
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On this episode of Unprecedented, Michael Popok and Dina Sayegh Doll discuss the decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which effectively dismantles the landmark Voting Rights Act and ushers in a new era of politics that could disenfranchise millions of Black voters. The Supreme Court also heard oral arguments this week in a case that will decide whether Kristi Noem’s decision to cancel Temporary Protected Status for Haitian and Syrian immigrants is unreviewable, as the Trump administration argues, or a discriminatory action taken without the legally required process, as the plaintiffs contend. In addition, the Justices tackled the legality of law enforcement searches and uses geofence data, and what criteria should be required for a warrant to avoid constituting an unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
By Dina Doll and Michael Popok4.9
5454 ratings
On this episode of Unprecedented, Michael Popok and Dina Sayegh Doll discuss the decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which effectively dismantles the landmark Voting Rights Act and ushers in a new era of politics that could disenfranchise millions of Black voters. The Supreme Court also heard oral arguments this week in a case that will decide whether Kristi Noem’s decision to cancel Temporary Protected Status for Haitian and Syrian immigrants is unreviewable, as the Trump administration argues, or a discriminatory action taken without the legally required process, as the plaintiffs contend. In addition, the Justices tackled the legality of law enforcement searches and uses geofence data, and what criteria should be required for a warrant to avoid constituting an unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

31 Listeners

51,054 Listeners

5,977 Listeners

814 Listeners

4,503 Listeners

1,172 Listeners

621 Listeners

501 Listeners

209 Listeners

332 Listeners

0 Listeners

18 Listeners

19,586 Listeners