
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Can cannabis use cost you your constitutional rights? That’s the question now in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and in a stunning move, the Trump Department of Justice has admitted there’s major disagreement inside the government over whether marijuana consumers should lose their Second Amendment right to own a gun.At the center of the case is Patrick Daniels, a Mississippi man convicted for owning firearms while admitting to cannabis use. An appeals court ruled the federal gun ban unconstitutional as applied to him, setting up a Supreme Court showdown with huge implications.The DOJ’s filing breaks from tradition by acknowledging that parts of the government believe cannabis users are dangerous with guns, while others see the ban as outdated given legalization across the states. This rare split exposes the cracks in federal cannabis policy and highlights the growing conflict between state legalization and federal prohibition.If the Supreme Court rules against the ban, millions of cannabis consumers could regain their gun rights overnight. It could also accelerate federal cannabis reform, adding pressure to reschedule or de-schedule marijuana entirely.Public opinion is already shifting — polls show most Americans, including gun owners, oppose stripping rights from cannabis users. With pro-cannabis and pro-gun groups on the same side, the outcome of this case could redefine both cannabis and gun policy in the U.S.#CannabisNews #SupremeCourt #GunRights #CannabisReform #Trump #SecondAmendment #MarijuanaPolicy #CannabisIndustry #CannabisLegalization #CannabisCommunityWant to see last week's recap? • Cannabis Industry Fights for Billions in R... Want to see more Cannabis Reform videos? • Congress Exposes Chinese Cannabis Cartel N... • Trump’s Drug Czar Pick: Cannabis a Biparti... • Congress Reacts to Trump’s Cannabis Commen... • Congress Takes Aim at China’s Cannabis Net... Want to be updated on Cannabis, Small Cap, AI, and Crypto? Subscribe to our Daily Baked in Newsletter!https://newsletter.thedalesreport.com...Find us as well on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and on the Web:Facebook: / thedalesreport Twitter: / thedalesreport Instagram: / dalesreport LinkedIn: / the-dales-report Apple Podcasts: https://tinyurl.com/TDRTradetoBlackon...Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/TDRTradeToBlackon...Website: https://thedalesreport.com/For copyright matters, please get in touch with us at:[email protected] Disclaimer (Financial Interests)The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any company, organization, or employer. The content is provided for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as financial, investment, or legal advice.The hosts and/or guests may hold positions in the companies, stocks, or financial instruments discussed during the show. These holdings should not be considered as endorsements or recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Listeners are encouraged to do their own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.By listening to this podcast, you agree that the hosts, guests, and producers are not liable for any decisions you make based on the information discussed.Full Disclosures: https://thedalesreport.com/website-te...
5
77 ratings
Can cannabis use cost you your constitutional rights? That’s the question now in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and in a stunning move, the Trump Department of Justice has admitted there’s major disagreement inside the government over whether marijuana consumers should lose their Second Amendment right to own a gun.At the center of the case is Patrick Daniels, a Mississippi man convicted for owning firearms while admitting to cannabis use. An appeals court ruled the federal gun ban unconstitutional as applied to him, setting up a Supreme Court showdown with huge implications.The DOJ’s filing breaks from tradition by acknowledging that parts of the government believe cannabis users are dangerous with guns, while others see the ban as outdated given legalization across the states. This rare split exposes the cracks in federal cannabis policy and highlights the growing conflict between state legalization and federal prohibition.If the Supreme Court rules against the ban, millions of cannabis consumers could regain their gun rights overnight. It could also accelerate federal cannabis reform, adding pressure to reschedule or de-schedule marijuana entirely.Public opinion is already shifting — polls show most Americans, including gun owners, oppose stripping rights from cannabis users. With pro-cannabis and pro-gun groups on the same side, the outcome of this case could redefine both cannabis and gun policy in the U.S.#CannabisNews #SupremeCourt #GunRights #CannabisReform #Trump #SecondAmendment #MarijuanaPolicy #CannabisIndustry #CannabisLegalization #CannabisCommunityWant to see last week's recap? • Cannabis Industry Fights for Billions in R... Want to see more Cannabis Reform videos? • Congress Exposes Chinese Cannabis Cartel N... • Trump’s Drug Czar Pick: Cannabis a Biparti... • Congress Reacts to Trump’s Cannabis Commen... • Congress Takes Aim at China’s Cannabis Net... Want to be updated on Cannabis, Small Cap, AI, and Crypto? Subscribe to our Daily Baked in Newsletter!https://newsletter.thedalesreport.com...Find us as well on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and on the Web:Facebook: / thedalesreport Twitter: / thedalesreport Instagram: / dalesreport LinkedIn: / the-dales-report Apple Podcasts: https://tinyurl.com/TDRTradetoBlackon...Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/TDRTradeToBlackon...Website: https://thedalesreport.com/For copyright matters, please get in touch with us at:[email protected] Disclaimer (Financial Interests)The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any company, organization, or employer. The content is provided for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as financial, investment, or legal advice.The hosts and/or guests may hold positions in the companies, stocks, or financial instruments discussed during the show. These holdings should not be considered as endorsements or recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Listeners are encouraged to do their own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.By listening to this podcast, you agree that the hosts, guests, and producers are not liable for any decisions you make based on the information discussed.Full Disclosures: https://thedalesreport.com/website-te...
39 Listeners
3,791 Listeners
94 Listeners
1,839 Listeners
204 Listeners
67 Listeners
5,447 Listeners
409 Listeners
107 Listeners
29,342 Listeners
8,776 Listeners
154 Listeners
7 Listeners
14 Listeners
1,295 Listeners