they ask the president to run it for them.”
— Savannah Eccles Johnston
[00:29:14] “Sometimes a veto message gets overridden, but the constitutional argument inside it eventually wins.” — Matthew Brogdon
[00:31:00] “The constitutional system is structured so that each branch has to interpret the Constitution for itself.” — Matthew Brogdon
Resources and Links
This Constitution
Savannah Eccles Johnston
Matthew Brogdon

22,021 Listeners

78,326 Listeners

8,764 Listeners

1,135 Listeners

1,559 Listeners

5,476 Listeners

599 Listeners

6,073 Listeners

660 Listeners

68,563 Listeners

989 Listeners

370 Listeners

26,636 Listeners

2,434 Listeners

1,538 Listeners