Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link (where you can read the transcript of Chas Freeman’s talk)

Australian Peter Myers feels uneasy about the prospect of China eclipsing the Zionist-occupied US as the great power with the most sway over his country. I think his fears are overblown. Who’s right? Watch our sometimes-fiery debate and sound off in the comments! (The debate on China starts in earnest at the 25:50 mark.)

Most smart red-pilled people agree on many things. We’re all on the same page regarding the Kennedy assassinations, 9/11, and Zionism. We all support ending privately-created fiat funny-money and replacing it with public banking. We all want the US to stop fighting and provoking stupid wars waged under false pretenses. We all agree that Western mainstream media peddle lies and half-truths and deserve to be relentlessly attacked and ridiculed. And we are all sick of ever-escalating censorship.

But there is one momentously important topic that we don’t all agree on: the rise of China, and what, if anything, could or should be done about it. Many critics of the US empire’s unbelievably evil and stupid policies frame their critique as follows:

“The idiots running the US empire offshored manufacturing in the 1980s, thereby enabling China’s rise. They colluded with Israel’s 9/11 attack on New York and Washington and were deceived into wasting over $7 trillion destroying the Middle East on behalf of Zionism—a strategic disaster for the US. Instead of triangulating Russia, Iran, and China to contain the only serious challenger, China, they mindlessly attacked Iran and Russia, thereby driving them into China’s arms. Now China has eclipsed the US in PPP-adjusted GDP, and is threatening to leave the US in the dust in terms of technology and the military power it enables. We ought to radically revise our approach before it’s too late, by throwing all of our chips in the ‘contain China’ basket! If we don’t, China will eclipse the US empire and…gasp…rule the world! What a disaster that would be!”

Those of us on the other side of the debate agree with that analysis, except for the last three sentences. We argue that a desperate, belated US attempt to prevent China from becoming a regional hegemon would be at least as foolish as the policies that preceded it.

The first and most obvious reason to accept China’s rise philosophically is its near-inevitability. China’s large, smart, cohesive, highly-educated population makes it a natural regional hegemon. Its population of 1.4 billion boasts a civilization whose identity stretches back for millennia. For most of that period China represented almost a third of global GDP. That 30% share collapsed to single-digits during the 19th century, hitting a low of less than 5% around 1950 before rebounding to its current 20%+. Though the official figures tell us that the US is still ahead, boasting 25% of global GDP compared to China’s 20%, when adjusted for purchasing power parity the US share plunges to 15%, giving China a rapidly-increasing lead. Given the underlying factors and the momentum they generate, only drastic, catastrophic events could radically alter China’s trajectory vis-a-vis the US. Since global catastrophe is not an inviting prospect, US decision-makers ought to accept China as the Asian regional hegemon and global geostrategic equal of the US. The bottom line is simple: If US leaders follow the example of King Cnut by building themselves a throne on the beach and ordering the Chinese tide not to come in, they will fail. And if they unleash nuclear or biological weapons on the ocean in a vain attempt to stop the tide, they’ll merely drown themselves, and perhaps the planet, in unnecessarily toxic seas.

The second reason to gracefully acquiesce in China’s rise is almost equally simple and obvious: It probably won’t be as bad as all that. During our debate, I repeatedly asked Peter Myers what was the worst-case scenario he feared emerging from China’s equaling or eclipsing the US as a regional and global power. His answers didn’t convince me.

Peter charged China with “genocide” over its treatment of the Uighur people of Xinjiang and Chinese Muslims in general. Though I might join him in deploring specific Chinese policies and actions, Westerners charging China with genocide ought to compare pictures of Xinjiang and Gaza, and remember the Biblical line about specks in the other guy’s eye and beams in your own. (Another Australian, Gideon Polya, puts the 9/11-triggered Muslim holocaust death toll in the double-digit millions.)

What’s more, I’m not convinced that the Chinese policies in Xinjiang have been all that unreasonable given the CIA-sponsored separatist threat. Nor am I convinced that China has been oppressing Muslims in general outside of Xinjiang. My Malaysian Muslim friends, no fans of China, don’t seem to think so. They say Chinese Muslims are for the most part doing fine, and actually gave me a beautiful coffee table book about Islam in China, featuring incredible photos of some of the thousands of mosques functioning happily in China with the full approval of the authorities.

Peter is also concerned about the Han Chinese expanding at the expense of surrounding civilizations in Tibet, Southeast Asia, Mongolia, and perhaps even Korea and Japan. (Maybe even…Australia?!) Some of that concern is no doubt legitimate. But both historically and in more recent times, Chinese expansionism seems to have been less militant than most of its competitors.

The Western European expansion into the Americas, Africa, and Australasia was extreme and destructive. It genocidally replaced local populations of humans as well as flora and fauna, as detailed in Alfred Crosby’s magisterial Ecological Imperialism, and slaughtered indigenous people with shocking cruelty, as documented in Sven Lindqvist’s Exterminate All the Brutes. The 19th century Western destruction of China via the rising Judeocracy’s Opium Wars was not very pretty either.

I see no evidence that a rising China is likely to treat either its neighbors, or people on the other side of the world, with anything remotely approaching that level of callousness. On the contrary, China’s current leadership seems to favor a win-win approach in its dealings with both neighbors and rivals. Admittedly, it’s always possible that future Chinese elites could pivot to a nastier policy and start inflicting “surplus repression” the way the West habitually does (and the way Japan did circa 1937-1945). But anyone who takes such an outcome for granted is engaging in unfounded speculation. John Mearsheimer, for example, seems to think that all governments are about equally nasty, that their nastiness rises with their power to inflict it, and that the corollary is that a more powerful China must necessarily be a nastier China. Though there may be some truth to his pessimistic-realist perspective, it is far too abstract, ignoring as it does historical specifics. Given the facts of China’s civilizational history, and the possibility that today’s extreme abundance vis-a-vis ancient times could allow for more peaceful, win-win outcomes, it seems likely that Mearsheimer is wrong and that today’s China could become more powerful without growing abusively brutal.

