John Owen, as well as some contemporary postmillennialists, interpret 2 Peter 3:10-13 as having already occurred in 70 A.D. Is this correct?

Is the doctrine of inseparable operations (ISO) biblical, historical, or even pastoral? Let's explore the embarrassment of riches we have in this lofty doctrine.

Does the biblical text make partitive exegesis necessary? We affirm.

What is sola Scriptura and how is it different from biblicism?

Does the law & gospel have any persuasive power toward those who do not believe? With some important qualifications, I believe it does. Join me as I explore the apologetic value of law & gospel.

There are various kinds of legalisms. But one kind of legalism is ecclesiastical legalism, where we take it upon ourselves to make the rules for God's church. But if Christ is the Lord of the church, we have no right to usurp His role as the church's law-giver.

We hear a lot about biblicism today. What is it? And what are some of the reasons it's dangerous?

There is much talk of Gnosticism. On the one hand, it's a prevailing cultural heresy found even in secularized and agnostic circles. On the other hand, it seems to be the "go to" charge against opinions we don't agree with. So, what is Gnosticism?

Here, I look at John Arrowsmith to help us understand what is meant by the phrase, "without body, parts, or passions," in the Confession. I dialogue concerning the doctrine of simplicity and the doctrine of actus purus.

In this third part of a short series on the difference between Baptists and other traditions, I ask the question, "What are the differences between Baptists and Roman Catholicism?" I cover part 4 out of seven differences between us and Rome (baptism) in this part.  

Check out parts 1-3 by clicking either link below!  

Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbolt...  

Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4bnL...  

Part 3: https://youtu.be/pez9rKp2XGI 

Part 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCwzA...  

Part 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiW94D7GYKM