The source, excerpts from Elaine Scarry's work, explores the relationship between human experience, particularly pain and desire, and the creation of artifacts. Scarry argues that artifacts are projections of human sentience, materialized attempts to alleviate suffering and enhance human capabilities. The source connects Scarry's ideas to the field of design, suggesting that design is an ethical and deeply human endeavor, not just a technical process, involving the materialization of sentience and a responsibility to consider the object's impact on the user within a broader cultural context. The act of designing is seen as a cycle of projection and reciprocation, with objects both reflecting human needs and shaping human experience.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Scarry, E. (1987). The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. University of Oxford Press.

The first source, excerpts from Judith Butler's Frames of War, examines how cultural frameworks shape our understanding of grievable lives, arguing that the value placed on a life is contingent upon its recognizability within established norms. This impacts our responses to war and violence, highlighting the unequal distribution of precariousness and the need for a more inclusive ontology of the body and social responsibility. The second source, "Precarious Life and Design Ethics," applies Butler's concepts to design, proposing a design ethic rooted in recognizing the inherent precariousness of all life and the importance of grievability in valuing life. This necessitates a shift from anthropocentric design toward a more socially conscious and responsible approach that considers the interconnectedness of life and the social conditions required for flourishing.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: when is life grievable? Verso. (pp.1-32)

The sources explore Emmanuel Levinas's philosophy, focusing on his concept of the "Other." The first source examines how Levinas's ideas apply to design, arguing that ethical design should prioritize the user's unique "otherness" over self-centered or utilitarian approaches. The second source examines Levinas's critique of traditional ontology, emphasizing the "Other's" irreducibility and its ethical implications. It highlights the "Other" as a disruptive force that commands responsibility and challenges egocentric perspectives. The "Other's" presence, rather than fulfilling needs, evokes a deeper "desire" transcending self-interest. Both sources ultimately stress the ethical imperative inherent in recognizing and responding to the "Other."

Peperzak, A. T., & Lévinas, E. (1993). To the other: an introduction to the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Purdue University Press. (pp.18-22)

This excerpt from Lévi-Strauss's The Savage Mind contrasts Western scientific thought with the cognitive processes of so-called "primitive" societies. Lévi-Strauss argues that these societies possess a deep understanding of their environment, demonstrated by extensive botanical and anatomical knowledge. He further explores the nature of artistic creation, suggesting it mediates between scientific objectivity and the more intuitive approaches of myth-making and bricolage. The author examines how games and rituals similarly function as structured activities that either generate differences (games) or overcome them (rituals). Finally, he analyzes how artistic expression integrates structure and event, contrasting this with the reverse process in myth-making.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). The savage mind. Univ. of Chicago Press.

This paper explores the concept of sustainability in design education through the lens of Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialist philosophy. The author argues that sustainability should not be viewed as a mere add-on to design projects, but rather as a fundamental aspect of the designer's "existential project," their self-definition through actions and choices. He proposes that a designer's fundamental project, their core values and motivations, shapes their approach to design, influencing whether they prioritize sustainability. The design studio is presented as a key environment for fostering this self-reflection and potentially leading to a "radical conversion"where students adopt sustainability as a freely chosen value. Ultimately, the paper suggests that by integrating existentialist thought, design education can cultivate a more ethical and sustainable design practice.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

D’Anjou, P. (2007). The Existential Self as Locus of Sustainability in Design. Design Philosophy Papers, 5(3), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.2752/144871307X13966292017559

This paper challenges the traditional hylomorphic model of making, which views creation as the imposition of form onto passive matter. Instead, the author argues that making is a process of weaving, where practitioners actively engage with material flows and forces, following the "grain" of the world's becoming. This approach emphasizes itineration and improvisation, contrasting with the architectonic model's focus on pre-conceived designs. Examples like carpentry, drawing, and kite-making illustrate how skilled practice involves a continuous, responsive interaction with materials, generating form through movement and transformation, rather than imposing it. The paper ultimately advocates for a re-evaluation of creativity, moving away from a backward-looking, causal explanation to embrace a forward-looking, generative perspective.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Ingold, T. (2010). The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep042

This text explores Heidegger's phenomenology of space, arguing that his concept of intentionality, the relation between humans and their environment, rejects a subject-object dualism. The author contends that Heidegger's views on space and relationality are relevant to urbanism, particularly considering the co-constitution of human experience and the built environment. The text examines debates surrounding the interplay of "subjective" and "public" space within Heidegger's framework, emphasizing the role of technology and everyday practices in shaping urban experience. Finally, the text connects Heidegger's ideas to Arendt's work on the public realm, highlighting the significance of shared spaces and the politics of appearance.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Keane, J., & Selinger, E. (Eds.). (2014). Footprint: Architecture and Phenomenology. 3. https://doi.org/10.7480/FOOTPRINT.2.2.

This text explores Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotle's philosophy, focusing on the concept of "seeing" (eidenai) as the origin of knowledge. Heidegger analyzes Aristotle's hierarchy of knowledge—aisthesis, empeiria, techne, episteme, and sophia—arguing that Aristotle privileges theoretical contemplation (theoria) over practical wisdom (phronesis). The text examines Heidegger's critique of this prioritization, contrasting the "restricted orientation" of cognitive knowledge with a more existential understanding of Dasein's engagement with the world. Ultimately, the analysis investigates the relationship between theoretical knowledge and practical action, highlighting the complexities of human experience and the role of "practical vision" (aisthesis) in shaping our understanding of being.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

McNeill, W. (1999). The glance of the eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the ends of theory. State University of New York Press.

The provided texts explore the intersection of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Book VI, and the field of design. They analyze how Aristotelian concepts like techne (craft/skill), phronesis (practical wisdom), the "golden mean," deliberation, episteme (scientific knowledge), and telos (purpose) inform ethical and responsible design practices. The authors examine how these principles guide designers in finding balance in their work, making ethical choices, and creating meaningful products and systems that serve human needs and the common good. Specific examples are given to illustrate the application of these philosophical concepts to various aspects of design, from the creation of user interfaces to the development of sustainable technologies.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Aristote, Ross, W. D., & Brown, L. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics (ed. rev). Oxford university press.

Albert Borgmann's essay "The Depth of Design" argues that modern design prioritizes engineering and efficiency over aesthetic and user engagement. He contends that this shift has led to a decline in the "depth of design," resulting in superficial and unfulfilling interactions with our material world. Borgmann calls for a revival of design that integrates engineering and aesthetics to foster deeper human engagement with objects and the environment, citing examples like urban planning and kitchenware. He emphasizes the designer's role as both trustee and artisan, responsible for creating environments that promote meaningful experiences.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Buchanan, R., & Margolin, V. (Eds.). (2007). Discovering design: explorations in design studies (7. Aufl). University of Chicago Press. (pp.13-22)