And then there is the issue of China’s alleged totalitarianism, which anti-China voices contrast with Western individualism and Enlightenment-based freedoms. This is probably the single biggest issue that alarms the red-pilled China bashers. They argue that the internet censorship-and-surveillance regime we’ve all experienced since roughly 2015 was developed in China and then imposed on the West. Therefore, it must be China’s fault!

Those making this argument typically try to blame China for COVID-19. According to them, the “Chinese virus” was part of some sort of nebulous conspiracy to lock down the West in a Chinese-style digital gulag.

Such arguments are incoherent. Why would China’s government want its Zio-American rival to censor the Western internet, intensifying the Western leaders’ ability to propagandize their populations?

The “blame China for COVID” argument was actually invented by those Zio-American geniuses who developed and unleashed COVID in a biological attack on China. Indeed, the American biowar complex probably funded and built the Wuhan lab so it could be used as a patsy in the long-planned COVID bio-attack. In January 2020, before anyone understood COVID, US MIC propagandists were already injecting the “blame China for the coming horrible pandemic” talking point into the mix via their controlled-opposition assets. Elements of the US MIC, namely the DIA, already knew the pandemic was coming in early November 2019, proving that they themselves were the guilty party.

China’s relatively collectivist society reacted to COVID more effectively than the more individualist West did. The US-MIC’s mRNA vaccines, which the bio-attack perps wanted to test in hopes they would provide a “magic bullet” antidote giving the US biowar complex strategic dominance over its rivals, failed miserably, almost certainly doing more damage than good. Oh well, back to the drawing board!

So blaming China for COVID dystopia gets it exactly backwards. The Zio-American leadership recognized that China’s collectivism, complete with a moderately censored internet, represented a strategic advantage vis-a-vis the West’s individualism. When the Zio-Americans attacked China with COVID, it gave the Western authorities an excuse to censor their internet and lock down their societies, which Western leaders think will close the “collectivism gap” and narrow China’s strategic advantage. It is the Western leaders, not the Chinese ones, who behaved with shocking recklessness in service to an agenda (war with China) that requires rolling back Western freedoms and propagandizing Western populations.

Bottom line: A West dedicated to peace and coexistence with China may or may not be able to preserve some of its traditional individual freedoms. Only time, and technology, will tell. But West that plunges into World War III with China will inevitably collapse into dystopia. War on that scale might or might not be the health of the state, but it would inevitably be a mortal illness for individual liberty.

The sane way to deal with China’s re-emergence as a great power would be through strengthening international law and the institutions that sustain it, starting with the United Nations, and engaging diplomatically under a global legal system in which no nation would be above the law. Trump’s band of lunatics is moving in precisely the opposite direction: destroying international law in service to Zionist genocide perpetrators, while abandoning Ukraine (good) in order to make Taiwan the next Ukraine (not so good).

Why is US policy so insanely (self-)destructive? The single biggest reason is that criminal Jewish-Zionist oligarchs have captured the commanding heights of the West by using centuries of private fiat currency creation to build up their power base. The guiding dream of the Zionist oligarchy is global domination. It’s based on Jewish messianic millenarianism, which envisages a “messiah” (Jewish military conquerer) exterminating and enslaving all non-Jews, and ruling the ensuing paradise from a “rebuilt” blood sacrifice temple in Jerusalem.

The Chinese public banking model represents a direct challenge to the Zionist usurers. And just as public banking is inherently both more economically productive and less corrupt than private fiat currency creation, the Chinese way of dealing with other nations is less ruthlessly exploitive than the Zionist-occupied West’s.

So if the world, or at least the Asia-Pacific region, comes under the sway of a Greater China that has reunited with its lost-and-found province of Taiwan, such a state of affairs will represent a considerable improvement over the current international order, dominated as it is by Jewish-Zionist bankers loyal only to their genocidally expansionist dream of a world ruled (or exterminated) by Greater Israel.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Press TV is now joined by author and commentator John Steppling, who’s with us from Inderoy, Norway. We also have Kevin Barrett, joining us from Saïdia, Morocco. Gentlemen, welcome to the program. Let’s start off with Mr. Steppling: Please just give us your perspective on how events have transpired with regards to Venezuela.

John Steppling: The targeting of ships off the coast of Venezuela seems to have entered into a new phase with the seizure of this oil tanker. The U.S. can’t invade Venezuela. They’re not capable of an actual land invasion, some kind of amphibious invasion with boots on the ground. They can’t do it. The American public has no appetite for the deaths of American military personnel either. So they’re going to avoid that at all costs.

The original justification for blowing up these fishing boats in the Caribbean was that they were transporting fentanyl. The boats couldn’t even reach the United States. They don’t have the range for that. The cartel that they accused Maduro of being the head of doesn’t exist. It’s a mythical cartel.

They—the US government—just keep inventing new stories, just keep inventing new justifications. And they’re not (plausible). They don’t even try very hard.

Now they seize an oil tanker. It looks very good, but there’s some other tankers out there delivering oil. This is meaningless. It’s a little tiny drop in the bucket. It has some symbolic resonance, I guess. But the U.S. is not going to invade. They may bomb a few places, but they’re terrified that Venezuela will shoot back.

So the US is a country that’s like a rabid dog that has been cornered. And it’s very dangerous in one sense because it’s unpredictable. Trump is trying to find things to do that will distract from Ukraine, Gaza, and Jeffrey Epstein, not necessarily in that order. So, you know, this is piracy. Is it illegal? Of course it is. Blowing up the fishing boats was illegal, too. But the U.S. doesn’t care. They’re flailing about, and they’re like a cornered dog that is snarling and yapping, but ultimately isn’t going to do much damage, I don’t think.

