Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute link

German chemist and historical scholar Germar Rudolf is helping organize and host the first Holocaust skeptics’ conference in more than two decades. The ARMREG Holocaust Academy Summit is scheduled for Tuesday, January 27. Learn more at the HolocaustSummit.com.

(Watch and listen to my earlier interviews with Germar Rudolf.)

Excerpt:

Germar Rudolf: It’s the first time I’m doing this. Now, conferences for and by Holocaust skeptics have been organized here in the United States beginning the early 1980s and 1990s…I think the first was in organized in 1979 by the Institute for Historical Review. And then they did them yearly or biannually into the early 2000s. And then the whole thing kind of went dormant. And there were a few conferences by a competing organization, a split off, so to speak. The Barnes Review had a few in the late 90s and early 2000s. But that has come to complete dormancy by now, too. There is no event where we can all gather and talk, and realize we are a community.

We are a small ecosystem of a lot of people who are interested, who support this and who want to see it thrive. And I’ve actually been asked since the early 2000s —I think the last conference the IHR, the Institute for Historical Review, did was in 2002 if I’m not mistaken—and then nothing happened. And I was asked whether I could organize it. Back then, I was logistically not in the position to be able to pull that off. But the question came up again the second time around I came into this country after my extended hiatus, my extended leave of absence...

You were a guest of the German state for a while, weren’t you?

Yeah, I was allowed to breathe sieved air, as they say, for 44 months because of what you just mentioned, countries. 27 Western countries, liberal democracies, have decided democracy is when two wolves and a lamb decide what’s for dinner. And I happen to have been a lamb. So it didn’t go down well for my liberty…

Congratulations on coming at the powers that be with ideas that are so powerful that they have to lock you up for 44 months. That’s pretty serious, especially in these Western countries that normally try not to do things like that.

Plus, in the wake of my activity as a forensic expert showing up at trials, the general authorities were so desperate to put a stop to it that they changed case law based on my appearances and my activities, primarily other activities too. One lawyer wanted to introduce me to testify as a forensic expert on the question of whether or not the Auschwitz gas chambers could have worked and if there’s any trace, chemically speaking, that supports either the theory of its existence or non-existence. And the reaction of that was that the lawyer, just for having filed the motion to hear me, was prosecuted, sentenced. And that was, I think, a prison term on probation and a fine. And ever since, trying to defend yourself in these cases of historical dissent is illegal.

So they are so desperate, they don’t even want you to present your evidence in court when you’re being dragged in court. And that suggests maybe they’re afraid of that evidence.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

The genocidal Zionist oligarchy that runs the West is running into HEROIC resistance from the brave anti-genocide forces in Iran and Venezuela. Mainstream media aren’t telling you about the huge pro-government protests in Iran that dwarf the anti-government ones, nor about the huge crowds in Venezuelan cities demanding that gangster Trump release their kidnapped president. Kevin Barrett schools Richie Allen! Transcript:

Richie Allen: Listen, Kevin Barrett needs no introduction to this audience. Kevin has been gracing this programme for many, many, many years. He is an academic, a broadcaster, researcher. He’s got his own Substack account, kevinbarrett.substack.com. You’ll find him on unz.com. You’ll find him everywhere. Let’s welcome him back to the programme and wish him a happy New Year to boot. Kevin, welcome back. How are you?

Kevin Barrett: Hey, thank you, Richie. Great to be back with you. Happy New Year to you too.

Fantastic, Kevin. Thank you. I’m going to play some audio for you. It’s Good Morning Ireland. It’s an RTE. It’s an Irish national radio programme. And they were discussing the protests in Iran this morning. We will, of course, speak Venezuela. But I wanted to play this for you. And on the programme, they spoke with a woman called Tara Kangarlou. Interesting character, Tara Kangarlou. She is a professor at Georgetown University and she’s written a book on Iran. She was invited onto Irish National Radio, Kevin, to discuss the organisation of these protests, which I’m fascinated by. So let’s have a listen to what she said.

Tara Kangarlou: Who organised the protests in Iran? The protests, as you mentioned, are moving into the th day across Iran. And they’re ordinary people, young and old, boys and girls, women and men, who for the past few years have come out on the streets in the protests that we’ve seen over the years in in the aftermath of Mahsa Amini’s death in the custody of the morality police and prior to that in and which, by the way, were prompted by Iran’s poor economy. These are the same people, ordinary Iranians, who are suffering every day from poor living conditions, dire economic conditions. And quite frankly, I would call it an economic crisis. This is a country of million people with great potential, an extremely resourceful country where the people are not benefiting from these resources. And their money is being looted, quite frankly, by a very narrow group within the regime. So they’re unhappy. And once again, they’re taking it to the street and they’re being brutally stifled by the regime forces.

Kevin, the Telegraph newspaper is reporting today that the Iranian government has promised to pay five pounds, that’s five British pounds, a month to any citizen who agrees not to attend protests. They will receive this in the form of a voucher. You have travelled in the country, you’re very interested in the country. Talk to us about this economic situation as described by the American academic. How bad is it in Iran?

Well, last time I was there was a couple of years ago. I was going every year from February 2013 up through 2019, when Sigil Mandelkar, who’s an Israeli citizen who Trump appointed as the head of the U.S. Treasury Department sanctions program, sicced the FBI on the various university professors and public intellectuals who, like me, were going to conferences in Iran. And the FBI told us that if we accepted any more invitations from the New Horizon NGO, founded by Nader Talebzadeh, Iran’s biggest talk show host and a big filmmaker there, we would be arrested when we returned from the conference.

So I went many times over those years, and I was shocked at how favorably the economic situation in Iran compares with countries like Morocco, Turkey, Mexico, Guatemala, and various other countries I’ve visited. It’s a booming country. There was constant construction going on. The problem is,. everybody has a car, unlike most third world countries, so that creates the problem of too much traffic.

So this notion that there’s some uh massive, horrific economic situation there is, I think, a gross exaggeration, because I heard the same kinds of things when I was visiting and seeing the opposite with my own eyes. But…what we just heard from that evil witch that you recorded is satanic lies She’s working for the genocide perpetrators. She’s working for Team Genocide. She’s working for the people who don’t like the government of Iran because it’s run by people who actually have morals and ethics and who are standing strong against the genocide of Palestine. That’s the only reason it’s targeted for overthrow.

These protests are infiltrated by Operation Gladio terrorists who have been murdering Iranian police officers who have been extremely lenient and very, very careful to try to separate the CIA and Israeli paid teams of trained killers who are in these protests from the genuine protestors.

Let’s forget about Israel for a minute. Let’s forget about Israel for a moment. You can’t. That’s what this is all about. That’s all this is about. We’ll come back to...You’re on a proper radio show now. You do know this, don’t you? You’re not on a podcast with somebody who’s just going to sit there and nod along and agree with everything you’re saying. Do you know who Tara Kangarlo is? Have you ever heard of her before today?

No, I haven’t. And I hope I never hear from her again.

So you fundamentally disagree with her and an academic such as yourself—

She’s a genocide propagandist. She should be tried for (complicity in) genocide.

She hasn’t committed any genocide against anybody as far as I’m aware of.

She’s doing propaganda for genocide.

No, she disagrees with you, Kevin. She disagrees with you, Kevin. And as an academic, it’s rather pathetic to be calling people evil witches because you don’t agree with them. Look, according to multiple sources, and I get my information from multiple sources, the sanctions that Iran faces currently...and we can get into the justification or lack of for those sanctions. The sanctions and the subsequent depletion of oil sales have obviously left the country in a terrible state. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have the government saying to people, we’ll give you a voucher to the tune of £5 a month to buy things if you agree to stop these protests. Why would the government say, we’ll pay you to stop protesting?

Why would you believe that that’s true, Richie? I don’t believe that that’s true until I verify it.

Yeah, and I’m not saying it is true for a fact. I’m not saying that. I’m saying this is what is being reported. And I don’t see any, I don’t see any, what’s the word I’m looking for here now? I don’t see, certainly coming out of Iran, nobody seems to be disagreeing with this or saying this isn’t happening.

Everybody’s disagreeing with it.

No, nobody’s denying that the government is offering a cash incentive.

You’re following Western media people, Richie, the Western media is a genocide propaganda machine. You need to follow the real people on the ground in Iran. I follow quite a few of them.

So they’re making it up.

I just got something from the Pure Wilayah Substack, which is a very good source, pointing out that the street unrest in Iran has fallen to less than one third of its initial level as more and more of the protesters have recognized that by continuing to go into the streets, they’re providing cover for these Operation Gladio style terrorist teams that the Americans and Israelis have sent in there to kill people and especially kill police officers.

So when the Telegraph and the Times and the Irish Times are reporting that President Pazeshkian announced this financial support for people in order to dissuade people from taking to the streets, you reckon they’re just making it up?

I think if it’s true, there’s obviously more to the story. In other words, I doubt very much that it’s nothing but a payment purely for promising not to protest. That sounds unlikely. Biut if it’s true, I mean, yeah, people in Iran right now shouldn’t protest. I mean, they normally should protest. But when their protests are exploited by genocide perpetrators who send teams of trained killers into the protests to turn them into violent riots, then they shouldn’t protest. And if the government is offering them $5 a month to sign some pledge that they’re not going to protest at times when these protests are infiltrated by American and Israeli terrorists, well, that wouldn’t be that terrible if it were true. But I doubt that that’s the whole story.

There is a quote, right? And before anybody gets their knickers in a twist, I’m not in favour of the state of Iran or any other country being sanctioned by the IMF at the behest of Washington or anywhere else. Of course I’m not. And I know that Iran doesn’t represent any threat to global peace and security. I know this. I’m not playing devil’s advocate here.

They (Iran) are the only country that’s a threat to genocide, Richie.

We’ll come back to that in a minute. I’ve got a quote here from Pazeshkian. So they’re alleging Pazeshkian said this, right? Any problems or shortcomings in society are a direct result of actions. Therefore, it is essential that stakeholders and implementers are involved in all aspects of decision making. Now that sounds like word salad, but then he goes on to say, undoubtedly, direct interaction with the people, listening to their concerns, demands and criticisms, and working to persuade public opinion plays a key role in reducing psychological and social pressures. Now, Kevin, if that quote is right, and this is in The Telegraph today, if Pazeshkian has said this, that sounds to me like a direct olive branch to the people of Iran. He’s basically saying there, OK, you’re pissed off and I can recognise maybe you have a reason and maybe we need to interact with you. That’s interesting to me.

Well, this is exactly the same thing that’s been going on repeatedly since the 1979 revolution. There are always protests in Iran. There are constant protests here and there, just like in a lot of other countries. And what happens is that periodically—I can’t even count how many times we’ve seen exactly the same story— there are big protests financially backed by the Israeli occupied United States government. If they can get enough people out on the streets, then they send in terrorists to try to start violence between the protesters and the police.

This is how they overthrew the government of Ukraine on Maidan Square. The terrorists sent by the American government were stationed on rooftops in Maidan Square. They shot both at police and at protesters in order to create the conditions that could lead to the overthrow of that government. The United States has overthrown many dozens of governments using exactly that playbook. And that’s what they’ve been trying to do for to Iran so many times: 1999, 2003, 2009, 2011, 2016? I can’t remember all the years it happened. Sometimes it was after elections. There was the so-called green movement in Iran in 2009. Exactly the same scenario.

They (Zio-Americans) spend vast amounts of money doing this. They are tremendously. desperate to try to get a regime change because, again, as I said, the Iranian government is the only government on earth that poses a threat to the genocide of Palestine. So the Zionist oligarch-occupied American government, which is no longer even remotely a democratic government, is pushing for the overthrow of the Iranian government—extremely unsuccessfully.

This has happened at least a dozen times. I keep saying the exact same things I’m saying today. We could just play a replay of what I said three years ago, five years ago, eight years ago, however many years ago. Every time, I say the same thing that I’m saying right now, which is that this whole story has been grossly blown up in the Western media, grossly distorted. Yes, there are real protesters with real grievances. But the reason that they’re this big is because the United States is putting billions of dollars into making them this big. And the reason the American government is doing that is so they can send in Operation Gladio terrorists to do what they did on Maidan Square.

And they’ve already done it. They’ve killed dozens of Iranian policemen. But the Iranian people see through this, and they always realize what’s being done to them. And they say, “well, I wanted to demonstrate for this or that cause—the economic situation or whatever it is. But at this point, it’s not worth giving cover to these terrorists that the Americans are sending after us.” So then they stay home. It dies down and it’s over.

And that’s happened, I don’t know, like a dozen times. And I’ve said exactly the same thing about it a dozen times. Here I am again. And I guarantee I’ll be back in two or three years saying the same thing.

Well, I hope we’re here in two or three years’ time, Kevin. I hope we’ll still be able to do programmes like this. Your characterisation of the coup in Ukraine is right on. I can’t challenge any of it. In fact, it was overseen by Victoria “Yats is our guy” Nuland, the Eurasian secretary. That was a coup. Look, I spent a good deal of time on yesterday’s programme discussing Bolivarianism. And here’s where I would be concerned. I’m no fan of Islamic theocracy. No fan of it. We won’t get into that today. There’s no need to get into it. You and I have...

Let me just say I am a fan of it.

I was just going to say that. You and I have butted heads about this before. I don’t want to be told by anybody what I should and shouldn’t do based on their religious ideology. But we might get into it in a future programme. But I will not be told by Western media... controlled by western intelligence agencies that Iran represents some threat to security in the world or in the region. I know that’s not the case. But here’s the thing. You see eventually people do crack, Kevin, and this is what my concern would be for the region and for the future, is that is that what what we saw in Latin America was these sanctions eventually bite so hard that people do eventually rise up And I’m going to disagree with some of what you’ve just said to me there about the people going back home and about it being overblown by Western media. I will accept your point about it being infiltrated by actors. I know this is probably true. We’ve seen it all over the world when protests…We certainly saw it during the Arab Spring. We know exactly what that was about. We don’t need to get into it. But these sanctions that they impose on countries, strangling their imports, stopping them earning money, bringing money in through their exports, through their only real industry. Eventually, they can bite hard enough that the economic situation becomes so difficult for people that people do decide, well, do you know what? It might be the devil outside the door causing all of these problems, but maybe we’re better off with the devil. And I’m going to put it to you that I reckon, and I don’t know, this is a guess, I don’t know because I’m not on the ground there, but I would venture, I guess that a lot of people coming out to protest are genuine, that they’ve had enough of it. They’ve had enough of poverty. If it is the case that they’re being offered five bucks a month to remain calm, well, the situation for people must be horrendous, Kevin. And my fear would be that there will be a breaking point. Your response to that?

