
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When we think about problematic sexual behaviors in youth, we often think of a neighbor child, or someone at school. Someone acting out in the community with a child of our own. But rarely do we think about sibling sexual abuse, which we think of as somehow very rare. As you’re going to hear in this episode, it isn’t. It’s not uncommon.
Some of the most difficult cases we deal with at Children's Advocacy Centers are sibling sexual abuse cases. Mom and Dad come in, horribly upset. You have one child who is the victim, and they want to support that child. But at the same time they were terribly concerned about the child who had harmed their other child. The child who had thought it up and acted it out. And trying to think about how to prevent them from winding up and suffering all the pain and indignities of the criminal justice system.
What do we do in these cases that can actually be productive? How do we understand them moving forward? And how do we address the research gaps that leave us not always knowing entirely what to do?
Topics in this episode:
Links:
Nina Bertele is a research fellow at Charité - University Hospital Berlin (Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin)
Anat Talmon, Ph.D.
Support the show
Did you like this episode? Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts.
By National Children's Alliance4.6
3737 ratings
When we think about problematic sexual behaviors in youth, we often think of a neighbor child, or someone at school. Someone acting out in the community with a child of our own. But rarely do we think about sibling sexual abuse, which we think of as somehow very rare. As you’re going to hear in this episode, it isn’t. It’s not uncommon.
Some of the most difficult cases we deal with at Children's Advocacy Centers are sibling sexual abuse cases. Mom and Dad come in, horribly upset. You have one child who is the victim, and they want to support that child. But at the same time they were terribly concerned about the child who had harmed their other child. The child who had thought it up and acted it out. And trying to think about how to prevent them from winding up and suffering all the pain and indignities of the criminal justice system.
What do we do in these cases that can actually be productive? How do we understand them moving forward? And how do we address the research gaps that leave us not always knowing entirely what to do?
Topics in this episode:
Links:
Nina Bertele is a research fellow at Charité - University Hospital Berlin (Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin)
Anat Talmon, Ph.D.
Support the show
Did you like this episode? Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts.

43,653 Listeners

27,169 Listeners

25,819 Listeners

14,432 Listeners

87,117 Listeners

111,929 Listeners

56,595 Listeners

1,444 Listeners

6,401 Listeners

17,740 Listeners

5,526 Listeners

41,531 Listeners

7,980 Listeners

622 Listeners

1,684 Listeners