Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

False Flag Weekly News special! Kevin Barrett joins Laurent Guyénot from an undisclosed location in a bunker deep beneath the Alps.

When people say “Europe is committing suicide” they’re usually talking about demographics, meaning low fertility and excessive immigration. But Europe is also committing spiritual and geopolitical suicide. The low fertility that’s the main cause of the demographic problem is a symptom of a spiritual malaise in general and hedonistic, individualistic materialism in particular. Did that stem from the collapse of Christianity, as I generally argue? Or was there already something about Christianity that made Western civilization vulnerable to the Jewish-Zionist criminals who have taken over its commanding heights, as Laurent Guyénot thinks?

Geopolitically, too, Europe keeps acting against its own interest. It colludes in the coverup of the destruction of its energy supplies via Biden’s bombing of the Nordstream pipeline, then rabidly cheers on the US war on Russia…which was always also a US war on Europe. Now the US wants out, but Europe wants World War III!

Europe allows itself to be occupied by an empire that threatens to attack it in order to seize its territory (I’m talking about the US empire and Greenland, of course). It supports the genocide of Gaza and earns the wrath of the Global South...while destroying its own reputation as the home of international legal institutions like the ICC and ICJ. And now, Europe refuses to profit mightily from establishing trade relations with Iran, and instead shoots itself in the foot by becoming a fanatical cheerleader for looming Zio-American war on Iran.

In this episode of False Flag Weekly News, recorded in an undisclosed-location bunker deep beneath the Alps, Laurent Guyénot and I marvel at the insanity of the Zionist-oligarch-owned Trump regime…and the European poodles’ pathetically obsequious pandering to that evil empire.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihadRadio link

Who’s irrational, the “conspiracy theorists” or the academicians who are paid to attack them with ad hominems, circular arguments, and other fallacies? I’ve opined on this before. Now let’s find out what a genuine expert—sociologist and expert on conspiracy movements Richard Ellefritz—thinks. He’s an assistant professor of sociology at the University of the Bahamas, and the author of numerous articles on this and related topics.

Kevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audiovisual. I’m Kevin Barrett and I’ve been doing this since when Fox News made me too toxic to employ in the academy. So I’ve been pushing back against the dubious portraits of what’s really going on in the world in the mainstream media and academy ever since from outside the academy. But today I’m happy to go back to somebody inside the academy who’s thinking about some of the same things that I think about. That’s Richard Elfritz. He’s a sociologist working at University of the Bahamas who has done participant observation ethnography involving the 9/11 truth movement, which means he hung out with 9/11 truthers and kind of did what they did and observed it just like any other ethnographer would do with a group they were interested in studying. And it’s actually kind of a fascinating topic or confluence of the discipline of ethnography and the 9/11 truth movement. So anyway, I’m really looking forward to this interview. Welcome, Richard Elfritz. How are you doing?

Richard Ellefritz: I’m all right. I’m here in sunshiny Bahamas. It’s been cloudy for the last week. You know, apologies to the tourists, but I’ve been working at the University of the Bahamas since fall as a full-time assistant professor of sociology. Prior to that, I worked three years full-time at Oklahoma State University after I earned my PhD there. So they thought I was doing a good enough job. You know, I love what I do teaching sociology, which is, in my opinion, kind of a natural inroad to investigating what are called conspiracy theories. And yeah, that’s that primarily is how I really got interested in studying the 9/11 truth movement, because one of my primary questions is, why are these people called conspiracy theorists?

Right. And of course, there are various theories about that, including the infamous CIA memo after the JFK assassination, ordering their media assets to smear people questioning the official story by calling them conspiracy theorists. Is that a conspiracy theory?

Well, there’s a there’s a book called The Stigmatization of Conspiracy Theories Since the 1950s: “A Plot to Make us Look Foolish” (by Katharina Thalmann)…the author doesn’t go far enough. Because as I showed in a series of essays published at PropagandaInFocus.com, the CIA did not coin the term conspiracy theory or conspiracy theorist. And the reason that’s important to say is because, as a matter of fact, those terms do appear in some literature and newspapers prior to the release of that CIA memo 1035-960 to their CIA office chiefs overseas.

And oftentimes I will hear, and in fact, just last week I was correcting somebody on an essay that they’re publishing: You can’t factually say the CIA coined that term. But what you can say is that the CIA no doubt helped to popularize the term, much like Norman Rockwell and Coca-Cola helped to popularize our modern imagery of Santa Claus.

So I think it’s interesting that there’s this academic book out there that claims to have studied the rise of this conspiracy label, as I call it. But then they basically backtrack at a certain point because I think they (Katharina Thalmann) were unwilling, for whatever reason, to just go a little bit deeper. And in my series of essays on the topic, especially in the third installment, I showed that the CIA memo, which anybody can find, very likely led to a regional editorial published by Tom Bethel.

Now, Tom Bethel was a very vocal advocate of the Warren Commission that served as the official story of what happened to JFK in November 1963. There are some other blogs and articles I found that drew suspicion that he had direct ties to the CIA. And so he publishes in a regional news outlet in the northwest, I believe, an editorial that then served as the hypothesis for the first psychology publication analyzing conspiracy theories. And so that was in the late 1970s. And they name him, they name his article, they use his postulation, his conjecture in that article as their hypothesis for their theory that big events lead to big explanations. And that logic then was picked up by psychologists in the future to form part of the foundation of the psychologism of conspiracy theories: the claim that the reason that you’re questioning government’s official explanations is because your psychology just can’t handle the fact they say that big events sometimes have small causes, that a kind of a nobody could assassinate a president, that Islamic jihadist terrorists could pull off something as catastrophic as the events of September 11th. “You see, your psychology just can’t handle this.”

Never do they explore the empirical evidence. Never do they offer up anomalies like World Trade Center Building Seven. And when they do, for example, in an article called What About Building Seven, they don’t have any time to seriously entertain the peer reviewed publications that analyzed, for example, active thermitic material found in the dust samples of that building. They don’t analyze the physics of the collapse like David Chandler did. So they ignore the strongest empirical claims that are directly made by who they label conspiracy theorists, and rather turn to psychologizing the issue as a way of explaining why it is that some people pose direct questions to the official accounts and narratives.

So what I showed in the third installment of the essay series is that the CIA memo laid out the framework that Tom Bethel proposed in his editorial, that his editorial served as the hypothesis for the first psychology study. And that study then led to a blossoming of other studies that do anything but critically interrogate the many anomalies made in the empirical claims by who they label conspiracy theorists.

And that’s very much in line with the work of Lance DeHaven-Smith, who wrote Conspiracy Theories in America and drew attention to that CIA memo, among other things. And as far as the psychologizing of the conspiracy theorist goes, it does strike me as kind of counterintuitive, this whole notion that people would really much rather believe that their very powerful insiders had blown up the World Trade Center or killed the president, as opposed to believing the official explanations that these nobodies had gotten lucky. It seems to me that in almost all cases when people are faced with a choice of beliefs, they choose the beliefs that a serve their interests the best and are the most pleasant to hold. Beliefs that don’t serve their interests and are unpleasant and anxiety producing are usually avoided. For that reason, I would think the cognitive bias would always be away from the so-called conspiracy theory, except perhaps for a very small subset of people with some unusual factors in their psyches. But who really wants to believe that the United States is governed by these monsters that would do 9/11 and would be able to get away with it? How can anybody seriously argue that psychological argument? It really floors me.

