Trump installed civilian leadership at Defense that will do his bidding; Biden's national security and foreign policy transition team has the patina of warlike Hillary Clinton and Madeleine Albright. Col. Lawrence Wilkerson joins Paul Jay on theAnalysis.news podcast.
Transcript
Paul Jay
Hi, I'm Paul Jay. Welcome to theAnalysis.news podcast. And please don't forget, we've got a fundraising campaign on. One of our members has generously contributed a $10,000 matching grant. So, if you donate now, you get matched. If you do a monthly subscription, that will be matched times twelve. So, hang on; we'll be right back.
Heads have rolled that the Department of Defense as President Trump fired Secretary Mark Esper and install his loyal sycophants. OK, perhaps "loyal sycophant" is redundant. Now joining us to discuss the significance of these appointments and Trump's reported plans to withdraw most U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Iraq and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Elliott Abrams' trip to the Middle East at a time when it's been reported Trump is asking about bombing Iran is Larry Wilkerson. Larry is a retired United States Army colonel and former chief of staff to the United States Secretary of State Colin Powell. He's a distinguished adjunct professor of government and public policy at the College of William and Mary and a member of the National Election Task Force for Election Crises.
Thanks for joining us, Larry.
Larry Wilkerson
Good to be on in such tumultuous times.
Paul Jay
So, connect the dots here. First of all, I guess of all the things I just listed, Trump asking about bombing Iran is the most dangerous. Now, there's been some talk. He was "walked back from that," and then there was talk he may have been only walked back from that temporarily. How serious is this threat against Iran? Is it connected to the issue of the changes at the Defense Department? Let's start there.
Larry Wilkerson
I'll give you the rumors first. And the rumors come from my contacts in the Pentagon and around the building. The rumors are the Pompeo was behind it. I know he's been trying to tell people that he wasn't behind it, that he was "aginnit" [i.e., against it], as it were. And, as you might imagine, Pompeo's people like Elliott Abrams. And I've been told also that Doug Macgregor, who went in as an adviser to this young man, Chris Hughes, the new acting secretary of defense, -- and I know Doug pretty well -- was dead set against it. And that's Doug. I imagine he would have been. So, I think the uniformed military and Doug's advice prevailed. That's my rumor story anyway. And so, there wasn't very much support for it.
Now, my analysis of what's going on there, though, tells me that he [i.e., Trump] is probably trying to set up the Pentagon so he can deal with it, if he wants to deal with it, in a way that is unopposed to him. If that's the case, though, why did he put Doug there? Because Doug is dead set against these endless stupid wars and he's dead set against any kind of conflict in the Middle East or North Africa. Anywhere in the world, it'd have to be really seriously in our vital interests before Doug would be for it. So, Doug must be there, I think, to fulfill Trump's real wishes, which are no war.
But Trump wants to get the troops out. I think he really wants to get the troops out, particularly in Afghanistan.