Actual 911 dispatcher Jon and cop Drew dive deep into the Dan Markel murder case—focusing on the now-infamous 911 call that many claim led to a delayed EMS response. As the Donna Adelson trial looms, the public is still debating: who’s truly at fault? In this episode, we dissect: The full 911 audio from the day Dan Markel was shot; Expert commentary on what went wrong (and what didn’t); Whether the dispatcher’s actions really cost Markel his life; Why the family sued the city—and what the $40,000 payout means

Dan Markel was on the phone in his driveway when someone unknown to him pulled up. The person on the other end of the phone then heard something he could not explain. Next door, a neighbor worried about burglaries sees a Toyota Prius driving off. When Jim Geiger went to check on his neighbor, he found Dan Markel with a gunshot wound to the head. He dialed 911-- a complicated call which failed to save Dan's life. Now 11 years later, Dan's ex mother in law, Donna Adelson, is getting ready to stand trial for first degree murder.

We've got a plan this time

Bryan Kohberger pled guilty to five counts in a shocking Idaho courtroom moment—ending the student murder case without a trial and leaving victims' families with no closure. In this episode, retired police lieutenant Drew Breasy and active 911 dispatcher Jon deliver expert true crime analysis on the plea deal, the courtroom strategy, and the emotional toll behind the headlines.This isn't just a recap. It's a real breakdown of how the justice system works—from the inside out. No spin. No hype. Just facts, context, and accountability.

Returning to the show are Barb and Drew Oldrati.

We break down Michael Proctor’s 20/20 interview, the fallout from the Karen Read trial, and raise questions about juror misconduct and the long-term damage to public trust in law enforcement. Proctor defends his investigation into John O'Keefe’s death despite being vilified during Karen Read’s trial. We examine how the defense weaponized his words, why Juror #11’s statements raise red flags, and how conspiracy-driven narratives erode trust in law enforcement. When public opinion turns into courtroom strategy, justice becomes collateral damage—and real accountability is lost.

CHECK OUT OUR MERCH STORE

https://thecommcenter-2.creator-spring.com/?page=2

Karen Read Verdict: Alan Jackson’s Final Argument Breakdown (Part 1 of 2)

Karen Read was found not guilty of murder in the death of Officer John O’Keefe—but convicted of DUI. In this episode, we break down defense attorney Alan Jackson’s closing argument in detail.

No outrage. No fanfare. Just critical analysis.

🎯 What We Cover:

• Strengths and flaws in Jackson’s courtroom strategy

• Legal logic that didn’t add up

• Parallels to O.J. Simpson and Casey Anthony trials

• Why public opinion is still split

🎙 Part 1 of our Karen Read trial series.

True crime for thinkers, not cheerleaders.

🎥 Watch the video version on our YouTube channel: youtube.com/@thecommcenter
🌐 Visit thecommcenter.com for all the latest updates

When both ICE agents and protesters dialed 911 in Worcester, MA, dispatchers were caught in the middle of a constitutional and jurisdictional tug-of-war. Now, a nearly identical situation is unfolding in Los Angeles, where ICE activity has triggered large-scale protests, police response, and curfews.

In this episode of The Comm Center with Drew Breasy, we break down:

Why federal agents turned to local dispatchers for help and how dispatchers navigated real-time legal and political pressure. We'll explain what happens when local agencies are asked to support federal operations,

The parallels between Worcester and the unfolding situation in L.A.

What this all means for dispatchers, command staff, and public safety

Real insight from a retired law enforcement officer and an active dispatcher — no spin, no theatrics.

Did the prosecution’s expert really deliver the smoking gun — or just a well-produced simulation? In this episode of The Comm Center, we break down Judson Welcher’s 3D modeling and paint test, which prosecutors say proves Karen Read backed into Officer John O’Keefe.

With real-world insight from a retired police commander and an active 911 dispatcher, we separate the facts from courtroom performance.

WATCH: https://youtu.be/vUw9ESbgcbE

MERCH: https://thecommcenter-2.creator-spring.com/📞 Call the show: (848) COMM‑911🛒 Support us via Drew’s Amazon Storefront:https://amzn.to/43UYCptSubscribe for more true crime from the inside:@thecommcenter

This episode was built directly from a YouTube community poll where we asked which law enforcement official lost your trust the fastest during the Karen Read trial. Thousands of you responded—and we listened.We went through the results, starting from the least selected to the most, and told the personal stories of each man. Not to clear their names. Not to change your mind. But to show a different side—the side that existed before they were made villains.In a time when trust is fractured and lines are drawn, we know this video may provoke strong reactions. That’s okay. That’s the point. Because behind every accusation is a person. And behind every uniform is a story.Some will reject this outright. Others will appreciate it.We made this for both—and for the truth that lives somewhere in between.