
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


It turns out your favorite artist is a monster. Say they committed murder, advocated genocide, or engaged in some other act so outside the scope of a dignified, respectable society that it cannot be redeemed. What now? Must you throw the art out with the artists? It's a question at the heart of both pop culture and high art critique. For some, a work of art is an entity in itself. It should be appreciated and revered without regard to the life of its creator. If we disregard all great art for the sins of the artists, we risk losing many of the world's greatest cultural touchstones and masterpieces. But for others, the act of supporting a work of art translates directly affirming its creator's evil acts. In this timeless debate, we ask: Should we separate the art from the artist?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21062,106 ratings
It turns out your favorite artist is a monster. Say they committed murder, advocated genocide, or engaged in some other act so outside the scope of a dignified, respectable society that it cannot be redeemed. What now? Must you throw the art out with the artists? It's a question at the heart of both pop culture and high art critique. For some, a work of art is an entity in itself. It should be appreciated and revered without regard to the life of its creator. If we disregard all great art for the sins of the artists, we risk losing many of the world's greatest cultural touchstones and masterpieces. But for others, the act of supporting a work of art translates directly affirming its creator's evil acts. In this timeless debate, we ask: Should we separate the art from the artist?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,126 Listeners

6,754 Listeners

3,968 Listeners

5,090 Listeners

10,740 Listeners

3,395 Listeners

783 Listeners

26,369 Listeners

4,267 Listeners

1,117 Listeners

904 Listeners

2,315 Listeners

789 Listeners

7,080 Listeners

16,085 Listeners