
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The podcast originally appeared on 'Uncovering Politics' from UCL's Department of Political Science.
In the run up to the UK General Election we have a special episode on opinion polls.
Opinion polling is a staple of modern elections, captivating political enthusiasts with fluctuating numbers but also sparking controversy. Polls are sometimes criticized for inaccuracies, notably in the Brexit referendum and the 2016 US presidential election. Polling methods, including sampling and voter prediction, are hotly debated. The emergence of MRP polls, which accurately estimated results in the 2017 UK election, has added to the intrigue, despite producing widely varying predictions for the outcome of the current UK election. So what should we make of the polls? And how can we best interpret all the numbers to understand what’s really going on?
Our guest is Prof Ben Lauderdale. Ben is Professor of Political Science here at UCL, a former Senior Data Science Advisor to the polling firm YouGov, the original brain behind the development of MRP methods and general polling guru.
UCL’s Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy offers a uniquely stimulating environment for the study of all fields of politics, including international relations, political theory, human rights, public policy-making and administration. The Department is recognised for its world-class research and policy impact, ranking among the top departments in the UK on both the 2021 Research Excellence Framework and the latest Guardian rankings.
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Whatever the result of the upcoming general election, a large number of new MPs will enter the House of Commons. A well-designed induction programme will be crucial for helping them to find their feet and become effective parliamentarians. So what do new MPs need to know about their roles in parliament and beyond? How might this differ from in the past, and how might such induction best be delivered? We discussed these questions with experts from the Hansard Society and Institute for Government, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, and a former MP.
Speakers
Chair: Professor Meg Russell – Director of the Constitution Unit
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Recent years have seen many changes to election regulations in the UK. These changes affect key aspects of how elections are fought and administered, including party spending, voter identification, the voting rights of citizens living abroad, and the electoral system used to elect mayors and police and crime commissioners.
So what has changed, what effects might these changes have, and what challenges do they present for parties, candidates, and electoral administrators? An expert panel discussed these questions a week before the 2 May local elections.
Speakers
Chair: Professor Alan Renwick – Deputy Director of the Constitution Unit
Read a briefing from the Hansard Society on general election rules and regulations: https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/briefings/general-election-rules-and-regulations.
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
The UK’s recent air strikes on the Houthis in Yemen have renewed discussion about parliament’s role in approving military action. The government is not constitutionally required to consult parliament on military deployments, and can choose whether and when to seek MPs’ approval. So what is parliament’s current role? Should this be changed, as some opposition parties have suggested? If so, what are some of the possibilities and challenges?
In this webinar, an expert panel discuss parliament’s current role, and whether reform is desirable or feasible.
Speakers:
David Lidington – Chair of the Royal United Services Institute, former Conservative MP for Aylesbury, and former Minister for the Cabinet Office, Lord Chancellor, and Leader of the House of Commons
Dr Veronika Fikfak – Associate Professor in International Law, University College London
Dr James Strong – Senior Lecturer in British Politics and Foreign Policy, Queen Mary University of London
Chair: Lisa James – Research Fellow, Constitution Unit
Diagram of parliamentary war convention
Useful reading:
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Protest is a fundamental part of democracy. From thousands attending pro-Palestine marches in London, to farmers driving their tractors into Paris, Berlin, and Cardiff, to Just Stop Oil spraying UCL’s famous portico orange – protests are rarely out of the spotlight.
But what do protests actually achieve? Do they affect political debate and policy outcomes?
A new study sheds light on that, focusing on the impact of climate protests here in the UK on what MPs talk about – both in parliament itself and online.
One of the co-authors of that article is Tom Fleming, Lecturer in British and Comparative Politics, who joins us for this episode.
Mentioned in this episode:
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
