The True Crime Tapes

The True Crime Tapes

By Bobby CapucciNewsNews CommentaryDaily News
Download on the App Store

The True Crime Tapes episodes

  • The LISK Files: Former Police Chief James Burke Gets Arrested For Solicitation (9/8/25)
    James Burke is a former law enforcement official who served as the Chief of Police in Suffolk County, Long Island, New York. His tenure as chief was marked by both accomplishments and controversies.Some key points about James Burke's career include:
    1. Law Enforcement Career: Burke had a long career in law enforcement, rising through the ranks in the Suffolk County Police Department. He eventually became the Chief of Department, the highest-ranking uniformed officer.
    2. Controversies: Burke's time as chief was marred by various controversies. One of the most significant incidents involved his arrest and subsequent conviction for violating the civil rights of a suspect. He was accused of assaulting a suspect who had stolen items from his vehicle, and then orchestrating a cover-up involving other officers.
    3. Resignation: Due to the controversies and legal issues surrounding his actions, James Burke resigned from his position as Chief of Police in 2015. His resignation followed mounting pressure and legal actions against him.
    4. Legal Consequences: Burke's actions led to his conviction in federal court in 2016. He was sentenced to prison for his role in the assault and cover-up, receiving a 46-month prison sentence.
    5. Impact: James Burke's case drew significant attention to issues of police misconduct and abuse of power within the Suffolk County Police Department. It also highlighted the importance of accountability and transparency in law enforcement.


    You now also add to his list of shame a solicitation charge he just caught at park in Long Island where he solicited an undercover PARK RANGER during a sting operation and ultimately ended up getting cuffed.

    This comes a few weeks after Rex Heuermann was arrested as the alleged Long Island Serial Killer.



    (commercial at 10:50)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]


    source:

    Disgraced Long Island police chief James Burke who botched Gilgo Beach serial killer Rex Heuermann probe is seen leaving jail after being busted for 'offering male undercover cop oral sex' at 10am in prostitution sting | Daily Mail Online
    17 min
  • Jeffrey Epstein And A Global Ledger of Convenient Deaths (Part 4) (9/8/25)
    Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 ignited a chain of suspicion that has never faded, morphing into a narrative where suicide is never just suicide. From Epstein himself to Jean-Luc Brunel in Paris, to former White House aide Mark Middleton in Arkansas, to Deutsche Bank executives and even Ghislaine Maxwell’s father decades earlier, each sudden death has been folded into a larger pattern. Official rulings of suicide or accident are met with disbelief, because the timing always feels too convenient, the circumstances too strange, and the institutions overseeing these figures too compromised.

    Together, these deaths form more than a morbid list—they’ve become symbols of systemic failure. Each one robs survivors of testimony, erases potential evidence, and reinforces the belief that the powerful never face full accountability. Whether by incompetence, coincidence, or conspiracy, the effect is the same: witnesses vanish, truth is buried, and public trust corrodes. In the shadow of Epstein, bizarre suicides are no longer personal tragedies—they are the story itself, a grim reminder that justice often dies before it can be delivered.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]
    13 min
  • Jeffrey Epstein And A Global Ledger of Convenient Deaths (Part 3) (9/8/25)
    Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 ignited a chain of suspicion that has never faded, morphing into a narrative where suicide is never just suicide. From Epstein himself to Jean-Luc Brunel in Paris, to former White House aide Mark Middleton in Arkansas, to Deutsche Bank executives and even Ghislaine Maxwell’s father decades earlier, each sudden death has been folded into a larger pattern. Official rulings of suicide or accident are met with disbelief, because the timing always feels too convenient, the circumstances too strange, and the institutions overseeing these figures too compromised.

