Shake the Tree

This is; an Audio & Readable version, of a individual’s private action, being taken against council engaged, who’s defrauded a citizen. The defendants costs, just to read & respond, will cost many times their, momentary benefit. The Councils policy and process is so, that most citizens, simply could do no other than mitigate their loss. So such is blatant deception by the state, carried out by the named individuals, who will be seen, to have knowingly colluded, to defraud thousands of citizens. The claimant has found, when dispute detail, is  in the public domain, the time and costs of the dispute are reduced.

Do ensure you take in Parts 2 and 3..

Rent can be likened to HP payments. As so, it is not the monthly payment that define the overall cost. Its the term and agreement conditions which define the cost. As one would not expect to pay the same amount on having a fully repairing and insuring lease, when compared to one not have the same obligation. And the following podcast illustrates how a tenants focus can be focused on the short term, with an expectation that that the two alternative options can be directly compared.. When it is simply not pragmatic to do so.. This podcast should leave one in no doubt, there is clear water between the tow parallels..

The detail in the documents, provides reason, why such action has been taken. But in the round, (1) citizens should respect, the reasonable rights of others. (2) citizens should respect the environment they use and occupy, which they will pass on to others. (3) citizens should not, further their progress, at a cost to others, via corruption & deception. (4) citizens on seeing such is occurring, should report such to the authority, in the hope that the authorities, have the resource to discourage, that which UK rules, & laws deem, is as a minimum, anti social behaviour. (5) Hopefully on citizens reporting such, UK society, will not, continue to decline.

I’ve decided to take this dilemma out of your hand’s. Thus I’ve detailed my analysis of the situation, and relayed it to the D V S A. Who will likely investigate, how your most recent MOT test station, has certified a vehicle, as road worthy and compliant, when it was evident, that the vehicle, whether in motion or static, could do no other, than constantly leak oil onto the highway. And as that on its own, defines a fail, I will hound the D V S A, until they for fill their societal responsibility. Clearly, my agenda, is to have your Land Rover, K573 URY, moved off the highway, & certainly out of Lichfield Close, Kislingbury, Northants. Save your vehicle, being parked, on your own property.

We the DVSA, investigate reports, to make sure MOT testers, and operators, meet the rules set out in the..

Road Traffic Act of 1988.

Well, "lets see if that is what they do.." ??

This is a brief 5 minute open letter, to Council’s, & UK citizens. It’s best absorbed with, or before, “How to sue the Council, Part’s 1 & 2”.

Which provides guidance on why & how, those imposing & encouraging the deception, (being the Council & Judiciary), must be tackled.

There’s now multiple UK wide entities, doing that detailed, by imposing a loss on UK citizens. On a council, having or composing such a policy, they are breaching the fraud act of 2006, & enticing their employees & contractors, to be complicit in fraud. Yet to enforce, a highway repair policy, flouting U.K. law, is beyond stupidity, being arrogant, when it’s existence, breaches the Fraud Act.

If you wonder, who’s going to prevent such deception..??. then read on..

This episode, explains how the UK judiciary, view and treat a claimants evidence..

You'll likely be disappointed, how highly paid servants of the state, aka, UK County Court Judges...

Do tell Shake the Tree, what you think.. ??

1.       This is an open letter, that contains the detail required; to take a council to the county court, on a council having breached the fraud act of 2006. Councils, across the country, are doing so, by imposing a loss on U.K. citizens. Yet no council, should have, compose, or aim to enforce, a highway repair policy, that flouts U.K. law.

2.       The detail further clarifies, how the UK has got itself into this dire mess. With many examples of highly paid servants of the state, repeatedly failing to measure their own performance, whilst dictating how other citizens, should measure theirs.

3.       On reading between the lines, you will note, there is no difference, in the delivery of justice, between the major parties. You will further see, education and intelligence, have little to do with the delivery, of reasonable and just, societal rules and laws.

4.       For a council, to defend a fraud claim, it may cost them circa £20,000. But it may, also cost a council, significantly more.  At some point the penny will drop, I’ll keep all updated on that. The risk to the claimant is less, than when using the small claims, money claim process, for multiple, complex reasons. Again updates will be provided as the clock ticks.

5.       However, I’m not after the council per-say, it’s their employees, or contractors who action the fraud, thinking as a council operative, they’ve an entitlement, to defraud their relatives, neighbours, friends & any unfortunate citizen, (some of whom, will be working 2 or 3 jobs, just to survive). Fraud is carried out by people, not by an entity.

6.       A delivery driver, on stepping into a company van, still has to adhere to the law. Likewise an administrator, needs to adhere to the law, even when in front of a works, P. C. I could better illustrate that, but I’m sure the recipient of this detail, gets the inference.