Yeah, I actually agree that probably the majority of protesters have been genuine. And that’s why the crowds in the street are now at well under one third of their level a couple of days ago. It’s because these are real genuine people who have real issues to protest about, and they don’t want to see their protests hijacked by these genocidal devils that you correctly referenced as such.

Indeed, having a country taken over by the genocidal U.S. Zionist oligarchy is having it taken over by the devil. You’re exactly right. That was a perfect metaphor. And that’s what happened to Ukraine, of course. And look what it did for the Ukrainian people. I bet those people who were out there protesting on Maidan Square in 2014 are having second thoughts—the ones who are still alive, anyway. There’s been a million Ukrainians dead.

So, yeah, it (the Israeli-occupied USA) is the devil. And if the devil takes over your country, it actually is likely to get even worse, not better, as happened in Ukraine, as has happened in Syria, as has happened in Libya, and as would certainly happen in Iran if something catastrophic changed that would allow for the devils to succeed in Iran. But they won’t. Because there is a very big difference between the situation in Iran and situations like Ukraine, Syria, Libya, and so on. And that is that the people in Iran are aware of these things. They had their government already overthrown in 1953 by the United States in a coup. And their media does show them the truth about what happens around the world, about who’s coming after them and why.

And so they realize that they are really caught between the proverbial rock and the hard place. They’re stuck in a country whose economic potential is indeed being restrained by these sanctions and weather warfare. Let’s not forget that. I think that it’s highly likely—I would bet my life if it came to that—that the United States, operating as a tool of the Zionist oligarchy, has waged weather warfare against the region internationally. and that they destroyed Syria largely by creating a horrific drought that hit the regions that had the most unrest. It worked in Syria because Syria was not a very coherent state. The majority of people there are Sunni Muslims, who were always the elite, but had been overthrown when the French colonizers arrived, and various other groups, including the group that the al-Assad family was a part of, were then privileged, and that led to a lot of social grievances and social incoherence that made Syria a perfect target.

I never was saying Syria will never fall. If you go back and listen to what I’ve said about Syria over the years, I didn’t say the things about Syria that I’ve been saying about Iran. Iran has a different history, a different mentality, a different government, which is relatively competent. And so it’s very, unlikely to fall. I think the West will fall before Iran does. And it might only be another few years before we see that kind of collapse. The economic signs are picking up that the U.S. The dollar is losing it. That’s why gold and everything is going up. And that’s why Trump is lashing out and freaking out and invading Venezuela, threatening to seize Canada and Greenland. And China is going to get Taiwan. And Israel is going to collapse. And within a few years, the West will be suffering a collapse with people in the streets because of economic hardship, much more than Iran is today.

Yeah, I think rare earth minerals has got a lot to do with what’s going on in the last months to maybe even to four or five years. Like my contention, my thesis is that without a drastic turnaround, we’re all going to be living in a technocratic prison in a few years. And it’ll be a prison without any visible walls. It’ll be a digital prison where everything we do, everywhere we go, will be controlled and will be monitored. And this will need a massive technical infrastructure. And I believe Rare Earth Minerals has got a lot to do with Venezuela and Colombia and Greenland. And I have never believed that any president was really acting of his own volition. I believe that Trump is just a messenger. And Venezuela wasn’t his idea, in my opinion. But let’s talk about it for a few minutes while we have time.

You’re listening to Kevin Barrett. Check out truthjihad.com, kevinbarrett.substack.com. You’ll find Kevin’s articles and links there. Kevin is an academic. I first came across Kevin many, many, many years ago when he stared down the despicable, deplorable, disgraceful so-called journalist of Fox News when he dared to challenge the thinking around September the 11th. It’s good to have Kevin on the programme.

Kevin mentioned using weather warfare. For listeners who are new to the concept, back in 1977 a lot of countries came together and signed the Environmental Modification Convention, or NMOD, as it’s known, where they agreed not to use the weather... or the environment for hostile purposes. Like, don’t use technology to cause earthquakes or floods or droughts. Now, that was many years ago, dear listener. Do you think they might have that technology today? I think they might just have. Why else would they have been talking about it years ago? So let’s talk about this antic disposition then of Donald Trump talking about annexing Greenland, carrying off the most audacious—or at least his military did—operation in Caracas last Saturday, where the President Maduro and his wife were basically kidnapped, taken out of the country, and eventually ended up in a Manhattan courtroom yesterday on drugs and gun charges. This is astounding to me, regardless of who is really pulling the strings, Trump or somebody else in the shadows. Kevin, what’s that about? Why is it happening, do you think?

I think the single biggest reason, again, is genocide. They want to keep perpetrating genocide in Palestine. And Venezuela is a key link in the axis of resistance to genocide. Iran is the most important country that’s resisting the genocide of Palestine. But Venezuela is up there due to its oil reserves and the strong relationship that it maintained with the Axis of Resistance—Iran, Hezbollah, and so on.

Maduro was perfectly willing to hand over his oil to Chevron under a reasonable deal. It’s not what they’d had before the 1990s, but it was still a very favorable deal for the United States. And as so often happens—as happened with Saddam Hussein making the same kind of offer shortly before he was attacked—they wouldn’t take yes for an answer. So why wouldn’t they take yes for an answer in either case? Because in both cases, the real reason for these invasions was not that American oil companies need some kind of a better deal from Iraq or Venezuela. It’s because America is ruled by Jewish billionaire oligarchs who are loyal to the Zionist project of committing genocide in Palestine and building a state there that’s so strong that it will ultimately rule the world. This in accordance with messianic millenarian prophecies that a Jewish messiah will conquer the world and exterminate and enslave all non-Jewish people. Now I’m not saying that these oligarchs believe that. But it’s a convenient prophecy to get them to mobilize extremely radical Jewish extremists around that project, and it helps them build their wealth and power. And they do have a real chance of ruling the world, although I doubt very much whether it will be in precisely that millenarian messianic fashion.

So that’s why they attacked Venezuela, because it’s part of the axis of resistance to genocide. They could have had a perfectly good oil deal, a perfectly good rare earth deal. And no, they don’t want that, because Venezuela insists on remaining a sovereign, independent country and opposing the genocide of Palestine.

Yeah, and a country that for three, four decades has believed in the principles of Bolivarianism, that is, exploit your natural resources, but for the good of everybody in the country.

Absolutely. It’s got something to do with that as well.

Going to read a few comments, Kevin. Loads of these. Andrea is in Glasgow and she was asking about weather warfare causing droughts in Syria. A number of people have asked me to kind of go after you there. I don’t really want to go after you because I believe the weather modification thing is really a thing. But I’ve been asked by friends, when you’re having a beer, Richie, you’re talking a load of bollocks there. Have you got any evidence? I’m like, well, I can’t provide you with blueprints. I can’t provide you with actual video of the thing in action or the machinery in action. But I do believe that meddling with the ionosphere, which is a thing that’s been going on for years, charging it with particles and all sorts of stuff like that can accelerate storms and it can also, excuse me, maybe cause earthquakes. So I can’t go after you on it, but you are the guy who brought it up. Have you ever seen any hard evidence that weather modification…Forget about cloud seeding, we know that. We know it’s been around…the Americans did it in Vietnam. We know it’s happened around big entertainment events, we know that. But actual top secret equipment that could lead to earthquakes and cause great droughts. Have you ever seen anything remotely like hard evidence, Kevin?

Well, I don’t know about earthquakes, Richie, but Bill Clinton’s Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, said something about owning the weather for weather warfare by 2025. I’ve read the book Weather Warfare by Jerry Smith, who unfortunately passed away at a somewhat untimely age, as I recall, perhaps because of that book. I don’t know. I had him on the show once back in the day. But the reason that I’m pretty sure that that’s real is, number one, I spoke to an Iranian scientist who was working on a program to counter the weather warfare targeting Iran. As you know, Iran is suffering a terrible drought. There have been rumors that they might have to evacuate parts of Tehran. And so that drought, I think, almost certainly doesn’t have a natural origin. That’s what the scientist told me. I met this guy in the VIP lounge at the airport in Tehran. And he was very, very convincing that, yeah, he was really an Iranian scientist who’s working on efforts to counter this weather warfare against Iran. And he, at the time, was pretty optimistic. This was, I think, around 2016. He thought they were succeeding. He thought they’d made some sort of breakthrough and were likely to succeed. But it doesn’t look like that was the case.

I also spoke to a mainstream journalist in who didn’t believe in conspiracy theories in general, and didn’t accept my version of 9/11, but knew that chemtrails are very real, and had investigated and discovered that it’s run by the military and that they are spraying aluminum, barium, and strontium in quite considerable quantities into the atmosphere. There are a couple of different programs. One of them is a weather control program and the other is an experimental effort to block sunlight to try to push back against global warming, kind of a global sunscreen. And then the third is a classified communications (and surveillance) technology that uses these metals that they’re dumping into the atmosphere.

So based on those two very informed sources, one, a mainstream journalist who had done a very large investigation of this and apparently wasn’t allowed to publish about it, and then secondly, a scientist actually working on a weather warfare program, I’m pretty sure it’s real.

Yeah, and it interested me greatly in the last couple of years. There were several stories. Sometimes they ran concurrently. Other times you’d have one, and then you’d have one six or eight weeks later. But that talked about firing... particles into the stratosphere or the ionosphere to reflect the sun’s rays away from the Earth and of course guys like us chuckled at the time because some very good researchers Michael Murphy before Michael became unwell. He made an amazing documentary many years ago called What in the World Are They Spraying? A very high-quality documentary, where he even had congressmen and women talking about it. I reckon they’ve been at it forever, Kevin. There are levels of evil, I think, that sometimes... Do you find this? I don’t think I’ve ever asked you before. Do you find it difficult at times to comprehend this stuff to talk about it to reconcile it? Like you finish writing an article you’ve done an episode of Truth Jihad you’ve come on here for an argument with me in the style of Monty Python all those years ago “I came here for an argument.” So you do all that and when you’re sitting down having a bit of supper do you sometimes shudder at the levels of evil that is apparent, as I do?

Yeah, and I shudder with anger, outraged anger, quite often. Like you, I’ve long been in this alternative media business and forced to pay attention to these things. What really gets me is not so much just the evil. I understand how evil is part of existence. It’s part of the challenge that we face as human beings, how we react to it. And I understand how power is going to be manifesting as evil, sometimes inevitably. That is, for instance, to maintain a government that can maintain order and provide a decent standard of living for people in a given territory. that government is going to have to do some evil things. Absolutely, I understand that.

I was just debating or arguing with somebody who seems to think that the government in Venezuela was bad on human rights and therefore maybe we shouldn’t be so outraged about what Trump did to Venezuela. Well, if you actually read the human rights report on Venezuela, what the Venezuelan government has been doing to try to maintain public order and its Bolivarian Constitution is extremely tame compared to the kinds of evil things that all governments have to do to maintain order if they’re going to be governments.

So what gets me isn’t so much just evil. I understand why Castro had to be evil sometimes, why the Bolivarians have to be evil sometimes, why the Islamic Republic leaders have to be evil sometimes. But what I don’t understand is extreme, over-the-top, gratuitous evil, like the genocide of Palestine. They don’t have to do that. The Zionists who in 1948 slaughtered people and terrorized people, killed them and stole their homes, expelled them and stole their homes, stole their property…they could actually live there with a lot of that stolen property if they would just treat the people that they victimized as human beings and be somewhat reasonable. They could even negotiate from position of strength: The two state solution coming out of the Oslo agreements and so on.

Three decades ago was a golden opportunity for them to get away with murder and genocide and massive theft and still live peacefully and in friendship with their neighbors. And yeah, they would have committed a vast amount of evil. They would still have to commit some evil to be a government. But it would be at a kind of a normal level.

But what they’re doing, this over-the-top genocide, just deliberately murdering tens if not hundreds of thousands of little children under five, hundreds of thousands of women, it’s just obscene and unnecessary, and it makes me wonder, what’s wrong with these people? They don’t need to do that. It would be more effective for them if they didn’t do that. They would run their countries more effectively without doing that.

So I see that the West, and especially the Zionists, are just doing so much excessive evil so much more than they even remotely need to be doing. And that’s what really bothers me.

Next time you’re on, we might have a conversation about the theories of one or two others. People like David Ike and the late Jordan Maxwell and the late great Jim Marrs and others, because they collectively believed and believe that there is some some non-human element to this, that there is some demonic thing going on. We might get into that. Listen, thanks for coming on today.

I know you’ll be back with us throughout when you have time. I appreciate you greatly.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN link

I spend a lot of time writing and talking about how bad things are, and rarely offer solutions of the “here’s what you can do” variety. During the decade when I was doing a lot of in-person lectures (2006-2016) I noticed that audiences always asked the same question: “What can I do about this?” (This being the 9/11 false flag.) My answers, which leaned heavily into info-activism, were only marginally satisfactory.

Today, the outrages “up with which we must not put” are coming at us hotter and heavier than ever. No sane human being wants to put up with:

*The US-taxpayer-funded Gaza genocide, featuring the deliberate murder of perhaps 680,000 people including 380,000 children under five years old according to UN Rapporteur Francesca Albanese.

*Lying Epstein-crony and accused child-rapist and child-murderer Trump’s grotesquely mendacious thuggery against Venezuela, his “Christmas bombing three countries for Israel,” among other guided-by-Israel policies including genocide complicity and threats against Iran.

*And the underlying problem: Runaway technology in the hands of genocidal Zionist billionaires determined to turn Earth into a prison planet…a planet not worth living on, where the only human option would be to sacrifice one’s life in glorious revolt.

Inaction would be inhuman. No human being could accept these outrages, do nothing, and live with themselves.

So…what kind of actions? Key criteria: They should be ethically defensible, potentially effective…and, if possible, life-enhancing and enjoyable.

E Michael Jones, Ron Unz: Two Viable Projects

False Flag Weekly News co-host E. Michael Jones is pushing a Catholic-Muslim alliance. Dr. Jones identifies the enemy as Jewish tribalism in general and its extremist messianic-millenarian Zionist manifestation in particular. Catholicism and Islam have the prerequisites to solve the problem.

The world’s nearly 1.5 billion Catholics and 2 billion Muslims represent a little less than half of the global population. Throw in sympathetic non-Catholic Christians, starting with the Eastern Orthodox, and you’ve got a global majority. That majority represents universal ethical monotheism—the reformed, corrected, viable alternative to the Bronze Age unethical tribalist henotheism of the Jews. And the Catholic-Muslim alliance agrees that usury is perhaps the worst of crimes, meaning that the Jewish-Zionist bankers who run the West are the worst of criminals. Their other crimes—propaganda lies, deviance and degeneracy, murder and genocide in service to property theft, and so on—are related to usury, as Ezra Pound so eloquently noticed. Simply by enforcing the first of sacred rules—a universal ban on usury—the Catholic-Muslim Alliance would solve Earth’s biggest pressing problem.