On 1 February a cross-party expert commission, the UK Governance Project, chaired by former Conservative Attorney General Dominic Grieve, published its report. It makes various proposals for improving governance standards in the UK, aimed at restoring high standards of integrity in public office, enhancing the role of parliament, improving working between ministers and the civil service, and protecting democracy. What are the commission’s proposals? How could they be implemented? Could they improve how the UK is governed?
This webinar will discuss the commission’s report with its chair, Dominic Grieve, and Helen MacNamara, another member of the commission, with opportunities for the audience to put questions to its authors.
Speakers:
Chair: Professor Meg Russell – Director of the Constitution Unit
Further reading:
Read the commission's report
Read a summary of the report on our blog by Dominic Grieve
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
The Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales launched its final report in January 2024. Its recommendations – which assessed options for ‘entrenched devolution’, full federalism, and Welsh independence – have implications for the whole UK. How would such arrangements be viewed outside Wales? How would they function in practice? Would they affect constitutional debates in Scotland, England, and Northern Ireland?
This webinar discusses these UK-wide implications with an expert panel including the Commission’s Co-chair, Professor Laura McAllister.
Speakers:
Chair: Alan Renwick - Professor of Democratic Politics and Deputy Director of the Constitution Unit
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
How parliaments hold ministers (particularly prime ministers) to account is a fundamental part of parliamentary democracy. And one of those mechanisms of accountability involves asking questions.
We take a good hard look at how – and how effectively – parliaments question prime ministers.
We are joined by Dr Ruxandra Serban, Associate Lecturer in Democratic and Authoritarian Politics here in the UCL Department of Political Science. Her research focuses directly on parliamentary questioning processes.
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Peace in Northern Ireland is widely recognised as one of the leading achievements of politics in recent decades. The Good Friday, or Belfast Agreement, reached in 1998 by the British and Irish governments and most of the main Northern Ireland political parties brought an end to thirty years of violent conflict in which over three and a half thousand people were killed.
It did so in part by establishing a system of power-sharing government. A new Northern Ireland Assembly would be elected by proportional representation, so no one group could dominate. Within the new Northern Ireland Executive, representatives of Northern Ireland’s two political traditions would have to work together.
Over the years since the Agreement was reached, the power-sharing institutions have worked well some of the time. But for others they have worked badly or not at all. Since February 2022 their functioning has once again been suspended. Public anger at this situation is intense. Negotiations for restoring the institutions are ongoing. But, as yet, there has been no breakthrough.
Indeed, the situation has become so grave that many think the future viability of power-sharing government is now in doubt. And there are suggestions that the settlement reached in 1998 may need to be revisited.
In this episode we’re joined by two experts:
Alan Whysall is an Honorary Senior Research Associate at the Constitution Unit here within the UCL Department of Political Science. He was previously a senior civil servant in the Northern Ireland Office, where he worked for many years on the Northern Ireland peace process – including the talks that led to the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement.
Conor Kelly is a Research Assistant at the Constitution where he has worked on multiple projects relating to Northern Ireland, most recently examining perceptions of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement among politicians and the public in Northern Ireland.
Mentioned in this episode:
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
Over the past two years, a Constitution Unit team has been examining public attitudes to democracy in the UK. The project’s final report draws together the findings – from two large-scale surveys and a citizens’ assembly – and reflects on implications for policy-makers. It examines what kind of democracy people in the UK want and consider what changes in policy or behaviour may be needed in response.
Marking the report’s launch, this seminar gathered several leading figures from Westminster, together with an expert on public attitudes and members of the project team, to explore the findings and identify possible next steps.
Speakers:
Useful Links:
Links:
Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/constitution-unit
Mailing list: https://mailchi.mp/ucl/constitution-unit
Blog: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit
From the publisher's feed

155 Listeners

27 Listeners

148 Listeners

38 Listeners

171 Listeners

17 Listeners

34 Listeners

3,017 Listeners

2,427 Listeners

1,100 Listeners

936 Listeners

330 Listeners

1 Listeners

146 Listeners

8 Listeners