Hi everyone,

I’m pleased to release this interview I recorded on Monday with vice presidential candidate Nicole Shanahan. We discuss her background in law and her investments in science, particularly in reproductive longevity. We delve into the need to restore free speech in science and the detrimental effects of suppressing dissenting voices. We highlight the inefficiency and high cost of the American healthcare system, particularly in addressing chronic diseases. Shanahan suggests investing in public health systems, rethinking agriculture practices, and ensuring access to clean water as preventive measures for chronic diseases.

The conversation highlights the need for preventative healthcare and a shift away from relying solely on drugs to manage symptoms. We also discuss the influence of capitalism on healthcare and the importance of addressing conflicts of interest in the industry. The failures of regulatory bodies like the FDA and CDC are examined, with a focus on the need for screening for conflicts of interest and community-based input.

We hope you enjoy this conversation.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

10:03 Free Speech in Science

25:40 Addressing the Root Causes of Chronic Disease

29:31 Restoring Free Speech and Scientific Debate

30:22 Shifting Towards Preventative Healthcare

33:43 Corporate Capture in the Healthcare Industry

36:48 Failures of the FDA, NIH, and CDC

56:02 The Impact of the Pandemic on Education

57:58 Prioritizing the Well-being and Development of Children

Sound Bites

* "Investing in science for the sake of information and not for the sake of a commercial outcome."

* "A vast effort by the federal government to suppress the speech of scientists who disagreed with government scientists."

* "Scientists do not feel comfortable publishing the paper they actually want to publish."

* "We need preventative healthcare... healthcare professionals who aren't playing whack-a-mole with symptoms and their only tool being prescribing new drugs to patients."

* "If sick people are being viewed as business opportunities, there's no incentive to reduce the numbers of needy people."

* "The CDC, the FDA, the NIH, all have failed in pretty fundamental ways."

Hi everyone,

This episode was scheduled for public release in a week, but I got too many messages and emails asking when this will be released to everyone. Here it is! In this episode, I interview Dr. Adeel Khan, a leading innovator and clinician in the regenerative medicine space. He runs Eterna Health where he’s treated people like Tony Robbins, Jordan Peterson, and Israel Adesanya.

While the focus of the conversation was initially about the fundamentals of regenerative medicine, we had to discuss vaccine injuries since before we started rolling, Dr. Khan told me how he’s successfully treated hundreds of vaccine-injured patients.

Dr. Adeel Khan explains that stem cell therapy can help regulate and restore the immune system by reprogramming white blood cells to send the right signals. This is particularly beneficial for individuals with chronic inflammation, such as those with myocarditis. Stem cells can interact with the heart muscle and help reduce inflammation. Dr. Khan acknowledges that the stem cell industry is full of shady clinics, but his clinic is focused on research and pushing the field forward. He is confident in his protocols and believes he can successfully treat most vaccine injuries and psychosomatic long COVID cases. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and the need for more awareness and options for patients.

(NOTE: I am not endorsing any particular treatment or product here. I only gave Dr. Khan a platform to delineate the remarkable success he’s seen at his clinic. I was skeptical in the conversation and pushed him on what seems to be “too good to be true” but Dr. Khan stood his ground and presented a compelling rationale for his clinical protocols. I encourage everyone to go in with an open mind and consider this as a *potentially* highly effective alternative to the current failures in the medical system to treat vaccine-injured patients.)

The Illusion of Consensus is a citizen-supported podcast. To receive exclusive posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* Dr. Khan emphasizes the importance of a nuanced approach to vaccination and the need to explore alternative treatments for COVID, such as peptides and lifestyle interventions.

* He highlights the potential risks and benefits of mRNA vaccines, including the use of lipid nanoparticle vectors and the potential for offsite targets and immunogenicity.

* Stem cell therapy can regulate and restore the immune system by reprogramming white blood cells to send the right signals.

* Stem cells can interact with the heart muscle and help reduce inflammation in individuals with myocarditis.

* He is confident in his protocols and believes he can successfully treat most vaccine injuries and long COVID cases.

