Recently, we released an episode regarding the limited utility of by BMEs; now, I mean, limited utility as a routine, annual exercise in the low-risk asymptomatic, and non-pregnant patient. And there’s plenty of evidence that has shown that just doing a bimanual exam because “that’s what we’ve always done” -without a real indication- is just not helpful. All to say, we received numerous comments regarding that episode with 99% saying, “this is great”, “thank you for sticking with the evidence”, and “yes, we stopped doing bimanual exams without indication, when the ACOG first put that out several years back”. But of course there’s always that 1% who state something like, “I can’t believe you’re not recommending this exam, this is how we find ovarian cancer, etc”. This is very interesting because the whole episode was how it exactly did NOT help in the early detection of ovarian cancer, but simply increased the ordering of tests and patient anxiety! (Which makes me think, maybe they didn’t even listen to the episode). One of the comments that came in was worth noting. This provider said, “Isn’t the same debate applicable to clinical breast examinations (CBEs)?” What’s the data on that? And how do various medical groups and professional societies agree or disagree with CBEs? Well, that’s exactly why we’re doing this episode! In this episode, we’re going to cover the various guidelines and opinions regarding the utility of clinical breast examinations. Plus, you’ll want to hang out with us until the end of the episode, when we will provide some real, practical applications for daily practice. Yep, let’s “feel the data out” (see what I did there?). 🧐🙂🙂