Kevin Barrett, I’d like you to weigh in on the situation as well. Venezuelan officials have said that whatever the U.S. is doing, it’s just along the lines of justification, specifically alluding to the attacks on the fishing boats. Venezuelans, high ranking officials, say that it’s always been about Venezuela’s natural wealth, its oil, its energy and its resources. How would you explain what the U.S. is doing with regards to Venezuela, specifically this massive military buildup in the Caribbean?

Well, I recently wrote an article posted at the Unz Review, that’s UNZ.com, pointing out that we’re living through a kind of a deja vu flashback to George W. Bush’s buildup to war with Iraq. In both cases we have preposterously false justifications for attacks on oil-rich nations. In the case of Bush Jr., they made up stories of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction that clearly didn’t exist. Now Trump’s people are making up even more ridiculous stories about a different kind of chemical weapon, fentanyl. But it’s widely known and admitted by everyone, including the U.S. government, that virtually all fentanyl consumed in the United States is manufactured in Mexico. Mexico, of course, is directly south of the United States. Venezuela is down in South America and has nothing to do with fentanyl. The fishing boats that Trump has been blowing up and murdering people and Hegseth has been ordering double-tap attacks to kill survivors—these are extremely grotesque war crimes. These fishing boats have nothing to do with any fentanyl. So that whole excuse is preposterous, just like the Iraq war excuses were.

And Trump is beating his chest like a baboon, like Bush did in 2003, defaming the leader of the sovereign oil-rich nation that he wants to attack. Back then, Bush was calling Saddam Hussein an evil dictator. That’s the sort of rhetoric that we’re now hearing from Trump about Maduro.

But what is this really all about? Well, it is largely about the fact that it’s an oil-rich country, and the United States right now is smarting under the sting of being slapped in Ukraine, being unable to leverage any power with China, and being in a position to lose a war with China over Taiwan. So what else can they do? Well, they can go try to attack a smaller country in the American hemisphere.

But again, I agree with the other guest John Steppling. I don’t think that’s going to work. But I think the hidden factor here that isn’t being mentioned in the mainstream media is that it’s really not about oil, in the sense that the United States can buy Venezuelan oil. Maduro, as he recently said, will happily sell the United States Venezuelan oil at a perfectly reasonable price.

Why won’t the United States take yes for an offer? It’s the same situation as with Saddam Hussein in 2003. The reason is that the United States is owned by Jewish Zionist gangsters who completely dominate the media and the financial sector. And those Jewish Zionist gangsters are not even loyal to the United States of America or its empire. They are loyal to the genocidal entity squatting in Palestine.

And that’s why Saddam Hussein was taken out. Not because he had oil that he wouldn’t sell. He wanted to sell his oil to the United States. They took him out because he was building up a military that had as its ultimate intention the liberation of Palestine.

And in Venezuela, we have a government there that is very much allied with the Resistance Axis and has an independent foreign policy and opposes the genocide of Palestine. And the Jewish Zionist gangsters that have taken over the United States, murdered the Kennedys, blew up the World Trade Center on 9/11, have destroyed my country. So I don’t even want to live there anymore. Those horrific monsters are behind these crimes against Venezuela.

All right. And a quick question for Mr. Steppling, if you’d like to add anything to what Mr. Kevin Barrett just alluded to. And in addition to that, what is the endgame with regards to Venezuela? Because we’ve seen this type of animosity towards Caracas over various US administrations.

John Steppling: Well, yeah, I think, Kevin, you know, mentioning Israel was an important addition to this whole equation. You can never minimize the influence of the Zionist billionaires in the U.S. government, and their control of media in particular. And they’re in the middle of a massive re-legitimizing campaign—re-legitimize Israel, because the world hates them right now. The end game, I don’t know. I mean, it’s true that this echoes the invasion of Iraq. It echoes Bush Jr. But the U.S. is even less powerful now. Their military is less well-stocked with weapons. They are less well-trained. They’ve had a string of failures. They couldn’t even stop Yemen from shutting down the Red Sea. I mean, they haven’t had a win…taking over an unarmed oil tanker is not exactly Iwo Jima. It’s a little bit pathetic, in fact.

So I don’t know that Trump thinks in terms of end games. They don’t really have one. Everything starts to feel like they’re shooting themselves in the foot with every decision they make. And this is another example. None of this will end well for the U.S.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

This week’s False Flag Weekly News theme is inspired by J. Michael Springmann’s article "Israel: America’s Oldest Enemy.” Dr. Springmann is the State Department whistleblower who exposed the pre-9/11 Visas for Al-Qaeda program in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Arabic news channels often eschew Israel in favor of the Zionist entity (الكيان الصهيوني). When they do mention Israel it is usually part of the expression the Israeli enemy (العدو الإسرائيلي).

The former expression conveys the belief, near-universal in this part of the world, that “Israel” is not a legitimate nation-state. Instead, it is temporary settler colony, like the crusader kingdoms of the 12th and 13th centuries, that doesn’t belong there and will soon be gone.

As for the epithet the Israeli enemy, it raises the question: whose enemy, exactly? Is “Israel” the enemy of the 420 million native Arabic speakers (“Arabs”)? Or of the roughly two billion Muslims, alongside the roughly 2.5 billion Christians? That would give “Israel” a grand total of 4.5 billion enemies, a solid majority of the Earth’s population.

Certainly “Israel” is the expression of a Jewish religious war against Christianity and Islam. The first real Zionist was the self-proclaimed satanic antichrist messiah Sabbatai Tzvi, who called for the Jews to “return” en masse to the Holy Land during the mid-17th century. Ever since then, Zionism has been an expression of Jewish messianic-millenarian extremism. Zionists make the “Jewish state” the focus of their idolatrous worship. Implicit in their fanatical idolatry is the millenarian notion that “Israel” is part of some divine plan that will ultimately “repair the world” by restoring the Jewish people’s rightful and natural dominion over all other peoples. The Jewish Messiah, Jewish eschatology tells us, will be a military conqueror who exterminates most of the goyim (the non-Jewish peoples) and enslaves the rest. This messiah, they believe, will rule the world from a “rebuilt” blood sacrifice temple in Jerusalem, inaugurating a millennium of peace and prosperity and flourishing (for Jews) built on the extermination and enslavement of non-Jews.