Okay, so maybe you’re neither Muslim nor Catholic/Christian, and for whatever reason not interested in converting. In that case, another good info-activism strategy was articulated back in 2016 by Ron Unz. In his article “American Pravda: Breaching the Media Barrier” Unz persuasively argues that since “the media is the crucial force empowering the opposition, then it should be regarded as a primary target of any political strategy.” In other words, we should be working overtime to erode the mainstream media’s credibility. Our primary targets must be the ever-shrinking portion of the population, especially those with significant wealth/education/power, who have not yet awakened to the reality that mainstream media peddles propaganda lies. Only secondarily should we be preaching to the converted, with the aim of convincing them to act more effectively against the media, reinforcing their stamina and enthusiasm, or stopping them from drifting back into the media propaganda orbit.

Anti-MSM info-activism has prospered on social media. But now that the Zionist billionaires are buying up social media and cracking down on algorithms, we may be facing diminishing returns. Maybe it’s time to get out into public spaces, like Charlie Kirk famously did, and start conversations aimed at red-pilling people. (I know Charlie wasn’t very red-pilled, but if he can start conversations in public, so can we.) T-shirts bearing messages about red-pill subjects can be good conversation starters. I often wear the “9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB” T-shirt Alex Jones gave me while traveling, even though we all know that 9/11 was an Israeli job. That shirt has started many dozens of conversations, including several with pilots and TSA personnel. Thank you, Alex!

It’s important to remember that not just any anti-MSM message actually works against the MSM. The anti-MSM message needs to appear to not-yet-converted (non-red-pilled) people as reasonably credible. A crazy person ranting about 9/11, however accurately, or a crank pushing ridiculous-sounding ideas like flat Earth or viruses don’t exist or nuclear weapons don’t exist, may actually reinforce the authority of mainstream media by fostering the impression among the target (not-yet-converted) audience that “conspiracy theorists are cranks.” Likewise, overly angry attacks on overly broad categories of people create the impression that “conspiracy theorists are hateful” and drive the target audience towards mainstream thinking rather than away from it. Much of the cranky, hateful stuff out there is paid disinformation. Don’t do it for free.

My Suggestion: “Resistance Fiction”

E. Michael Jones and Ron Unz are brilliant, and I fully endorse their projects. Here’s another, complementary idea: Write resistance fiction.

Even if you’re not a born storyteller or fiction writer, I urge you to begin work on a resistance story or novel ASAP. Think of it as a visualize resistance exercise. Ask yourself: What would cool, heroic, adventurous, exciting resistance look like? Then imagine a hero or heroes doing it. Write it down, as fiction.

If you like, you can think of it as a prayer or meditation or visualization exercise. By conjuring up a positive vision of resistance to evil, alongside many others doing the same thing, you’ll be increasing the chances that actual resistance will manifest in reality. That may sound like New Age woo-woo. But even if you don’t buy the idea that consciousness collapses the wave function and directly determines what happens in reality, as Dean Radin among other scientists argue, ideas that are “out there in the air” have a way of spreading from person to person, partly unconsciously. By helping forge a heroic narrative of resistance, you’ll be contributing, however modestly, to that process.

I urge you to conjure up tales with a positive spin, rather than dystopian satires. I write a lot of dystopian satire myself, and the humor is definitely a life-saver, but the kind of narratives we really need are heroic ones. Comic book scripts and storyboards, epic poems even in doggerel, children’s tales, Substack serials…these and similar genres could provide the right sort of energy infusions appropriate to the current Kali Yuga moment.

AI is making it increasingly easy to produce visuals to accompany narration. AI can take your ideas and help you produce comic strips or even comic books. And AI-assisted filmmaking is enabling lone wolf subversive storytellers to make movies that aren’t funded and controlled by the Hollywood Kosher Nostra.

And speaking of AI, and the digital surveillance grid in general, here’s the best thing about writing “resistance fiction”: If enough people do it, it will throw the control grid for a loop. Our Orwellian overlords want us to believe “resistance is futile” and to that end they are surveilling all of our actions and transactions and using shadowbanning, pre-crime algorithms, and, increasingly, outright deplatforming and debanking to stop us from challenging their dystopia.

So let’s monkey wrench the panopticon. Let’s storm its gates with a huge crowd of “resistance fiction” writers researching subversive stuff, including things that would be illegal were they actually put into practice. With all of that research going on, the pre-crime panopticon will grow overwhelmed with possible alarms, and eventually stop functioning.

Get my drift? By writing “resistance fiction” we will naturally have to research methods of resistance. In order to write The Monkey Wrench Gang, for example, Edward Abbey engaged in quite a bit of research. He had to learn—theoretically of course—how to destroy earth-moving machinery in various ways, how to slow down construction developments by pulling up surveying stakes, and last but not least, how to blow things up. To learn these things, he visited his local public library, talked to construction/demolition specialists and military veterans, and quite possibly purchased some Loompanics Unlimited books.

Today, we have the internet. The good news is that information about resistance techniques, ranging from the completely non-destructive (Gandhian nonviolence, info-activism) to property damage without hurting humans (Palestine Action smashing genocide weapons with sledgehammers) to military resistance (Che Guevara, Hamas/Hezbollah/Islamic Jihad, the coming Venezuelan guerrilla campaign) is widely and very cheaply available. The bad news is that when you research resistance techniques, the Panopticon sees you, allowing its Orwellian Controllers to run algorithms guessing what you may do with your knowledge, and taking actions to prevent you from succeeding. That’s what they are doing now in their war on info-activism: The Panopticon “sees” the threat and Big Brother responds by shadowbanning, censoring, deplatforming, and debanking.

When millions of “resistance fiction” writers suddenly flood cyberspace with traces of their research looking into such subjects as how a fictional nonviolent movement could succeed in overthrowing the private banking cartel, how a fictional character might succeed in destroying genocide weapons with sledgehammers, how a fictional lone wolf might save the world by assassinating a deranged president, how a fictional anti-genocide scientist might construct a weapon that would terminate a genocidal entity, and so on, the ambiguity—“are these actual threats or just fiction”—will overwhelm the AI, rather in the same way that the 9/11 false flag operation used coercion to disable and brainwash the American people via fact-fiction ambiguity (is the World Trade Center really blowing up or is this just a disaster movie?”) A world full of “resistance fiction” writers researching the most subversive subjects imaginable would be a world in which the Panopticon-based control grid would cease to function.

Okay, you say, maybe I could get away with researching nonviolent movements overthrowing banking cartels. But if I start researching how to break into military contractors in order to smash genocide weapons with sledgehammers, how to use drones to assassinate presidents, or how to build WMD to terminate Israel, won’t the sledgehammer of the state will come down on me?

The answer is: Probably not. If you’re an American citizen, the US government cannot legally stop you from, or punish you for, researching even the most destructive techniques and technologies, as long as you are not illegally engaging with classified material. The USA vs. Progressive Magazine case established that the Constitution even protects your right to publish a recipe for building a nuclear weapon, as long as you’re drawing from unclassified sources. As a fiction writer, you clearly have the First Amendment right to research how anti-genocide activists could destroy or disable genocide weapons, how freedom fighters might use drones against corrupt leaders, how resistance fighters might build the most effective bombs, how hackers could spill evil secrets of evil states, how how smaller countries could prevent themselves from being bullied by obtaining WMD (paging Kim Jong Un), and so on. As long as you are learning all these things to make your fiction more realistic, and are not planning to actually engage in any illegal activity (including conspiring to commit a crime) you are well within your Constitutional rights, and the chances of blowback from the government are vanishingly small—about the same as the chances of blowback for obtaining Loompanics “how to build bombs” books from your local library or bookstore.

Naturally, “they” want you to be too terrified of possible repercussions to do anything like that. “They” don’t want you to even imagine heroic resistance.

And “they” would like you to think that the First Amendment no longer applies. Israeli billionaire Schlomo Kramer recently demanded that the United States scrap the First Amendment. He and his fellow genocide perps are terrified of free speech and free thought, because it leads to the truth—and if the truth is sufficiently understood, Schlomo and his genocidal friends will hang.

The way to defend the First Amendment is use it or lose it. Researching resistance techniques in order to write “resistance fiction” is a terrific way to stand up for your First Amendment rights.

Bottom line: The Global War on Humanity (GWOH) is a war on the human imagination. We can win it by continuing to imagine goodness rising up against evil…and using the creative imagination described by Ibn al-‘Arabi to draw closer to, and ultimately merge with, the singular source of supreme goodness.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Update: I awoke this morning, Saturday, to the news that the US has bombed Caracas and other Venezuelan cities. E. Michael Jones and I will discuss this and other news on today’s False Flag Weekly News—watch at or after 8 pm Quds Time (1 pm Eastern).

Kevin Barrett tells Press TV that Trump’s childish bullying can’t conceal the fact that the US empire is on the way out. Nor will it get the US a better deal from Venezuela than what sober diplomacy could have produced. (For more on this topic see my interview “Will Venezuela Defeat US in World War III?”)

Transcript:

I’d like to thank you very much, Kevin Barrett, for joining us today during this hour’s top headline. Mr. Barrett, let’s go ahead and start off with a situation. In your opinion, how close is a full-scale war on Venezuela? Or do you believe it’s just more threats by the U.S.?

I think there’s probably less than a 50% chance of a full-scale war. But, of course, that’s not really a very accurate forecast. That’s like saying it’s 50-50 whether it’ll be sunny or whether it will rain. But I think that there is a real chance of war.

What we are seeing is essentially a demonstration of weakness by the Trump administration and the U.S. in the form of over-the-top outrageous bullying based on these insane lies about supposed fentanyl coming from Venezuela, which everyone admits it doesn’t. And then recently we had Trump admitting that he really wanted the oil, which was a half-truth, because probably the single biggest factor driving this hostility to Venezuela is the Venezuelan government’s support for the Palestinians against the Israeli genocide.

So Trump’s bullying is a sign of weakness. Bullies are well known to behave the way they do because deep inside they feel weak. So they have to try to project a false image of strength by picking on someone smaller than they are. And that’s what the United States is doing now. It’s lost to Russia in Ukraine. It’s not in a position to genuinely challenge China in the South China Sea or anywhere else. So it’s picking on Venezuela as an easy target to demonstrate its bullying propensities.

Trump is a quintessential bully. He’s a narcissistic sociopath who’s been bullying people throughout his entire career as a stooge of the Kosher Nostra criminal organization that runs the United States. And so it’s not surprising that he and the United States have resorted to this obscene, disgusting bullying based on lies. And whether that means that they’re actually going to attack Venezuela in an all-out war remains to be seen.

We have over 115 people killed by the U.S. under this pretext, as you mentioned. And yet President Maduro is still open to negotiations, saying the ball is in the U.S.’s court. Do you see any negotiation attempt by Trump?

I don’t think that we should rule that out. Trump’s personality is very mercurial. He’s been known to use threats and crazy behavior to try to soften up people that he’s going to negotiate with. In the past, we’ve seen that lead to North Korea becoming essentially a legitimized nuclear weapons state. Trump yelled and screamed and pressured Kim Jong Un and then gave in.

And so it’s possible that an oil deal and a drug fighting deal will come out of this, and Trump will declare a win and imagine that his bullying has succeeded—when, in fact, I’m sure that the United States could have gotten the same deal without all the murder, bullying, and besmirching America’s reputation and squandering its soft power with this insane behavior.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

“Israel” has been genocidal from the very beginning. By the 1990s, the Israeli New Historians, and courageous voices like Israel Shahak, had exposed the terrible truth. But Zionist-dominated Western media covered it up, and instead of trying to atone, Israel only got more genocidal. In this interview, Salim Mansur discusses that unfortunate history, by way of his new article: “Thou Hypocrite, First Cast Out the Beam Out of Thine Own Eye”: Recalling Israel Shahak.

Salim Mansur is a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Western Ontario in Canada. He is a former columnist for the London Free Press and the Toronto Sun, and has contributed to various publications including National Review, the Middle East Forum and Frontpagemag.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Last week German journalist Anna Liedtke spoke publicly for the first time about being raped by Israeli soldiers after being kidnapped in international waters in September. If Iran or Venezuela or Russia had kidnapped activists, viciously abused them, and even raped one or more of them, it would have been front page mainstream media headlines for weeks…especially if one of the victims was one of the world’s biggest celebrities. And if Germany had kidnapped a ship full of Jewish activists…well, let’s not even go there. So let’s Google “Israel raped German journalist” to find some of that heavy media coverage.

When mainstream media cover a news story, the link inevitably shows up at the top of Google search results. So the absence of evidence of MSM coverage of Anna Liedke’s story is definitely evidence of absence. (Adding “New York Times” and “Washington Post” to the Google inquiry doesn’t help.)

It’s almost as if the media don’t want us to know that Israel is a nation of rapists and rapist-enablers. Israel prison guards train dogs to rape prisoners. They rape prisoners to death with sticks. Their soldiers take selfies dressing in the underwear of the women and girls they have murdered and/or raped. And most of the Americans who pay for it all have no idea.

The Israeli public loves it. If foreign pressure forces Israeli prosecutors to even look into such a case, a one-in-a-million occurrence, Israelis respond by turning out in huge throngs to support the killer-rapists and make them national heroes. Israel is probably the only country in history with a “right to rape” movement that turns psychopaths who sodomize people to death with sticks into celebrity victims.

Think about it: A prison guard who sodomized a prisoner to death with a stick appears on Israeli national television and plays the victim. And the Israeli Jewish public laps it up, rallying behind the killer-rapist and agreeing that he, not the person he sodomized to death, is the real victim. What does that say about the culture and psychology of these people? To me it says:

If you see a Jew coming after you with a stick, run! You know he’s going to cry out…but what he’s going to do to you while he’s wailing and playing the victim and profiting mightily from his “victimization” might be a whole lot worse than just striking you.

It’s odd that the #MeToo movement, which occasionally seems to go overboard persecuting American guys who might have looked crosswise at a woman decades ago, doesn’t notice Israeli rape culture. Here is a whole nation where the majority of men agree it’s fine to rape an acquaintance, and #MeToo doesn’t blink an eye. Once again, blame the mainstream media blackout. (For a balanced and sympathetic view of why the Jewish-dominated American mainstream media systematically covers up Israel’s criminal nature, check out Philip Weiss’s classic “Do Jews Dominate in American Media? And So What If We Do?”)