Yeah, and they do. There’s a lot to unpack there in what you said, because I have had a lot to say about all of that. Backtracking through what you’re saying, there are articles published by psychologists that they say show that quote unquote conspiracy theorists want to feel like they’re special, that they have special access to knowledge that the public just doesn’t have. Well, no, that’s not true because most of the 9/11 truthers that I interviewed in Manhattan on September 11 anniversaries are out there in the streets demonstrating with their signs and their placards and their t-shirts and the billboards that they put up. (They’re doing) advocacy of truth to the general public. So if they wanted to feel special in their knowledge why are they sharing it with as many people as they possibly can?

Secondly the psychologists say “these ‘conspiracy theorists’ feel more safe and secure knowing that the world is in control by some global network of nefarious elites.” And I’m like, really? Once again, the data I gathered from interviews shows that when when my participants had their conversion experience, let’s say when they woke up due to something like recognition that World Trade Center Building Seven was an indicator that they had been lied to about the events of September 11th, they experienced depression, anxiety, loss of appetite, loss of sleep, disruptions to their personal social relationships,disruptions to their occupation, a sense of panic and dread.

So the psychologists are saying “conspiracy theorists feel safe and secure believing that the world is under control when in fact the world is in chaos and global anarchy.” And my data directly contradict that. Most people that I’ve interviewed who woke up to 9/11 told me that they couldn’t sleep for weeks. They were in a dread panic. And I understand that because that’s the same thing that I went through.

Now, older members of the 9/11 Truth Movement that I interviewed had already woken up to JFK. A lot of them said that they had already been questioning the Warren Commission report. Some of them said that they they just initially believed the official story of September 11th, because why wouldn’t you? And then others were immediately skeptical, like: “So I had already been questioning things in the past. And so I was immediately skeptical.”

For for that vein, what the psychologist will say is that that is the problem of conspiracy theories is that they spread endemically through society causing people to question all of social reality. In some cases that’s very true. Joe Rogan in his comedy special said before the the covid pandemic he fully believed in vaccines. And then after the covid pandemic he he was questioning whether or not we went to the moon. Now that’s Joe Rogan. And certainly there are people who start questioning everything around them. But that’s because…it’s kind of like if a small child finds out that Santa Claus doesn’t exist, they can say, “what else are they lying about? Does the tooth fairy exist? Does the Easter bunny exist? What else have you been lying about?”

And, you know, that’s kind of a natural process. If you find out that your spouse has been cheating on you, well, what else have you been doing that I don’t know about?

So why wouldn’t we begin to question other aspects of our reality if we find out that information about the events of September 11th were withheld, such as World Trade Center 7? What else about that event were they lying about? And what else about history might have been, let’s say, let’s put it politely, misconstrued?

So going back to what you’re saying, there are literally hundreds of peer reviewed publications by psychologists analyzing every dimension and facet of conspiracy beliefs. And I can go through and reinterpret their findings based upon my own findings and interviews. But I also can reinterpret their findings to say that, “well, I think maybe what you’re tapping into is the type of critical thinking and psychological fortitude and resilience that equips certain types of people to entertain the possibility that they’ve been lied to about these big events, and then to work through that to a point where they begin to take it upon themselves to become what Katherine Olstein called ‘citizen sleuths.’”

There are a lot of people in the world today who are alert and vigilant. In the American ethos this was spelled out in the Declaration of Independence. This is the logic behind the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment. And JFK pointed this out in his famous “president and the press” speech where he told the press and his audience that they had the tremendous responsibility to alert the citizenry of some of the dark operations or deep politics, as Peter Dale Scott would say, of what was really going on. That it’s the function of the press to be the watchdog, to be the fourth estate, and that we can’t have self-government without that.

So why wouldn’t we celebrate citizens taking it upon themselves to investigate and question authority? Well, going back further into what you were talking about, we have social apparatuses that we could call state ideological apparatuses, which comes out of the work of Louis Althusser.And the way that I look at it is, you have mass education, which conditions the human mind over time to accept as normality that there will be an authority who has the answers, there will be an authority who has the questions, and that they are kind of in command of the knowledge structure.

And for decades, we had basically three news stations in the United States, ABC, CBS, NBC, Walter Cronkite being the most trusted person. We had The New York Times as the paper of record, which famously published Daniel Ellsberg’s whistleblowing on the Vietnam War. And for a lot of people over time, they trusted the news. And if you don’t trust Walter Cronkite, then you got Tom Brokaw or Dan Rather or something like that: Dan Rather saying on the morning of 9/11 “these buildings” talking about World Trade Center “it looks like a classic demolition, that it came down due to well-placed dynamite.”

So for me, you know, the question isn’t about why are people questioning the world around them? It’s why aren’t more people questioning the world around them? And so that’s where we get back to what you were alluding to in terms of psychological biases. And this is a well-known term among the 9/11 truth and other quote-unquote conspiracy communities: cognitive dissonance. There’s a really great paper published by the psychologist Laurie Manuel in a special issue of American Behavioral Scientists that was organized by Lance DeHaven-Smith. And Laurie Manuel’s article, “In Denial of Democracy,” spells out how cognitive dissonance works in terms of DeHaven-Smith’s famous concept, State Crimes Against Democracies, or SCADs. I would encourage everybody to read that article. I think she did a phenomenal job.

I believe it was Fran Shure, who’s a psychologist who was featured in Richard Gage and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Experts Speak Out documentary, who has also described cognitive dissonance, which is definitely applicable. But I’m a sociologist, not a psychologist. So I tend to have a different view of social behavior than psychologists do. I think cognitive dissonance is an explanatory mechanism of why it is inside our brains that some people are unable to hold contradictory beliefs. And so there’s a psychological partition or compartmentalization that operates. Your primary belief is that most social institutions operate for the benefit of society: Education systems might not be perfect, news systems might not be perfect, but by and large, they’re pretty much doing what they are supposed to do and educating and informing the public.

And in fact this logic undergirds anti-conspiracy discourse where the argument will be something like: “And furthermore, the reason that we know JFK or 9/11 or you-name-it is not a conspiracy is because if it were, journalists would cover that story. They would want to blow the lid off it, like Woodward and Bernstein did with the Watergate scandal.”

That’s a known conspiracy. And we know that because journalists scrutinized and analyzed that. And, you know, if you dig deep into that, you’ll come to find, I believe it was Woodward, who is a former Navy intelligence officer, never covered those types of stories before. And then lo and behold, he gets this prime story sat in his lap by Deep Throat. And then you go further into that: The Watergate Hotel was allegedly used as a as a honeypot sexploitation blackmail operation, and to distract from that—

Epstein before Epstein. Russ Baker’s book Family of Secrets goes into how the Bush family was involved in what appears to have been a coup d’etat against Nixon.