* There is not comprehensive, robust RCT evidence on stem cell therapies but they have shown incredible efficacy in various clinical settings. Dr. Khan believes they should be presented as viable alternative or option on the table rather than a magic bullet which can cure all diseases.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Dr. Adeel Khan and Regenerative Medicine

02:27 Shift in Focus to COVID Vaccines and Vaccine Injuries

14:47 Vaccine Mandates and the Lack of Nuanced Approach

23:57 The mRNA Platform and its Issues

39:55 Connecting the Issues with mRNA Vaccines to Vaccine Injuries

41:31 Lack of Transparency and Downplaying by Regulatory Bodies

44:33 The Limitations and Risks of Psychiatric Drugs

53:40 Treating Vaccine Injuries: A Holistic Approach

01:01:16 Restoring Immune and Heart Function with Stem Cells

01:08:57 Addressing the Underlying Causes of Health Issues

01:18:16 Regulating the Immune System and Controlling Inflammation

01:19:06 Retraining the Immune System with Stem Cell Therapy

01:19:55 Treating Myocarditis and Restoring Heart Function

01:21:15 Investing in Research and Legitimizing Stem Cell Therapy

01:22:22 The Importance of Large Clinical Trials and Safety

01:32:46 Restoring Immune Dysregulation with Stem Cell Therapy

01:34:39 Impressive Safety Profile of Stem Cell Therapy

Listen now:

Apple podcasts / Spotify

Sound Bites

* "There's a lot of undocumented adverse effects that people will never know the true incidence and prevalence of these injuries because they're just not all going to be reported." - Dr. Adeel Khan

* "I just never understood why we weren't looking or why weren't we promoting healthy lifestyle? Why weren't we promoting peptides like in Russia where they use thymus and alpha-1 and thymulin to literally treat severe COVID?" - Dr. Adeel Khan

* "Lack of straight answers from Health Canada on COVID vaccines is concerning" - Dr. Adeel Khan

* "So much of what you do... seems too good to be true." - Rav Arora

In this unique, new conversation, I talk to professor Toby Green, and professor Reginald Oduor about the impact of lockdown policies on the global South. We also discuss the WHO treaty and its potential impact on the sovereignty of countries in the global South. Prof. Reginald Oduor raises several issues, including the ideology of treating the health of individuals, the environment, and everything equally, the problem of misinformation and disinformation, emergency use authorization of pharmaceutical products, centralization of medical care, and the imposition of a Western approach to disease management. They both argue that the treaty undermines the sovereignty of poorer countries and perpetuates neocolonialism. They criticize the elitism and narrow focus of Western experts and the imposition of Western medicine on the global South. The conversation concludes with a call for a more inclusive and equitable approach to global health.

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction and Background

01:02 The Catastrophic Impact of Lockdowns in the Global South

06:33 The Cruelty of Lockdown Policies in India

08:57 The Global South's Experience of Lockdowns

11:36 The Violation of the Implicit Promise of Globalization

21:51 The Impact of Propaganda and Fear of Death

26:13 Opposition to the WHO Treaty and Neo-Colonial Imposition

31:07 Impact on the Sovereignty of the Global South

34:05 Ethical Issues with Vaccine Policies

39:35 Xenophobia and Movement Restrictions

46:23 Imposition of Western Medicine and Knowledge

51:05 Critique of Neoliberalism and Colonialism

51:58 Maintaining Integrity in the Face of Pandemic

53:23 Closing Remarks

Our sponsor Alcami Elements:

Our new blend uses high-quality, organic Peruvian cacao, enhancing the delicious flavour of our original mix. True raw cacao is high in antioxidants and minerals such as magnesium which also can have calming effects.

Illusion of Consensus readers can get 10% off their first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusionconsensus” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.illusionconsensus.com

Hi everyone,

Suffice it to say I had my mind blown yesterday when I had on Dr. Adeel Khan — founder of the cutting-edge regenerative medicine clinic Eterna Health — to discuss stem cell therapy, peptides, vagus nerve re-set shots for restoring chronic back, knee, and other musculoskeletal, as well as mental health, issues.

I saw him on Jordan Peterson’s p…

In this episode, Aaron Kheriaty and I discuss our involvement in the Murthy v. Missouri case, which challenges the government's censorship pressures on social media companies. We discuss the censorship we personally experienced and the discovery of government involvement in online censorship. We also discuss the media blackout surrounding the case and the role of legacy media in supporting censorship. The episode concludes with a discussion of the Supreme Court oral arguments and the justices' positions. The conversation delves into the Supreme Court oral arguments in the case challenging government censorship on social media platforms. We generally express optimism that the case will result in a significant victory for free speech.

Sound Bites:

* "The government had essentially set up what he called an Orwellian ministry of truth."