“The Jew cries out as he strikes you” may be the world’s most underrated and understated proverb. It would be easy to fill a one-hour weekly news broadcast with stories illustrating it. In fact, quite a few of the past week’s most important news stories have a “cries out as he strikes you angle.” Let’s look at a few.

Donald Trump: Taught to “Cry Out” by the Master, Roy Cohn

First and foremost, US President Donald Trump—who may or may not be Jewish, but who learned the “cry out as you strike ‘em (and rape ‘em)” schtick from his Kosher Nostra mentor Roy Cohn—spent Christmas wailing and weeping crocodile tears about being accused of child-rape and murder of babies and teenagers. It’s those mean, nasty Democrats who are persecuting the poor, spotless, totally-Epstein-innocent Trump! If you haven’t figured out that Trump is a bordlerline-psychotic, sociopathic mega-narcissist by now, his bizarre tweeting and bombing over Christmas—that “most wonderful time of year” when, many years ago, he allegedly witnessed a baby being murdered and thrown into Lake Michigan, according to Justice Department files—should nudge you toward belated recognition of the hideous truth. To call Trump’s reaction to the escalating Epstein scandals textbook guilty demeanor would be putting it mildly.

I had to issue a “not satire” warning when I wrote the headline Trump Wishes “Sleazebags” a Merry Epstein Christmas:

“Merry Christmas to all, including the many Sleazebags who loved Jeffrey Epstein, gave him bundles of money, went to his Island, attended his parties, and thought he was the greatest guy on earth, only to ‘drop him like a dog’ when things got too HOT, falsely claimed they had nothing to do with him, didn’t know him, said he was a disgusting person, and then blame, of course, President Donald J. Trump, who was actually the only one who did drop Epstein, and long before it became fashionable to do so…

Seconds after Trump posted that, the internet started lighting up with images, videos, and Justice Department files documenting Trump partying with Epstein, frequently flying on his plane (despite Trump’s repeated denials), and generally carrying on like Epstein was indeed “the greatest guy on Earth.” If there are any MAGA fans out there who are still buying Trump’s self-pitying sobs about being the victim of “the Democrats’ Epstein hoax”…all I can say is, may the Good Lord protect them from further contact with Kosher Nostra types like Trump who cry out while coming at you with a stick.

If the reports in the newly-released Justice Department files are true, Trump could be “crying out” after having basically raped two people to death. One was the aforementioned baby he is reported to have watched being killed and dumped into Lake Michigan—Trump’s personal ghost of a Christmas long past. The assumption, of course, is that it was Trump’s baby, conceived by one of the teenage Epstein victims he raped.

The second person Trump is perhaps less credibly alleged to have “raped to death,” and cried out about on Christmas, was Dusti Rhea Duke, a teenage Epstein victim who allegedly went to police to report Trump raping her, and was found with her head blown off shortly afterward.

Trump loyalists argue that the allegation was politically motivated and baseless. Some argue that the case offers details similar to the Trump-Epstein rape allegations of Katie Johnson, suggesting that the tipster, Dan Ferree, fabricated the story based on “Katie” material—either due to mental instability, as an anti-Trump op, or (perhaps most plausibly) as a pro-Trump op to “poison the well” against the legion of actual and potential allegations against Trump. In any case, various people, with different backgrounds and motives, will undoubtedly be looking deeper into the Dusti Rhea Duke case. However it plays out, we can be sure that Trump, who has been shamelessly victimizing while playing the victim at least since Roy Cohn started mentoring him in 1973, will keep right on lying and scamming and weeping crocodile tears and screaming “no more!”

Trump is also shamelessly playing the victim while he victimizes other nations. Just this week he cried out as he struck Venezuelan fisherman and oil tankers (sobbing all the while that they’re killing Americans with imaginary fentanyl, stealing their own oil from us, and so on). If you’re wondering what that’s all about, cherchez le juif.

Trump also sobbed crocodile tears for the soon-to-be-victimized-by-Russia-and-China Greenlanders…as he prepared to rape that frozen island. And he cried out for the poor persecuted Nigerian Christians while ordering a completely random, pointless bombing whose real purpose must have been to rally the stupidest part of his base while distracting from the Epstein issue.

Enough About Trump!

In more cry-out-while-they-strike-you news, the genocidal Jews who own Britain had Greta Thunberg arrested as a supposed terrorist because she supports nonviolent protestors close to death from a hunger strike. It seems we are supposed to believe that Greta is the terrorist, and the genocidal Jews who have murdered tens of thousands of children are the poor, sobbing victims.

Meanwhile, a top Iranian military leader “noticed” that the Bondi Beach massacre by ISIS, colloquially known as the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service, was orchestrated by the people who orchestrated the media spectacle around it and who stood to benefit from it. The Jerusalem Post cried out about the terrible, horrible antisemitism entailed in such noticing.

And in Scotland, a 78-year-old anti-genocide activist named Mick Napier was fined $810 for quoting Israeli media reports that Israel Defense Forces Chief Rabbi Brig. Gen. Eyal Krim expressed support for Israeli soldiers raping Palestinians. It seems that those Israeli reports have supposedly been retroactively retracted, meaning nobody is allowed to quote them without being fined…especially in Scotland. Obviously Napier, the noticer, is the victimizer, and the poor little rapist nation is the victim.

Last but not least, no discussion of the “cry out as they rape you to death” theme would be complete without noting that the Anti-Defamation League—the biggest single source of the notion that there is such a thing as “antisemitism” and the most powerful and prominent organization tasked with making victimizers appear as victims—was founded to protect a Jewish rapist-murderer Leo Frank and falsely portray him as a victim.

When will the US, and the world, get tired of hearing them cry out as they rape us to death?

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Today I received some sad news:

Vladislav Georgievich Krasnov (AKA W. George Krasnow) passed away peacefully at the age of 88 on 23 November 2025 at the home of his daughter and son-in-law in Crockett, California…Vladislav graduated from Moscow State University in 1960 with a diploma in history and anthropology and worked with the Swedish Service at Radio Moscow prior to defecting to Sweden where he studied and lectured at the University of Lund (Sweden) several years prior to moving to the United States. With a Masters in Slavic languages and a PhD in Russian Literature from the University of Washington, he became known for his work on Soviet defectors, Russian literature and politics. He was a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Chicago, taught or conducted research at the University of Texas, Southern Methodist University, Hokkaido University (Japan), and Hoover Institution at Stanford University where his research materials are housed. He served as the director of the Russian Studies program at the Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, California.

He was passionately devoted to improving relations between the United States and his beloved Russia, to which end he established and led the Russia-America Goodwill Association. He studied and wrote prolifically, published numerous books and articles and lectured in a variety of venues. His books included: Solzhenitsyn and Dostoevsky, a Study in the Polyphonic Novel; Soviet Defectors, the KGB Wanted List; Russia Beyond Communism, a Chronicle of Rebirth; From the East to the West, a Message of Peace - Select Essays; Permian Cross: Mikhail Romanov; and, When I Was Born, The Genesis of Dissent (a memoir), the latter two in Russian only.

He heartily embraced and promoted the philosophical ideal espoused by Alexander Solzhenitsyn as a viable pathway toward a revitalized Russia. He actively participated in efforts by fellow native Permians to highlight the legacy of Grand Duke Mikhail Aleksandrovich Romanov who, as the ‘last’ Tsar of Russia, surrendered power in favor of a constitutional monarchy. And, as a board member of the Gandhian Global Harmony Association, he actively supported their efforts promoting global peace.

Vladislav was known and appreciated for his intellect, even temperament, friendliness and eagerness to promote goodwill. He travelled extensively in many countries, easily engaging people from all walks of life and ethnic backgrounds while spreading cheer and harmony along the way. He was thoughtful, considerate and kind to all. He cherished the company of the animals in his life, and they doted on his presence and affection. He enjoyed frolicking at the beach, taking a dip in the ocean, playing tennis, snow skiing, hiking and dancing to his own beat.

—

Vladislav Krasnov epitomized the way that people with uncommon common sense often wind up as dissidents. He didn’t get caught up in groupthink bubbles, whether the Russian Communist totalitarianism he was born into, or the post-Cold War and especially post-9/11 neocon “American” (covertly Zio-supremacist) triumphalism that has ruined the USA.

Like me, Vladislav was a literature scholar heavily influenced by M.M. Bakhtin and his Doestoevsky-based theories of dialogism and polyphony. He liked my podcast because he saw it (correctly, I hope) as radically dialogic: I listen to guests and interact, without ponderously imposing my own views Alex Jones style. That can get you in trouble, as Tucker Carlson found out when he interviewed Nick Fuentes, but it’s a good kind of trouble to be in if you’re an openminded truth-seeker who doesn’t mind offending fools and knaves.

Vladislav didn’t just dissent against silly orthodoxies and champion the heretics who poked holes in them. He focused on solutions. His Russia-America Goodwill Association (RAGA) was an exemplary attempt to foster cordiality between the great powers. Though a Russian nationalist at heart, his brand of nationalism did not exclude, scapegoat, or demonize the other. It was more about seeking and championing the best of Russian history, culture, and spirituality than about denigrating anyone else. Contemporary nationalists, including European and “white” nationalists, could learn from his example.

—

Vladislav “George” Krasnov: Is the USA Becoming Monologic and Totalitarian?

November 2017

Welcome to Truth Jihad Radio, and now Truth Jihad Video. I’m Kevin Barrett, doing all kinds of interesting interviews with some of the best guests you’ll find anywhere, talking about truths way outside of the mainstream box. Today, we’ve got a very special guest, Vladislav Krasnov of the Russian American Goodwill Association, or RAGA. He’s got a wonderful newsletter, and it features incisive and really fair and balanced commentary on these issues involving the rising tension with Russia. The American people can’t really figure out why we’re supposed to still be antagonistic towards Russia with the Cold War over. But somebody wants us to be. And for those of us interested in trying to defuse that, the Raga newsletter from Vladislav is a terrific resource.

Vladislav has a very interesting background in literary studies. In fact, he and I share an interest in the great Russian literary theorist M.M. Bakhtin, the inventor of dialogism and polyphony, which actually has a lot of relevance to the international situation and to politics, as well as to a lot of other things. So without further ado, welcome, Vladislav Krasnov. It’s good to have you.

Thank you, Kevin. I’m always glad to be on the show. It’s been for a while now, but I continue to watch and I know what you’re doing. So I’m delighted to see that you’re doing good work for dialogue, for polyphony in the United States. That’s what we need. We need different ideological, different religious voices. And we do not have to be enemies. We just should converse with each other and conduct a dialogue. Follow, if you wish, the foundation, the fountain spring of the Western tradition. Socrates. Go back to the Greeks.

Let’s explain to the listeners and viewers a little bit about this notion of dialogism. Bakhtin argued that there are tendencies towards monologism, which is a mode of discourse in which one voice purports to completely and perfectly describe reality and therefore subordinates or even almost erases all the other voices, versus dialogism and polyphony, which is a kind of multi-voice discourse, and which is actually what really happens in the world, except when the one voice is trying to crush all the other voices.

This has so much political relevance. In the Soviet Union, Bakhtin was suffering under the monologism of the communists. And today... Many of us think that in the unipolar world order with the neoconservatives and the supremacists—whether American supremacists or in some cases one might say Israeli Zionist supremacists—these sorts of people are trying to impose a single viewpoint, a single voice, and marginalizing other voices.

So polyphony and dialogism involves listening to the other, bringing on the other, paying attention to the other, and busting up this monologue, this monopoly on discourse. And that is partly what I try to do here. So literature and politics actually kind of intersect with this, don’t they?

They do. They do. Very much so. And actually I came across the name of Mikhail Bakhtin—Mikhail is the same as Michael in Russian—Mikhail Bakhtin. I came across his name when I was already out of the USSR. I defected to the West in 1960 and came to the United States. And when I started to study the art and novels of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who became a Nobel Prize winner for his novels, I found one interview Solzhenitsyn made with one reporter from Slovakia. It was not even published in Russia, it was published in Slovakia. Slovakia was a little bit freer compared to the Soviet Union. And in that interview with the Slovak journalists, Solzhenitsyn mentioned the word polyphony. He described his method, polyphony. That means when you write a novel, you do not have a single hero who the reader knows as well that he represents the views of the author himself. No, you never know that in polyphonic novel, like Solzhenitsyn’s novel The First Circle, for which he got the Nobel Prize. There are many heroes there. The reader is free to read and to make up his own mind and to choose his preferences.

So that’s the freedom that Solzhenitsyn gave to American readers. I think probably that’s one of the reasons that he was highly appreciated. People felt that he was not imposing his views. He wanted to have variety of views of the Soviet Union, the country which was a terra incognito for many Americans. And now they had more trust in the author who can be so objective and let other people judge situation in the former Soviet Union.

Solzhenitsyn and Bakhtin both suffered from internal exile because there were dissidents in the Soviet Union. Actually the chain is even deeper or longer starting with Dostoevsky. Because Dostoevsky was also a rebel or dissident and actually so much against the Tsar that he was suspected of being in a conspiracy in which they may have conspired to kill the officers of the Tsarist army.

He was considered a terrorist.

Yes. And whether they actually planned to kill someone, I don’t know. But they discussed those issues. So because of that, he faced the firing squad.

Actually, we could make a connection here, Vladislav, between that situation and the situation we have today in the United States, where repeatedly we find these so-called terror plots, which are often actually fabricated by the FBI... They invent a terror plot, and then they find some vulnerable, maybe mentally challenged young Muslim and convince them in discussions to say things that make it sound like they’ve acquiesced to the FBI terror plot. And then they swoop in and basically imprison that young person for life.

Dostoevsky was in a radical circle, and they were talking big, they were talking loosely, and there were police informers who were probably egging things on. So in a sense, Dostoevsky was in that kind of position, although he was probably a lot sharper than some of the Muslims that get entrapped.

Well, let me say, when I was teaching Russian…I was teaching Russian literature, and I had American students at Monterey Institute and elsewhere, including in Texas. So some American students told me: “You know what, Professor Krasnov? Dostoevsky saved me from being a revolutionary.” Because Dostoevsky knew both sides of the issue. He knew what it was to be a terrorist or be a suspected terrorist and how wrong it is. So eventually he came to the Christian viewpoint that one should love even your enemy, and of course even more your friends. “Love your neighbor.”

But originally he was familiar with his thoughts of grand revolutionaries. They were all, as Dostoevsky called them, small Napoleons. After Napoleon, the young people wanted to be heroic and to save mankind for some great adventures. And that’s why it was a temptation for the young people to be revolutionary. But Dostoevsky came around. So on the whole, I would say, Russia learned it the hard way. They had the temptation of strong revolutionary decisive action, of liberating the whole mankind. And they got burned with that.

