Shake the Tree

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para 27.

I have a loft full of box files, that leave no doubt I’ve so tried to retain faith in the UK justice process. Sadly on taking account of the results, all would come to my conclusion, the UK justice process has but one aim.

To take from the blue collar worker, and pass to the white collar worker. Frankly I’m realistic, those in the judiciary often have long stressful days, of course they won’t be sleeping on a concrete floor at the delivery end of a Heidelberg, but they do work hard, all the same.

But the corruption and deception cannot be disguised, the noticeable change in recent years, like most of UK society, it is worse, or better, being dependant what side of the fence you are on.

Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's 26.

It is impossible to put into context how one feels about being forced to leave ones home of 26 years. I could say at the moment that is just a threat, but it feels real enough to me. I believe you better understand situations if you have been through them, so here I am understanding how those to be evicted may feel. Hopefully it will make me a better landlord, although my two commercial tenant’s, that haven’t paid a single penny in rent for 3 months, are not likely to gain my sympathy. As they, and the likeminded, are partly the reason I’m in this situation.

Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's, Several.

Every thing in life has to be in context. And these few paragraphs put my position and stance into context. If I say I have been screwed by the judiciary, I will have provided detail that justifies that comment.

Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's 2-10.

As it says on the tin, but all is not how it appears, there is in fact zero arrears, in fact over payments have been made, since the mortgage was taken out. But that is not how Barclays want it to look.

Kevin Lamin.

The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's A-K.

This is the background to the environment, that the UK judiciary expects landlord’s to operate within. Which is simply not sustainable.

What the government has allowed the judiciary to do, is to pass the cost of a tenants failure to the landlord. Most of what is written here is so absurd it is not believable. But it leaves no doubt the judiciary are not the solution, they are part of the problem.

I am absolutely willing to have anybody tell me I have this all wrong and just need to open my eyes to the good the judiciary are doing, please do help me see that if you are able to do so.

Kevin Lamin.

Ironically this is not about arrears, in fact to the contrary, as despite a 4 fold increase in the monthly interest due, over payments were maintained.

But Barclays Bank’s stance is, the term has expired, and we want the loan repaid, now..

Yep that is right, Barclays are a Bank, thus they will, on the repayment of the money, via Barclays gaining possession of another home, they will simply lend the money to someone else...

It’s very likely, someone with a higher risk of default, and at a lower rate. In fact for comparison, today I saw HSBC where offering the same rate, being 6.6%, on a period loan, likely being unsecured.

So, Shake the Tree, has looked into this situation, done sums, comparisons and equations. And taken a view on the deception and advised the court and the Judges, they need to be mindful, of their complicity in perjury and fraud.

The BIG question is, will the Judges heed the warning, all fall in line with the multi nationals, as the courts and Judges did with Fujitsu and the Post Office...

You will of course, have a grasp on the Post Office scandal, which showed how woefully poor the UK justice process is.

So how will a UK Judge respond, to the deception used by Barclays Bank, in their blatant aim to re-possess a borrowers home.. In this case the borrower has offered vast quarterly repayments, which Barclays have declined, yet they have told the court they have sought a resolution.

That is an act of perjury and fraud, thus the courts have been advised of such, and they will be observed from every angle... Judges consider they are untouchable, trust me they are not.. Judges are no other then highly paid servants of the state, and they must serve the state is what they are expected to do..

Or they will end up behind bars, just as the common person does, who fall’s foul of that expected of them..

This Pod, like many on STT, illustrates just how poor the UK justice process is..

Content by; Shake the Tree..

Email at will: [email protected]

In England, fraud is a criminal offence. To the extent, a colleague gained a substantial prison sentence, for gaining reward; that (may), have gone to another. In reality the reward, would have (likely gone nowhere). But putting others, (at risk of a loss), was deemed by a London city Judge & Jury, as an act of Fraud.

The claimant assumes, the same laws apply, in Northampton, as in London. As the only UK’s Fraud reporting hub, Action Fraud London, is evidently stretched. The claimant work’s, with intent to maintain, a cohesive society, to reflect UK law.

Barclays Bank plc, take a customer of 25 years, to the precipice..!! After ignoring their customer’s 20,000 words of detail, providing a situation explanation, and on Barclays further refusing several offers, to pay off a circa  ¼ of 1 million pound historic loan. Barclays response has been; only the whole immediate repayment will suffice, regardless of however that is achieved. The borrower has offered substantial sums, which have gained, no other than a generic response from Barclays. Barclays in preference to accepting one of multiple offers, have opted to evict their customer, from their home, a client who, from June 2023, paid Barclays £17,000 interest, in 12 months. So lets see where this stance gets Barclays, and how UK Judges, respond to Barclays desire to regain a capital sum, gained by the procession of a property, (the home of 25 years, of one of their clients), so Barclays can then lend, the same sum to another, at a likely lower rate. It is a strange world we live in... but we do need to ask such questions, of those who manage society on our behalf...

Parts 1, 2 & 3, detail corporate deception, by West Northants Council, and shows how their highway policy, breaches the 2006 Fraud Act. It further shows, the council have ironically encouraged their engaged, (to include their employees), to be complicit in thousands of acts of Fraud.

The Parts also leave no doubt, the UK judiciary are also seen to encourage deception & fraud. Such consequentially shows, that the UK’s own judiciary, are creating societal may-ham. But of most importance, is that this detail and other of Shake the Tree’s detail shows. The UK government, is absent of what is required to build & sustain a cohesive society. And that the last thing the UK need’s is another Barrister as our  PM... So please vote REFORM, as the UK, desperately need such, as evidently the Cons, Labs & Libs, are soiled goods, also being clueless.

If you take issue of that said, please do email; [email protected]

Parts 1, 2 & 3, detail corporate deception, by West Northants Council, and shows how their highway policy, breaches the 2006 Fraud Act. It further shows, the council have ironically encouraged their engaged, (to include their employees), to be complicit in thousands of acts of Fraud. Parts 1, 2, & 3, also leave no doubt, the UK judiciary are also seen to encourage deception & fraud. Such consequentially shows, that the UK’s own judiciary, are creating societal may-ham. But of most importance, is that this detail and other of Shake the Tree’s detail shows. The UK government, is absent of what is required to build & sustain a cohesive society. And that the last thing the UK need’s is another Barrister as our  PM... So please vote REFORM, as the UK, desperately need such, as evidently the Cons, Labs & Libs, are soiled goods, also being clueless.

If you take issue of that said, please do email; [email protected] .