7.       In my home town of Northampton, it has got to the point, drivers anxiety levels & their mental health, are being impacted, as well as their pockets. I am hearing of increased numbers of citizens, selling, or changing their vehicles, for truck type transport.

8.       Sadly as with so many issues, Judges & the judiciary as a whole, are seen to encourage poor behaviour, (being complicit) in anything which may help grow the solicitors & barristers money tree. And like many other sectors, those within, Zip it, or their career’s would be over. But do have no doubt, their are many, from the judiciary, from Judges downwards, in prison for abuse of their position, but evidently, not enough.

9.       When I promoted, it was evident, that a top London barrister, with 1 of the largest UK solicitor firms, under the eyes of 7 county court judges, had ignored the industry standard dilapidation, PAP CD rules, in addition to flouting other rules & laws. And their evidence, showed, they’d severe impairments, or their actions, should earn them a prison term.

10.    The solicitor’s firm responded; by serving a bankruptcy order, for a £35,000 bill, they had just issued. That bill was only due, as the solicitors firm, a London barrister & 8 county court Judges, flouted government rules, and used blatant deception and fraud, simply to line the pockets of the same.. The same will gain, court papers during 2024...

11.    It goes without, few, have the time or financial resource, to explore or promote, such as state corruption. But when one sees the likes of Paula Vennels, & Fujitsu, slaughtering vulnerable, Post Office Masters. A spot-light, needs to be put on the states process, that allows & encourages, such to occur.  The fault mainly lies, at the door of the UK Judiciary.

12.    Don’t blame the government, as with the dilapidation PAP CD rules. A Gov' department can publish, simple & concise guidance. But on arrogant, self-serving solicitors, barristers & Judges, ignoring the rules, to suit them. It would need a very articulate being to counter the Judiciary.

Since my losses, my dogs, and I, have been trying to rebuild our lives, and find purpose and happiness. My main purpose in life since, has been to look after the babies, Abby and Reuben. As I’d promised, my wife Christine, I’d do just that! My role was to keep them both happy, and safe...!

a. This is a Procast to: Expose; how West Northamptonshire Council, (aka WNC), steals our days, the equivalent of, some folks annual holiday, while charging us for all their services, which they don’t adequately provide. WNC, deem, each time we venture out in our vehicles, we are at risk of a greater cost, than our likely weekly earnings. WNC, deem, they have a right to cause drivers extreme anxiety and cost, without any redress. WNC, say, their policy deems that is reasonable.

b.      We can either suck-it-up, or we can stand up. Most will have to do the forma, as they won’t have the resource to stand up, to the WNC’s onerous process. In other words, those hard at work will be exploited, by their own Council, who say. You can use the highway at your own risk, & WNC expect, your monitory & time budget, to be limitless. This is a council, who are buying up homes, solely to house those, who have likely paid zero tax, since illegally arriving on our island..   

c.       WNC say, a journey in your car, may deprive you, of 2, 3, 4, or as much as, the equivalent of your annual holiday in time, or the option of a circa £1,000 bill. Shake the Tree says, enough, let’s see, what our UK Judges, have to say about that situation. Shake the Tree say, WNC are exploiting their position, and WNC are defrauding those unfortunate, to have collided with a highway pothole.

d.      Facts to contemplate, almost without exception, highway repairs, cost less, the sooner they are dealt with. And cost more, the longer they are left. What they never do, is repair them self. What they always do, is damage vehicles, to varying extents, that collide with them.  

e.      Further the vehicle damage, will likely cost more, than the pothole repair, and if WNC defend a vehicle damage claim, they will gain legal costs, likely 10 times the vehicle repair sum, which is likely 3 times, the likely pothole repair sum.

f.        This is a situation, the Council can fix, or County Court Judges can fix, or it will be likely fixed by disgruntled vehicle owners, likely throwing, their blown-out, burning tyres, at council buildings.

g.      What can’t continue, is for potholes on the highway, that as a minimum will damage vehicles, at their worst will result in the deaths of those, likely to be travelling on two wheels. Naturally potholes represent, a very high risk, to the ever more popular, small wheeled scooters.

h.      One should ask the question, does the councils insurance policy, pay out for deaths on the highway, but not, the multiple vehicle damage claims, which promote, deaths by potholes, are imminent.? 

i.        An adverse effect of a poor highway surface, is the public will gradually transition to huge, heavy vehicles, with huge pothole busting wheels & tyres, which produce, 2 to 3 times, the emissions of a small town car, and of course, such heavy vehicles will result in even greater highway decay.

So, that’s the associated facts, and covers, as the following podcast’s forward..