Yeah. And you look at Hinckley and you listen to the audio of the shots fired at Reagan and what was allegedly happening with the transfer of power there. But that’s if there were one of these anti conspiracy psychologists analyzing what I just said, they’d say, “See, Elifritz himself is susceptible to these conspiracy theories.”

He’s gone native.

Yeah. I’ve gone native like Margaret Mead, in Margaret Mead’s classic anthropology. And certainly that’s something I have thought deeply about. But it’s because I think deeply about it… These psychologists and these people who prop up and defend the official stories and narratives have these explanations that kind of fall apart on their face if you actually just look at them a little bit more deeply.

In sociology, we have a whole discipline dedicated to the study of social problems and how a lot of times social problems are socially constructed by news agencies. Certainly the work of Peter Phillips, who’s a sociologist at Project Censored, shows that many of the top headline news stories are less important than what gets buried in the back of newspapers or never covered at all.

And, it’s known that news agencies were primary agents in disseminating disinformation. For example, the the famous claim that Iraqis were going through Kuwait hospitals and throwing infants out of the incubators. One analyst questioned that and said: “How how many premature infants were born in that hospital? How is it that there are so many of these infants that were in incubators?”

But this is like that’s like a part of a classic propaganda campaigns where you dehumanize the enemy: “Those monsters are unlike us civilized human beings and they need to be responded to with force.” And that’s covered really well in a documentary called Toxic Sludge Is Good for You. Because it’s not just governments, it’s corporations engaging in PR campaigns, what they call “strategic communication.”

But returning to these counterclaims like: “How we know that they’re not conspiracy or conspiracies is because journalists would have covered them.” Well, that assumes that we have a functioning media system. If you assume that we have a functioning education system, the primary question is, why do why do so many people then have to go off to a two or four year college to further their education? Why can’t these schools get the job done to create self-sufficient human beings in the years that they have the kids?

So you can just ask some basic immediate questions about these assumptions that are baked in to the rebuttals and debunking campaigns of these people who make these statements.

So sociologically, the way I look at it is that I’m very critical of social institutions like education and media, which are used to propagate the official narratives of significant historical events. And I got that language from Lance DeHaven-Smith in his very good book Conspiracy Theories in America. And I have to say every time I mention his name that he was so kind and gracious to correspond with me while I was working on my doctoral dissertation. He was really generous. And thank God he wrote that book because then I didn’t have to. Necause I had a version of my doctoral dissertation that was basically what he was arguing.

So you can stand on the shoulders of giants.

That’s right that’s exactly what I did. Him and David Ray Griffin. I gave the third annual David Ray Griffin lecture in December. One of his articles is called “Let’s Get Empirical.” I basically, in my doctoral dissertation, defended a central claim he made at the beginning of that article, which is that the conspiracy label is used to deflect serious empirical claims that contradict official narratives about historically significant events.

So there have been many scholars like yourself and several others that have contributed serious investigatory work in various domains and with various methods. But what gets propped up and promoted is the work of the anti-conspiracists, the people whose job, it seems, whether self-selected or top-down engineered, is to explain away all of this.

(Read the full transcript by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.)

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihad link

Stephen Miller and his B-grade actor Trump aren’t fighting illegal immigration—they’re fighting the Constitution and trying to establish a dictatorship. That makes them traitors who need to be tried, convicted, and executed.

Press TV

Kevin Barrett: Well, really, the strangest thing about these events is the way they’ve been described by the Trump administration–the president himself and some of his administration members and the people in charge, like Greg Bovino, the commander of the ICE war on the Twin Cities, who has just been essentially relieved of his duties and sent home, apparently, after claiming that Alex Purdy was bent on massacring ICE officers.

These kinds of statements from him and from the president himself are so obviously gaslighting American citizens, who can see multiple videos from multiple angles, showing that what happened was that the ICE agents attacked Mr. Pretti and threw him on the ground and gassed him, used chemical weapons on him for no reason whatsoever, threw him on the ground, pulled his gun out, disarmed him, and then shot him multiple times, including in the head, shot him dead.

Classic death squad style execution. This is what death squads do in Central America. This is what the mafia does to people that it wants to kill. Normally, it’s not what American police officers do. But things have changed, apparently. This administration has encouraged these ICE agents to behave in ways that would have shamed the Gestapo. And by putting out these bizarre gaslighting statements, Trump and his minions have contributed to eroding what popularity he still has. Currently they’re in full-scale retreat, and the people of the Twin Cities are on the offensive with these protests. And it looks like it’s going to be the people who deport ICE rather than the other way around.

Press TV: And if it was a one-time incident, but this is the same exact rhetoric, to your point, that was employed with Renee Good, the mother of three fatality, back on January 7th. She was turning to flee the scene, to leave the area, and the Trump administration, Trump himself and multiple others have said that she was turning to ram and run over that agent that shot her point-blank range in the face.

Indeed, that’s what’s so crazy about this. Normally, a presidential administration that was doing this would be much more cautious in its defense of the officials involved. But in this case, they’ve gotten way out ahead of the killings when videos clearly show that these officers are just blatantly executing people who pose no threat whatsoever. These officers get angry because they don’t like protesters impeding their operations by filming them, by following them around and blowing whistles. And so they get angry. And then finally, they just go off and kill people. And that, of course, creates even more protests.

So if you’re trying to create a civil war in the United States, perhaps Trump’s strategy makes sense. But as a political strategy aimed at winning Republican majorities in the midterm elections, it makes no sense at all. So maybe Trump wants a civil war so he can call off elections and name himself permanent dictator of the United States in the same way that he’s trying to name himself permanent dictator of the world by replacing the United Nations with a private organization with himself as lifetime self-appointed chairman of the board.

This would be humorous—the madness of this megalomaniac who’s in charge of the most powerful military in the world—it would be hilarious if it weren’t threatening to basically destroy civilization.

Press TV: And it’s funny because people on both sides of the aisle, you very well know, you’ve lived in the States all your life, as I have, almost 40 years. Both sides, the Democrats, Republicans, independents, whatnot, support strong immigration policy to vet people that come into the States and to remove those who overstay. Yet the way that Donald Trump is doing it, that’s what they don’t agree with. It seems that it’s reflecting badly also on him when it comes to the polls.

That’s an excellent point. If Trump really wanted to get rid of illegal immigrants, it would be simple. He would just have Congress pass a law imposing severe penalties on anyone who employs or rents to an illegal immigrant. And they would have no more opportunities to live and work in the United States, and they would go home. And it could be done without any violence, without any serious enforcement operations.

But instead, what Trump has done is he’s vastly increased the funding for ICE. He’s hired all of these crazy, hyper-ideological idiots who have no policing skills whatsoever. And he’s turned them loose, goading them on to attack the citizenry. And this has actually hurt the popularity of the Republican position on immigration, which is to reduce illegal immigration, which is a very popular policy, as you said—or it was, anyway, until Trump turned it into an excuse to try to create a new American Reich.