Here’s the big secret that Western mainstream media isn’t telling you: Israel’s biggest enemy isn’t the Arabs or the Muslims. It’s the Christians. The primary civilizational challenger to messianic-millennial Judaism has always been Western Christian civilization. Destroying Western Christian civilization has been the biggest preoccupation of messianic-millenarian Jews, whether in the guise of Marxists, Zionists, or hyperliberal secular humanists. They have done everything possible to undermine the Christian core of Western civilization, from the anti-Christian underpinnings of the American, French, and Russian revolutions, to the deliberate sabotage of Christian family values via sexual degeneracy, abortion, and feminism, to the current assault on the Christian ethnic-ideological core of Western countries through replacement immigration.

What’s more, the Zionist entity’s genocide of the Palestinians is a symbolic war on Christianity. The Palestinians, many of whom are Christians, are the descendants of Jesus’s family. By slaughtering and oppressing them in the most horrific and disgusting ways that the perverse imagination can conceive, the messianic-millenarian Jewish nation that calls itself “Israel” is re-crucifying Jesus on a daily basis. When they train dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners, they are doing that to Jesus. When they burn children alive, they are burning alive the infant Jesus. When they celebrate shooting pregnant Palestinian women in the belly with “one shot two kills” T-shirts and memes, they imagine themselves killing the infant Jesus and his holy mother Mary with one Jewish-Zionist bullet.

Jewish extremists use the Western media they dominate to obscure this reality, and to obfuscate their war on Western Christendom by promoting an illusory war between an imaginary “Judeo-Christian” West and the Islamic world. That fake war was conjured into imaginary existence by way of the Jewish-Zionist-orchestrated 9/11 human sacrifice.

In reality, Western attacks on Muslim countries have been Jewish-Zionist projects. Their purpose is not just to weaken regional Muslim-majority nations that pose a threat to “Israel,” but also to weaken the Christian West, in preparation for its complete destruction by messianic-millenarian Jewry.

Why do radical Jews hate Christianity so much?

Both Christians and Muslims are viewed as enemies in traditional Judaism. Christians are symbolically viewed as the descendants of Esau, the dumb hairy redhead that the Jews’ eponymous ancestor “Israel” swindled so successfully. Muslims, for their part, are held to be the descendants of Ishmael, the illegitimate and correctly-disinherited offspring of Abraham’s handmaiden Hagar. Both of these mythic tropes are used by self-styled God-chosen Jews to explain why they are inherently superior to those who follow the two main branches of monotheism. According to Jewish tradition, the Christians (Esau) and Muslims (Ishmael) like their eponymous ancestors deserved to be swindled and disinherited. From the Jewish perspective, Israel’s swindling his Christian brother, and Sarah’s banishing and disinheriting Abraham’s Muslim son, were blessed actions fully approved of by God, despite their being dastardly deeds. Corollary: God approves of Jews’ doing dastardly deeds against Christians and Muslims. Why? Because Jews imagine God as a tribal patriarch named Yahweh, a psychopath whose first characteristic is jealousy, and imagine themselves to be Yahweh’s chosen psychopathic tribe, whose purpose on Earth is to swindle and disinherit the competition, to unjustly prosper, and to ultimately use lies, crime, and betrayal to enslave and exterminate everyone else.

So why do radical Jews hate Christians the most? Why do they spit on Christians, not Muslims? Do they view dumb, hairy Esau as a bigger villain than “that b*****d Ishmael”?

The answer lies in the person not of Esau, but of Jesus. Jews view Jesus as a false messiah. And they especially hate his message of universalism and brotherly love. Such a message directly contradicts their core precepts of supremacism (chosenness) and hatred of non-Jews. What’s more, Jesus not only brought a radically anti-tribalist message, but became (in Jewish eyes) an object of idolatrous worship. Jesus’s nominal followers have always taken a dim view of tribalist Judaism, and the Jewish tribe’s conflicts with Christians have been more numerous and more intense than its conflicts with any other group. So Jews have grown to deeply despise Jesus, imagining him (in their Talmud) boiling eternally in excrement. That same obscene hatred is on display every day in Jewish-tribalist treatment of the descendants of Jesus’s family, the Palestinians.

So Israel is not so much a nation as a tribe—a tribe named after its eponymous founder, as all tribes are. (The Jewish tribe or nation has been called Israel, by itself and by others, since long before the modern nation existed.) It’s a group of people who imagine they have the same ancestor, who make up an extended family, who are better than outsiders, and who are divinely commanded to use tribal nepotism to amass more and more wealth and power. And it’s a tribe whose rabidly supremacist mythology, especially its messianic-millenarian fantasies, poses a clear and present danger to the world.

Catholic historian and FFWN co-host E. Michael Jones likes to quote 1 Thessalonians 2:15, according to which the Jews are “the enemies of all humanity.” If that’s the case, they shouldn’t just worry the Christians and Muslims, but the rest of the world as well. Indeed, the Jewish messianic vision of the millennium has no more place for an independent, sovereign China or India than it has for independent sovereign Christian or Muslim nations.

Though the secular-globalist Jews couldn’t bring the world together on the basis of universal Jewish-usury-based fiat money—the Chinese with their public banking have doomed that project—the Zionists are succeeding in forging a very different kind of planetary concord: They are uniting the world in disgust and loathing for their genocide in Occupied Palestine. The Israeli enemy’s war on the world will end with the world winning. A new, harmonious global order—a millennium if you will—will be established not by supremacist Zionist Jews conquering the goyim, but by the goyim belatedly rising up to unite and defend itself.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link to interview Bitchute link to interview

John Hankey’s new film Justice for Charlie Kirk is being shadowbanned on YouTube, so please share it! You can also watch it at my channels: Rumble link to film Bitchute link to film.

