There is a joke format which I find quite fascinating. Let's call it Philosopher vs Engineer.

It goes like this: the Philosopher raises some complicated philosophical question, while the Engineer gives a very straightforward applied answer. Some back and forth between the two ensues, but they fail to cross the inferential gap and solve the misunderstanding.

It doesn’t have to be literal philosopher and engineer, though. Other versions may include philosopher vs scientist, philosopher vs economist, human vs AI, human vs alien and so on. For instance:

One thing that I love about it is that the joke is funny, regardless of whose side you are on. You can laugh at how much the engineers miss the point of the question. Or how much the philosophers are unable to see the answer that is right in from of their noses. Or you can contemplate on the nature of the inability of two intelligent agents to understand each other. This is a really interesting property of a joke, quite rare in our age of polarization.

But, what fascinates me the most, is that this joke captures my own intellectual journey. You see, I started from a position of a deep [...]

---

First published:

Source:

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.