If you only argument against the pro-life view is to dismiss it as religious you've not done your homework. You need to work a little harder.

The question of who we ought to save is distinct from the question of who we get to intentionally kill.

We should never assume that our kids have a biblically grounded worldview. They have to catch it, not simply assume it.

Do not under any circumstances let someone badger you into believing they have refuted your argument when all they’ve done is call you a name or otherwise ridicule you.

We should preach the gospel, care for people around us, and love our neighbors, but we should never be told that we’re not pro-life unless we fix everything.

The Alabama State Supreme Court ruling has national implications but also has an impact on how Christians should think about assisted reproductive technologies.

Pro lifers who act prudently given the real fallen world they are forced to work in are not compromising. Those who reject our principles are.

Pro-life advocacy demands that we testify to the truth even if everyone in our culture hates us for it.

Pro-life advocates must be careful not to compromise their principles when they work to save as many children as they can.

Here’s a link to Jason’s speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haKxTJVLN8w

Acting to save one life instead of letting two humans die is sometimes the greatest moral good we can achieve.