Kevin Barrett: There are two huge, glaring problems with the Charlie Kirk story. One is the ballistics, as you point out so brilliantly, with the help of a couple of ballistics experts. That 30-06 cartridge fired from somewhere in the neighborhood of not much more than 150 yards through soft tissue in his neck— if that had been the actual shot that they tell us it was, it would have gone right through, exiting with a big blood spray right behind him, splattering the stuff behind him. But no such thing happening. It didn’t exit. So the whole ballistic story is insanely false and obviously false. And secondly, the Tyler Robinson on the rooftop story is equally insanely and obviously false...

John Hankey: I’ve been thinking about this more and more, and maybe this is the time to raise it. The blue shirted idiot, the guy who I identify as being the leader of the (”security” i.e. assassination) crew, has been interviewed on Australian video, probably a podcast, like a three hour interview. When I first saw him talking, I thought, that guy’s an idiot. He couldn’t have been the leader of anything. And I now get that, you know, this is the Mossad. And when they do stuff, you better spend a week thinking about what it is your eyes saw because that’s not what happened. And his goal in looking like an idiot, one, is to persuade you that he’s not Mossad because he appears to be an idiot. And two, he ducks the issue and pretends that it’s not his fault that they didn’t cover the roof. And you hear him say it and you think, well, that idiot might have been capable of being that inept. They’re pleading ineptitude.

So there are two guys: there are security team members named Brian Harpole and Dan Flood, who worked for Schaffer Personal Protection and supposedly finagled Schaffer out of the TPUSA contract and worked exclusively for Charlie.

Kevin Barrett: So which of those two guys is the blue shirted guy that you thought was the head of the team?

John Hankey: First one, Harpole. Brian Harpole. He did a two hour podcast from Australia and sounded really stupid.

Kevin Barrett: What’s his official story on his background?

John Hankey: Oh, who cares? I don’t care what anybody says his background is. I doubt that that’s his name. Don’t you think that if he’s genuinely deep Mossad...he says he’s a cop from Texas. Well, he’s a cop from Texas who was sent to Israel and got recruited. That I think is fairly clear. But the point that I was trying to make is that with hours to look at it, what I recognize is that his job is just to get you focused on the issue of why did they not stop Tyler Robinson from shooting Charlie Kirk?

But Tyler Robinson was not on that roof. He certainly wasn’t on that roof with a 30-odd six. In the court filings, when they filed the charges against Tyler Robinson, they said that one of the local cops saw the guy running across the roof. Well, if he saw the guy who instantly, within two or three seconds, had disappeared from the view of anybody who might have been watching him—if that cop was watching the roof, the local cops were watching the roof. And so if the local cops were watching the roof, why didn’t they see this guy? Because he wasn’t there.

Kevin Barrett: Right. I think you reconstruct that right. So probably they had somebody run, go up the stairway and run out. So there never was anybody on that spot on the edge of the roof where they claim that the shots came from. Because the local cops would have immediately spotted him and called off the rally. That’s why the video doesn’t show any of that. All the video shows is what they claim is the second half of his run across the roof. They don’t get him running from where he supposedly took the shot. But they should have, because that security camera has that whole view of that whole roof. The guy they shot running across the roof, who probably wasn’t Tyler Robinson, he just went up the stairway and ran like that. There was never anybody in that alleged sniper’s position. That is, I think, a pretty good deduction. (Read the full transcript at my Substack by clicking on “transcript” above the video image.)

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

What is WRONG with these people?

They are the global rape capital. They can’t stop committing genocide even after signing a ceasefire. They deliberately starve innocent civilians. They are the world leaders in racist violence in service to ethnic cleansing. They routinely torture prisoners to death, steal and traffic their organs, and leave their bodies so mutilated as to be unidentifiable.

They get away with all of this and more because they have taken over America. They blackmail US presidents other notables, and use their sex-trafficking blackmailers to defame anyone who breathes a word of truth about their stranglehold over US foreign policy. They routinely commit assassinations and other terrorist outrages, often designed to be blamed on their enemies, as with 9/11.

They manufacture controlled opposition dissidents like Jeffrey Epstein’s good friend Noam Chomsky. As I recently informed a leftist who only recently figured out what a scumbag Chomsky is:

Chomsky’s scumbaggery is related to his being a Jewish supremacist tribalist and agent of the Genocidal Zionist Entity. His entire political career was spent running cover for Israel, by posing as pro-Palestinian while using his enormous influence to steer public opinion away from icebergs that could have sunk “Israel” such as the JFK assassination, 9/11, and acknowledgement of the Kosher Nostra’s stranglehold over the US in general and Mideast policy in particular. Chomsky is just Epstein in intellectual drag. See: https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/why-chomsky-is-wrong-about-9-11/

Perhaps most mystifyingly, they are perplexed about why people dislike them, and outraged by that growing dislike. To solve their popularity problem, they buy up the media so they can prevent anyone from pointing out that they control the media. Then they buy up social media so they can shadowban or deplatform anyone who posts about them buying up social media.

When they are criticized for slaughtering thousands of innocent civilians every few years and calling it “mowing the lawn,” they respond by saying: “OK, we won’t ‘mow the lawn’ any more—instead of killing thousands every few years, we’ll just go ahead and kill hundreds of thousands all at once!” What a great way to win friends and influence people.

One of the weirdest aspects of their psychology is their love of sexual abuse. I already mentioned the excellent “global rape capital” article by Elias Ekleh which starts by discussing Israelis mass hating on the woman who leaked “the video showing Israeli soldiers and their dog torturing and sodomizing a Palestinian prisoner/hostage in Sde Teiman desert prison,” and goes on to demonstrate in nauseating detail “what a demented sadistic sexually psychopathically satanic culture the whole Israeli society is.” Tucker Carlson’s brother Buckley has been abused and threatened for sharing that article on X—and for plugging the Unz Review, where Jewish supremacist psychopathology is not off-limits for discussion and critique.