Dostoevsky changed his mind while he was serving prison time after almost being executed, in Siberia. Then it happened to Bakhtin. And it makes you think hard. You learn the hard way.

And of course, Baktin got in trouble precisely because he was reading Dostoevsky. That’s where he got his ideas of dialogism and polyphony, from Dostoevsky, And then he ended up getting exiled.

Exactly. And Solzhenitsyn too. He was serving in the Soviet Army. He was a brave officer, an artillery officer. But then he also felt the deficiencies of Soviet system. Even in the military and what he saw around him. So it made him think hard that maybe the whole foundation, the value system, of the Soviet Union was wrong. So he came to the other side. So Russia has learned the hard way. Unfortunately many people in the West…and I know that because when I came first to Sweden then to the United States they were rather naive about communism. They were they had many illusions about communists: tkind of idea seems to be good. Oh, well, liberating poor people and the whole world seems like a very sympathetic great idea. But this idea was, of course, made in hell.

Yes, well, it’s a millenarian offshoot of the Judeo-Christian tradition. You could see Marxism as a kind of heretical form of Christianity or Judaism in that there is this millenarian tradition that keeps cropping up in religions and certainly in our monotheistic mainstream. Marx was saying that if we have this great revolution seizing state power, and then the state withers away, we’ll have a sort of paradise on earth. And this parallels the millenarian dreams of religious visionaries going back millennia.

Well, maybe I disagree a bit about Marxism as being a Christian offshoot or something like that. It seems like it’s antithetical. Because it’s a revolt against God. It’s a revolt against the Russians who got involved…

But it parallels other (strands of messianic millenarianism). We could look back at Shabtai Zvi and Jacob Frank, who led this first Zionist movement. They were also sort of anti-God anti-Christians, millenarians, and they were a heretical offshoot from Judaism. They said the Messiah will come if we can get all the Jews back to Palestine. And so Shabtai Zvi, who was a Satanist and a very diabolical, demon-haunted kind of person...

Yes, on that I agree with you. Yes, there was an element of Messianism. Yes, a false messiah. Both for Zionists and also Marxists. Of course, Marxists tried to hide it because they were anti-religious openly. But nonetheless, there was a kind of messianic subtext for the Marx activities. And those, especially Jews…many Jews in Russia followed Marx precisely because it was messianic. So they did not admit to religion, but they felt that it was some kind of salvation of mankind. Indeed, it was a revolt against God. So in my essay about Karl Marx, as Solzhenitsyn wrote precisely that it was a teomachy. It’s an uprising, just like Marshall’s (?) model on Prometheus. And Prometheus, on the one hand, yes, he gave the use of fire for mankind, liberated mankind. But on the other hand, another image of Prometheus is that he was a rebel against God. So it was his personal rivalry with Zeus and some supreme Greek pantheon of God that made him so obnoxious. So I think the followers of Marx tried to say, well, he just liked people so much that he wanted to make revolution in order to save them. Other people say, no, it was not so much love of neighbor, of people around, poor and downtrodden, but it’s rather self-love, revolt, the affirmation of himself as a god.

Very good point. Do you think that there is a connection and a parallel between this sort of aspect of Marxism as a millenarian anti-religious religion, a kind of revolt against God, and today’s secular humanism, which seems to be in some ways more... fundamentalist and more extremist than most actual religious extremists. For instance, in France today, they force women to take their clothes off on the beach. There are so many examples. You’re a heretic if you believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. And you’re a human rights violator if you don’t want Pussy Riot to go and desecrate the cathedrals in Russia. And so you can argue there’s so many of these examples that would suggest that today’s secular humanism, which is almost a sort of new state religion of the Western elite, is following this path of communism as a kind of extremist reaction against traditional religion.

It’s monologic, monologic. They’re against polyphony. They’re against dialogue…Socrates was condemned in a democracy. So democracy by itself does not guarantee a better way of life or justice. So he was certainly condemned unjustly. So he’s one of the heroes of free speech. And I think Dostoevsky follows him, Bakhtin follows him, Solzhenitsyn follows him, and I wish the modern secularists would follow and allow more dialogue instead of affirming the political correctness one way or another. So that’s what is missing now. So when I was writing my book, Solzhenitsyn and Dostoevsky, A Study in the Polyphonic Novel… At that time, I thought the issue was for the Soviet Union, because the Soviet Union was a totalitarian state. It could not tolerate, it did not print Bakhtin for a while, and Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn especially, and so for them it was the issue. And the United States was okay, because I based my findings on numerous reviews of Americans who read Solzhenitsyn’s novel, that they welcome such diversity of opinion.

And now I see the situation turn around. Now in Russia—and I spend a lot of time now in Russia—this freedom of expression…there’s a greater variety of views there than there seems to be here, especially in the media. When you see such anti-Russian campaigns (as currently in US media)…It’s too much uniformity. I think there should be more dialogue. And that’s why I’m president of RAGA, Russia America Goodwill Association, at the website www.raga.org. As Americans, we favor multipolarity, many views, polyphonic views. I do not try to choose some Russian author and poll them on Americans. Most of the authors I include in my almost monthly newsletter…I call them RAGA antidote newsletters, because they’re an antidote against overwhelming propaganda of monologists, the people who take monological, almost totalitarian views.

It’s not totalitarian yet, because we still have private property, unlike in the Soviet Union. But nonetheless, it is already too much of the same. So I want to have antidote to the poison which they spilled on Russia and other countries. I think my attitude toward other countries is essentially based on our founding father for the United States. We were not supposed to meddle in other countries.

Or based on the writings of a great philosopher whom I learned about when I came to the United States, Edmund Burke, a British statesman, member of the parliament, and a hero for us Americans, because he was one of the few members of parliament who voted against King George’s sending troops to suppress George Washington. And for that reason, he was called a traitor by the supporters of the king there. And for that reason, in Washington, D.C., where I lived a number of years, there is a monument to Edmund Burke. And so he was a conservative. He’s the father of conservative thinkers, the conservative movement. His attitude was, don’t meddle in other countries. And he based his reasons on ancient Greek philosophy, on Socrates and Aristoteles, that countries are different, and depending on their geography, neighbors, national tradition, religion, they choose their form of government. And one cannot say that this democracy is the best, it’s the best for all. No, it may or may not be.

And he was not against Republicans. Edmund Burke liked Switzerland. That’s fine. They already, for many centuries, decided to divide the country in the six different cantons, and they have a Republican form of government. It’s good for them. But maybe for some large countries, maybe like Russia, maybe a more centralized way of organizing the government is better.

So we should not judge the nation, or meddle by trying to change the ways of the people, just because we think that our American constitution is great. I happen to believe that we have good organization here. But as soon as we go to impose our constitution or our notion of what is good on other countries, it’s a severe mistake. And I think our founding fathers were against that.

Read the full transcript by clicking “transcript” above the image at my Substack.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

The US was humiliated by its $8 trillion forever wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. What will happen if it loses in Venezuela? What if an American fleet, or much of it, gets sunk, revealing the limits of naval power in a world full of cheap anti-ship missiles?

Transcript:

Thank you very much, Mr. Barrett, for joining us during this hour’s top headlines. Let’s go ahead and start off with the U.S military buildup and everything that is happening in Venezuela. Caracas is preparing for a likely US invasion of Venezuela. With all of Trump’s threats and all the games that he’s been playing lately, do you think that there is a possibility of the invasion of Venezuela?

Yes, I think there is a possibility. I think it would be a very ill-advised move by the Trump administration. It would essentially be a repeat of the very mistakes, the invasions of Afghanistan and especially Iraq, that Trump actually won office originally in 2016 by exposing and decrying. Trump was a critic of Bush Jr.‘s ridiculous claims that Iraq was full of weapons of mass destruction, but now Trump is doing the same thing. He just hilariously classified fentanyl, the drug, as a quote unquote weapon of mass destruction, so he can use the same excuse that Bush used to invade Iraq, which turned out to be a disaster, to invade Venezuela. And that would be at least an equally big disaster. Venezuela’s terrain is much more favorable to a guerrilla war than Iraq’s ever was. The mountains, the jungles, and then, of course, the anti-ship weapons that Venezuela may possess could deliver a terrible shock to the U.S. Navy.

The people of the region, especially the more intelligent, educated people, know about the horrors of U.S. imperialism in the region, and they will unite behind Venezuela, not just the people inside Venezuela, but everywhere else as well. I think in the same way that the Trump administration and the Israelis were surprised that Iran rallied as a nation against the evil Israeli aggression last June. And that led to a lot more virtually unanimous support for the government in Iran. The same kind of thing would happen in Venezuela, but also outside the borders, the whole continent, and indeed all of Latin America. Even Mexico will be full of people wanting to defend Venezuela and Latin America in general from these rapacious, crazy Yankee imperialists who want to come in and steal their resources, which Trump has even admitted is his goal.

Now he’s finally admitted that no, it’s not about fentanyl which of course doesn’t come from Venezuela anyway—that’s all just a ludicrous pretext—what it’s reallyabout is stealing what Trump says is “our” oil. Well, Trump, what is your oil doing under Venezuela’s land? Maybe Trump doesn’t realize…he looks at a globe and he sees that Texas is above Venezuela and he thinks the oil leaked out of Texas down into Venezuela, so he’s going to go get it back.

This is so ludicrous. And so the international community needs to stand up and say, look, we have a multipolar world now. We need it to run under some vestige of international law. And instead of having the UN and international law working together with the Americans, which has been the way it’s been since World War II, it’s time that international law and international cooperation has to happen against the Zionist occupied U.S. empire.

And Mr. Barrett, if you could briefly, please, in around a minute…you did mention a very important point that I’d like to go ahead and focus on. You said that there are people that support Venezuela that are willing to defend it, such as Mexico and other neighboring countries. But again, I want to ask about when it comes to Venezuela’s other allies around the world, such as Iran. Iran has stood by Venezuela for years now. You have Russia, you have other countries. Do you believe these countries will come in and defend and protect Venezuela in the case of an invasion by the U.S.?

I don’t think that we’re going to see Iran firing rockets at US military bases. And I don’t think we’re going to see Russia launching its unstoppable rockets at United States targets. I think that the aid to Venezuela will be deniable. And I wouldn’t be surprised—again, I’ve been making this point but haven’t seen very many other people make it, but I think it’s an important point—that the missile technology today is such that the anti-ship missiles are very difficult to stop. That is, it’s much cheaper to build a missile that can pose a real threat to sink a ship than it is to defend against that missile. And so that means that relatively cheap, relatively powerful anti-ship missiles are out there. And one of the reasons the United States has never invaded Iran, and that is off the table, is because they know that Iran can sink their ships. Years ago, Iran had Chinese sunburn missiles or the Iranian equivalent that could threaten American ships and that technology has continued progressing.

So I think that China, Russia, Iran and Cuba and North Korea and so on are going to be helping Venezuela in a covert and deniable way And they even be laying a trap for the United States. That is, if China wanted to see the United States go down without suffering horribly in a war over Taiwan, China would be very smart to make the American ships sink off Venezuela rather than in the South China Sea. And that would be very easy to accomplish. Just put some good anti-ship missiles into Venezuela’s hands and sit back and watch, you know, make some popcorn.

Well, on that point, I’d like to thank you very much for joining us, Kevin Barrett, from Saidiya, Morocco.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

Was Bondi Beach a false flag designed to shut down anti-genocide protests that have rocked Australia? Were the "redacted Epstein Files non-release" and Trump's obsequious "handling" by Miriam Adelson and Mark Levin humiliation rituals? These and other pointed questions about the week’s news, and its context, were raised in the latest False Flag Weekly News podcast with Helen Buyniski. I normally write an article to accompany each FFWN podcast, but Helen’s latest is so good I decided to just send it out instead. -KB

Sexual Blackmail Makes the World Go ‘Round

Jeffrey Epstein may be dead, but the network that created him is still screwing us all

HelenOfDestroy Substack

American democracy has devolved into a humiliation ritual in which we are expected to pledge support for people who hate us so they can steal our property, molest our children, and punish us for talking about their crimes. In election after election we are pressured to declare allegiance to one morally bankrupt criminal, simply because the other morally bankrupt criminal in the race might be even worse, thus becoming complicit in the election of a morally bankrupt criminal. Casting that vote on an electronic voting machine that even the government’s own intelligence director has admitted is totally hackable only strengthens the power of the ritual. Americans feel dumber every time we feed our choices into the ballot scanner and pray not to be disenfranchised, as if our selections made a difference in a contest that has been limited to the “lesser of two evils” for years. Standing up for ourselves and refusing to participate in such demeaning pageantry is denigrated as un-American, and our sentimental attachment to the democratic ideal masks the understanding that no change is actually possible within a system designed to deprive us of agency, so we legitimize a corrupt system with our participation instead. Like the teenage victims of Jeffrey Epstein, who returned to his mansions again and again even as they felt the humiliating experience draining their life force because they’d become convinced they could expect nothing better out of life, we have grown so accustomed to having our faces rubbed in outrageous and self-evident lies that we are starting to think we deserve the abuse.

Trump voters in particular have had a difficult year. Spooked back in July by a trickle of leaks suggesting he had been closer with Epstein than he claimed, the president raged at his supporters for demanding the release of the government’s remaining files on the case, despite repeated promises to release them during his 2024 reelection campaign. He sent FBI chief Kash Patel — who had also called for Epstein transparency before joining the Trump administration and acquiring his own Mossad handler (you gonna sue me, Kash?) — to inform the public that Epstein trafficked hundreds if not thousands of girls to absolutely nobody, despite copious documentation including an actual client list featuring at least 20 boldface names in FBI possession. The humiliation ritual was an encore performance for Patel, who had already appeared alongside his deputy Dan Bongino earlier in the year in an infamous clip where the pair, looking more uncomfortable than the stars of the average hostage video, reassured the public that Epstein had killed himself after all — case closed!

Having publicly disavowed the support of anyone still concerned how an intelligence operative working for Israel and the US was able to fly planeloads of teenage girls around the world for sex and lend them out to a who’s who of the global elite, maintaining a trove of compromising video footage of the aforementioned, without authorities lifting a finger in protest or (supposedly) finding the resulting videos, Trump spent several months trying to block the release of the files. He only took time out from railing against what was now declared a “Democrat hoax” to relocate Epstein’s partner-in-crime Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence, to a minimum-security facility, in violation of prison sex-offender protocols. He even teased a pardon for the alleged Mossad asset, whose victims remember her as even more abusive than Epstein himself. Trump targeted Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie — perhaps the most respected man in American politics — with his next social media tantrum, condemning him as a “loser” for co-authoring a bipartisan bill to release the files, then turned his rage on Marjorie Taylor Greene, excoriating the Georgia Republican who was once among his most loyal supporters as a “traitor” because she hosted a press conference with a group of Epstein survivors in support of Massie’s transparency bill. The president even announced he’d host his first fundraiser of the 2026 season to reelect notoriously closeted warmonger Lindsey Graham, South Carolina’s Israel-First senator. By the time Trump finally dropped his opposition to the file release — which predictably showed he had been much cozier with the billionaire child trafficker than he’d admitted in the past — he had effectively alienated most of his base with seemingly unforced blunders that made no political sense.

