1st Contributor: Paula, Vennells, CBE – positions held; CEO of the Post Office, resigning in 2021, she had worked for; L’Oreal, Dixons, Argos, & Whitbread. Whilst in leadership roles requiring dedication, Paula took time-out, to train & become a Deacon in 2005, & a Priest in 2006, this is mentioned, as it gives her a likely position, in the House of Lords, (God help us all, comes to mind). That said, Paula’s membership, of the Churches Ethical Investment Advisory Group, has now been terminated.   

2nd Contributor: Joanne, Kate Swinson, CBE, F R A S, – positions held; MP, and Liberal Democrat Leader, (all be it, for a short period). Prior to such, Joanne Swinson, was a spokesperson for Women & Equality. Joanne, has been described, as the most inept, of the recent Post Office minister’s.  

3rd Contributor: Sir Edward, Jonathan Davey, F R S A – positions held; MP, Post Office Minister, the current Liberal Democrat Leader. Here’s a taster, of Sir Edward Davey’s, principals. When 500 post masters, were fighting a class action, against the Post Office, Sir Edward Davey MP, was paid £5,000 a month, I understand gaining circa £250,000. Simply for, information sharing with Fujitsu... As; www dot law, dot com, said on; 17 Nov 2021, — Liberal Democrat party leader, Ed Davey, resigned from his role at, Herbert Smith Freehills Solicitor’s, as such had become, an unwelcome focus for Parliament. I emphasise, at that time, Herbert Smith Freehills, were defending the Post Office, against a Postmaster’s class action. I say Ed Davey, should be thrown to the wolves, if his digestion is an issue, I’ll eat, Ed, myself. Sir Edward Davey, Liberal Democrat leader, should as a minimum, be sacked, & disqualified as an MP, & then prosecuted, for complicity in perjury, theft & fraud, or are  MP’s, exempt from law breaking.

4th Contributor: Sir Tony, Blair, – positions held; MP, 1994-2007, leader of the Labour party & UK Prime Minister from 97 to 2007. His Fujitsu comparability is detailed later. This is the Sir Tony Blair, who gave us new, PFI hospitals, that 2 decades on, cost half a billion a year, in interest payments, & a further 2.3 billion in, cleaning & maintenance. Ironically, PFI halted in 2018, when the provider Carillion, collapsed.

Barclays Bank, can (in 6 minutes), further explain to the court, the benefit to society, or to Barclays, of Barclays trying to forcibly redeem a loan, from a customer of 2 decades, to loan to a new customer, at a lower rate. The reader should note, all detailed here, has already been conveyed to Barclays Bank, as early as the summer of 2023, and evidently Barclays have continued to ignore what the law of the land asks of them, with Barclays being like the Post Office, preferring to intimidate others via their financial advantage.. Barclays should take note, I am not, a gentle Post Master, open to corporate manipulation...

Just a 4 minute introduction to the detail in DvL Parts 1, 2, & 3, being extensive, & it showing, Susan Rust, Sali Brown, Christian Halls & Edwina Lane, were instrumental & complicit in theft, perjury & fraud. As defined by those Acts, with Fraud, being a loss to Kevin Lamin, being ongoing, as Kevin continues to have sustained a loss, due to the named.

This Podcast further advises the named what action will follow and provides links to the three parts. It is anticipted those charged with theft, perjury and fraud will replicate the particular behaviour of a large Australian flightless bird...

Blatant lying by professional females, (is now a non event, as Baroness Michelle Mone, has just shown). And the UK judiciary has been rewarding liars since time began, many examples available. DvL, shows with out doubt, you can’t believe a word said by (female) Susan Rust. And on, Edwina (female) & Christian grasping the M.D., Sali Brown’s (female) witness statement, (available on request), they will concur, Sali fabricated pivotal matters, making Edwina & Christian complicit.

4,831 words, 26 minutes - Like many, being a self determinant manager of time. Not the Pot Hole, aka (pot’s), but the one who came across it. I like others have daily tasks & distractions, some foreseen, some imposed, & some spontaneous. But what they all demand, is resource of time or money, being one of the same in this era.  And it is the United Nations, who define that one’s liberty is compromised, on not being able to use one’s time, how one chooses.. Otherwise one is being deprived of liberty. Thus one that deprives another, of their liberty, are in breach of the Human Rights Act of 1998..

Whilst PART 1, drilled down into the character of the defendants, and their motivation. PART 2, associated the defendants, a Sali Brown MD (of Chelton Brown Ltd., D1), a Susan Rust, D2, (of Custard Creative Ltd.), a solicitor Nick Phillips, NP, (of Toller’s LLP) with District Judge Glassbrook, (DJG). All are seen to have used deception, to impose a monetary & time loss, on a claimant, being a plaintiff, PL, being Kevin Lamin, KL, of Northampton. In PART 2, solicitor’s firm Goodchild Vizard & Smart, (GVS), of Northampton, joined the fold, evidently also looking for notoriety, via exposure by, “Shake the Tree”. GVS ironically being another deluded female, also a friend of, Sali Brown, the MD of Chelton Brown Ltd., D1.  Who coincidentally recommended that Susan Rust D2, used GVS, in the sales transaction, in the referred to, jointly owned property.