* "This is the worst free speech violation in United States history."

* "Throttle everything that's positive about Great Barrington Declaration."

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Personal Experiences with Censorship

06:15 The Scope and Impact of Censorship

10:27 The July 4th Ruling and Constitutional Violations

13:17The Circuit Court's Ruling and Third-Party Censorship

16:46The Appeals Court and Preliminary Injunction

17:26Media Coverage and Economic Interests

20:03The Supreme Court Case and Expectations

24:55 The Twitter Files and Reporting

26:52 The Role of Legacy Media and Censorship

28:59 The ACLU and Professional Medical Societies

32:33 The Supreme Court Experience and Observations

36:21 Reading the Tea Leaves: Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson

39:16 Concerning Justices and Compelling State Interest

41:46 The Purpose of the First Amendment

46:00 Government's Spread of Misinformation

46:47 Illusion of Consensus

47:29 Government's Right to Free Speech

48:56 Censorship vs. Speech

49:26 Government's Misinformation

53:24 Section 230 and Liability Protection

58:27 Potential Supreme Court Ruling

01:00:48 Impact of Winning or Losing

01:07:31 Importance of Free Speech

In this conversation, AJ Kay discusses her early experiences with writing about COVID-19 and the backlash she faced for challenging the mainstream narrative. She shares how her essay on Medium, titled 'The Curve is Already Flat,' was censored and demonetized, leading to the formation of the Rational Ground group. AJ also talks about the impact of school closures on her children, particularly her daughter with autism and her other daughter with special needs. She highlights the loss of services and support that these children relied on and the detrimental effects of isolation and disrupted routines. The conversation highlights the importance of early intervention and support for children with special needs. They express concern for children diagnosed in 2020 who did not receive in-person help for three years, emphasizing the critical period of neuroplasticity in early childhood.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

01:16 Early COVID Essays

06:37 Censorship on Medium

08:03 Formation of Rational Ground

22:30 Motivation to Speak Out

25:49 Transition to Zoom School

31:32 Impact on Children with Special Needs

34:16 Lack of In-Person Help for Children with Special Needs

39:51 The Effect on College Students

45:36 The Purpose of Life and the Importance of Relationships

52:55 The Great Barrington Declaration and Consent

58:29The Critique of the Great Barrington Declaration

01:00:54 The Inhumane Treatment in Nursing Home

Takeaways

* AJ K. faced censorship and deplatforming for challenging the mainstream narrative on COVID-19.

* The Rational Ground group was formed as a response to the censorship and aimed to provide a platform for independent writers and researchers.

* School closures had a significant impact on children with special needs, depriving them of essential services and support.

* The isolation and disrupted routines caused by the pandemic had detrimental effects on the mental health and well-being of children. Early intervention and support are crucial for the development of children with special needs.

* The period of neuroplasticity in early childhood is finite, and the lack of in-person help during the pandemic may have long-term consequences for children's outcomes.

* College closures and isolation measures have had negative effects on young adults' socialization and well-being.

* The trade-off between safety and the loss of important relationships and experiences raises questions about the purpose of protection.

Hi everyone,

I’m excited to bring you this conversation with clinical psychologist Dr. Roger McFillin. His content on X and Substack is incredibly thought-provoking and challenges the popular medical consensus on mental health.

McFillin challenges the efficacy of antidepressants and stimulants, pointing out that the placebo effect plays a significant role in their perceived effectiveness. He also emphasizes the lack of scientific evidence supporting the chemical imbalance theory of depression and the potential negative consequences of long-term use of psychiatric drugs.

We also discuss the potential harm caused by antidepressants, including an increased risk of suicide, self-injury, and permanent sexual dysfunction. The third theme is the influence of pharmaceutical companies on medical guidelines and research, leading to biased and distorted information.

He explains how major medical organizations in the United States are funded by biotech and pharmaceutical companies, as well as nonprofits that are pushed by pharma. He highlights the focus on drugs as healthcare in the allopathic medical model and the lack of emphasis on diet interventions and addressing root causes of poor health. Dr. McFillin also criticizes the overdiagnosis of psychiatric conditions like ADHD and the role of schools in promoting the use of medication.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported podcast. To receive exclusive posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* The pharmaceutical industry has a significant influence on the mental health field, leading to overprescription and misrepresentation of scientific data.

* There is a lack of evidence for the efficacy and safety of psychiatric drugs, and the long-term consequences are often not fully understood.