Rosetta Stone

Unlike most political scandals, which only expose one aspect of the machinery behind the scenes, the Epstein case and its incompetent coverup provide all the intellectual tools needed to understand how the sausage is made. Like the apocryphal apple that fell on Sir Isaac Newton’s head and alerted him to the existence of gravity, the revelation that a multinational intelligence operation rooted in organized crime had for decades trafficked teen girls by the thousands as a means to secure global control not only of politics but of science, technology, industry, and the arts, with full knowledge and even cooperation of multiple law enforcement agencies, highlighted a force that most people had never considered was influencing current events. The phenomenon of Jeffrey Epstein — and the others like him who are still blithely ruining kids’ lives to secure leverage over power — finally makes sense of what for many on the dark side of the informational iron curtain had been a hopelessly scrambled puzzle.

This is why the Epstein files won’t go away, no matter how many distractions are dumped into the news cycle. The Epstein case and the ongoing efforts to bury its implications constitute a geopolitical decoder ring allowing anyone to understand how vibrant, thriving democratic societies are reduced to kakistocratic loosh farms with seeming impunity. Seen through the lens of Epstein — the real-world equivalent of the glasses from They Live — the narrative deceptions and limited-hangout misdirections become transparent, the proximity alarms surrounding “dangerous” thoughts are defused, and one can see right into the beady little eyes of the organized crime ring masquerading as a country masquerading as a religion, headquartered in modern-day Israel, that has its tentacles in every boardroom (and bedroom) in the West. While the source of its power was once a closely-guarded secret — journalist Danny Casolaro was famously murdered for investigating aspects of the network, which he called “The Octopus” — it has more recently leaned into the power of ritual humiliation in cementing its dominance, and can frequently be found flaunting its impunity. This is “Big Parasite” (think Big Pharma or Big Oil), an empire built through the covert extortion of resources from its host.

Because the first rule of Pedo Club is you don’t talk about Pedo Club, it’s difficult to determine when this tactic became widespread as a means of coercion. Whitney Webbcredits the Prohibition-era Jewish mafia, who used it on the law enforcement agencies that were supposed to be pursuing them, earning years of peace while the mortified cops looked the other way. But it has certainly reached its nadir in modern Israel, where soldiers who gang-rape Palestinian prisoners are celebrated as heroes while rabbis campaigning for peace are arrested for bringing food to starving people. Built by terrorists, criminals, and Nazi-collaborators to provide a secure base of operations and diplomatic cover for their illegal enterprises, forced down the world’s throat through the judicious application of blackmail and bribery, Israel quickly became the ultimate money-laundering front and an extradition-proof haven for pedophiles. It has secured de facto exemption from nearly every international treaty, human rightsconvention, international arms agreement, and social norm that binds the civilized world, using a muscular and deep-pocketed propaganda apparatus to escape accountability by blaming its enemies and bribing or threatening allies to look the other way. Its victims are preemptively accused of the crimes committed against them so that when they do contact authorities, they appear suspect. Its trained assassins will kill another nation’s citizens anytime, anywhere to remove an obstacle to further consolidation of power, and whenever the central bank needs a top-up, the US and Europe will fight each other for the privilege of handing over their last pennies to the country that has everything (except a soul).

While a Venn Diagram depicting Big Parasite and “The Jews” would partially overlap, it would also show a serious imbalance in power driven by what “ex-Jew” Gilad Atzmon calls pre-traumatic stress syndrome — a pathological reaction to a feared (but nonexistent) trauma. Big Parasite, conflating Zionism with Judaism to justify the existence of its criminal outpost in the Middle East, claims to speak for all Jews while advocating the ethnic cleansing of “Greater Israel” and other war crimes. The resulting international condemnation of Zionist aggression, spun as a surge in anti-Jewish hate by a media establishment in the pocket of the thugs doing the killing, frightens “the Jews” — who’ve been propagandized from the cradle to believe that everyone wants them dead simply because they’re Jewish — back into the arms of their Zionist manipulators. But while it is undeniable that Jews in the West enjoy some privilege as a trickle-down benefit from their leaders’ influence, it has long baffled me why more of them don’t condemn those leaders’ crimes, at least for self-preservation’s sake, since they reflect so poorly on the entire group. When a serious effort is finally made to rip the Zionist facehugger off Lady Liberty, Americans will remember who it was that pimped her out and then cut out the people’s tongues to stop their complaining.

But Jewish apathy toward going down with the Zionist ship makes more sense as a manifestation of learned helplessness, itself the product of the very real trauma of epidemic child sexual abuse within the Orthodox tradition. Those who try to blow the whistle are ostracized as traitors, so the majority keep silent, becoming complicit in the abuse and even developing a Stockholm Syndrome-like loyalty to the group. The powerful Chabad Lubavitch sect, which counts Epstein lawyer Alan “I kept my underwear on” Dershowitz and Jared Kushner as adherents, is particularly notoriousfor protecting child abusers, shuttling offenders between cities (a tactic also used to protect Catholic predators within the priesthood), colluding with secular authorities to bury the charges, and ostracizing parents of victims. One popular Chabad rabbi admitted in 2013 that most of the children in its programs had been sexually abused at some point and even defended the practice as harmless, arguing it was up to the victims how they felt about the experience. Tunnels discovered beneath the group’s Brooklyn headquarters in a police raid last year contained stained child-sized mattresses and other kiddie furniture. Ghislaine Maxwell, half-Jewish only on her father’s side, officially converted in prison to access privileges supplied by a Chabad-linked group. The absence of a strong cultural taboo against child predation in many Jewish communities means that even if some amoral entity were to entrap Netanyahu himself in bed with a dead girl or a live boy, it’s unlikely that he would lose the support of diaspora Zionists. Big Parasite itself is thus all but immune to the pedophilic blackmail it has weaponized against the world, and only this can explain its staying power.

Child-Trafficking As Statecraft

Epstein began working for this pedocentric network in the 1980s with the CIA, and by 1983 was working with media baron and Israeli spy Robert Maxwell, according to former Israeli intelligence officer Ari Ben Menashe. While the US and Israel were already running multiple trafficking rings that used underage children to compromise powerful figures as part of their Iran-Contra operations, Israel’s military intelligence directorate Aman had selected Epstein to deal with a more serious threat: the US was considering making peace with the Palestinians and had to be stopped, Epstein was told, with orders to set up his own ring and blackmail presidential candidate Bill Clinton with underage girls. Through L Brands and Victoria’s Secret owner Les Wexner, a billionaire faithful to the Zionist cause with mafia ties hidden beneath his respectable clothing business, Epstein was outfitted with a massive Manhattan townhouse outfitted with state-of-the-art surveillance in every room, a seemingly bottomless bank account, and a low-effort cover story that cast him as money manager for Wexner, who as co-founder of the Mega Group, a “philanthropic club” where 20 of the wealthiest and most powerful Zionists could focus on advancing the cause of Jewish supremacy, had a potentially unlimited amount of power and influence at his fingertips.

While Clinton was such an enthusiastic participant in his own compromising that it’s impossible to say which honeypot (Monica Lewinsky being the most famous) secured his cooperation, a nation that views the peaceful solution to a conflict as a greater evil than child-trafficking has clearly lost the plot. By the time Epstein’s operation was in full swing in 2000, Israel was literally run by (“alleged”) rapists. Ehud Barak, who would later be accused by Virginia Giuffre of raping her so violently she bled for hours and becoming aroused by her terror as she begged for her life, was prime minister, while Moshe Katsev, who would later be convicted of raping one of his employees, was president. That same year, the nation welcomed back Arie Scher, its disgraced vice-consul of Rio de Janeiro, after he was found to be trafficking children to Israeli tourists in Brazil, not only not prosecuting him but handing him a promotion as Consul of Canberra (Australia, in a rare show of good judgment, wouldn’t let him in). Another Israeli child trafficking ring was exposed in 2018 in Colombia, operating with protection from local authorities.

Barak seemed genuinely surprised when his friendship with Epstein, whom he would continue to visit at least 30 times in the US after the pedophile’s 2008 conviction required him to register as a sex offender, became a sticking point for voters during his attempted return as Prime Minister in 2019. Unwilling to believe Israelis had suddenly started caring about rape, especially rape of impoverished shiksas, Barak blamed his opponent Benjamin Netanyahu for ginning up a “poisoned atmosphere” to distract from the multiple corruption charges pending against him. Barak had a point — Israel had officially declared itself a Jewish supremacist state the previous year, abdicating any responsibility to protect its second-class citizens. After a 2024 UN report condemned Israel’s acceptance of the use of sexual humiliation, harassment and torture against Palestinian prisoners, 10 IDF soldiers were arrested for gang-raping a Palestinian man being held without evidence as a Hamas fighter. The backlash was immediate as government officials — led by Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who called the rapists “heroes” — rallied to secure their release and demand those who ordered the arrest be punished. The soldiers’ lawyers even argued they had acted in self-defense.

Revelation of the Method

Unlike most intelligence agency honeytraps, Epstein’s trafficking ring included a public relations aspect, with glossy media profiles depicting him as a suave, mysterious, Jay Gatsby-by-way-of-James Bond playboy jet-setting around the world with princes and presidents, a bevy of (near)-babies surrounding him at all times. It is absurd to believe that it took a decade after survivor Maria Farmer first reported Epstein and Maxwell to the FBI for the agency to build a case against him even as he carried on with the same behaviors, or that the agency only found time to interview Farmer in 2006 after Palm Beach police made them look bad by charging the pedophile with abusing a 14-year-old girl. When the Palm Beach case landed in their lap as well, they waited until it was resolved in that jurisdiction, then wrote to victims falsely claiming a “thorough investigation” was underway. The agency’s behavior is less baffling given the FBI has been sexually compromised from its very beginnings, with founder J. Edgar Hoover blackmailed out of the gate by the same organized crime syndicate the agency was established to police, forcing him to deny the very existence of the Mafia for years. One can attribute the same motive to Kash Patel’s “who’re you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?” wide-eyed denials of reality.

Nor was the FBI the only law enforcement agency to mysteriously drop the ball on the 52-page indictment. Palm Beach State Attorney Barry Krischer abandoned the charges that could have put Epstein away for life after meeting with his defense team, deciding probation and a psychological evaluation would be sufficient punishment given that the girls were “prostitutes.” Krischer, who retired the following year, was in charge of the state’s Crime Against Children unit, yet had habitually refused to prosecute cases of men raping teenage girls even when his inaction led to further harm coming to the girls. His true motives were likely revealed in the award he would receive 10 years later from the Anti-Defamation League, an organization that was literally founded to protect Jewish pedophile and murderer Leo Frank from justice after he was found guilty of murdering his 13-year-old factory employee Mary Phagan. Bellowing the quiet part out loud, the ADL’s “Jurisprudence Award” is supposed to recognize “an outstanding contribution to the legal profession and to the community at large, while exemplifying the principles upon which the Anti-Defamation League was founded.” It certainly did that last part.

Palm Beach police chief Michael Reiter kicked the case up to US Attorney Alex Acosta, who also fumbled it, agreeing with Epstein’s lawyers to an infuriating no-prosecution deal on a single charge of soliciting a teen prostitute that would allow him to serve just 18 months in jail with day release. Victims were not told of the agreement, in violation of federal law. Acosta would later admit when he was interviewed by the Trump transition team for a cabinet post that he had been ordered to back off Epstein because “he belongs to intelligence,” but this was apparently acceptable to the incoming administration, which appointed him Secretary of Labor. Only when the public learned of the interaction was he pressured to resign.

Epstein had briefly considered fleeing to Israel like so many pedophiles before him in order to escape conviction, even complaining to friends that an “antisemitic conspiracy” in Palm Beach was to blame for his prosecution, a notion other Palm Beach Jews who didn’t spend their days molesting children found ludicrous. But instead, he embraced his new routine, leaving his cell each day to go to “work” and sneaking girls into his “office,” and served just 13 months of his sentence. He ignored the requirement that he register a sex offender and was never asked to, nor did his wealthy and powerful friends drop him over his conviction.

As an asset of both US and Israeli intelligence, insulated in the personal wealth of mafia-affiliated Mega Group billionaires, surrounded by the wealthiest, most influential, and most powerful people he and Maxwell could lure into their nest, a retinue of nymphets obediently attending to his every need, Epstein likely believed that truly “getting caught” was impossible and thus resumed flaunting his lifestyle after weaseling out of the 2006 charges. Indeed, it’s the flaunting of the crime that makes for such an effective humiliation ritual. Confronted with such a towering miscarriage of justice, it is impossible to believe in the integrity of the US political system, and the destabilization of society advances by leaps and bounds.

This Substack is reader-supported. If you found this post useful, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Sex Slaves Breed Thought Slaves

Only by recognizing the role of sexual blackmail and the networks that run it can Americans understand the generational betrayal that has reduced our political system to just another asset-stripping mechanism. Decades under the thumb of Big Parasite have withered the US from a proud world power to a desiccated husk, one unethical compromise at a time. Dignity and patriotism left the building when, fresh off a starring role in the assassination of JFK, Israel persuaded his successor Lyndon Johnson to look the other way as it attempted to sink the naval intelligence ship USS Liberty, killing hundreds of Americans to drag Washington into its war with Egypt. Johnson, repeatedly blocking rescue efforts so as to leave no survivors to tell the truth about the attack, inaugurated a traitorous tradition that subsequent presidents have followed religiously. Israel will be permitted to violate everything from international law to the laws of physics, while the US will stand by to enforce its lunatic demands. Americans, reduced to serfs on an Israeli plantation, embraced the scam of Christian Zionism to try to make some moral sense of the situation, a coping mechanism the Israeli lobby has eagerly exploited with propaganda campaigns aimed at turning American churches into recruiters for what is ultimately a self-effacing death cult. As the US’ national debt spirals uncontrollably alongside its foreign aid bill, it is a wonder Big Parasite has not instituted a debt forgiveness program that allows Americans to offer up their nubile young daughters as payment. What do you get the nation that has everything, besides shame?

