More on the trees -- selling fields and trees (if the tree is grafted or cut). Addressing the parameters of the cases presented, and how expansive the details listed are. Also, the case of one who uses a document to establish another party as a guardian for one's items. What happens when that guardian claims he has returned the items -- and the owner says he hasn't received them and the document remains in full standing. Plus, the Nehardeans do things differently - again.

Two mishnah. The first describes which items are included in the sale of a city? The daf discusses the definition of one of the items mentioned in the mishnah and what does this mean about what the Rabbis in Bavel knew about life in the time of the Mishnah. The second mishnah discusses the sale of a field.

3 mishnayot! Each about selling different properties, where the details of the sale are not specified. First, a courtyard. (if the details are specified, or if the seller says: "I'm selling you everything that is therein," then those sales are simpler, as per the stipulation). Second, an olive press, and third, a bath house. Without specification, the attached portions are all part of the sale, and the movable items are not.

Rabbi Eliezer and the Rabbis disagree if a once completed utensil then attached to the ground is considered part of the land. The Gemara discusses some ranging cases through the lens if this disagreement ranging from beehives to the susceptibility of food becoming impure.

More on the dispute between Rabbi Akiva and the sages - who, with several cases. For example, what happens when a property is given to two different people, and neither has access to pass through the other's portion. Plus, the difference between a sale and a gift -- where the dispute whether a sale is "generous" does not apply to gifts, because it's accepted as a given that the gift with generosity. Also, a new mishnah! One who sells the door to one's home together with the house - but not the key to that door -- how does that work?! The Gemara then attempts to determine whether this mishnah is in accord with Rabbi Meir's approach or not.

More on the cistern, and how it's not necessarily included in the sale of the house - again, without specifying its inclusion. But how will the buyer get there? Perhaps by purchasing a right-of-way to get there, but it's a machloket. Which leads into another key machloket - between Rabbi Akiva and the sages, whether one sells "generously" or "sparingly" - what is included in that which is not stipulated? Or one of several other possible points of dispute.

When one stipulates that another should get a portion of one's property - but without stipulating how much property - the Gemara establishes the minimums of how much is given. Also, when one sells a house with depth and height o the structure identified, the ground and air rights are only included when one adds - from the depths to the sky.

The daf includes visual aids to determine the boundaries of sales that account for division of property, and who owns what where, in relation to the boundaries. Also, Rabbah's precise language that leads to practical differences in the sales, with Abaye's questioning whether those differences are different enough after all.