Great input. Always a pleasure taking with you, Dr. Kevin Barrett. Joining us out of Marseille.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

Imagine: You work in a lunatic asylum. One of the patients insists he has stopped seven wars and demands the Nobel Peace Prize. What do you do?

Your dilemma gets worse when you check his file and discover he’s a senile sociopathic narcissist and suspected rapist-murderer. If you try to deal with him rationally by attempting to help him understand that his belief that he deserves the prize is delusory, he will probably fly into a rage and attack everyone in sight.

Maybe you should just “give him the prize.” In other words, humor him.

But systematically humoring criminally insane people by giving them everything they want is not a sustainable policy. The 3.8 million square mile lunatic asylum known as the USA has been humoring the criminally insane Donald J. Trump for far too long. The result is clear: A once-great nation is reeling on the brink of unprecedented disaster.

I woke up this morning to the news that ICE agents in Minneapolis had committed another death-squad-style murder—and the senile, criminally-insane president had once again lied about it, in an effort to encourage more such executions.

The good news is that Trump, who cheered on ICE’s brutal execution of mother-of-two Renée Good, now feels bad about her death. The bad news is that the reason the senile narcissist feels bad is that Good’s parents were Trump supporters.

And the really bad news is that Trump is once again lying outrageously to cover up a cold-blooded murder, thereby encouraging ICE death squads to believe the madman-in-chief has their backs when they execute people for protesting their thuggery.

This time, the demented POTUS’s mendacious attempts to excuse the murder are even more outlandish. When Trump justified the killing of Renée Good, he could later weakly claim he made a mistake based on being shown only the ICE killer’s video, not the other videos that bely the killer’s ludicrous alibi. The excuse that Renée Good was “trying to run over ICE agents” was obviously false, at least if you do your due diligence. But if you only looked at the killer’s phone video, you might not know that.

But the murder of Alex Pretti can’t possibly be seen for anything other than what it was: A death squad execution. Pretty was filming the ICE goons and they didn’t like it, so they gang-tackled him, brutalized him, and shot him dead while they were holding him down. It seems that after tackling Pretty, one of the officers noticed the gun in Pretty’s waistband and screamed “he’s got a gun,” which led other officers to panic and murder the man they were holding down. (New York Times video analysis.) Then they lied and claimed that the camera he’d been pointing at them was a gun. And Trump amplified the lie.

Is This Really About Immigrants?

Trump wants his supporters to believe that he’s sending crazed brownshirt thugs into American cities to assault, kidnap, and murder people in a good faith effort to rid America of illegal immigrants. But nothing could be further from the truth. Trump is waging a personal vendetta against his political opponents. Jeffrey St. Clair notes:

Minnesota’s immigrant population ranks 23rd in the US, far behind red states like Texas, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and Utah. But most of Minnesota’s immigrant population is documented. For example, Minnesota has an estimated total immigrant population of 495,352, but only 77,836 are undocumented (16%) Compare that to the undocumented populations of Florida 1 million (20%), Texas 1.8 million (32%), Arizona 250,00 (25%), Georgia 374,000 (32%), North Carolina 325,00 (34%), Utah 100,000 (33%).

I sympathize with MAGA-adjacent people like False Flag Weekly News co-host Dr. J. Michael Springmann who like the idea of sending illegals home. But they seem awfully slow to figure out that trying to grab illegals one-by-one, as Trump is allegedly doing, can’t possibly work. There are 10 to 15 million illegals in the US, maybe more if you believe the alarmists. Trump’s goon squads claim to have arrested 3,000, so far, in Minneapolis. But that claim is undoubtedly exaggerated, and may include all of the countless US citizens who have been caught up in the dragnet then released (or, in a few cases, not released). ICE agents are paid a bonus for every arrest they make, even if the individual is released. So they have a strong financial incentive to randomly snatch people off the streets—an outrageous violation of the 4th Amendment.

ICE’s banana-republic-style war on the citizenry of Minneapolis and other cities is creating a thunderous backlash that is turning Americans against immigration enforcement. In the long run, it will make it much harder to maintain non-porous borders and send illegals home.

If Trump really wanted to rid the US of illegal immigrants, he would direct Congress to pass legislation imposing severe penalties on anyone who employs or rents to illegals. Unable to work, unable to find housing, the illegals would quickly self-evacuate.

But Trump’s war on his political enemies has nothing to do with immigration. That’s just the excuse. The truth is, he’s a demented sociopath seeking revenge for perceived slights to his hypersensitive, hyperinflated ego.

But is ICE’s war on cities purely Trump’s personal initiative? Or is Trump a mad dog who has been unleashed on Minneapolis and other cities by his owners—whom we can call, for lack of a better term, the Kosher Nostra?

The lasting effects of the looming Trump Civil War will very likely include the normalization of extreme repression. We are being habituated to seeing masked federal goons kidnap, murder, and “disappear” people the government doesn’t like. When Trump’s obvious madness finally implodes the current regime, will its Democratic successor decide to go back to obeying the Constitution? Or will it continue to use the expanded toolbox of repression that madman Trump created?

Why the Ruling Oligarchy Is Doing This

The Kosher Nostra is panicking because people on both the left and right are coming to understand that the US is occupied by genocidal Israel. If Americans retain their Constitutional rights to free speech, free press, and to protest for redress of grievances, get ready for a rebellion against the ruling Jewish-Zionist billionaires. So to retain Kosher Nostra rule, America’s traditional freedoms must be crushed. Jews like Israeli tech billionaire Schlomo Kramer are demanding that America cancel its First Amendment. So we may expect Trump’s successor regime to amp up the “war on antisemitism,” which is a euphemism for a war on people who tell the truth about who rules us and how.

It’s no coincidence that pro-genocide supremacist Zionist Stephen Miller, Trump’s Homeland Security Advisor, is egging on Trump’s madness. Miller wants Americans to be treated the same way his genocidal tribe treats Palestinians.

Ultimately, Trump’s war on the people of Minneapolis is part of the Jewish-Zionist billionaire oligarchs’ war on the American people. The trained-in-Israel ICE cops are using Israeli-style tactics, including summary executions and outrageous lies. At the end of the day, the Jewligarchs’ contempt for ordinary Americans is no different from their contempt for the Palestinians. The difference is that Palestinians understand who is occupying and destroying them.

We need an American intifada. We need an American Resistance. We need Americans to wake up and wage an all-out war of liberation against their supremacist, genocidal occupiers and oppressors.

Trump’s “war on everybody” is just the delusional lashing out of a pathetic senile sociopath. The real “war on everybody” is being waged by Trump’s (and the Democrats’) masters. You know who they are because they’re the ones you’re not allowed to talk about.

It’s time for everybody to rise up and fight back.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Press TV: Joining us at the city of Saidia, Morocco is Dr. Kevin Barrett. Dr. Barrett, always a pleasure, sir. Now, this policy of a crackdown on immigration and mass deportations, we saw with the Democrats, we’re seeing with Trump. Why does Trump get so much blowback when what he does it as opposed to that? Is it because of the way he’s deploying in military attire and he’s more in the scene and in the public’s eye?