* The concept of a chemical imbalance as the cause of mental illness is not supported by scientific evidence. Pharmaceutical companies often have a significant influence on research, including ghostwriting and biased reporting.

* Medical organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychiatric Association, receive funding from pharmaceutical companies, leading to conflicts of interest.

* The FDA's analysis of studies and approval of drugs may not always consider the risks and adverse effects.

* The overprescription of ADHD medications is influenced by the mass indoctrination in education and the desire for obedience in classrooms. ADHD is a spectrum of attentional challenges, rather than a disorder.

Watch Now:

Apple podcasts

Time-stamps:

00:00 Introduction and Background

03:19Awakening to the Flaws in Mainstream Mental Health Approaches

05:09 Influence of Pharmaceutical Industry on Mental Health Field

08:57 Lack of Efficacy and Safety of Psychiatric Drugs

12:16 Prevalence and Problems with SSRIs and Stimulants

28:30 Meta-Analysis on SSRIs and Suicide Risk

40:21 Conflict of Interest in Research

43:13 Ghostwriting and Pharmaceutical Influence

45:21 Corruption in Medical Organizations

48:55 Lack of Proper Analysis by FDA

56:06 Overprescription of ADHD Medications

01:01:48 Mass Indoctrination in Education

01:10:38 The Rise of ADHD Diagnoses

01:21:25 The Power of Behavioral Interventions

01:26:28 The Influence of Pharmaceutical Industry and Labeling

01:32:19 Understanding ADHD as a Spectrum

01:43:00 The Value of Unique Skills and Abilities

01:50:13 The Normalization of Attentional Challenges

01:59:18 Cultivating Inner Reality and Expectations

01:56:24 Depathologizing Mental Health

01:59:44 The Challenges of Achievement and More

02:01:06 The Value and Limitations of Labels

02:03:15 Understanding ADHD on a Spectrum

02:04:23The Spectrum of Trauma and PTSD

02:08:10 The Mismatch Between Evolution and Modern Society

02:19:19The Value and Danger of Labels

02:28:39 Cultural Factors and Changing the Culture

02:29:12 Future Discussions: Trauma and Treatments

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Subscribe to Dr. McFillin’s Substack:

Hi everyone,

In this new episode of The Illusion of Consensus podcast, I interview Charles Rixey, a member of the group DRASTIC, which has been investigating the origins of the COVID-19 virus. They discuss the efforts by scientific leaders, such as Tony Fauci, to suppress the lab leak theory and create an illusion of consensus around the natural origin theory. DRASTIC, a group of citizen scientists, uncovered evidence that challenged the natural origin narrative, including deleted sequences from the Wuhan lab's viral database. The conversation emphasizes the importance of uncovering the truth and restoring trust in science and medicine.

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

03:12 Unscrupulous Scientific Leaders and Motives

11:02 The Importance of Furin Cleavage Site

12:30 The Significance of ACE2 Receptor and Furin Cleavage Site

15:50 Debate Among Molecular Geneticists

25:57 Formation and Work of DRASTIC

29:46 Access to Wuhan Lab Sequences

40:53 The Michael Warby Paper and Flaws

43:52 Questioning the Accuracy of Chinese Data

48:44 The Lancet Commission and Jeffrey Sachs

55:31 Evidence of a Lab Leak: The Diffuse Proposal

01:02:12 History of Gain-of-Function Research

01:15:10 The Implications for Future Pandemic Preparedness

01:20:15 The Collapse of Trust in Science

Consider helping us fund our podcast expansion as we seek to hire a producer and video editor:

https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2

This 3-hour long conversation is with Philadelphia cardiologist Dr. Anish Koka. He is one of the few brave voices in the cardiology community that changed his views in real time and spoke out against mass Covid vaccination absent any reliable safety and efficacy data for cardiac outcomes in particular.

Myocarditis happens to be the most common severe adverse event associated with the mRNA vaccines — concentrated in young, healthy men — and instead of honestly discussing the risks and benefits, the CDC and FDA gaslit the public and harmed untold numbers of young people who no conceivable reason to benefit.

In this wide-ranging conversation, Dr. Anish Koka and I discuss how he came to regret vaccinating young, healthy people at his clinic and his comprehensive analysis of the relevant vaccine myocarditis data.

We need more clinicians and scientists like Dr. Koka. This podcast may offer a glimmer of hope.