Only when the role of institutionalized pedophilia as the driving force within the halls of power is taken into account does the behavior of American politicians, uniting in lockstep to tear up the Bill of Rights so Israel’s feelings aren’t hurt, make any sense. Mere avarice or lust for power cannot account for the anti-human, shortsighted cravenness that defines the political class. Warehouses full of video recordings of these people and their associates schtupping 14-year-olds can.

When a State Department official praises Israel over the US and brags about sporting a Star of David necklace despite being Italian, it’s not because they don’t understand optics. When the Democratic Party commits political Seppuku by embracing a “hug Bibi” pro-Israel strategy in the middle of a genocide, it’s not because they love the wildly corrupt Israeli PM more than their jobs. When BlackRock-controlled brands like Bud Light and Jaguar clamber on board the LGBT bandwagon in the most tone-deaf way possible, offending their entire customer base and tanking their stock price with commercials that constitute aesthetic terrorism, it’s not because they love gay people or hate money. These are acts of ritual humiliation that provide Big Parasite with spiritual nourishment. Many of Epstein’s victims report that he and Maxwell seemed to take as much pleasure in their fear and distress as they did in the sex itself. Like the girls, blackmailed politicians must betray themselves anew with every assignment, cringing through life like a kicked dog knowing somewhere in a nondescript warehouse sits evidence of crimes that could put them away for a very long time. It’s kiss the Wailing Wall or kiss their ass goodbye.

Destroying Something Beautiful

While the media has lazily followed Alan Dershowitz’s lead in characterizing Epstein’s victims as trailer-trash juvenile delinquents barely on the wrong side of the age of consent, Epstein and his associates were in fact very picky about their prey, spending at least as much time strategizing the ruination of the flower of gentile femininity (the absence of Jewish girls from the “sisterhood,” confirmed by Maria Farmer and also notable among the victims of producer Harvey Weinstein, is notable given the ethnic-supremacist ideology of the parasite class) as they did on compromising VIPs — though admittedly it wasn’t rocket science getting a prince or a president to drop his zipper in the presence of underage beauties. They wanted “white girls” who appeared “prepubescent” and demure, according to survivor Courtney Wild, while another report specified their ideal type as “nymphishly thin, with no tattoos.” Maxwell insisted the girls should be “as young as possible.” Not only were they required to be virginal and disease-free (on pain of death), but they were forbidden from drinking, smoking, and using drugs and put on strict diets if they started to gain weight. Academic achievement and artistic talent were a bonus. Youth and beauty were important, but it was purity and innocence they were targeting.

Epstein was ideally placed to recruit girls — and charm their wealthy parents — from his first job, having been installed as math and science teacher at the prestigious Dalton School despite lacking even a college degree in what was likely an intelligence posting designed to position him in New York high society. He leveraged his financial benefactor Les Wexner’s Victoria’s Secret brand to great effect, enticing girls to his townhouse by pretending to be a model scout. At Interlochen Center for the Arts, where he had attended a youth music camp, his name emblazoned on the “Jeffrey Epstein Scholarship Lodge” helped him pick up musicians, while New York Academy of Art’s dean of students Lisa Guggenheim allegedly pimped out her choicest young students to him, among them Maria Farmer, the painter who would first report Epstein to the FBI.

So innocent when she first met Epstein at a gallery show that she actually believed his explanation that the steady trickle of young girls (many in school uniforms) in and out of his townhouse were Victoria’s Secret models on casting calls, Farmer, hooked with the promise of helping her art career, reluctantly agreed to travel to brand owner Les Wexner’s Ohio estate to work as an artist in residence. Trapped on the well-guarded property and verbally abused by Wexner’s wife Abigail, she was kept under constant surveillance and forbidden to eat at the “Jewish-only” country club on the property, losing 20 pounds as she gradually lost her will to resist.

Farmer only snapped out of her despondency when Epstein and Maxwell sexually assaulted her during a visit to the estate. The pair had set their sights on her younger sister Annie after spotting a nude photo of her that Farmer had used for a painting, and Farmer realized she had been bundled off to Wexner’s so that they could have full access to the younger girl. While she ultimately escaped and reunited with her sister, her art career had been destroyed, not helped, by her association with Epstein, who had forced her to turn down a Hollywood painting commission so she could be locked away in Ohio instead. He and Maxwell threatened to cut her off from “art related opportunities,” and she fled the city to get away from them. Despite her pre-Epstein success selling $20,000 paintings and showing in galleries, she stopped painting for 20 years, explaining to Whitney Webb, “They destroyed me on purpose.”

While one can only speculate on how many other talented young girls had their creativity deliberately snuffed out, or why this was so important to Epstein and Maxwell, it is clear that many brilliant works of art, music, and literature that could have uplifted humanity were not made because their creators were made to give up. This has left space for Big Parasite, with its chokehold on the entertainment industry, to aesthetically terrorize the population with soulless mediocrity without having to worry about competition. Under their guidance, music and other forms of popular entertainment have become not a celebration of life but a grooming tool, with Diddy’s “freakouts” only the latest sexual blackmail scandal to surface in an ecosystem that was literally built by organized crime. The sexualization of young girls by popular culture and the normalization of pornography have inspired epic pearl-clutching by politicians willing to look at everything except the source. The role of Epstein’s virgin sacrifices in the runaway success of Big Parasite in its cultural warfare against the West should thus not be underestimated.

Playing the Box

The surest route to long-term compliance with an unconscionable order is tricking the target into active participation in enforcing it, a strategy Epstein himself called “playing the box.” Only when their own participation in the trafficking ring had ceased with Epstein’s death did institutional enablers like JP Morgan Chase and the Virgin Islands government experience attacks of conscience over what they’d facilitated for so many years, though both stopped short of taking accountability and blamed the other for allowing their cooperation to be bought. Journalists who had obediently spiked negative coverage of the pedophile during his life marked his death with disingenuous bewilderment at why the media never looked into the girls.

Efforts to defuse the Epstein bomb by grooming the media were underway long before the pedophile was rearrested and “suicided.” Israeli intelligence operatives poisoned the epistemological well in 2017, priming the American public to reject future political pedophilia scandals by seeding 4chan and other social media platforms with the QAnon psy-op. Q recast Trump — whose mentor had been Roy Cohn, perhaps the most famous sexual blackmailer in US history — as a real-life superhero saving trafficked children from Deep State pedophiles. Smothering its kernel of truth (the rich and powerful are in fact preying on children on an industrial scale) in a bath of b******t (JFK Jr faked his death and is coming back any minute now! here’s Hillary Clinton in a snuff film!), it suggested Trump was only pretending to sell out to the Deep State while secretly outflanking them in “5-D chess” ordinary folks weren’t smart enough to understand. The narrative punch was further spiked with promises that hundreds of sealed indictments dropping any minute now would send Hillary Clinton and other prominent Democrats off to Guantanamo Bay for life, and the cryptic post format encouraged followers to waste hours hunting for hidden messages, effectively making them participants in deceiving themselves. It should surprise no one that both QAnon itself and the 4chan /pol/ board where it originated were confirmed as Israeli intelligence honeypots earlier this year, with half of all /pol/ posts originating from IP addresses in that country. The Q narrative was tailor-made to pacify millions of Americans with hopium — why rise up against the government when there was a chance the “white hats” within the administration might be engaged in deeply heroic feats of child-rescue behind the scenes? — while ensuring the Epstein revelations would be met with yawns and disbelief by “real” journalists.

Victims were also tricked into complicity with their abuse with the order to recruit other girls for pay, a dynamic that ensured their silence and kept many in Epstein’s thrall for months or years. What Palm Beach police described as a “sexual abuse pyramid scheme” was far more effective than threats alone. Many girls dutifully came back with friends, needing the money or believing the false promises of career advancement that had lured them to the property in the first place, even as they gradually lost their will to resist under repeated assaults by Epstein and Maxwell. These encounters were designed to humiliate and strip the girls of agency, and the pressure to recruit other girls blurred the line between victim and perpetrator so effectively that some opted to remain silent out of fear of prosecution, a valid concern given the aggressive legal tactics of Epstein’s defense team. Courtney Wild, who recalls bringing as many as 80 girls — all underage — to Epstein for $200-$300 per girl during the three years she spent in his orbit in Palm Beach, says the money kept her out of homelessness, but at a price. When she met Epstein at 14, she was an A student and captain of the cheerleading team despite a troubled home life. Deemed too old for the predator’s tastes at 17, she drifted into stripping and began using drugs, eventually spending time in prison while her abuser continued feeding on her peers. Had the network bankrolling Epstein had the foresight to provide his victims with the financial anesthetic of a “retirement plan,” allowing them to convince themselves they were benefiting from the abuse years after they’d aged out of the Lolita zone, one wonders how many would have spoken out at all.

The same model of grooming that saw Epstein’s victims evolve from shocked repulsion at the public sex acts performed on his properties to reluctant participation and ultimately to gathering juicy details on the VIPs they were loaned out to can be observed in any society under parasitic exploitation. A wet-behind-the-ears politician initially appalled at the feeding frenzy of lobbyists bidding on his integrity will soon be hooked on their money, perhaps even coming to enjoy the quarterly debriefing with the “AIPAC babysitter” the Israeli group has apparently assigned to everyone in Congress except Thomas Massie. Americans who protested George W. Bush’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 didn’t even raise an eyebrow when his successor Barack Obama, Nobel Peace Prize in hand, began bombing five more countries, and later freaked out when Trump threatened to end the war in Ukraine. Repeat an atrocity enough times and it becomes business as usual.

All Wars are Pedos’ Wars

It’s hard not to compare Epstein’s girls — thrown away once they aged out of jailbait, having given their best years in servitude to masters who saw them as “trash” — with the (mostly) male victims of the US military-industrial complex. These, too, are often left broke and broken on the streets after too much killing has rendered them “unfit for polite society” (in the cringeworthy words of Pete Hegseth). War historically harvests the cream of the generational crop, sacrificing the strongest and bravest boys to enrich a ruling class whose own children always dodge conscription, and while voluntary service has lowered the profile of such systematic abuse, poor kids with no prospects are easily enticed into joining the armed forces the same way girls were sucked into Epstein’s world: promises of good pay, good education, and the opportunity to achieve their dreams. Through the ur-humiliation ritual of boot camp, they become aggressive little golems eager to wipe their asses with international law (and their own self-preservation instincts) for America’s Best Friend, blasting brown civilians until they end up losing a limb or their mind and get sent home, the realization finally dawning that they’ve been used and thrown away. Reading US Third Air Force Commander Lt. Gen Richard Clark tell the Jerusalem Post (once owned by Robert Maxwell) that US troops would be ready and willing to die for Israel, how many veterans felt like General Patton, horror dawning that they have defeated the wrong enemy and doomed the world? Certainly, Israel’s continued existence as a nuclear-armed ethnostate determined to achieve the ultimate loosh harvest by conducting the world’s first live-streamed genocide in Gaza — gorging themselves on the suffering not only of the Palestinians but of everyone who watches the violence knowing that it’s funded by their tax dollars and that there’s nothing they can do about it —is not going to leave many survivors.

While war for its own sake is beloved by Big Parasite, it too has a parallel pedocentric motive: extracting foreign nations’ nubile natural resources for financial and sexual exploitation through UN “peacekeepers” and private military contractors. Sex trafficking by UN peacekeepers is so common it has its own Wikipedia article. The peacekeeping force seems tailor-made for predators, as they are not governed by local laws, and their home country is unlikely to follow up on a claim against them by a foreigner halfway around the world. Abusers caught in the act are merely sent home. The UN has promised to beef up accountability for decades, but no change has been forthcoming, suggesting the widespread child rape is a feature, not a bug. In Haiti, where Hillary Clinton infamously intervened in 2010 to reduce the sentence of missionary Laura Silsby after Silsby was caught attempting to kidnap 33 children from the country, rape by peacekeepers has become so common that a 2017 investigationfound only one woman in 12 who’ve been raped by a UN peacekeeper even bothers to report the abuse anymore, knowing nothing will be done. Wars and natural disasters both provide an ideal environment for stealing children, as populations are displaced and authorities distracted while the presence of foreign do-gooder operations is seen as normal, even desirable, by outsiders.

Because private military contractors are not subject to US or military law when operating overseas, they are extremely popular with intelligence agencies in need of plausible deniability for their black ops. They have also become synonymous with human trafficking. The CIA’s preferred contractor Dyncorp was forced to fire several employees in Bosnia in 1999 after two separate whistleblowers revealed the company was operating a sex trafficking ring with the help of the Serbian mafia, flying girls as young as 12 from Serbia, Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, and Romania into local brothels and sex clubs where they were trafficked to Dyncorp personnel as well as UN, NATO, and human rights NGO workers. Dyncorp was involved in all areas of the operation, forging documents, smuggling the girls through checkpoints, and tipping off brothel owners to raids. Despite an abundance of evidence that included the company’s Bosnia site director making a home video of himself raping two of the girls, no one was prosecuted, the girls were sent back home, and Dyncorp even kept its contract to provide police forces to the UN. However, the whistleblowers were fired. The plane Dyncorp used to bring the girls to Bosnia shared a tail number with a helicopter owned by Epstein, who was known to have purchased his own Yugoslavian sex slave Nadia Marcinkova during the civil war.

In 2004, Dyncorp contract workers at an airbase in Colombia filmed themselves molesting local kids and distributed the video in the streets of Bogota, suggesting self-blackmail may be de rigueur at the company as a form of mutually assured destruction. Another incriminating video leaked online in 2010 showing Dyncorp employees who’d been contracted to train the Afghan police force enjoying lapdances from a young boy dressed as a female. Pizzagate princess Hillary Clinton herself helped squash the story, though the scandal would ultimately leak again in a Wikileaks cable dump. Sex trafficking by military contractors is so common the Pentagon’s effort to ban it (presumably due to the bad publicity) was shot down by industry lobbyists in 2005.

In the glorified money laundering operation that is Vladimir Zelensky’s Ukraine, an entire generation of men has been sacrificed so the parasitic elite can indulge their perversions. White Angel, a paramilitary offshoot of the Israeli-funded neo-Nazi group Azov Battalion, has trafficked tens of thousands of children out of the country under orders from Zelensky’s government, taking advantage of demoralized and confused parents’ willingness to hand over their kids to “any person in military or police uniform” amid the fog of war. Paid $2,000 for each stolen child, the state-sponsored predators were deployed daily in villages across eastern Ukraine in a bid to strip its assets before the inevitable Russian victory, given orders to use violence against parents who would not voluntarily hand over their kids. Ending up an Israeli billionaire’s sex slave might actually be the more desirable of the options open to kidnapped Ukrainian children, however — many were allegedly sold for parts, with organ trafficking such big business in the country that the Verkhovna Rada literally legalized organ theft in 2021, removing the requirement for consent from a donor or relative. While the people of Ukraine have long since soured on their corrupt government, it is clear Zelensky and his puppet-masters are unwilling to permit the end of the war because of the sharp drop in income it would entail.