Kevin Barrett: Well, I think Trump actually has gone a couple of steps beyond what his almost equally senile and crazy predecessor was doing in terms of deportations. And the reason is that the blatant illegality of the conduct of these ICE officers, the blatant unconstitutionality, is now fully on display for everyone to see. And that’s led to this backlash.

Under previous administrations, although there were plenty of deportations going on, they were following more or less what passes for the rule of law in the United States today, which may not be much, but it’s not absolute and complete chaos and criminal anarchy, which is what we’ve got now. People on X, even though it’s being massively suppressed—you still can’t miss these videos of outrageous violations of people’s Constitutional rights and human rights.

Rather than getting a warrant and going after specific people, in calm legal ways, which is what they used to do when they deported people, Trump has sent these barely trained, 50-year-old pot-bellied flunk-outs from the police academy into these neighborhoods to just smash people’s automobile windows, attack them physically, detain them unconstitutionally without any judicial warrant of any kind, based on whim, sometimes having a foreign accent.

So it’s an occupation army. It’s an American Gestapo in the streets attacking the American people almost at random. It’s pure political punishment for the city of Minneapolis and other cities which are targeted because they’re Democratic strongholds.

And that’s the thing, Doctor, we’re almost out of time. I want to get the second question on to you before we have to wrap it up. Really quick, if you could, please, in about a minute: Why doesn’t he at least deploy them to some Republican-controlled cities as well so he doesn’t look like he’s adding to the polarization of America?

Well, that’s a good question. And the answer is that Trump is mentally unwell. He is an extreme sociopathic narcissist who lacks enough reality testing, as the psychologists say, to understand how his actions look to others. As we saw from his crazy letter to the government of Norway recently, where he said, “since you didn’t give me the Nobel Peace Prize, I’m going to wage war on the entire world in revenge.” And he doesn’t even understand that now even his supporters see that he is insane. The man has always been an extreme psychopathic narcissist who found his niche in organized crime, money laundering—that’s all he ever did—controlled by the Kosher Nostra.

And now he’s been promoted way beyond his level of competence. His senility is reaching the point that he cannot even pretend to hide his extreme sociopathic narcissism anymore. And everybody now can see it. It’s on full display for the entire world.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

The people of Iran have spoken. Massive, gargantuan, humongous protests, “the biggest and most beautiful protests the world has ever seen” as Trump would say, have brought countless millions of Iranians into the streets to send the theocrats (and parliamentary representatives) who govern them a message:

“We love you! We love the Islamic Republic! We despise the Operation Gladio terrorists Israel and the US keep sending to murder our police officers and vandalize our property.”

The patriotic pro-Iran protests were orders of magnitude larger than the comparatively minuscule “please fix the economy” protests infiltrated by the CIA’s Gladio killers and US-taxpayer-financed vandals. The largest “anti-government” protest (which was actually not anti-government at all, just pro-Iranian-economy) brought perhaps 10,000 people AT MOST into streets in downtown Tehran on January 8. Western propaganda media grossly inflated that already-generous number, falsely reported that most protesters were anti-Islamic-Republic rather than pro-economy, and hallucinated various ridiculous numbers of poor, innocent, peaceful demonstrators being killed by police. In reality, CIA-Mossad paid killers were hunting and killing police officers, while rooftop Gladio snipers were shooting at both police and protesters, as during the Maidan Square coup of 2014 and so many similar operations. By the time it was over, more than 100 Iranian police had been murdered, and Western-paid vandals had caused millions of dollars worth of damage, without advancing their regime change agenda one iota.

Western Mockingbird media’s ludicrous lies were exposed on January 12, when many millions of Iranians turned out in all of the major cities to mourn the dead police officers and support their government’s response to the US-Israeli terror attacks. Aerial footage of the pro-government demonstrations shows their stunning magnitude. Watch some of it above on False Flag Weekly News.

Why did the usually-skeptical Richie Allen get all of this so grotesquely wrong when I debated him almost two weeks ago? Richie knows mainstream Western media echo big lies scripted by their military and intelligence services. But the lies about Iran are so breathtakingly audacious, so over-the-top in their brazen audacity, and so cleverly designed to bypass the defenses of Western liberals and pwogwessives, that they sometimes convince people who are less affected by lesser lies about other issues.

I learned firsthand how Western media were lying about protests in Iran when I visited Tehran during the first week of February 2023, in the immediate aftermath of months of Western-orchestrated anti-hijab protests following the death of Mahsa Amini. As with the pro-economy protests of early 2026, the protests themselves were not entirely organic. Mahsa Amini was visibly in perfect health during her court appearance for a traffic-ticket-level hijab infraction, then suddenly collapsed in the courtroom and died for reasons presumably related to her well-documented prior heart condition (though I wouldn’t put it past Israeli intelligence to have covertly killed her as part of a scripted PR stunt designed to trigger the protests). The billions of US taxpayer dollars spent to destabilize Iran then came into play, targeting the small secular pro-Western segment of the Iranian population with “THEY KILLED MAHSA” propaganda. And a relative handful of these secularist types did indeed protest. Those relatively small protests were then used as cover for the usual Operation Gladio killers and vandals to wreak their usual Maidan Square style havoc.

-

Note: The Iranian government loosened its hijab policy in 2022-2023, and rich secular women in North Tehran who used to prefer “bad hijab” (a tiny bit of cloth not covering more than a couple of hairs) now feel free to go “no-hijab.” In more conservative areas, where the vast majority supports universal hijab, women can still get the equivalent of a traffic ticket by violating the local dress code. (Note: Anthropologists know that what people cover up and what they let hang out varies widely according to culture. So if you think it’s okay for your group to make people cover their genitalia in public, why not allow other groups to decide what their people should cover up and what they can let hang out?! People who want to impose their culture’s dress code on other cultures, rather than allowing each culture to set its own dress code, are arrogant morons. Since Iranians are not arrogant morons, they are not trying to impose Iranian-style hijab on American feminists. Maybe the feminists should extend the same courtesy to Iran.)

-

I talked to witnesses who had viewed and/or attended the Mahsa pro-Western-feminism protests, including the biggest one in Tehran. They described the size of the crowd, showing the area it occupied in a couple of blocks of downtown Tehran. I forget whether that protest, the very biggest of the Mahsa protests, numbered in the high hundreds or low thousands. In any case, it was minuscule compared to the many millions who regularly turn out to support their government in its defensive battle against the Israeli-occupied USA. Shocked at how tiny the Mahsa protests were compared to the way they were represented in Western media, I dug back through MSM reports and found that they pointedly avoided documenting the size of the crowds, instead featuring relatively close-up photos designed to make us imagine that a protest of a couple of hundred people actually featured millions.

