The Case for Life

If you’re not a trained pro-life apologist, saying less is better than saying more.

Any argument that defines the unborn as potential humans instead of actual humans will dehumanize humans outside the womb too.

Referenced article: https://philpapers.org/archive/RODBIH.pdf

Embryos can exist in a frozen state, you can’t. That doesn’t prove the embryos isn’t alive.

Focus on this question to bring clarity to the abortion debate.

Genesis 2:7 does not teach that we are not living human beings until we breath air through the lungs. Saying it does confuses a descriptive passage with a normative one.

Moral Relativism, the belief that right and wrong are up to our society is not neutral. it is a view of right and wrong that is every bit as much a claim to know something as those who say right and wrong are real.

When you ground human equality in psychological traits, horrific consequences ensue.

If you only argument against the pro-life view is to dismiss it as religious you've not done your homework. You need to work a little harder.

The question of who we ought to save is distinct from the question of who we get to intentionally kill.

We should never assume that our kids have a biblically grounded worldview. They have to catch it, not simply assume it.