The Baptist Broadcast

Three years ago, Dustin Segers and I discussed New Covenant Theology and the law. This is a clarifying monologue of my own position in light of that conversation. I hope you enjoy.

Landmarkism began in the 19th century. It proclaims the Baptist church as the only true church, and it unqualifiedly denies the universal church. Is it correct to do so? Did Christians, including Baptists prior to the 19th century, really miss this doctrine for almost 2,000 years?

Dr. Cooper brought some valid criticisms to Dr. Ortlund's argument for credobaptism from the earliest years of post-canonical church history. I want to weigh in to this conversation, not predominantly for criticism's sake, but by way of developing the discussion from a Baptist perspective.

It is often supposed by our paedobaptist friends that Baptists outrightly reject the notion of covenant-holiness with regard to children of believing parents.

We often view baptism and the Lord's Supper as footnotes to the Christian life, or as unexplained appendages in our walk with Christ.

A dangerous trend newly emerges in response to CRT. Let's see if it's tenable in light of orthodox theology.

Critical Race Theory devastates the biblical gospel, and is never available to the Christian for appropriation into orthodox theology.

In this episode, in addition to the sin offering in Ezekiel 40, I present six more reasons why interpreting Ezekiel 40ff as a literal brick and mortar temple puts one at odds with the New Covenant.

There is a big temple described in Ezekiel 40ff. But is it merely describing a bigger version of the first and second temple, or something other and greater?

This is a very practical issue that demands our love, loyalty, and patience.