Joined this time by Sahanika Ratnayake a scholar and postdoc at the University of Vienna, after recently getting her PhD from Cambridge University. A philosopher by trade (though she hates being called one) Sahanika has spent her academic career getting to grips with the underlying mechanisms of psychotherapy, asking all the important and at times uncomfortable questions about the how and why they work. Much of her writing has questioned the authority of CBT and the Mindfulness movement, that currently dominates the discourse around mental health and illness more generally. In this episode we cover a lot, we talk about mindfulness meditation, implicit biases and values that come with it, how mental illness is classified, how CBT functions and excludes other therapeutic alternatives, it's underlying world view, pathologisation of normal human experience, and how CBT can inadvertently ignore structural inequalities in our society related to ones race, gender or class etc. If you would like to read more of her work, see links below:
https://aeon.co/essays/mindfulness-is-loaded-with-troubling-metaphysical-assumptions
https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2020/07/20/its-not-catastrophizing-if-its-a-catastrophe-lessons-from-the-pandemic-for-psychotherapy/
https://mh.bmj.com/content/early/2021/11/28/medhum-2021-012210.full (message her @SahanikaR on Twitter her for journal access to this one)