
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Episode 98
In 1999, Garland “Butch” Martin was convicted of killing his girlfriend, Marcia Poole, and her two young children, Brady and Kristin, and was sentenced on three counts of capital murder in Midland, Texas. The State told a compelling story: domestic abuse, accelerant-driven fire, pre-fire blunt force trauma, and motive. A jury believed it.
Twenty-four years later, Butch Martin was exonerated.
In Part Two of this two-part series, April breaks down what the jury didn’t hear: conflicting fire science, flawed forensic anthropology testimony, discarded physical evidence, and the physics of fire that contradict the State’s entire arson-murder theory. We examine the defense, the appellate process, modern NFPA-aligned fire investigation principles, and how the work of Dr. Gerald Hurst and John Lentini unraveled the narrative.
Because before you can call something arson-murder, you have to prove arson — and in this case, there is zero credible evidence that this fire was intentionally set.
In this episode we cover:
The defense’s accidental fire theory
Conflicting chemical analysis (Norpar & “deparaffinated kerosene”)
What Dr. Gerald Hurst and John Lentini found years later
Why NFPA 921 rejects “pour pattern” folklore
The missing extension cord and freezer on the back porch
40 mph winds and the physics problem for the State’s origin theory
Cerebral edema vs. “blunt force trauma”
Anthropologist vs. medical examiner expertise boundaries
The appellate court’s reasoning for exoneration
How wrongful arson convictions keep happening
When you strip away mythology and examine only evidence, this case collapses. Every credible data point points to an accidental fire — and an innocent man lost 24 years of his life.
The Crime to Burn Patreon - The Cult of Steve - is LIVE NOW! Go join and get all the unhinged you can handle. Click here to be sanctified.
Inner Sanctum Acknowledgments:
Listener discretion is advised.
Background music by Not Notoriously Coordinated
Get your Crime to Burn Merch! https://crimetoburn.myspreadshop.com
Please follow us on Instagram, X, Facebook, TikTok and Youtube for the latest news on this case. You can email us at [email protected] We welcome any constructive feedback and would greatly appreciate a 5 star rating and review.
If you need a way to keep your canine contained, you can also support the show by purchasing a Pawious wireless dog fence using our affiliate link and use the code "crimetoburn" at checkout to receive 10% off. Pawious, because our dog Winston needed a radius, not a rap sheet.
Sources: Please see the source list from Episode 97.
By lilpyrogirl5
5656 ratings
Episode 98
In 1999, Garland “Butch” Martin was convicted of killing his girlfriend, Marcia Poole, and her two young children, Brady and Kristin, and was sentenced on three counts of capital murder in Midland, Texas. The State told a compelling story: domestic abuse, accelerant-driven fire, pre-fire blunt force trauma, and motive. A jury believed it.
Twenty-four years later, Butch Martin was exonerated.
In Part Two of this two-part series, April breaks down what the jury didn’t hear: conflicting fire science, flawed forensic anthropology testimony, discarded physical evidence, and the physics of fire that contradict the State’s entire arson-murder theory. We examine the defense, the appellate process, modern NFPA-aligned fire investigation principles, and how the work of Dr. Gerald Hurst and John Lentini unraveled the narrative.
Because before you can call something arson-murder, you have to prove arson — and in this case, there is zero credible evidence that this fire was intentionally set.
In this episode we cover:
The defense’s accidental fire theory
Conflicting chemical analysis (Norpar & “deparaffinated kerosene”)
What Dr. Gerald Hurst and John Lentini found years later
Why NFPA 921 rejects “pour pattern” folklore
The missing extension cord and freezer on the back porch
40 mph winds and the physics problem for the State’s origin theory
Cerebral edema vs. “blunt force trauma”
Anthropologist vs. medical examiner expertise boundaries
The appellate court’s reasoning for exoneration
How wrongful arson convictions keep happening
When you strip away mythology and examine only evidence, this case collapses. Every credible data point points to an accidental fire — and an innocent man lost 24 years of his life.
The Crime to Burn Patreon - The Cult of Steve - is LIVE NOW! Go join and get all the unhinged you can handle. Click here to be sanctified.
Inner Sanctum Acknowledgments:
Listener discretion is advised.
Background music by Not Notoriously Coordinated
Get your Crime to Burn Merch! https://crimetoburn.myspreadshop.com
Please follow us on Instagram, X, Facebook, TikTok and Youtube for the latest news on this case. You can email us at [email protected] We welcome any constructive feedback and would greatly appreciate a 5 star rating and review.
If you need a way to keep your canine contained, you can also support the show by purchasing a Pawious wireless dog fence using our affiliate link and use the code "crimetoburn" at checkout to receive 10% off. Pawious, because our dog Winston needed a radius, not a rap sheet.
Sources: Please see the source list from Episode 97.

3,278 Listeners

11,048 Listeners

4,219 Listeners

5,212 Listeners

7,017 Listeners

370,033 Listeners

813 Listeners

3,006 Listeners

17,921 Listeners

20,088 Listeners

4,473 Listeners

3,977 Listeners

11,654 Listeners

7,412 Listeners

1,581 Listeners