
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In its attempt to end birthright citizenship, the Trump administration has cited a 19th century lawsuit that denied U.S. citizenship to Native Americans. The president’s executive order has been blocked by multiple federal judges, and his use of Elk v. Wilkins to justify the order is generally deemed invalid by legal scholars. But the use of the lawsuit has raised concerns over immigration enforcement in some Indigenous communities, even though Native Americans were granted citizenship in 1924.
Nazune Menka is an assistant professor of law and director of the Center for Indian Law and Policy at Seattle University. She joins us to share more about Elk v. Wilkins and the lasting impact it’s had on relations between tribal and federal governments.
By Oregon Public Broadcasting4.5
272272 ratings
In its attempt to end birthright citizenship, the Trump administration has cited a 19th century lawsuit that denied U.S. citizenship to Native Americans. The president’s executive order has been blocked by multiple federal judges, and his use of Elk v. Wilkins to justify the order is generally deemed invalid by legal scholars. But the use of the lawsuit has raised concerns over immigration enforcement in some Indigenous communities, even though Native Americans were granted citizenship in 1924.
Nazune Menka is an assistant professor of law and director of the Center for Indian Law and Policy at Seattle University. She joins us to share more about Elk v. Wilkins and the lasting impact it’s had on relations between tribal and federal governments.

38,475 Listeners

6,822 Listeners

25,796 Listeners

320 Listeners

9,191 Listeners

3,984 Listeners

1,006 Listeners

25 Listeners

14,620 Listeners

134 Listeners

224 Listeners

87,274 Listeners

9,048 Listeners

4 Listeners

4,210 Listeners

16,353 Listeners

978 Listeners

15,892 Listeners

219 Listeners

10,746 Listeners

207 Listeners