 

PART 3, is dependant on that conveyed in Parts 1 & 2, so do PLEASE, adsorb the PARTS in order. As it is seen, the individuals have lied, & or, manipulated processes, or others, to impose a substantial loss, on the property co-owner KL, being D2’s ex-partner, & business associate for 15 years. For no apparent definable reason, other than malice. The legal term for Kevin Lamin, PL’s & Susan Rust, D2’s, relationship was, they were inexplicably linked. As shown, Susan Rust D2, decided in 2010, she no longer valued that link. And as PL often anticipates likelihood, (as that’s been PL’s job for 3 decades), it was of no surprise that D2’s behaviour led her, to be band, as much as one can be banned, from a whole village. As PL is now warning D1 & D2, there behaviour is likely to do as PL, specifically recalls in 2010, advising D2, whilst in PL’s walled garden. That such choices, may change ones life beyond recognition, clearly D2, thought that would be for the better, as D2 chose, to de-couple, in circa 2010, 2011.. But here we are, in 2023, with the stakes for D1 & D2, elevated into the stratosphere, & as all know, you mess with that, & it’s the end of days. they’ve been warned.

Whilst, Deception versus Liberty, PART 1, drilled down into the character of the defendants, and their motivation. PART 2, circa 30 minutes, associates the defendants, a Sali Brown MD (of Chelton Brown Ltd., D1), a Susan Rust D2, (of Custard Creative Ltd.), a solicitor Nick Phillips NP, (of Toller’s LLP), with District Judge Glassbrook, DJG. Who all used deception, to knowingly impose a greater monetary, & a time loss, on a claimant, a Kevin Lamin PL, of Northampton, England. In PART 2, they are joined by another solicitor’s firm, Goodchild Vizard & Smart (GVS), of Northampton, who is evidently looking for notoriety, via exposure by “Shake the Tree”. Ironically another deluded female, being a friend of, Sali Brown, the MD of the rental estate agent, Chelton Brown Ltd., D1 of Northampton. Who recommended that Susan Rust D2, should use GVS.

3.        Other than the stupid, all, will have known, that pre & post their action, at stake was, defrauding another of their liberty. The composer pens, as 1 who’s been adversely effected, particularly by female deception, financially & otherwise. Thus the composer rightly has zero tolerance, with those aiming to gain, by restricting another’s liberty, regardless of their gain, loss, or their status...

4.        To re-quote the orator; Doctor Jorden Peterson, a clinical psychologist said, of his 12 rules of life, prior to a speech at the O2 Arena in London, on 2nd November 2023. “Western Civilisation would benefit, by embracing the truth”. Whilst, Doctor Jorden Peterson, promotes adherence, “Shake the Tree”, provides examples, of how costly, deception is to our civilisation.

There will be no winners in this matter, just stressed females, unable to grasp the magnitude of their deception, with a cool male solicitor & a Judge, who collect their Friday pay cheques. All have ignored the risks that the females, are imposing on themselves. Deception & lying, is a scourge on society, & typically associated with those seen as, “low life”. “Shake the Tree” shows, professionals at all levels, use deception & fraud, with zero concern of accountability, for their self gain.

Words 1,200 - Minutes 7.

As this matter shows, taking that which is not yours, can be costly. If a property owner, takes what they know to be another’s, then they will have to humble them selves, & return, that which is not theirs, to it’s rightful owner... at no cost to the owner.  Whether that be, another’s chattels, or another’s right of way. If they do not.!! They will learn, that deceiving another in the UK, is against the 2006 Fraud Act, and in the UK,

Fraud is a criminal offence..!!

At some point, one needs to halt data submissions, when its evident, its recipients, Barclays Bank plc, are simply ignoring the data.

Email Header, for MTE 06, author & copyright: Kevin Lamin. 26 th November 2023...

At some point, most will be required to submit financial data, & most will simply conform. As did most of RBS’s business customers, to include Chiman Patel, a director of Sykes Chemists, who’d been with RBS for 35 years, building a network of 5 Pharmacies, employing 60 staff. But that mattered not to RBS, who destroyed Chiman Patel’s business, and his life, in the 2008, 2009, financial scandal.  Then there are others, a rare breed, who foresee where a process will lead, & instantly weigh up risk, & benefit, & they can gauge, who will benefit from such compliance.

2,949 words, 20 mins. - Banks lend a client money for 20 years, and they are delighted to do so. But come term end, suddenly, lending money appears an alien process to the Bank, & as the American country music artist, Sammy Kershaw’s song, of January 2003 title says. "I, Want, My Money Back".  The Banks likely have good reason for this, but the Banks behaviour & actions, is contrary to societal cohesion, & what’s more of a surprise, contrary to them gaining profit, likely via a raised interest rate, and via lending at a lower than usual risk, and having a lower associated lending costs.. Which is further explained at the end of this detail.