    Together, these deaths form more than a morbid list—they’ve become symbols of systemic failure. Each one robs survivors of testimony, erases potential evidence, and reinforces the belief that the powerful never face full accountability. Whether by incompetence, coincidence, or conspiracy, the effect is the same: witnesses vanish, truth is buried, and public trust corrodes. In the shadow of Epstein, bizarre suicides are no longer personal tragedies—they are the story itself, a grim reminder that justice often dies before it can be delivered.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]
    13 min
  • Jeffrey Epstein And A Global Ledger of Convenient Deaths (Part 2) (9/8/25)
    Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 ignited a chain of suspicion that has never faded, morphing into a narrative where suicide is never just suicide. From Epstein himself to Jean-Luc Brunel in Paris, to former White House aide Mark Middleton in Arkansas, to Deutsche Bank executives and even Ghislaine Maxwell’s father decades earlier, each sudden death has been folded into a larger pattern. Official rulings of suicide or accident are met with disbelief, because the timing always feels too convenient, the circumstances too strange, and the institutions overseeing these figures too compromised.

    Together, these deaths form more than a morbid list—they’ve become symbols of systemic failure. Each one robs survivors of testimony, erases potential evidence, and reinforces the belief that the powerful never face full accountability. Whether by incompetence, coincidence, or conspiracy, the effect is the same: witnesses vanish, truth is buried, and public trust corrodes. In the shadow of Epstein, bizarre suicides are no longer personal tragedies—they are the story itself, a grim reminder that justice often dies before it can be delivered.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]
    13 min
  • Jeffrey Epstein And A Global Ledger of Convenient Deaths (Part 1) (9/8/25)
    Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 ignited a chain of suspicion that has never faded, morphing into a narrative where suicide is never just suicide. From Epstein himself to Jean-Luc Brunel in Paris, to former White House aide Mark Middleton in Arkansas, to Deutsche Bank executives and even Ghislaine Maxwell’s father decades earlier, each sudden death has been folded into a larger pattern. Official rulings of suicide or accident are met with disbelief, because the timing always feels too convenient, the circumstances too strange, and the institutions overseeing these figures too compromised.

    Together, these deaths form more than a morbid list—they’ve become symbols of systemic failure. Each one robs survivors of testimony, erases potential evidence, and reinforces the belief that the powerful never face full accountability. Whether by incompetence, coincidence, or conspiracy, the effect is the same: witnesses vanish, truth is buried, and public trust corrodes. In the shadow of Epstein, bizarre suicides are no longer personal tragedies—they are the story itself, a grim reminder that justice often dies before it can be delivered.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]


    14 min
  • From Cynicism to Certainty: How The Epstein Scandal Confirmed the Rigged Game (Part 2) (9/8/25)
    Americans were taught to believe in blind justice, but scandal after scandal has stripped that belief bare. The Jeffrey Epstein case shattered whatever illusions remained, exposing a system that bent over backwards to shield a wealthy predator while silencing his victims. The secret deals, the protection from prosecutors, the suspicious death in federal custody—all of it confirmed what many had long suspected: the United States operates under a two-tiered justice system where money and connections outweigh truth and accountability.

    Epstein’s scandal resonated more deeply than past betrayals because it involved the most vulnerable—children and young women—and still, justice was denied. It showed in stark terms that the law is not broken by accident but by design, functioning to protect elites while crushing the powerless. In doing so, it left Americans angry, disillusioned, and convinced that equal justice under the law is a myth. The lingering outrage is not just about Epstein—it is about the collapse of trust in the very institutions meant to defend fairness, a collapse that may take generations to repair, if it can be repaired at all.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]
    12 min
  • From Cynicism to Certainty: How The Epstein Scandal Confirmed the Rigged Game (Part 1) (9/8/25)
    Americans were taught to believe in blind justice, but scandal after scandal has stripped that belief bare. The Jeffrey Epstein case shattered whatever illusions remained, exposing a system that bent over backwards to shield a wealthy predator while silencing his victims. The secret deals, the protection from prosecutors, the suspicious death in federal custody—all of it confirmed what many had long suspected: the United States operates under a two-tiered justice system where money and connections outweigh truth and accountability.

