
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week's episode covers three cases that deal with how the criminal justice system makes money off criminal convictions, which include Nelson v. Colorado (whether the government has to refund your fees if you are later found guilty), Manrique v. U.S. (whether an appeal has to be amended if you want to appeal a subsequently determined monetary penalty) and Honeycutt v. U.S. (whether co-conspirators are jointly and severally liable for foreseeable profits from the conspiracy). Law starts at (04:38).
By The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court4.4
230230 ratings
This week's episode covers three cases that deal with how the criminal justice system makes money off criminal convictions, which include Nelson v. Colorado (whether the government has to refund your fees if you are later found guilty), Manrique v. U.S. (whether an appeal has to be amended if you want to appeal a subsequently determined monetary penalty) and Honeycutt v. U.S. (whether co-conspirators are jointly and severally liable for foreseeable profits from the conspiracy). Law starts at (04:38).

32,130 Listeners

8,469 Listeners

5,092 Listeners

3,497 Listeners

1,002 Listeners

374 Listeners

1,120 Listeners

3,563 Listeners

246 Listeners

2,537 Listeners

1,483 Listeners

5,756 Listeners

730 Listeners

382 Listeners

737 Listeners