Send us a text

A young teacher, a locked apartment, and twenty wounds that refuse to settle into a single story. We dive into the Ellen Greenberg case with a clear-eyed look at the timeline, the 911 call that primed the response, and how a scene labeled too soon can close doors that should have stayed open. We talk through the concierge logs, the missing hallway footage, and the mechanics of a latch that became the centerpiece of a suicide narrative.

From there, we pull apart the evidence that sparked years of debate: shallow punctures versus a single fatal stab to the heart, bruises in different stages of healing, and medications that complicate judgment but don’t resolve pattern or force. We explore why some see hesitancy marks while others see overreach, and how toxicology, body mechanics, and wound placement can support more than one conclusion. The most telling conflict may be institutional—a medical examiner’s homicide ruling set against law enforcement’s suicide determination—exposing the cost of early certainty and the weight of a mishandled scene.

Along the way, we consider the texts about job stress, the dynamics of a new engagement under pressure, and the optics of removing electronics after cleanup. None of it is definitive; all of it matters. What emerges is less a tidy answer than a hard lesson: when investigators let first words guide the work, families lose faith and truth gets buried under procedure. Listen for the timeline, stay for the evidence, and decide where you land on the locked-room puzzle. If this episode moved you, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with the one detail that most shaped your view.

www.texaswineandtruecrime.com