    Epstein’s scandal resonated more deeply than past betrayals because it involved the most vulnerable—children and young women—and still, justice was denied. It showed in stark terms that the law is not broken by accident but by design, functioning to protect elites while crushing the powerless. In doing so, it left Americans angry, disillusioned, and convinced that equal justice under the law is a myth. The lingering outrage is not just about Epstein—it is about the collapse of trust in the very institutions meant to defend fairness, a collapse that may take generations to repair, if it can be repaired at all.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]
    15 min
  • Bryan Kohberger And The Pastor Ministering To His Spiritual Needs (9/8/25)
    We've heard numerous times now about Bryan Kohberger and his newfound glory in God. Beyond the fact that he had been meeting with a pastor and exploring his faith however, we didn't know much else.


    In this episode, we are learning more about his visits to the pastor from the man who runs the ministry who is in charge of providing services to the incarcerated in Idaho.



    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    Brian Kohberger pastor tells how he prays with the quadruple murderer | Daily Mail Online
    13 min
  • The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 4) (9/8/25)
    Case Overview:

    Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.

    Key Points of the Opinion:
    1. Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
      • Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
      • The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
    2. Confinement Conditions:
      • Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
      • The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
    3. Evidentiary Rulings:
      • Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
      • The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
    4. Juror Misconduct:
      • Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
      • The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
    5. Sufficiency of the Evidence:
      • Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
      • The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
    6. Sentencing:
      • Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
      • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
    ConclusionThe court affirmed Guzman's convictions and sentence, rejecting all of his arguments on appeal. The opinion underscored the fairness of the trial process and the substantial evidence supporting Guzman's guilt.


    (commercial at 7:42)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]


    source:

    USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
    17 min
  • The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 3) (9/7/25)
    Case Overview:

    Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.

    Key Points of the Opinion:
    1. Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
      • Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
      • The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
    2. Confinement Conditions:
      • Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
      • The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
    3. Evidentiary Rulings:
      • Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
      • The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
    4. Juror Misconduct:
      • Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
      • The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
    5. Sufficiency of the Evidence:
      • Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
      • The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
    6. Sentencing:
      • Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
      • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
    ConclusionThe court affirmed Guzman's convictions and sentence, rejecting all of his arguments on appeal. The opinion underscored the fairness of the trial process and the substantial evidence supporting Guzman's guilt.


    (commercial at 7:42)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]


    source:

    USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
    12 min

About The True Crime Tapes

From the publisher's feed


The True Crime Tapes pulls you into the shadowy depths of the criminal underworld, where the line between justice and chaos is razor-thin. Each episode dissects the minds of history’s most…

More shows like The True Crime Tapes

In The Dark by The New Yorker

In The Dark

28,523 Listeners

Heavyweight by Pushkin Industries

Heavyweight

17,627 Listeners

Crime Junkie by Audiochuck

Crime Junkie

369,640 Listeners

Police Off The Cuff/Real Crime Stories by Bill Cannon Police off the Cuff/Real Crime Stories

Police Off The Cuff/Real Crime Stories

861 Listeners

The Standard by The Evening Standard

The Standard

20 Listeners

The Binge Cases: Doctor Billions by Sony Music Entertainment

The Binge Cases: Doctor Billions

4,357 Listeners

Unraveled by ID

Unraveled

10,532 Listeners

Game of Crimes by Game of Crimes

Game of Crimes

1,460 Listeners

Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime Podcast by Rhapsody Voices

Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime Podcast

444 Listeners

The Epstein Chronicles by Bobby Capucci

The Epstein Chronicles

231 Listeners

The Connect- with Johnny Mitchell by Johnny Mitchell

The Connect- with Johnny Mitchell

564 Listeners

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles by Bobby Capucci

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

13 Listeners

Sit Down with Michael Franzese by Michael Franzese

Sit Down with Michael Franzese

85 Listeners

Adrift by Apple TV / Blanchard House

Adrift

805 Listeners