The first successful births from frozen eggs were twins, born in Australia in 1986. IVF serves a valuable role for those with persistent infertility issues or other conditions where natural conception is hindered. Although oocyte cryopreservation was initially used as a fertility preservation strategy for medical indications, currently, it is increasingly used to circumvent age-related infertility. This process of elective egg retrieval and cryopreservation- targeting women in their 20s- has gotten out of hand! Mainly due to social media, Gen Z women are panicking about their fertility. Should They Be? For decades, the age of 35 has been seen as a “demarcation line” for female fertility. Before 35, the theory often goes, most women will have little trouble conceiving, but at that point, fertility falls off a cliff. This misunderstanding of natural fertility processes, spurred on by false information on social media, has led to 20-somethings calling for egg retrieval and egg freezing. The dread of age 35 is so pervasive that its effect bleeds backward in time, with women in their early 30s—and yes, sometimes even in their late 20s—already feeling as if they are behind in the race against their “biological clock.” But the reality of fertility “loss” is much more complicated then just “falling off a cliff” and should be viewed more as of a natural “slope” rather than a “cliff”. About a decade after it shed its “experimental” label from the ASRM, oocyte retrieval and cyropreservation has become ubiquitous in our social media culture and has ballooned in popularity, with over a million frozen eggs or embryos stored in the United States today. It has done little, however, to materially change women’s lives. The ASRM has an ETHICS COMMITTEE OPINION (2024) on this very thing. Is 35 really a fertility cliff? Or it it 32? Is egg freezing in late or early 30s the best way to go for delayed fertility? Listen in for details as we set the record straight.