
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Your LSAT and GPA are the most important parts of your law school application, but a strong personal statement can set you apart from other applicants with similar numbers. What makes for a well-crafted personal statement? This week, Nathan and Ben pull no punches as they critique a listener’s essay through the eyes of harried admissions officers. The guys also delve into Logical Reasoning prediction methods, urge a listener to fire their awful tutor, and unpack a new report that casts doubt on the golden-ticket reputation of a law degree.
Study with our Free Plan
Download our iOS app
Watch Episode 463 on YouTube
2:15 - Prediction and Review - The guys instruct LSAT Demon student Brian on how to review his mistakes. They emphasize prediction as crucial to success in Logical Reasoning.
13:09 - Awful Tutor - Nathan and Ben counsel an anonymous listener to fire their terrible LSAT tutor and to cut back on their full-time study. One to three quality hours of study per day is plenty.
23:26 - Comparative Passages - Ben and Nathan summarize their approach to comparative passages in Reading Comprehension.
28:34 - Tuition vs. Cost of Living - Listener Alex compares the cost to attend two in-state law schools. Nathan and Ben weigh Alex’s options and advise them to broaden their list of target schools.
35:26 - Earnings Outcomes - The guys discuss a Georgetown study on what lawyers are earning after four years of practice. Reuters’ Karen Sloan reports that outcomes vary wildly depending on which law school graduates attended.
45:14 - Personal Statement Review - Ben and Nathan give listener K a brutally honest appraisal of their personal statement.
1:07:25 - Word of the Week - Deposition is more than just a torturous legal exercise.
By Nathan Fox and Ben Olson4.6
877877 ratings
Your LSAT and GPA are the most important parts of your law school application, but a strong personal statement can set you apart from other applicants with similar numbers. What makes for a well-crafted personal statement? This week, Nathan and Ben pull no punches as they critique a listener’s essay through the eyes of harried admissions officers. The guys also delve into Logical Reasoning prediction methods, urge a listener to fire their awful tutor, and unpack a new report that casts doubt on the golden-ticket reputation of a law degree.
Study with our Free Plan
Download our iOS app
Watch Episode 463 on YouTube
2:15 - Prediction and Review - The guys instruct LSAT Demon student Brian on how to review his mistakes. They emphasize prediction as crucial to success in Logical Reasoning.
13:09 - Awful Tutor - Nathan and Ben counsel an anonymous listener to fire their terrible LSAT tutor and to cut back on their full-time study. One to three quality hours of study per day is plenty.
23:26 - Comparative Passages - Ben and Nathan summarize their approach to comparative passages in Reading Comprehension.
28:34 - Tuition vs. Cost of Living - Listener Alex compares the cost to attend two in-state law schools. Nathan and Ben weigh Alex’s options and advise them to broaden their list of target schools.
35:26 - Earnings Outcomes - The guys discuss a Georgetown study on what lawyers are earning after four years of practice. Reuters’ Karen Sloan reports that outcomes vary wildly depending on which law school graduates attended.
45:14 - Personal Statement Review - Ben and Nathan give listener K a brutally honest appraisal of their personal statement.
1:07:25 - Word of the Week - Deposition is more than just a torturous legal exercise.

376 Listeners

484 Listeners

515 Listeners

113 Listeners

172 Listeners

74 Listeners

79 Listeners

174 Listeners

31 Listeners

10 Listeners

18 Listeners

33 Listeners

31 Listeners

13 Listeners