
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This summer marks a year since Labour’s landslide victory at the 2024 general election. The party’s manifesto contained a number of pledges for reforming the UK’s constitution and political institutions. So how have those pledges fared since Labour took office? Which promises have been delivered? What unexpected changes have been introduced? And what further reforms will – or should – be on the government’s agenda?
This online conference took stock of constitutional developments in the last year, and looked ahead, with a range of senior speakers including parliamentarians, academics, and commentators.
The newly established Modernisation Committee has set out broad objectives of reforming standards, working practices, and procedure in the House of Commons. The Commons Procedure Committee has also announced a large number of inquiries. What are the priority areas for Commons reform? What should any reforms aim to achieve, and how can they balance competing priorities, for example of strengthening scrutiny and easing MPs’ working lives? How can reforms successfully attract broad support and allow the Commons to work more effectively?
Speakers:
Chair: Dr Tom Fleming – Lecturer in British and Comparative Politics, UCL
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
This summer marks a year since Labour’s landslide victory at the 2024 general election. The party’s manifesto contained a number of pledges for reforming the UK’s constitution and political institutions. So how have those pledges fared since Labour took office? Which promises have been delivered? What unexpected changes have been introduced? And what further reforms will – or should – be on the government’s agenda?
The rule of law
The Lord Chancellor and the Attorney General have both placed great emphasis on this new government upholding the rule of law. What does this mean in practice? Has the government delivered on this aspiration, and what more is needed to do so? What challenges has it faced?
Speakers:
Chair: Professor Veronika Fikfak – Professor of Human Rights and International Law, UCL
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
This summer marks a year since Labour’s landslide victory at the 2024 general election. The party’s manifesto contained a number of pledges for reforming the UK’s constitution and political institutions. So how have those pledges fared since Labour took office? Which promises have been delivered? What unexpected changes have been introduced? And what further reforms will – or should – be on the government’s agenda?
The electoral system in a multiparty era
The growth of multiparty politics raises questions about whether the First Past the Post electoral system can still be justified. What are the arguments for and against reform? What alternative systems might be considered? And, with ministers saying they will maintain the status quo, is there any way reform could actually come about?
Speakers:
Chair: Professor Alan Renwick - Deputy Director of the Constitution Unit
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
This summer marks a year since Labour’s landslide victory at the 2024 general election. The party’s manifesto contained a number of pledges for reforming the UK’s constitution and political institutions. So how have those pledges fared since Labour took office? Which promises have been delivered? What unexpected changes have been introduced? And what further reforms will – or should – be on the government’s agenda?
Standards in public life
The Labour Party put standards and ethics at the heart of its attacks on the previous Conservative government, promising to bring in a ‘politics of service’. Has the party's conduct in office lived up to this rhetoric? How has it changed the regulation of standards in government and parliament? What further changes are needed in this area, and what is the best means to ensure that these are delivered?
Speakers:
Chair: Lisa James – Senior Research Fellow, Constitution Unit
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
This summer marks a year since Labour’s landslide victory at the 2024 general election. The party’s manifesto contained a number of pledges for reforming the UK’s constitution and political institutions. So how have those pledges fared since Labour took office? Which promises have been delivered? What unexpected changes have been introduced? And what further reforms will – or should – be on the government’s agenda?
This online conference took stock of constitutional developments in the last year, and looked ahead, with a range of senior speakers including parliamentarians, academics, and commentators.
Opening keynote from Nick Thomas-Symonds MP, Minister for the Cabinet Office
In this opening keynote address, Nick Thomas-Symonds summarised the government’s approach to the constitution, and priorities for constitutional reform. What has been achieved so far, and what are the most important priorities for the future? Which key principles underpin the government’s plans?
Speaker:
Nick Thomas-Symonds MP is Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office, with responsibility for the constitution and EU relations. He has been the Labour MP for Torfaen since 2015 and his previous posts include Shadow Home Secretary and Shadow Solicitor General. He is a former barrister and academic.
Chair: Professor Meg Russell FBA – Director of the Constitution Unit
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Artificial intelligence (AI) is predicted to transform many aspects of our lives in the coming years. One of these is the functioning of the democratic system. AI could shift how election campaigns are conducted and how citizens receive and process information. It could also fundamentally alter patterns of power across society. So what potential effects of AI on democracy should we be particularly aware of? To what degree are there opportunities as well as dangers? And how should policy-makers respond? We discussed these questions with an expert panel.
Speakers:
Chair: Professor Alan Renwick – Deputy Director of the Constitution Unit
Additional reading:
'The Real Dangers of Generative AI' by Danielle Allen and E. Glen Weyl
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Talk of possible reforms to the Stormont institutions has been growing recently, spurred by concerns about repeated institutional collapses, perceived inequities between different parts of society, and criticisms of the institutions' record in governance. But what options for reform are there, and what impacts might these have if implemented? A newly published report from the Constitution Unit at University College London addresses these questions. It does not draw conclusions, but aims to promote wider, more coherent and better-informed debate.
This public event, hosted in collaboration with the Democracy Unit at Queen’s University Belfast, offered an occasion for such debate. The report’s authors were joined by leading experts to explore the ideas and possible ways forward.
Speakers:
Chair: Professor John Garry, Director of the Democracy Unit, Queen’s University Belfast
Read the report
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Political parties are central to the functioning of representative democracy in the UK, playing a crucial role during and between elections. How parties fund their activities is thus a vital question, and one that has been much discussed in recent months. New controversies have shone a light on long-standing debates about who can donate to political parties, how much they can donate, and the transparency of their donations. So what are the strengths and weaknesses of the UK’s party funding regulations? Are the current regulations sufficiently robust, fair, and transparent? And if not, how might they be improved? We discussed these questions with an expert panel.
Chair: Professor Alan Renwick – Deputy Director of the Constitution Unit
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Politics in the UK has been in turmoil in recent years — Brexit, Covid, movements for independence in Scotland and Northern Ireland, rule-breaking Prime Ministers and now the shockwaves from Donald Trump’s return to the White House. These pressures have tested the UK’s political system, raising serious questions about whether constitutional reforms are needed.
In this episode, we dive into a new report from the UCL Constitution Unit, which examines possible constitutional changes, their likelihood of passing, and whether they could truly address the challenges the UK faces. Our guests are two of the report’s authors:
Our host, Alan Renwick, also a co-author of the report, leads the discussion on possible constitutional reforms, their feasibility, and what reforms could be on the horizon.
Mentioned in this episode:
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Recent years have seen frequent complaints about the quality of legislative scrutiny by parliament, and particularly by the House of Commons. Various commentators and experts have argued that the scrutiny of proposed laws is too often rushed and/or inadequate, leading to worse policy outcomes for citizens. This online seminar will explore a number of important questions. What problems are there with the legislative process? Have they got worse? And what can be done to fix them?
Speakers:
Chair: Lisa James – Senior Research Fellow, Constitution Unit
Further reading
Prof Meg Russell's research on the decline of parliamentary scrutiny
Prof Meg Russell and Dr Daniel Gover's book: Legislation at Westminster: Parliamentary Actors and Influence in the Making of British Law
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
From the publisher's feed

155 Listeners

27 Listeners

148 Listeners

38 Listeners

171 Listeners

17 Listeners

34 Listeners

3,017 Listeners

2,427 Listeners

1,100 Listeners

936 Listeners

330 Listeners

1 Listeners

146 Listeners

8 Listeners