Their sex-abuse-loving culture has a special penchant for raping children and adolescents. And it isn’t just an Israeli thing. In New York City, rabbis have set up a child rape assembly line, and terrorize anyone who breathes a word about it. Recently one such perverted rabbi, whose excuse is that the Talmud says it’s just fine to rape little children, has benefited from Jewish political power and appears poised to escape a 103 year prison sentence. He will presumably benefit from the same kind of Jewish supremacist influence that forced the US to release Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard in 2015. (That notorious traitor was recently honored by a private visit from US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee.)

What’s the source of all this pathological behavior? Laurent Guyénot thinks it ultimately stems from the Torah. Ron Unz likewise suspects that unfortunate aspects of the Jewish religious tradition are still influencing secular-tribalist behavior.

E. Michael Jones, this week’s FFWN co-host, reframes Unz’s insight in conventional Christian terms: Jews rejected and killed Jesus, opted for an anti-Christ theology, and made themselves “the enemies of all mankind.”

I find much to agree with in all of those analyses. Alongside the Christian critique, I would add the Qur’anic one:

The Qur’an has a lot to say about the Jews, most of it highly critical: They (or their tribal leaders) distorted the scriptures for their own gain (2:75); their willful ignorance of the divine message of the scriptures, even as they pose as its custodians, makes them like donkeys carrying loads of books (62:5); they are the greediest people on earth for the things of this world (wealth and power) (2:96); they go to extreme lengths haggling with God and trying to ignore His commands (2:67-73); they even believe they can chain God’s hands (5:64); and they, alongside the pagans, are the worst enemies of Muslims (those who submit to God)—while the Christians are Muslims’ best friends and allies (5:82).

This Qur’anic criticism targets the Tribe’s leadership, while acknowledging that some (powerless, marginalized, prophetic) Jews have remained pious and faithful to the divine message (3:113-115).

And here is a psychological observation based on attachment theory:

8th-day circumcision is likely a major reason why Jewish tribalism is so paranoid and psychopathic. Jews are conditioned by rabbis and other Jewish leaders to hate the “evil goy who wants to do unspeakable things to us”—a buried memory of the evil stranger who ripped the baby out of his mother’s arms and inflicted horrific sexual mutilation, ruining the infant-child bond that Bowlby discovered was the key to lifelong ease and well-being, and leading to overcompensation in the guise of “Jewish mother syndrome.” Jews need to start a circumcision truth movement under the slogan: “Circumcision was an inside job!”

Here is a study that offers modest support for that theory.

But enough about me. What do you think is wrong with these people?

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Philippe de Vulpillieres, author of 9/11 Explained to the FBI, presents “the Arnon Milchan hypothesis”—according to which the self-confessed Israeli spy Arnon Milchan, who has bragged about stealing American nuclear weapons secrets/components and giving them to Israel, was the likely mastermind of the 9/11 false flag operation. According to de Vulpillieres, the film Swordfish, released three months before 9/11, features a protagonist (Gabriel Shear, played by John Travolta) based on Milchan, an associate of the filmmakers. Swordfish’s Milchan character lays out the rationale for the 9/11 false flag, arguing that slaughtering a thousand New Yorkers in a fake terrorist attack would be virtuous, because it would help a secret counterterrorism squad linked to Mossad “protect our way of life” by killing Osama Bin Laden etc. etc.

From the book:

“Aesopian language is a means of communication intended to convey a concealed meaning to informed members of a conspiracy or underground movement while simultaneously maintaining an innocent meaning to outsiders. The term refers to the allegorical writings of the ancient Greek fabulist Aesop”…What I will set out to demonstrate—without much difficulty in fact—is that the mastermind of 9/11 used this very Aesopian language in a specific film produced in 2001 by someone to whom he was extremely close. If the film in question was difficult to decipher upon its release, the later success of the 9/11 operation gradually led the individual concerned to lower his guard and boast recklessly in the 2010s about peripheral exploits —without realizing how much this made the work’s Aesopian coding less and less impenetrable…

“This film is Swordfish —and it contains a swarm of inconsistencies that can only be explained by the hypothesis of an unrestrained use of Aesopian language…accompanied by dialogue that links “success” with “massacre” and situates that massacre—of hostages—inside a New York building, the supposedly necessary and patriotic sacrifice of innocents on U.S. soil culminates, in this pre-September 11 film, with the triumphant assassination of a figure clearly modeled on Osama bin Laden.”

Read the full transcript by clicking on “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Note: This week’s False Flag Weekly News is up and the audio is fixed! -KB

Now joining us with more analysis on the story is Mr. Kevin Barrett from Saidia, Morocco. I’d like to thank you, Mr. Barrett, for joining us during this hour’s top headlines. First of all…human rights groups are saying that these are potential violations of international law. They’ve been targeting their killing innocent bystanders on those boats, from what we’ve heard from the Venezuelan president, from the Cuban president. And the thing is that people are not knowing about the timing. They’re saying the timing and scope of these planned operations are unclear. But are they truly unclear in your opinion, Mr. Barrett?

No. They are preparing for a potential war of aggression to try to seize control of Venezuela’s oil supplies. Venezuela has the most proven oil reserves of any nation on Earth, and it’s sitting right there in the Western Hemisphere, which under the Monroe Doctrine supposedly belong to the United States. So somebody like Trump, who doesn’t care about international law, is tempted to just move in and seize those resources. And the pretext is the most ludicrous, transparently absurd pretext. And that’s saying something, because the United States has a long history of waging war on false pretexts. The Israeli demolition of the World Trade Center was used as a pretext to launch the series of post 9/11 wars of regime change on behalf of Israel. And now we’re seeing this new pretext: They make up a completely false story about a non-existent drug cartel and lie and say that the president of Venezuela is the head of this non-existent cartel. It’s a complete joke. And then they start murdering fishermen claiming that they’re stopping drugs. Everybody knows this is a big lie. But because they have the power, they can get away with it.