You can verify this for yourself by looking at Western media reports of Iranian anti-government protests. You’ll find they never feature sprawling aerial views that could document hugely-attended gatherings. Nor do they feature precise descriptions of how much space is being taken up by a given crowd. Instead, MSM consumers are treated to weaselly imprecise descriptions and absurdly inflated numbers. Witnesses routinely report that protests portrayed by Western media as gigantic actually barely occupied one square block. That’s because THERE ARE NO ANTI-GOVERNMENT PROTESTS IN IRAN BRINGING OUT MILLIONS and never have been, at least not since the ones that brought down the US-backed Shah in 1979. The only documented yuuuuuge “protests” in Iran are the pro-government ones, which, as you can see for yourself, bring out many millions of people—around three million in the case of the recent march in Tehran.

I myself participated in a march of three million Iranians in…when was it…2018? It was slightly intimidating to be one of a handful of Americans in the midst of more than three million Iranians, many of whom were brandishing signs reading “Death to America, Death to Israel” and/or chanting those phrases. Naturally people carrying “Death to America” signs would sometimes approach me and ask where I was from. When I sheepishly admitted I was American, their invariable reaction was a big smile and even more sheepish but enthusiastic welcome, followed by assurances that they had nothing against me, they just didn’t like my government’s policies. Naturally I would admit that I didn’t like those policies either. One such group of “Death to America” Iranians initiated a discussion about whether that slogan should be retired, since it was potentially misleading. I replied that if Iranians were smart enough not to blame ordinary Americans for their governments’ evil policies, Americans should be smart enough to understand what “Death to America” really means, and why Iranians would use that slogan.

So what is the real story of “Iranian anti-government protests”? In reality, there are all sorts of protests on all sorts of issues going on in Iran all the time, since Iran is a shockingly free society in which every mullah seems to be fearlessly arguing with every other mullah on every possible issue, ditto for the elected politicians, while ordinary citizens show absolutely no fear of publicly criticizing their leaders. (I have had many political conversations with both New York cabbies and Tehran cabbies, and the latter clearly feel free and fearless, while the former often need a lot of coaxing and reassurance before admitting their real political beliefs, presumably due to the pervasive climate of fear installed on 9/11/2001.)

So there are always protests of some type going on in Iran. Only a few get amplified by the Western propaganda establishment, like the Mahsa protests in 2022-2023 and the economy protests this month.

Both of these Mockingbird-media-amplified waves of protest followed exactly the same script. First, the Western banking establishment mounted an all-out attack on the Iranian rial, creating uncertainty and economic hardship for ordinary Iranians. Then selected small protests were amplified by the CIA-Mossad propaganda network, which spends billions of dollars and has many assets inside of Iran. Once the protests reached a certain size—say several hundred people—chaos was created by Operation Gladio style killers and vandals. The result was grossly exaggerated and distorted in Western mainstream media in an effort to create the false perception that the people of Iran were rising up against their government, in order to provide cover for various regime-change options—just like Maidan Square in 2014. This year, a repeat of June’s decapitation strikes against Iranian leaders was presumably the go-to option. It was probably called off, or at least put back on the shelf, due to the Iranian people’s increasingly sophisticated understanding of what is being done to them, who is doing it, and why.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link Truth Jihad Radio link

In a recent “food fight” with Dr. Drew, Peter McCullough MD argued that RFK Jr.’s DHHS didn’t fix the old food guidance pyramid by turning it upside down. In this interview Dr. McCullough elaborates…and suggests that Trump’s authoritarian obscurantism may be affecting even the smarter people in his cabinet.

Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and media commentator. He is Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company and President of The McCullough Foundation.

Excerpt:

Dr. Peter McCullough, you just did a debate with Dr. Drew. He likes the new pyramid. And you’re not so sure. And frankly, I think based on what I understand, and I’m no expert, you got the better of him. And that’s partly because you’re willing to listen to the established research and not just flip it upside down, but figure out what’s right about it and what’s wrong about it.

So let’s talk about the pyramid. What was wrong with the old one and what’s wrong with the new one?

Well, first, let’s just talk about leadership methods. So I’ve been in leadership roles my entire life. I’m Chief Scientific Officer of the Wellness Company. I’m President McCullough Foundation. I was previously the Chief Scientific and Academic Officer for the St. John Providence Health System, the largest unit in Ascension Health. So let’s just talk about leadership for a minute. What should our leaders in Washington be doing? They should be identifying issues, calling in experts from all over, getting different viewpoints, arriving at a consensus, and then driving policy.] This is what RFK should be doing. We’re not seeing this. This is what people in the other positions in the cabinet should be doing. We’re not seeing this. And we should see natural disagreement among cabinet members, people in the administration. We’re not seeing this either. This is very disturbing.

Do you know 100% of Trump’s cabinet members agree with Trump 100% of the time?

I certainly would think so, yeah.

But isn’t that disturbing? Do you know 100% of Vladimir Putin’s close advisors and 100% of the Politburo agree with Vladimir Putin? No, seriously, this is a real problem.

I can’t believe Tulsi Gabbard agrees with invading Venezuela and planning a huge war on Iran.

Well, here’s the thing. If we don’t get different viewpoints, and we don’t vet them, we can get off course. And so the best read on this is team of rivals. Lincoln, he was a real leader. What did he do? He invited all his rivals who had different viewpoints into his cabinet. We’ve seen just the opposite with Trump.

And now each cabinet member is taking on the same method. So RFK takes on the food pyramid, but doesn’t get any input from the groups that have been opining on this for years and years and years, the American Heart Association, the American Dietetics Association, There are groups out there that are completely dedicated to advancing this. There have been huge dietary trials, massive clinical trials. But without calling in the experts, getting their opinions, and kind of doing it on your own, we ended up with this inverted food pyramid, which just from its presentation, is presenting things that can’t go together.

For instance, the text indicates that the calories derived from saturated fat should be less than 10% of calories. Well, okay, that’s what the American Heart Association says too. Well, how many grams of saturated fat would that be then? The AHA does the math for you. I’ve done it as well. I try to keep my saturated fat below 10 grams per day. AHA says 13 grams a day. Well, you see that big fat steak on the RFK inverted pyramid or that big whopping turkey up there? We’re talking 20-plus grams of saturated fat.

You can’t eat (lots of) steak. You can’t even eat a steak in the RFK presentation. The steak should be way down there. A bite or two, very seldom. I don’t think anybody’s against that. So the whole presentation is something that doesn’t even follow the text. You can tell it wasn’t peer reviewed. It wasn’t carefully thought out.

And so this presentation claims that fats derived from red meat and dairy are healthy fats. That’s a deception. Those are unhealthy fats. Remember, the animal fats are saturated fat. They are not essential. Human bodies do not need them. They’re directly responsible for the liver producing cholesterol and cholesterol directly blocking arteries in the body. And you know what the counterclaim is? “All of that prior research has been invalidated by recent studies.” Well, there are no large recent well-done studies. There’s some sloppy nutritional epidemiology that has declared, “we can’t really find the signal between saturated fat and heart disease.” That’s making what’s called a type 2 error: failing to find the safety signal is not the same as saying it’s healthy. That’s a deception.

(Read the whole transcript at my Substack by clicking “transcript” above the video image.)\

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

Watch the fiery argument between me and Dr. J. Michael Springmann, concerning the role of ICE and the murder of René Good, beginning at the 24:30 mark.

