
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Speaker: Professor Dev Gangjee (University of Oxford)
Session 2: AI Transforming IP Application / Registration Processes and Eligibility Tests
On Saturday 29th March 2025, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Is AI Transforming IP?'
For the last few years, lots of attention has been paid to AI and IP. The Supreme Court has already considered whether AI can be regarded as an inventor. There is also on-going litigation, in various jurisdictions, on whether training AI systems with copyright material infringes copyright, in what circumstances the outputs might infringe; as well as when, if at all, AI-generated content, designs or other outputs might be protected by intellectual property rights and, if so, for whose benefit.
While these are important questions that involve the application of the existing understandings of the law to new factual scenarios, the conference moved beyond them to focus on: (i) what AI reveals about existing law; and (ii) how AI might be changing IP, altering the legal tests with which we have become familiar, as well as the assumptions that underlie them – and what the implications might be.
For more information see:
https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-spring-conference
3.4
55 ratings
Speaker: Professor Dev Gangjee (University of Oxford)
Session 2: AI Transforming IP Application / Registration Processes and Eligibility Tests
On Saturday 29th March 2025, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Is AI Transforming IP?'
For the last few years, lots of attention has been paid to AI and IP. The Supreme Court has already considered whether AI can be regarded as an inventor. There is also on-going litigation, in various jurisdictions, on whether training AI systems with copyright material infringes copyright, in what circumstances the outputs might infringe; as well as when, if at all, AI-generated content, designs or other outputs might be protected by intellectual property rights and, if so, for whose benefit.
While these are important questions that involve the application of the existing understandings of the law to new factual scenarios, the conference moved beyond them to focus on: (i) what AI reveals about existing law; and (ii) how AI might be changing IP, altering the legal tests with which we have become familiar, as well as the assumptions that underlie them – and what the implications might be.
For more information see:
https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-spring-conference
1,840 Listeners
4,252 Listeners
23 Listeners
894 Listeners
16 Listeners
833 Listeners
0 Listeners
1 Listeners
15 Listeners
3 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
74 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
219 Listeners
698 Listeners
744 Listeners
174 Listeners
3,085 Listeners
977 Listeners
142 Listeners
4 Listeners
99 Listeners