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Quotes from the podcast:

“Me running around saying it's ‘safe and effective,’ and giving it to 17-year-olds, given that most of the patients that were in the vaccine studies weren't 17-years-old — I wasn't technically correct.”

“This is a very cardioactive vaccine”

“I would not give it to low risk people again…That was a mistake on my part.”

Takeaways

* The data suggests that COVID-19-related myocarditis is different from vaccine-related myocarditis, with the latter showing higher troponin levels and a higher likelihood of scar formation.

* Myocarditis should not be characterized as a mild condition, as it can have significant consequences and requires hospital care and follow-up.

* Higher troponin levels indicate more severe heart muscle damage and a higher risk of long-term impacts. Higher cardiac biomarkers indicate more heart muscle damage and a higher chance of long-term impacts

* The smallpox vaccine had side effects, leading to its discontinuation despite its effectiveness against smallpox.

* The mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 have shown a higher risk of myocarditis in young men. Myocarditis is more commonly seen with the Moderna vaccine compared to the Pfizer vaccine, likely due to the higher mRNA dose in the Moderna vaccine.

* The initial vaccine trials had limitations, and the effectiveness of vaccines against new variants is uncertain. Interpreting studies and data related to COVID-19 requires epistemic humility and careful consideration of the baseline risk of viral infections.

* A study from Korea found severe cases of vaccine myocarditis, highlighting the importance of understanding the severity of adverse events.

Time-stamps:

02:21 Evolution of the COVID Vaccine Conversation

08:09 Myocarditis and Previous Vaccines

26:39 Discussion on Vaccine Efficacy

35:22 Uncertainty about Vaccine Benefit

40:25 Limitations of Vaccine Recommendations

43:54 Risk of COVID-19 in Healthy Children

48:10 Granularity and Humility in Public Health

57:31 Differences Between COVID-19 Myocarditis and Vaccine Myocarditis

01:03 Misconceptions about COVID-19 Myocarditis

01:08 Misleading Comparisons of Myocarditis Rates

01:21:36Troponin Levels in Myocarditis Cases

(Note: our podcast editing software was not able to generate full time-stamps for the whole 3 hour show. We apologize for this and aim to contact tech support to ameliorate this)

If you would like to help us fund our podcast expansion to Rumble and YouTube (we would like to hire a producer and purchase professional theme music and graphics when we are financially able!), you may donate to us here. Your support is greatly appreciated:

https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2

Hi everyone,

I have just recorded my first thoughts on the Murthy v. Missouri case, which involves the foundational First Amendment rights of Americans. I delve into the history of the case and the concerns about the Biden administration’s censorship regime. Also, I go into some detail about the preliminary injunction and Judge Terry Doughty's ruling, as well as the appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

This is the first part of our exclusive Murthy v. Missouri coverage. Rav and I will be recording a podcast next to discuss the implications further. Moreover, we will be recording episodes with my co-plaintiff Aaron Kheriaty and Jenin Younes (an attorney on the case).

The Illusion of Consensus is a citizen-funded podcast. Please consider supporting us by becoming a paid member:

Takeaways:

* The Murthy v. Biden case involves the First Amendment rights of Americans and concerns about censorship by the Biden administration.

* There is a pattern of social media censorship, with the government directing social media companies to censor speech on various topics.

* The preliminary injunction in the case ruled that the Biden administration was violating First Amendment rights, but the case is still ongoing.

* The Supreme Court's decision in this case will have significant implications for the protection of free speech and the role of the government in censorship.

Listen now:

Apple:

Spotify:

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction to the Murthy v. Missouri Case

01:00 Concerns about Censorship by the Biden Administration

04:00 Role of the Government in Censorship

06:03 Preliminary Injunction and Judge Terry Doughty's Ruling

08:13 Appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

09:39 Limitations of the Preliminary Injunction

10:34 Stanford University's Involvement

12:02 Government as the Source of Misinformation

16:20 Supreme Court Hearing: Standing and Traceability

21:45 Traceability and Coercion by the Government

24:35 First Amendment and its Application

26:33 Government's Argument for Censorship

28:30 Analogies and Differences with Traditional Media

31:27 Coercion vs. Persuasion by the Government

35:12 Restrictions on Social Media Companies

39:05 Hypotheticals and the First Amendment

43:19 Stakes and Importance of the Supreme Court Decision

If you would like to help us fund our podcast expansion to Rumble and YouTube, you may donate to us here. Your support is greatly appreciated:

https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2