Who’s behind the recent wave of attacks and threats on and by the United States?

The US kidnapping of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro wasn’t just an attack on Venezuela. It was also an attack on America.

The United States of America is not a “deep” organic nation featuring people who have lived there for many centuries under gradually-evolving cultural traditions, including language and religion. It emerged only 250 years ago as an idea, and that idea is enshrined in the Constitution, whose main function is to prevent autocratic, tyrannical rule. To that end, the president cannot make law, only execute it. He cannot declare war, only command it.

The Trump regime is not just attacking the Constitution. It is an ongoing attack on the Constitution.

Last week Trump’s ongoing unconstitutional attacks on American cities led to the murder of Renée Nicole Good, a mother of three young children, in Minneapolis. Trump’s goons, mostly overweight unemployable louts with beer bellies and atrophied brains who signed on for the lavish bonuses, have been routinely violating the 4th Amendment by stopping, interrogating and harassing people without probable cause to believe they have committed a crime. Now they are flipping out and shooting moms who disrespect them.

Does Trump have the right to send National Guard troops under his command into cities that voted against him, in order to punish his political enemies? Of course not. Cursory research reveals what the “arguments” on both sides of this “controversy” actually are:

The constitutional authority to deploy the National Guard is actually assigned to Congress, not the president. Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution gives Congress the power to “provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions”. Militias have been interpreted to include the National Guard.

However, the Constitution also charges the president with two very significant duties. The first is to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”; the second is to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed”. These two duties can amount to a significant grant of power in times of crisis.

So if there were an insurrection or invasion, Congress could deploy the National Guard. The president’s only role would be to “defend the Constitution” (including Article 1, Section 8) by taking care that the laws passed by Congress, such as deploying the National Guard if necessary, be faithfully executed.

But there obviously is no insurrection or invasion. Those calling excessive and/or illegal immigration an “invasion” are, of course, morons. If the immigrants were using military force to overwhelm the native police and military and seize political power at gunpoint, that would be an invasion…like Trump’s invasion of Venezuela. But that is very far from the case. No matter how much you dislike illegal immigration, lying about it only undermines your credibility. When the Founding Fathers used the word “invasion” they obviously meant (British) military attacks, like when Washington was burned down in 1812, not civilians landing in boats or walking across the southern or northern borders without telling the authorities.

And just as there is no invasion, there is no insurrection, as defined by Google or whomever:

An insurrection is a violent uprising or organized rebellion against a government or established authority, aiming to overturn it or resist its laws, often involving coordinated groups seeking political power.

If insurrections were happening in Chicago, Portland, Los Angeles, Washington, Memphis, New Orleans, or Minneapolis, there would be massive gunfire, military aircraft galore, casualties in the thousands, and so on. Nothing remotely like that is going on. These cities are pretty much the same as they’ve always been, when everyone agreed that no insurrections were happening and anyone who said they were would have been deemed insane.

Note: The January 6th 2000 protests at the capitol were obviously not an insurrection either.

Since there is no insurrection or invasion, Congress has no right to send the National Guard into American cities. If it tried, those who voted to do it would be traitors to the Constitution and ought to be tried for treason.

But even if Congress could make the case that an insurrection or invasion had occurred, which is very far from the case today, any president who tried to send the National Guard into American cities himself, rather than letting Congress (or state governors) decide whether to do it, would be a traitor to the Constitution, and ought to be immediately impeached, convicted, expelled from office, tried for treason, and, if convicted, hanged by the neck until dead. Indeed, anyone given that unconstitutional order would be required to disobey it, and if necessary execute the traitor who was issuing it.

Treasonous War Crimes

Even as he wages treasonously unconstitutional war on American cities, Trump has unconstitutionally ordered a series of acts of war against Venezuela, including the kidnapping of its president. The US military was required by the Constitution to refuse to carry out those orders, and, if necessary, shoot the traitor who gave them. Any officer who obeys Trump’s unconstitutional orders is himself a traitor and must be shot rather than obeyed if it comes to that.

Trump is also threatening to commit more US acts of war against Iran, a country that, like Venezuela, has never attacked the United States. Trump’s illegal attack on Iran last June, ordered by Netanyahu, was blatantly treasonous in two senses. First, of course, it was unconstitutional, since only Congress can declare war. Secondly, by obeying the orders of a foreign leader who happens to be an indicted war criminal, Trump committed treason against the United States, and made himself an accessory to Netanyahu’s war crimes including genocide.

Who’s Behind the Destruction of Rule of Law?

Trump’s treasonous crimes against the Constitution are part of a larger pattern. The orange baboon is dancing around scratching his purple ass and hurling his reeking verbal turds in the general directions of Greenland, Canada, Columbia, Mexico, Panama, Cuba, Lebanon…and and of course Iran, where he assassinated that nation’s top military official in 2020 and bombed its nuclear sites last June. These constitute blatant war crimes and threats to commit war crimes, and even the threats are illegal. At the same time Trump has accelerated the process, begun under only-slightly-less-Zionist-dominated administrations, of shredding all international agreements including the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (IRNF), the Open Skies Treaty, the Iran Nuclear Treaty, various trade treaties. Revealing his true loyalties, Trump has attacked the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), and has defunded the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) and the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), all on behalf of his masters in Tel Aviv.

Trump’s entire agenda consists of the systematic destruction of the rule of law, both domestically and internationally. And he is doing that on behalf of his Zionist masters, as I explained on a recent episode of the Richie Allen Show.

Why would Zionists want to destroy the rule of law? They have been at war with the rule of law since the illegal creation of “Israel” in 1948, which was never approved by the Security Council and thus has no firm basis in international law. Since 1948, the Zionists have thumbed their noses at a long series of United Nations resolutions requiring them to withdraw from stolen territory and allow the refugees they genocidally expelled to return to their homes, reclaim their property, and be compensated for their suffering.

Until October 2023 the Zionists tried to disguise the fact that their entire project has always been based on the supreme crime of genocide. But since then they have ripped off the mask, proudly proclaiming that they are committing genocide and daring the world to stop them.

A world with even the tiniest shred of functioning international law would stop them, and punish them for their crimes. That’s why international law has to go. That’s why the Zionists inserted their gangster asset Trump into the White House: to systematically destroy all forms of the rule of law, in hopes that the outrageously criminal Zionist entity can survive in a world without law, without morality—a world where psychopathic gangsters rule and normal people cower before them.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

For more on Trump’s lifelong Kosher Nostra links, see “It’s In the Blood: The Trump Family’s Multiple Generations of Fealty to Jewish Power” by José Alberto Nino.

Transcript:

Kevin Barrett is joining us from Saadia, Morocco. Mr. Barrett, it’s great having you with us. First of all, we’ve seen many crackdowns by ICE recently, especially since when Donald Trump took office. But this is a major escalation. A mother of three was shot in broad daylight and killed. How do you see these protests differ from past ones? And do you think this will bring about a change?