And it’s just shocking, especially because the United States and especially the CIA is the world’s worst drug trafficker. Indeed, the invasion of Afghanistan was sort of a mirror image of this. One of the reasons, perhaps the biggest single reason, for invading Afghanistan in 2001 was to re-enable the drug trade, which the Taliban had shut down. And even today, now we’re hearing about possible U.S. attacks to re-invade Afghanistan and seize Bagram Air Base because, once again, the Taliban has shut down the CIA’s narcotics trade.

So I am so ashamed to be an American with a government that is this corrupt, and I hope and pray that the Israeli-occupied U.S. government is defeated as soon as possible and in the most conclusive way possible.

Mr. Barrett…per your expertise and everything that we know that has happened already, we’ve been hearing that the regional destabilization there in Latin America is already in progress. And we do know, according to the Venezuelan president and the people there, that again, they see that resistance is the only way. But again, they have been saying that this is the reason from the beginning, other than the oil, as you did mention, is that they want to topple the government of Venezuela. But do you think they are actually able and willing to go ahead and do it? Or is this basically threats and bullying as we are used from Trump?

I don’t think they’re sure that they can do it. And so I think it’s quite possible that, as some of the reports in the US mainstream media suggest, that they may be putting on pressure to try to get a better deal in terms of getting Venezuela to sign away some portion of its oil for the use of the United States while maintaining a degree of sovereignty, which Venezuela is reportedly willing to do. But there is, of course, the question of what precisely are the terms of trade here? And Venezuela wants to remain a sovereign state, not some occupied colony.

And so there’s a kind of a power struggle going on. But I certainly hope that Venezuela has the means to defend itself. It’s not just that they can launch a powerful guerrilla war that would make Vietnam look like a walk in the park. They’ve got the terrain for that. They’ve got the jungles. They’ve got the mountains. So that’s a good last-ditch effort. But I certainly hope that they’ve also obtained some good anti-ship weapons. These days, aircraft carriers are obsolete. Indeed, all surface ships are obsolete because very cheap anti-ship missiles can be used to sink them. We know that 20 years ago, those Sunburn missiles out of China, which Iran had and other countries have gotten some of and then manufactured their own versions of, are entirely capable of sinking American ships. And so if Venezuela has that, it’s a solid deterrent. And if they don’t have it, then they’ve made a terrible mistake by not obtaining it.

Sources: Press TV TruthJihad.com

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

New York Times: “Brooklyn investor who stole homes faces years behind bars. Sanford Solney was sentenced up to seven years in prison for a deed theft scheme that preyed on distressed homeowners from minority communities.”

So I thought, hmm, minority communities, Sanford Solney, he’s an investor. It’s like, is this an ethnic joke or something? Is The New York Times going to be tossing around ethnic stereotypes? Well, let’s read the story and find out…

A huge thank you to the donors to False Flag Weekly News who “produced” the past two weeks’ shows! Now it’s on to this Saturday’s show featuring the return of Helen Buyniski to FFWN: https://fundrazr.com/national-epstein-security

I really do appreciate folks helping keep these FFWN Fundrazrs on track. These Fundrazrs help me keep going after Stripe’s debanking my Substack instantly removed 75% of what I had been living on. I also appreciate those who “subscribe to my Substack” through my Paypal donation page, or through Zelle (to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com).

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Richie Allen: The UN Security Council has voted in favor of a US drafted resolution which effectively endorses President Donald Trump’s twenty point plan for Gaza. Included in the plan, and this is very interesting, is the establishment of an International Stabilisation Force, or ISF, to which the Americans say multiple unnamed countries have offered to contribute. The resolution was backed by countries including the UK, France and Somalia, with none voting against. Russia and China abstained.

While that was going on, humanitarian organizations are saying that there is a disaster about to befall the Palestinians. Now, you might say, what? There is a genocide underway in Gaza. Yes, yes, yes. But they are facing the winter. The aid is not getting in. UK Foreign secretary Yvette Cooper told the House of Commons today that aid is stacking up in Jordan and elsewhere and is not getting in. The Palestinians need tents. They need sleeping bags. They need the means to heat themselves as the winter closes in. To discuss this and more, let’s welcome back to the program a friend of ours. He is an academic, an author, researcher and broadcaster. You’ll find him at kevinbarrett.substack.com. He writes for Unz.com, he writes for TruthJihad.com and many other publications. Let’s say a big hello to Dr. Kevin Barrett.

Kevin, welcome back. The conditions currently being endured by the Palestinians are looking to become worse as winter closes in and they are left there with no places to shelter themselves. And humanitarian organisations are saying if something isn’t done about this immediately, there’s going to be a great loss of life this coming winter. And disease is a big problem as well. How do you read this?

Kevin Barrett: That’s true, Richie. Winter is already here in Morocco, which is sort of the same kind of south-of-the-Mediterranean kind of climate, with the same weather patterns coming through here heading in the direction of Palestine. It’s been very cold and raining. And the rain, of course, is very welcome in Morocco. But it won’t be so welcome in Gaza where all the buildings have been blown up. There’s no shelter, not enough food, not enough warm clothing. And this whole fake solution that Trump has pushed through on behalf of his owner, Bibi, is, I think, calculated to just blow up and continue the genocide. And it’s really scandalous that the Security Council went ahead and fell for it again.

Some of our listeners believe that the Epstein file saga is currently being used to keep Donald Trump in line. I’m not sure about that, but it doesn’t really matter what I think. What do you think?

No, I agree with them. I think it’s obvious that Israel doesn’t just have something on Trump. They have a lot on Trump. Remember, Trump is the creation of (notorious sex criminal and blackmail-orgy-organizer) Roy Cohn. Roy Cohn was an organized crime kingpin as well as a lawyer, so he could operate in the legitimate world as well as the crime world that was his main home. And he ran New York for the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate. He relayed orders from J. Edgar Hoover to remove and even kill important politicians. Hoover, of course, was basically owned by Meyer Lansky, the Jewish gangster loyal to Israel, who had pictures—the same types of pictures of J. Edgar Hoover that we now have heard that the Epsteins and their friends allegedly had of Trump and Bill Clinton.