While Big Parasite consolidated itself under the cover of “Israel” when that nation was created, taking advantage of international sympathy towards Jews post-WW2 to ethnically cleanse its new home with shocking viciousness, it has always been a global network whose only real loyalty is to itself. Organized child sex trafficking is not a recent innovation. An attempted crackdown on “white slavery” in Eastern Europe in the late 19th century raised familiar questions regarding impoverished female victims’ agency in the sex trade, tolerance and even regulation of the trade by the authorities, and the ethnic dynamics of Jewish traders trafficking Polish and Galician nubiles — often tempted with promises of “real” jobs and wealthy husbands, or at least financial freedom — to slave auctions and Middle Eastern harems, their earnings heavily taxed or confiscated. Like Alan Dershowitz, modern apologists for the white slavers argue that desperate families’ willing sale of their daughters — some of whom might have already had sexual experience — in order to pay their debts constituted consensual prostitution, dismissing the stereotype of predatory Jewish slavers as a blood libel because Polish and Galician pimps existed as well and that if Jews hadn’t stepped in to run the sex trade with better business acumen, it would still have existed. Epstein, who bragged about buying “sex slave” Nadia Marcinkova from her parents in Yugoslavia, would be proud.

Pedo-Futurism

It is not only our present that has been hijacked by this criminal gang, but our future. Seemingly driven by the same pre-traumatic stress syndrome that leads them to see a Shoah in every shoelace, agents of Big Parasite have flooded the communications and technology sector with backdoored equipment and spyware so completely that surveillance is the expectation, not the exception. It is not an exaggeration to say that their quest for omniscience created the modern surveillance state, and that this process has been driven, enabled, and protected by sexual blackmailers. Robert Maxwell sold backdoored PROMIS communication software to 42 governments including the US in the 1980s, opening up the mother of all eavesdropping channels. Ghislaine’s sister Christine sold Chiliad datamining software to the FBI to enable its “War on Terror” through aggressive surveillance of Israel’s enemies, guiding US foreign policy off a cliff. Palantir, the CIA-funded pre-crime program that was recently handed centralized control over all US government systems, began as an extension of PROMIS and has blossomed into a dystopian surveillance behemoth whose executives openly boast about killing people and telegraph their allegiances by reminding the world that they “defer to Israel.” Ghislaine’s other sister Isabel opened the door to Big Parasite’s takeover of the internet by convincing Silicon Valley investors to pour funding into Israeli startups in the 1990s, leading to the success of companies like Commtouch, now a ubiquitous and hidden part of email systems used by Google and Microsoft (whose founder, Bill Gates, has likely been compromised by Epstein since the 1990s). Israeli startups acquired by US tech giants can easily take control of the company’s direction from within without disturbing the public-facing image of the company as all-American, and this has become standard operating procedure for Israel’s military intelligence Unit 8200, which has turned industry giants like Microsoft and Intel into espionage bonanzas even as their products degrade in quality, burdened and bloated with snitchware. When Netanyahu reminded smartphone users that they were “holding a piece of Israel,” he was not exaggerating — Israeli companies like Pegasus, Candiru and Ehud Barak’s Epstein-funded Carbyne911 have perfected the transformation of personal communications device into personal surveillance device.

Every elite sex trafficking scandal that becomes public is reported in a vacuum, as if there have not been hundreds if not thousands more not mentioned here. Evidence of similar rings can be found anywhere humanity’s baser instincts are exploited. Every time we fail to interrogate the “why” of these scandals beyond “powerful men are into forbidden fruit” and keep silent out of fear of offending the boot wedged firmly on our necks, we are giving our agency over to these predators. As long as there are assets left to strip, Big Parasite will be there, luxuriating in our cowardice while it grows fat off our distress. Epstein may be dead and gone, but the network that created him is still screwing us all.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Podcast guest K. Barrett Bilali has recently published articles on ChatGPT’s crisis and AI in (Moroccan) art and music.

An American “MomOf4” drew a quarter-million views with her YouTube video “Why I Moved to Morocco.” Apparently, moving to Morocco is becoming a thing. The other Kevin Barrett, who moved to Morocco before I did, joined me on the Truth Jihad podcast to explain why, and to express his potential willingness to serve as a consultant for those considering such a move. (To contact him, subscribe to his Substack and reply to his welcoming email.)

God is currently showering blessings on Morocco in the form of rain and snow, which the country badly needs after seven years of drought, and also in the form of soccer victories, most recently last night’s thrilling Arab Cup final against Jordan. Next week Morocco starts hosting the Africa Cup, in which its team is the top seed, using infrastructure developed in preparation for hosting the World Cup in 2030, when it will be rolling out the world’s biggest stadium, the Hassan II stadium in Casablanca. Since it overperformed in the last World Cup by reaching the semifinals, Morocco has become a soccer powerhouse, recently winning the U20 World Cup and putting in strong performances in various other categories.

But infrastructure development in Morocco isn’t limited to stadiums. Transportation and communications are also getting big upgrades. The Buraq high-speed train linking Tangier and Casablanca ranks among the top ten of world’s fastest trains, with more high-speed rail under development, and Tangier Med is the biggest port in Africa. Having diplomatically won an international consensus that the Moroccan Sahara is indeed Moroccan, the government is also building the Dakhla Atlantic Port, a $1.2 billion deepwater project scheduled to open in two to three years. It will connect landlocked Sahel countries (Mali, Chad, Niger) to global markets and serve as a hub for renewable energy, fishing, and industry.

Internet connectivity has exploded as well. If you need fast, reliable internet, Morocco is your best bet in Africa. Here in Eastern Morocco, which generally trails Western Morocco in infrastructure, people are excited about the Medusa fiber optic cable that will link Nador to Marseille, France. There is also quite a bit of buzz about a big AI project in Berkane, the closest real city to my Mediterranean vacation town of Saidia.

Like the Chinese, Moroccans are blessed with the impression that their country is growing, developing, and generally moving in the right direction. That’s a marked contrast to the perception among Americans, especially the better- informed among them, that the USA’s glory days are behind it, and that Trump is not only failing to make America great again, but rivaling Caligula as a mad emperor overseeing societal collapse.

Living in a developing, improving, optimistic country is one benefit of Moroccan residency. But there are more tangible ones as well. The cost of living is among the world’s lowest. The food is arguably the world’s best, as is the weather. The people are generally kind, welcoming, and helpful—sometimes a bit too helpful, truth be told. (If you don’t understand how being overly helpful can actually sometimes be unhelpful, you’ve never been to Morocco.)* And the culture and history are uncommonly rich: Greco-Roman civilization and its Arab-Islamic upgrade form an unbroken legacy stretching back thousands of years, and today’s political Morocco (al-Maghreb al-Aqsa) traces itself back the founding of the Idrisid dynasty in 788. You can get by speaking French almost anywhere, Spanish works in the north, and English is increasingly common among the younger, wealthier, and better-educated segments of the population. If, like me, you’re ambitious enough to want to master Arabic, untold linguistic, cultural, and spiritual riches will open before you like a treasure house opening to a magic password. And if you’re even more ambitious than me, you can study the various varieties of Amazigh (Berber) as well.

Excerpt from the podcast

K. Barrett Bilali: What I try to do is promote English and develop audiences here in Morocco that are English-centered or anglophone and create a space where they can communicate and expand.

Kevin Barrett: That’s interesting, because my friends and co-conspirators here in Saidia, on the other side of Morocco from you, just created a brand new English language “Saidia City in English” page on Facebook.

And yeah, Morocco is getting into English language because it’s the global language. Even though the American empire is crumbling. English isn’t.

And that leads us to Morocco. We’ll get back to your recent posts on AI later. But first, comment a little bit about Morocco as a kind of a happening place. Everybody’s heard that Morocco is doing really well in soccer. They reached the semifinals in the last World Cup. They’re going to host the 2030 World Cup. They’re now heading into the finals in the Arab Cup soccer (which they won). And they’re going to host the Africa Cup, which is this huge—it’s like the semi-Super Bowl of soccer for this part of the world. So anyway, it’s Morocco is on a world soccer map.

Yeah, it’s on the world soccer map and that’s all well and good. But I’ve been here years and I’ve seen tremendous growth in this country. And I think sometimes that the people don’t really appreciate how much they have, as an African nation. A little aside here: The influence of English is so powerful now that the Buraq, which is the high-speed train for Morocco—it’s the only one in Africa, I believe, and in fact, America doesn’t have one—but Morocco has a beautiful high speed train. It goes from Casablanca to Tangier in about two hours and 30 minutes, I think. And it’s an amazing high speed system. When I first got on it—I was almost the first one to take it back several years ago. It was not very well attended then. No one really went on it. But now it’s packed. Sometimes I can’t even get a ticket. I have to buy it ahead of time so I can be on it.

And at first they used to say the announcements in Arabic and French. Now they say the announcements in Arabic and English, because English is taking over. You can see it in the media. The young people, they prefer English over French. And despite the fact that France has its claws into the society, into the education system, into the economy of Morocco, the younger people are preferring English. And it’s a beautiful thing to see. And the younger people, because they have chosen English, are usually more technologically savvy. They have higher disposable incomes, the English speakers, and their families. And they’re more apt to engage in reading and writing and things that are of English. I believe English is a beautiful language for reading and writing, and that’s why everybody chooses it. And economically, this country...

Zee French would not aghree weeth you that zee Engleesh is better than zee French for reading and writing.

Yes. Well, the French, sadly, are losing it. I don’t know if they’re losing it on their own behalf. Well, they’re losing it because of their actions. They’re certainly losing it in Africa between Burkina Faso and other African nations like Niger and Mali. They’ve left the the confines of the French system and mindset. Even Benin just last week had a coup d’etat in which the French are slowly being pushed out.

But what’s happening here in Morocco to make it more stable and more developed is that Morocco is becoming a hub of those countries and a neutral kind of geopolitical power. They have good relations with every nation. As long as any nation accepts the formerly Western Sahara as the integral part of Morocco, they have good relations. If not…well, Moroccan diplomacy plays different games to make sure that that happens. Because that’s the most important thing here.

With that, Morocco is offering the South, the Saharan provinces, Dakhla and these areas down there, which were part of the Western Sahara, more security, more development. There’s investors coming into the South. There’s infrastructure being built. There’s desalination plants. There’s so much going on here that is positive for the populace and for the rest of Africa.vBecause in King Mohammed VI created what was called the Atlantic Initiative. And this initiative is connecting Niger, Burkina Faso, Mali, Mauritania—countries locked out of the French system with no oceanic border—to the sea. He is opening up Morocco and the south, Dakhla, and building a huge port there so that products from Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso can come and reach the Atlantic and go to America, China, and so on.

As I said, I see a lot of economic development, a lot of social development, too, even if it’s not at the same pace. There’s still a lot of problems in the society here in terms of employment, in terms of quality of life and different things. But I see...Morocco as being a hinge and a connecting point between Africa, Europe, the Khaliji in the Gulf, and the Americas. And they’re doing really well to keep it that way.

Yeah, it’s a relatively competently administered country, for sure. And you mentioned that it’s adopting English, and that especially the upwardly mobile, educated and younger segment of the Moroccan public is increasingly getting into English. And that actually leads to wondering whether you and I may not be the last Americans and native English speakers to come and spend time and maybe settle in Morocco. A lot of people these days are not too happy with the way things are going in the US. Whether it’s Muslims who say “hey, I’d really rather be in a majority Muslim country,” or whether it’s people up in the northern states in the United States who are shivering in the winter and saying “man, I could be enjoying nice weather and my spending power would be a lot higher, I could survive on my pension,” this sort of thing. So I wonder if there’ll be more native English speakers, Americans, coming here.

I think so. I have a little business I’m doing with my English. But if I could expand it to open up a travel agency. And it’s possible because providing English services is what I do. So a tourist agency would be an amazing thing for Anglophones, maybe Muslims, coming to a country where Islam and Halal meat and everything is available. They would be able to come here and live very well. If they wanted to go to McDonald’s, they could do that. Burger King, KFC, if that’s your thing, it’s all here. In addition, you have security, stability, lower prices, and a lot of other perks.

I’ll give you an example. I have a friend who I’ve just met. So I guess it’s an acquaintance, but I call her a friend. She... And her aunt and uncle met me, and they wanted to find a place to live in Rabat, in the capital here. And part of the reason is that one lives in Ghana, in Accra, and she’s just tired of the electricity going off. Sadly those countries down there don’t have the stability, the infrastructure. Ghana Gambia, Cameroon…I have a friend down there, and the electricity is off all the time. The water systems, the traffic system…it’s just not working down there for a lot of African-Americans, specifically.

And so she’s coming up here and she may be bringing people with her because there is stability here in Rabat and in Morocco, all over the country, especially in the bigger cities. There’s security, there’s stability, there’s development.

It’s not as easy to make money here. And it’s not the same kind of money you can make in America for sure.

But if you’re on retirement or if you want to sell your house and want to build something or buy something over here and be on the Atlantic coast, or, like you are, on the Mediterranean coast, you can do very well here. And so there’s a potential for a business opportunity to attract Anglophones to Morocco.

*Here is an example of a Moroccan being unhelpfully overhelpful: I was running barefoot along Saidia’s 14 km Mediterranean beach when a passerby helpfully stopped me to explain that I shouldn’t be doing that. In the winter, he said, the beach cleaning crews don’t come out in force, so there is a chance that a buried object might injure your foot. That had actually once happened to someone he knew. I thanked him and told him I would be careful. He told me I should be running on the sloping wet sand close to the water, where it was safer. I thanked him again with the various Moroccan ways of thanking people (barakAllahu fik = may God bless you for it, Allah yarham walidik = God bless your parents, shukran bizzaf = thank you very much, etc. etc.) and managed to extricate myself, and continue my run, politely starting off on the sloping wet sand as he advised…and then, when he was well behind me, returning to the flat, slightly more dangerous sand that I had run on many dozens of times without incident. Had I tried to explain to him that running on the flat sand was reasonably safe since I kept a close eye out for hazards, that my joints didn’t like running on sloping sand, and that the health benefits of running where I was able to comfortably run outweighed the very small risk of incurring a cut on my foot, he probably wouldn’t have understood, because helpful Moroccans always think the type of help they’re offering is the last word, even though it often isn’t.

___

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com