This could be the spark that lights the flames of an uprising against this completely brutal, unconstitutional, treasonous, Israeli-owned Trump regime. There are basically three key points I would make here. One is that the absolute and complete destruction of all forms of law and civilized behavior by Donald Trump and his insane minions—and they’re as insane as he is by basically humoring him and going along with him—the purpose of all this is that Trump was inserted in office by the most criminal faction of Kosher Nostra Zionist billionaires. The reason that they want Trump to pursue this agenda of trashing international law by kidnapping presidents, pushing things to the brink of World War III against Russia, stealing people’s ships, threatening to invade Greenland and Canada, supporting genocide in Palestine, all of this—is because the Jewish-Zionist supremacist billionaires who own the United States ever since they murdered the Kennedys and blew up the World Trade Center don’t believe that they will continue to rule in a world that has law. A lawful world is a world that will stop the genocide of Palestine.

So they put Trump in office specifically to put an end to all forms of law, domestic and international, and create a gangster culture, a law of the jungle culture, where might is right, and masked agents can just snatch people off the streets for no reason and disappear them with no due process, no constitutional rights whatsoever.

People who write editorials in favor of Palestine in college newspapers get snatched off the streets by masked goons. And now they’re shooting people down. So my first point is that it is the Zionist billionaires who are behind Trump’s agenda of destroying rule of law.

And then secondly, it’s really important to note that we have to look at this kind of incident case by case to see what really happened. For instance, the earlier controversy in Minneapolis-St. Paul over George Floyd was actually distorted by the left-wing people. And an injustice was done to the police officer who was actually following department procedure, tragically and perhaps unwisely. But that particular George Floyd incident was not a case of egregious, extreme abuse by law enforcement.

But this case is a case of murder by this ICE agent. They just shot this woman down for no reason whatsoever, except that she didn’t do what they told her to do. And Trump lied insanely, claiming that the poor ICE agent was in the hospital. And as the Minneapolis mayor said, it’s b******t. He was absolutely right in his obscene words to ICE. And I hope he does call up the National Guard in Minnesota and use force to expel ICE.

And it’s really time, I think, for everyone in the United States who doesn’t want to live under this madman Trump dictatorship to rise up. Push any pro-Trump loyalist forces out of your neighborhood, out of your city, out of your state, out of your region. This has gone far enough.

And so I think these are the first two key points here. And this could be the beginning of the end of the Trump administration. He may not serve out his term…

On that note, Mr. Barrett, I was watching an American neighbor of Renee Nicole Good who urged her community members and fellow citizens to disregard the rights and the left and to unite against what ICE is doing. Do you think this will indeed unite the two sides or might we see the opposite happening, greater division within the United States?

Well, I think we will see greater division between two camps. One camp is both left and right: intelligent people who are following what’s really going on. And there are roughly equal numbers of them actually on the left and the right.

The other side is the fools. And right now, the fools are the people mostly on the right who still are making excuses for the mad would-be Emperor Caligula Trump, or Trumpigula, I guess some people are calling him now. The people on the right are realizing that they got sold a bill of goods by these Zionist billionaires who inserted Trump in office. They realized that they voted for America first. They voted for an end to foreign adventures and wars, and an end to foreign countries having too much influence over the United States.

But what do we have? An Israeli-captured American criminal regime waging all-out war on the world. And now Trump is trying to raise the military budget 50%—the biggest raise in all of American history—so he can be a bigger neocon imperialist than George W. Bush ever was.

The smart people on the right, half the right, has awakened to the fact that Trump is doing this in part because the Israelis have images of him raping 14-year-old girls through the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, which is getting bigger every day. That’s another reason that Trump is going completely crazy and destroying the rule of law: Because if the rule of law continues, he’ll end up in jail for rape and murder of 13-year-olds and their babies, like the one that he helped dump into Lake Michigan.

So the smart people on the right have woken up and they realize that these masked ICE goons dragging people off the streets and throwing them in vans and disappearing them, in some cases never to be seen again, are actually not—this is not about stopping illegal immigration. You can stop illegal immigration overnight simply by imposing very strong penalties on anyone who employs or rents to an illegal immigrant, and then they would all go home very quickly.

That’s not what they’re doing. They’re grabbing people and throwing them in vans and disappearing them. It is a warm-up to absolute repression, to an American gulag in which anybody who speaks out against the government, whether it’s Trump or whether it’s the Democrats who are gonna take over after Trump, is gonna be thrown into a van and taken to a barbed wire alligator Alcatraz and never heard from again.

People on the right see that this is targeting them. The whole reason Trump is doing this is to normalize having masked goons drive around in vans, grab people randomly off the streets, or maybe not so randomly, throw them in the vans and disappear them. And that’s what they’re going to do to the right-wing, the real MAGA people, the MAGA people who don’t want to live under an Israeli-occupied fascist dictatorship.

So on the left and right, I think the smart people are uniting, and they’re uniting against Trump.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

ChildrenOfJob Substack

Jasun Horsley writes: “This is easily the most comprehensive and coherent (& balanced) summation of the JQ I have come upon. If anyone knows a better one, please point me to it.”

Deep dive into organized Judaism, the Hebrew Bible, Zionism, and long-term religio-social engineering with Kevin Barrett of Truth Jihad. Full audio 2 hr 48 mins.

Part One: The Ideology of Identity

The difference between Jews, Judaites, & Zionists, separating the wheat from the tares of the Old Testament, Shlomo Sand, Laurent Guyenot, 8th day circumcision as trauma-based mind control, Zombie Judaism, the tribal Jewish takeover of media, banking, & organized crime, Genesis vs. the rest of the OT, isolating the ideological content, the Book of Job, God’s law vs. human law, Girard & scapegoating in the OT, Peter Thiel’s Straussian lies, 911 scapegoating ritual.

Part Two: Tribal Nepotist Mafia

The danger of scapegoating Zionist Jews, the greatest scapegoat of the 20th century, being liminal, Kevin’s truth jihad policy, balancing evidence & opinion, understanding “Jewish conspiracy,” the alliance of Jewish administrative elite with local power, merchant class politics & selective breeding, how Yahwist tribal politics attained social dominance, Jewish IQ, taking over the US, Meyer Lansky and the great banking swindle, Christian Zionism, the Scofield Bible, Jewish eschatology, installing the Jewish Messiah, Muslims on Jesus, Jasun in Morocco, Zombie Islam.

Part Three: Jewish Organized Crime King

The 2016 US election, installing DJ Trump, Roy Cohn, Meyer Lansky, and the NY mafia, competing factions, J. Edgar Hoover & compromat, Roy Cohn’s toyboy, Robert I. Friedman, the devil’s offer, the JCPOA, a fixation on Jerusalem, Maimonides & what Jews (can) do to bring on the Messiah, a spectrum from Judaism to Satanism via atheistic Zionism, accelerationism, a smorgasbord of agendas, a void of religious or historical justification, who still supports Israel besides power elite? Celts conquering Wales, Native Americans & the US, rational Zionism as oxymoron, fleeing Israelis, how a sociopathic superstate is created.

For a full transcript, click “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com