Read the full transcript by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News Link

According to the latest leaked emails, Jeffrey Epstein tossed around such lines as “I know how dirty Donald is” and “I am the one who can take him down.” The Mossad blackmailer and his brother also mentioned “Trump blowing Bubba photos” that the Russians might or might not have. (If you don’t want to see those photos, you’re not alone.)

Trump responded by “Ramping Up Pressure on G.O.P. to Thwart Epstein Vote.” He continued insisting, absurdly, that the whole Epstein affair is “a Democrat hoax.” The president viciously attacked Epstein transparency advocate Marjorie Taylor Greene—attacks that she claimed amounted to inciting death threats against her. Twenty-seven Epstein survivors signed a letter supporting Greene.

Trump’s apparent panic included blatant exhibitions of textbook “guilty demeanor.” Aboard Air Force One, Trump reacted to a question about Epstein by snapping “quiet! quiet!” while angrily jabbing his extended index finger to within a couple of centimeters from the reporter’s face. His reaction to Epstein questions at the White House was only marginally less incriminating. But Trump’s biggest implicit admission that he has something yuge to hide was his August order to move Epstein’s Mossad co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell to a country club prison, where she is being treated like Jewish royalty while awaiting the inevitable presidential pardon. In return, Maxwell has been dutifully but unconvincingly reciting a “Trump is totally innocent” script.

Israel, Not Trump, Is the Villain

But Trump is not the real villain of the Epstein drama. Israel is. And its accomplice in villainy is the Jewish-Zionist-dominated mainstream media, which clumsily contorts itself to avoid mentioning the Israeli elephant in Epstein’s living room.

Trump sure acts like Israel has something on him. He broke with US and world consensus by moving the US embassy to the stolen land of Occupied Jerusalem, endorsing Israel’s theft of the Stolen Golan Heights, and forcing US vassals in the region to “abnormalize” with the malignant, ever-metastasizing Zionist entity. His shredding of the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran likewise represented abject submission to Netanyahu and a gargantuan betrayal of American interests. And like his predecessor “Hairsniffer Joe” Biden—another blackmailed pervert—Trump has been destroying America’s global standing by his complicity in Israeli genocide.

Is the current drip-drip-drip of Epstein revelations orchestrated by Israel? Might they be calculated to terrorize Trump into letting Israel completely abandon the Gaza truce, continue its wars on Lebanon and Iran with US support, and pursue its genocidally expansionist plans in a way that grossly undermines US interests? That is what Candace Owens recently suggested:

Thomas Massie, a Congressional leader of the America First movement that is replacing MAGA (i.e. MIGA) obviously understands Owens’ point. He wants to force the issue, even if it means bringing Trump down. Massie’s Epstein Files Transparency Act

“would require the Justice Department to make public within 30 days all files, communications and investigative materials related to Epstein and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell. It would allow the redaction of details identifying victims or interfering with ongoing investigations but prohibit the department from withholding information over concerns of “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.” (source)

Monday morning Trump faced political reality and said he was no longer opposing Epstein transparency. As usual, though, his statement sounded unhinged and redolent of “guilty demeanor”":

“We have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party.”

Trump’s assertion that the whole Epstein affair is a “hoax” concocted by the radical left is, of course, preposterous. But sometimes when unhinged people say apparently insane things, there is a method to their proverbial madness. (That was one of several things that Freud wasn’t entirely wrong about.) So let’s put Trump on the couch and ask what “radical left” might mean here. The answer, of course, is “pro-Palestine” i.e. “anti-Zionist.” In today’s political reality, it’s the people furthest to the left who are, by and large, the most likely to support Palestine and oppose Israel. So what Trump is really saying, beneath the nonsensical surface, is that forcing the Epstein affair into the open is very bad for Israel—so bad that only the “radical left,” the pro-Hamas people, could possibly support it. In other words, Trump is warning Israel to stop blackmailing him by poking him with sharp Epstein sticks every couple of minutes. He is reminding Israel that the Epstein affair is political dynamite that could not only bring down Trump’s presidency, but also Israel’s control over America’s political system.

Are we witnessing a Mexican standoff, in which Israel is holding an Epstein gun to Trump’s head, while Trump tries to make Israel understand that the gun is actually a double-edged sword? (Pardon the mixed metaphor…) If so, Trump might be well-advised to signal to the Israelis that he holds other cards—other weapons—that could prove lethal to the Jewish state. As a “nuclear option,” Trump could let it be known, one way or another, that he is prepared to go on live television and blame Israel for 9/11 and the Kennedy assassinations, then order a punitive US military expedition to avenge those and other attacks on America. (Getting JD Vance on board would be helpful as assassination insurance.)

Trump probably doesn’t have the guts to do that. He would most likely just let Israel take him down without a whimper. After all, Trump was “made” by Roy Cohn, the notorious Kosher Nostra pederast, and has been on his knees servicing the Jewish mafia ever since. His professed love of screwing his business partners’ wives is textbook psychological compensation for his real deep profile as a “bottom” with Roy Cohn and other sadistic Jewish controllers on top. And if they tell him to “blow Bubba” on camera…well, you get the drift.

Trump was never any more a businessman than Jeffrey Epstein was an investor. Both were small-time frontmen whose talents for charismatic blather were harnessed by billionaire Jewish criminals: Epstein was good at seducing teenage girls, Trump at seducing low-IQ American TV-watchers, while pretending to preside over money-laundering establishments disguised as hotels and casinos.

When the American people finally tire of the whole tawdry spectacle, they are going to have to face the fact that their real enemy is the Jewish-Zionist oligarchy—and singlemindedly set about destroying it.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com