
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The proper name of the Act is the Respect for Marriage Act.
The case, Reynolds v United States 98 US 145 (1879), proves the folly of believing that you have any religious freedom to act on your beliefs, contrary to what the supporters of this Act say. Here is a nice summary of the case here.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/98us145
Also a review of where we are election wise, and a path forward.
A couple of oopsies from the President in his presser yesterday, and an accounting of spending for this election. Also, a link to Ann Coulter's column.
https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2022/11/09/a-nation-rejoices-a-humiliating-defeat-for-trump-n2615764
Political violence by whom? And what is on the ballot really, tomorrow. and...
the interstate commerce case referred to was Wickard v Fillburn 317 US 111 (1942). It was unanimous in its monstrosity.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/317us111
From the publisher's feed