In this episode of What’s New in Adapted Physical Education, we had a conversation with Ballie Ollila, a doctoral student at Old Dominion University, about her research examining Unified Physical Education and Unified Sports programs. Her systematic review, “Special Olympics’ UnifiedSports and Physical Education Programming: A Systematic Review”, recently published in Quest, found that despite the popularity of unified PE and Sports programming, there is a lack of empirical evidence supporting its effectiveness. Ms. Ollila explains that her research was motivated by the Virginia Board of Education’s decision to allow unified PE to count as a physical education credit, prompting questions about the evidence underpinning such policies. Through her systematic review, Bailey identified critical gaps in the literature and highlighted the challenges of conducting research in this area, including limited peer-reviewed studies and potential conflicts of interest in research funded by Special Olympics. The discussion explores deeper issues within unified programming, such as hierarchical labeling and role differences that can unintentionally reinforce inequality. Finally, Ms. Ollila also shares her plans to expand her research into dance and disability, addressing another underexplored area in adapted physical activity.